ライフサイエンスコーパス: speech perception

1 ict and decision uncertainty during impaired speech perception).

2 listeners activate motor brain areas during speech perception.

3 from language-universal to language-specific speech perception.

4 s' knowledge of speech production to explain speech perception.

5 ing day-to-day functioning on tasks, such as speech perception.

6 accompany learning drive changes in auditory speech perception.

7 reports implicating premotor cortex (PMC) in speech perception.

8 tral and temporal benefits to yield improved speech perception.

9 t least in part, for their difficulties with speech perception.

10 early oscillation-based selection influences speech perception.

11 knowledge are integrated in the brain during speech perception.

12 nfluence is modulatory but not necessary for speech perception.

13 vidual variability in children's audiovisual speech perception.

14 t the motor system is critically involved in speech perception.

15 ive and expressive language, and outcomes of speech perception.

16 f both types of cues would negatively affect speech perception.

17 s thought to mediate phonological aspects of speech perception.

18 c categorization and be important for robust speech perception.

19 e pure tone hearing loss, and marked loss of speech perception.

20 enewed interest in gesture-based theories of speech perception.

21 er the motor cortex has an essential role in speech perception.

22 syllable patterns and is critical for normal speech perception.

23 s exist and that they affect auditory-visual speech perception.

24 her this simulation process is necessary for speech perception.

25 ransients and may be especially relevant for speech perception.

26 perceptual and cognitive functions, such as speech perception.

27 h visual information about lip movements for speech perception.

28 sensitive period for bimodal integration in speech perception.

29 al and auditory cues are combined to improve speech perception.

30 s-by-synthesis" mechanism in auditory-visual speech perception.

31 ach of the major theoretical perspectives on speech perception.

32 t, from activation of brain areas underlying speech perception.

33 temporal lobe neural systems engaged during speech perception.

34 d discourse tracking (CDT) as the measure of speech perception.

35 s for the neural mechanisms underlying human speech perception.

36 al network computer simulation of disordered speech perception.

37 the primary auditory cortex does not affect speech perception.

38 s how formants are processed neurally during speech perception.

39 ack the rapid neural computations underlying speech perception.

40 s are critical for many behaviors, including speech perception.

41 ctrally salient features can improve tactile speech perception.

42 ive of speech comprehension rather than mere speech perception.

43 ity but not with peripheral hearing or clear speech perception.

44 sm whereby learning to write might influence speech perception.

45 ilar decomposition strategy is used in early speech perception.

46 ipients with respect to binaural hearing and speech perception.

47 different prosodic features in multisensory speech perception.

48 ated in many previous studies of audiovisual speech perception.

49 short gaps in sound, which are critical for speech perception.

50 to directly investigate its causal effect on speech perception.

51 cognitive benefits, one of which is enhanced speech perception.

52 p movements and syllables during audiovisual speech perception.

53 s may be linked to phenomena in auditory and speech perception.

54 tory objects in human AC during multi-talker speech perception.

55 ural processes that are specific to auditory speech perception.

56 STG), a brain area known to be important for speech perception.

57 he hierarchical generative models underlying speech perception.

58 al sulcus (pSTS) is known to be critical for speech perception.

59 agrammatism and subjective difficulties with speech perception.

60 the brain tracks lip movements to help with speech perception.

61 evidence for a Predictive Coding account of speech perception.

62 reliability of them to identify deficits in speech perception.

63 als in a region of the brain specialized for speech perception.

64 o accounts of how prior knowledge influences speech perception.

65 xtend current mechanistic perspectives on AV speech perception.

66 ability of articulatory codes during passive speech perception.

67 n of sensorimotor information during passive speech perception.

68 y of amblyopia have impaired visual-auditory speech perception.

69 ementation of top-down control in continuous speech perception.

70 lations in 22 participants during continuous speech perception.

71 information from the articulators influences speech perception.

72 nts are an effective technique for enhancing speech perception abilities in quiet environments for pe

73 Self-reported speech perception abilities were significantly better fo

74 g loss.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Differences in speech perception ability between individuals with simil

75 strate that neural oscillations predict both speech perception ability in noise and listening effort.

