ライフサイエンスコーパス: spherical equivalent

1 efractive error of +3.00 to -17.00 diopters (spherical equivalent).

2 cal equivalent +/- 1.0 diopter (D) of target spherical equivalent.

3 cylinder, and in 28 subjects (68.3%) for the spherical equivalent.

4 it of agreement, -3.01 D to +1.13 D) for the spherical equivalent.

5 th complete data on age, sex, education, and spherical equivalent.

6 years) with myopia between -1.25 and -4.50 D spherical equivalent.

7 It was unrelated to education and baseline spherical equivalent.

8 lines, and 59% vs 43% were within +/-0.13 D spherical equivalent.

9 nicity, blood pressure, body mass index, and spherical equivalent.

10 had a significantly lower refractive error (spherical equivalent 0.078 vs. 0.99 diopters, P<0.0001),

11 son product-moment) on linear regression for spherical equivalent (0.73-0.79), cylinder power (0.78-0

12 Emmetropia (spherical equivalent -0.5 to 0 diopter) was achieved in

13 80 cm, -0.05 logMAR +/- 0.14; postoperative spherical equivalent, 0.26 D +/- 0.47; cylinder -0.34 D

14 0.08; binocular UIVA, -0.05 logMAR +/- 0.12; spherical equivalent, 0.34 D +/- 0.50; cylinder -0.39 D

15 ters [D] vs. 0.25 D cylinder; P < 0.001) and spherical equivalent (-1.42 D vs. -0.50 D sphere; P = 0.

16 e axial length was 21.2 +/- 1.0 mm with mean spherical equivalent +1.49 +/- 1.34 diopters (range -2.2

17 ercentage of cases achieving a postoperative spherical equivalent +/- 1.0 diopter (D) of target spher

18 on the sphere, 46 eyes (0.51%) based on the spherical equivalent, 115 eyes (1.28%) based on treating

19 Ninety-three young persons with myopia (mean spherical equivalent, -3.0 +/- 1.8 D; age 16.8 +/- 2.1 y

20 Ten patients (mean age, 63 years; mean spherical equivalent, +4.7 D) had a median preoperative

21 max were within target refraction values for spherical equivalent (70% [216/310] vs 69% [212/310]), c

22 (defined as -6.0 diopter [D] or worse, mean spherical equivalent -8.66 +/- 2.00 D) and 88 controls w

23 fraction (OR, 1.17 per 1-diopter increase in spherical equivalent; 95% CI, 1.11-1.24).

24 genome-wide linkage analyses of refraction (spherical equivalent adjusted for age, education, and nu

25 her intraocular pressure, and more hyperopic spherical equivalent (all P < .001).

26 In total, 15404 individuals with data on spherical equivalent and 9074 individuals with data on a

27 ctors, measure severity, and correlate it to spherical equivalent and central visual acuity (VA).

28 etropia was calculated in clinical notation (spherical equivalent and cylinder) and in two forms of v

29 Manifest refraction spherical equivalent and cylindrical power improvement w

30 rmula with respect to the error in predicted spherical equivalent and evaluated the effect of applyin

31 Spherical equivalent and keratometry readings showed a s

32 hildren, with significant differences in the spherical equivalent and maximum and minimum keratometry

33 pairment is associated with axial length and spherical equivalent and may be unavoidable at the most

34 sitively associated with spherical power and spherical equivalent and negatively associated with axia

35 Mean spherical equivalent and postgestational age at the last

36 ction 1 month after surgery was converted to spherical equivalent and prediction error (predicted ref

37 Manifest refraction spherical equivalent and spherical and cylindrical power

38 ildren with myopia between -1.25 and -4.50 D spherical equivalent and without eye or systemic conditi

39 fraction error greater than -2 diopters (D) (spherical equivalent) and typical myopic optic disc morp

40 Refractive error (spherical equivalent) and visual acuity scores were obta

41 hs postoperatively for measurement of BSCVA, spherical equivalent, and IOP.

42 ion index, education level, diabetes status, spherical equivalent, and IOPcc.