76 Speech perception after implantation can vary widely--we

77 imately .3 between cognitive performance and speech perception, although some variability in associat

78 Speech perception among cochlear implant (CI) listeners

79 nnel noise-vocoded speech, thereby impairing speech perception and assessing whether this evokes doma

80 de modulation encoding is critical for human speech perception and complex sound processing in genera

81 nvolved in both language-specific processes (speech perception and comprehension, verbal working memo

82 involved in multisensory integration during speech perception and feedback control.

83 cordingly, they downweight pitch cues during speech perception and instead rely on other dimensions s

84 spheres are equally and actively involved in speech perception and interpretation.

85 provides a link between auditory signals of speech perception and motor programs of speech productio

86 ing, key for understanding behaviors such as speech perception and multimodal sensory integration.

87 s retain residual hearing, which can improve speech perception and overall outcomes.

88 oken language, grounding cognitive models of speech perception and production in human neurobiology.

89 e close connection between brain systems for speech perception and production, and in particular, ind

90 present in the posterior insula during both speech perception and production, suggesting an anatomic

91 though evidence for this has been limited to speech perception and production.

92 temporal, frontal and parietal lobes linking speech perception and production.

93 inks between the phonological mechanisms for speech perception and production.

94 nspeech categories, and the relation between speech perception and production.

95 ract form compared with speech coding during speech perception and production.

96 cortex, consistent with previous findings in speech perception and production.

97 by a critical computational unit for online speech perception and production: syllables.

98 etween frontal and temporal contributions to speech perception and reveal a hidden cost to processing

99 explain the foundations of the link between speech perception and speech production.

100 rom previous studies on visual awareness and speech perception and suggest that correlates of conscio

101 paradigm that dissociated between conscious speech perception and task relevance while recording EEG

102 aring loss can produce prolonged deficits in speech perception and temporal processing.

103 redictive top-down control during continuous speech perception and that top-down control is largely d

104 tex will inform our growing understanding of speech perception and the processing of other complex so

105 rticular those forming the prerequisites for speech perception and understanding.

106 voices in schizophrenia arise from disrupted speech perception and verbal working memory systems rath

107 People who upweight low frequencies in speech perception (and so perceive Laurel rather than Ya

108 erages of 0.74 for motor movements, 0.84 for speech perception, and 0.74 for speech production) in co

109 different cognitive tasks (motor movements, speech perception, and speech production), we show that

110 supratemporal plane during rhythm listening, speech perception, and speech production.

111 aced with restoration of hearing thresholds, speech perception, and synchronous activity in auditory

112 r skills with the auditory skills underlying speech perception, and the possible phylogenetic interac

113 distortions can lead to systematic errors in speech perception, and therefore hearing aid prescriptio

114 But like speech perception, and unlike several other perceptual s

115 esponses can perform transformations between speech-perception- and speech-production-based represent

116 Models of speech perception are centered around a hierarchy in whi

117 , with benefits shown to extend to untrained speech perception as well.

118 In speech perception, as in other domains, two functionally

119 Hierarchical models of speech perception assume that, to extract semantic meani

120 Results suggest that speech perception automatically triggers motor action, b

121 ovided by studies that have investigated (a) speech perception, (b) intensity discrimination, and (c)

122 ed specification of a computational model of speech perception based on predictive coding frameworks.

123 shold elevation and associated reductions in speech perception because speech sounds, especially cons

124 surements to investigate interactions during speech perception between native phonemes and talker's v

125 istive technology may improve not only their speech perception but also their connection and orientat

126 Cochlear implants enable improvements in speech perception, but music perception outcomes remain

127 Visual speech facilitates auditory speech perception, but the visual cues responsible for t

128 y cortical oscillations could play a role in speech perception by fostering hemispheric triage of inf

129 These results transform theories of speech perception by suggesting that even at the initial

130 Some of the age-related decline in speech perception can be accounted for by peripheral sen

131 Human speech perception can be described as Bayesian perceptua

132 e rather than specialization is critical for speech-perception capabilities that some have suggested

133 lation associated with tinnitus and impaired speech perception cause cochlear synaptopathy, character

134 ed model of causal inference in multisensory speech perception (CIMS) that predicts the perception of

135 sults support a predictive coding account of speech perception; computational simulations show how a

136 arpened Signals and Prediction Errors during speech perception could both explain these behavioural a

137 tudy, sentence recognition from the Mandarin speech perception database was measured in adult and ped

138 Subsequent tests of Mandarin speech perception demonstrated that exposure to Mandarin

139 vide novel insights into the neural basis of speech perception, demonstrating that both acoustic feat

140 The primary symptom in humans is poor speech perception despite normal pure tone audiometry.

141 s article, we review the literature on human speech perception development within the context of this

142 preventable-likely contribute to individual speech perception differences.

143 hearing loss etiology may explain heightened speech perception difficulties in people overexposed to

144 Hidden hearing loss manifests as speech perception difficulties with normal hearing thres

145 her electrophysiological, psychophysical, or speech perception effects.

146 Auditory speech perception enables listeners to access phonologic

147 motor and sensorimotor systems can influence speech perception even in infants too young to produce s

148 ll as sounds, and lip-reading contributes to speech perception, even for listeners with good hearing,

149 ural ENV coding was a primary contributor to speech perception, even in noise; and (2) neural TFS con

150 measures and then evaluated with subjective speech perception experiments for both normal hearing an

151 o stimulus-brain rhythm interaction predicts speech perception facilitation.

152 nding and treating individual differences in speech perception for people suffering from SNHL.SIGNIFI

153 tures and language and it suggests a role in speech perception for the motor system underlying speech

154 e effects of ARHL on brain areas involved in speech perception, from the auditory cortex, through att

155 left-sided dominance in Wernicke's area for speech perception has been demonstrated in 2.5-mo-old ba

156 Speech perception has been studied for over a half centu

157 Two long-opposing views of speech perception have posited a basis either in acousti

158 Debates about motor theories of speech perception have recently been reignited by a burs

159 ver, most functional neuroimaging studies of speech perception have used metalinguistic tasks that re

160 Self-reported speech perception, hearing thresholds (0.25-16 kHz), and

161 hus crucial for rigorously testing models of speech perception; however, to the best of our knowledge

162 For instance, during speech perception, humans transform a continuously varyi

163 up and top-down markers of poor multi-talker speech perception identified here could inform the desig

164 tions for: (i) perception-action theories of speech perception, (ii) the impact of "motherese" on ear

165 ts (32%) with NF1 showed clinically abnormal speech perception in background noise compared with 1 pa

166 The HINT tests for speech perception in background noise, the major complai

167 s that a similar organization might underlie speech perception in humans.

168 rom background noise, leading to deficits in speech perception in modulated background noise.SIGNIFIC

169 showed clinically meaningful improvement in speech perception in noise (39 of 49 children [79.6%]) a

170 D, CROS, and no treatment groups in terms of speech perception in noise and disease-specific QOL in p

171 ovide improvements in sound localization and speech perception in noise over unilateral CIs, bilatera

172 onths, the CI group had significantly better speech perception in noise scores than the BCD group (di

173 inal cohort study, cognitive functioning and speech perception in noise showed a clinically meaningfu

174 However, no benefit for speech perception in noise was found for the dual-proces

175 entation of repeating elements is crucial to speech perception in noise, since it allows superior "ta

176 he SMS than auditory regions for categorical speech perception in noise.

177 understanding of the neural basis for robust speech perception in noise.

178 ich can be considered a process analogous to speech perception in noise.

179 elated positively with behavioral indices of speech perception in noise.

180 fidence interval, 2.8 to 5.7], respectively) speech perception in noise.

181 were air conduction audiometry and binaural speech perception in noise.

182 and objective intelligibility (up to 97%) of speech perception in noise.

183 Sound energy above 8 kHz thus contributes to speech perception in noise.

184 dict variability in hearing-aid outcomes for speech perception in noise.

185 negatively by aging, potentially diminishing speech perception in noisy environments.

186 Moreover, each dimension predicts outcomes (speech perception in quiet and noise, subjective listeni

187 this manipulation significantly degraded CI speech perception in quiet by 15% and speech reception t

188 essed speech on bimodal listeners' telephone speech perception in quiet environments.

189 e most important known determinants of later speech perception in young children after cochlear impla

190 ) scores explained 60% of the variability in speech-perception in noise.

191 Outcomes were (1) postoperative changes in speech perception (in quiet was measured as a proportion

192 ul example of this phenomenon is categorical speech perception, in which a continuum of acoustically

193 he auditory system has centered around human speech perception, in which categorical processes result

194 Speech perception involves the integration of sensory in

195 Emotional speech perception is a multisensory process.

196 Human speech perception is a paradigm example of the complexit

197 e implanted safely and that their subsequent speech perception is at least as good as children implan

198 Therefore, a key step in audiovisual speech perception is deciding whether auditory and visua

199 It is well established that speech perception is improved when we are able to see th

200 A striking property of speech perception is its resilience in the face of acous

201 Speech perception is mediated by both left and right aud

202 Human speech perception is multisensory, integrating auditory

203 Recent psychophysics data suggest that speech perception is not limited by the capacity of the

204 Human speech perception is profoundly influenced by vision.

205 Speech perception is supported by both acoustic signal d

206 The influence of speech production on speech perception is well established in adults.

207 ts high temporal acuity, which is pivotal to speech perception, is a central issue of auditory scienc

208 S), a brain region known to be important for speech perception, is complex, with some regions respond

209 order language processes, or bilateral, like speech perception, is controversial.

210 g (fMRI) approach assessed sound perception, speech perception, language comprehension, and covert co

211 During speech perception, linguistic elements such as consonant

212 nd are instead retained over long durations, speech perception may require encapsulated memory buffer

213 73 SNPs were replicated with a self-reported speech perception measure.

214 account for 47% of the variance in the same speech-perception measures.

215 The robustness of speech perception might, in part, result from multiple,

216 Electrophysiological correlates of infant speech perception (mismatch response to speech stimuli)

217 These results demonstrate that during speech perception, missing acoustic content is synthesiz

218 Speech perception most strongly activated superior tempo

219 Historic theories of speech perception (Motor Theory and Analysis by Synthesi

220 ate or frequency, plays an important role in speech perception, music perception, and listening in co

221 anterior middle temporal and angular gyri; a speech perception network involving superior temporal an

222 owerful modulator of activity throughout the speech perception network.

223 A computer simulation of a speech perception neural network was developed.

224 Although recent evidence indicates that speech perception occurs bilaterally, prevailing models

225 Individual differences in speech perception often arise from disparities in access

226 we will demonstrate how our understanding of speech perception, one important facet of language, has

227 culatory phonological production rather than speech perception or lexical-semantic processes.

228 ion (tACS) leads to rhythmic fluctuations in speech perception outcomes after the end of electrical s

229 conversation (lipreading) markedly improves speech perception, particularly in noisy conditions.

230 y, a considerable reduction of the spread of speech perception performance from 40% to 93% for advanc

231 operties that have shown to be important for speech perception performance, and needs to be considere

232 ment" in articulator movement can compromise speech perception performance, raising the question of w

233 the latter, the interaction directly impacts speech perception performance.

234 latory configurations can influence infants' speech perception performance.

235 ing important spectral and temporal cues for speech perception, performance on speech tests is variab

236 Theories about the neural foundations of speech perception postulate that the left and right audi

237 Speech perception presumably arises from internal models

238 Speech-perception problems associated with noise overexp

239 nvolvement of specific motor circuits in the speech-perception process, we used event-related functio

240 sed with reference to their implications for speech perception processes.

241 imuli and a silence baseline; (ii) mid-level speech perception processing abilities were assessed by

242 As expected, audiovisual speech perception recruited both auditory and visual cor

243 nts and auditory envelope during audiovisual speech perception reduced the accuracy of subsequent the

244 he temporal structure of language influences speech perception-related brain activity.

245 Our results show that spatial multi-talker speech perception relies upon a separable pre-attentive

246 Our results show that speech perception relies upon a shared cortical auditory

247 ich sensorimotor integration plays a role in speech perception remains highly controversial, however.

248 Speech perception requires the rapid and effortless extr

249 Speech perception requires the successful interpretation

250 Human speech perception results from neural computations that

251 Hearing thresholds and speech perception scores were evaluated with respect to

252 together explain ~ 25% of the variability in speech-perception scores in quiet using the cochlear imp

253 rin Hearing in Noise Test than with Mandarin speech perception sentences at the normal rate.

254 idence that infants' increasing precision in speech perception shapes which signals they will link to

255 ral evidence for a phonological loop linking speech perception, short-term memory and production rema

256 ith cross-modal predictive mechanisms during speech perception.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Verbal communic

257 is procedure is problematic for multisensory speech perception since audiovisual speech and auditory-

258 During multisensory speech perception, slow delta oscillations (~1-3 Hz) in

259 1 outcome of interest measured numerically: speech perception, sound localization, device use, and p

260 essing in humans, including implications for speech perception, spatial auditory processing and audit

261 ation in precentral gyrus shows that, during speech perception, specific motor circuits are recruited

262 in different cortical areas along the dorsal speech perception stream are distributed on different sp

263 versial, however, to what extent the brain's speech perception system actively uses articulatory (mot

264 Sensorimotor activity in speech perception tasks varies as a function of context,

265 pmental milestones bidirectionally on infant speech perception tasks.

266 TFS sensitivity to performance in a range of speech perception tasks.

267 hey performed single-talker and multi-talker speech perception tasks.

268 en with cochlear implants, outcomes of adult speech perception tests were greater than preimplanted l

269 me measures were audibility, scores from the speech perception tests, and scores from a questionnaire

270 t success as measured by pediatric and adult speech perception tests.

271 bited more human-like sound localization and speech perception than models without, consistent with a

272 r the HINT results, the E+P group had poorer speech perception than the E and control groups across a

273 It is well established that in human speech perception the left hemisphere (LH) of the brain

274 During speech perception, the electric cortical activity of the

275 peech motor system (SMS) is activated during speech perception, the functional role of this activatio

276 For speech perception, this learning is selective: initially

277 disruption of human premotor cortex impairs speech perception, thus demonstrating an essential role

278 motor activation contributes to categorical speech perception under adverse listening conditions.

279 nduced by this disorder may actually improve speech perception under narrow conditions within an over

280 Speech perception uses information from both the auditor

281 d the cortical regions mediating categorical speech perception using an advanced brain-mapping techni

282 In contrast, this study shows that speech perception via a cochlear implant is unaffected b

283 f communication, and socioeconomic group) on speech perception was analysed.

284 Narrative speech perception was assessed through use of a masked s

285 r age at implant and interval since implant, speech perception was highest for children with hearing

286 To examine the role of motor areas in speech perception, we carried out a functional magnetic

287 However, in speech perception, we lack evidence of perception being

288 But in addition to speech perception, we routinely extract from voices a we

289 s at these characteristic time scales during speech perception, we studied the spatial and dynamic pr

290 Specifically, we obtained changes in speech perception when adaptation to altered auditory fe

291 movements of communication partners improves speech perception when auditory signals are degraded or

292 y judgments about speech sounds (rather than speech perception, which involves decoding of sounds).

293 ogy of mirror neurons to the Motor Theory of speech perception, which posits that perception and prod

294 concerns whether humans are specialized for speech perception, which some researchers argue is demon

295 ation of Heschl's gyrus selectively disrupts speech perception, while stimulation of planum temporale

296 ion will improve phoneme recognition and (b) speech perception will improve when channels with high t

297 sory detail and prior expectations influence speech perception with computational modelling, we provi

298 hat Broca's area participates in categorical speech perception, with a possible role of translating s

299 Language development builds on speech perception, with early disruptions increasing the

300 uperior temporal gyrus (STG) is critical for speech perception, yet the organization of spectrotempor