43 In univariate analyses, axial length, spherical equivalent, and mean deviation were correlated

44 aluate the association between axial length, spherical equivalent, and the risk of visual impairment

45 ctor dioptric distance is more accurate than spherical equivalent anisometropia or cylindrical anisom

46 in regards to postoperative manifest sphere, spherical equivalent, astigmatism, safety indices nor oc

47 57.10% of patients with the postoperative spherical equivalent at -2.00 diopter (D) to + 2.00D.

48 tly closer to emmetropia for both sphere and spherical equivalents at all time points.

49 outcome was the 3-year change in cycloplegic spherical equivalent autorefraction, as measured by the

50 Postoperative spherical equivalent averaged 0.78 diopters (0.49-1.07)

51 rformed at both loci using refractive error (spherical equivalent), axial length, corneal curvature,

52 rmed to investigate the effects of sex, age, spherical equivalent, axial length, and visual acuity on

53 Spherical equivalent became more positive in the younges

54 Spherical equivalent became more positive in the younges

55 sed body mass index (beta, -0.15; P = .001), spherical equivalent (beta, 0.70; P < .001), and higher

56 ected visual acuity between 20/20 and 20/25, spherical equivalent between +/-3 diopters, and no syste

57 etween -2.00 and -9.62 D) and 20 emmetropes (spherical equivalent between -0.50 and +0.50 D) with ast

58 Thirty-one myopes (spherical equivalent between -2.00 and -9.62 D) and 20 e

59 Despite large differences in spherical equivalent between manifest refraction and aut

60 tinoscopy refractive findings for sphere and spherical equivalents, but underestimated hyperopia or o

61 ss was weakly positively correlated with SE (spherical equivalent; combined sphere and 1/2 cylinder)

62 Secondary outcomes were spherical equivalent, contrast sensitivity, corneal aber

63 h night vision correlated with the change in spherical equivalent correction between the habitual and

64 ranged in age from 22.9 to 64.5 years, with spherical equivalent corrections ranging from +0.5 to -6

65 refractive error (the difference between the spherical equivalent cycloplegic autorefraction 30 degre

66 refractive error (the difference between the spherical equivalent cycloplegic autorefraction 30 degre

67 differences between these were analyzed as a spherical equivalent, cylinder, and spherocylinder.

68 Myopia (< -0.5 diopter [D] spherical equivalent) declined with age, whereas hyperop

69 The mean (SD) spherical equivalent differed between PlusOptix A09 and

70 +0.88/+1.25 (-8.75 to +4.75/-9.38 to +5.25) spherical equivalent diopter (D) in childhood and -0.25/

71 ce visual acuity (UDVA), manifest refraction spherical equivalent, endothelial cell count, and advers

72 The postoperative spherical equivalent fell within +/-0.50 D, +/-1.00 D, a

73 Mean spherical equivalent for the amblyopic eyes was +3.57 di

74 -cylindrical correction) or RMS based on the spherical equivalent for the eye with lower refractive e

75 Mean spherical equivalent for zone I ROP eyes treated with IV

76 nt decrease in both keratometry readings and spherical equivalent (from -4.0 to -1.56 diopters) was a

77 of 120 eyes of 83 patients with high myopia (spherical equivalent >/=-6 diopters or axial length >/=2

78 or to less severe high hyperopia (>= + 5.50 spherical equivalent) has not been fully elucidated.

79 uter segment, gestational age at birth, sex, spherical equivalent, history of laser treatment, and de

80 t spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), spherical equivalent, hyperopic shift, and endothelial c

81 Significant changes in spherical equivalent in adults occur over a 10-year peri

82 Mean spherical equivalent in amblyopic eyes was -10.79 +/- 3.

83 Spherical equivalent in the more extreme eye was used to

84 The intraclass correlation coefficient for spherical equivalents indicated good agreement between c

85 Refraction, as measured by spherical equivalent, is the need for an external lens t

86 e converted into power vector components: M (spherical equivalent), J(0) (positive J(0) indicates WTR

87 Prevalence of myopic refractive error (spherical equivalent less than -0.50 diopters) and area

88 al age at birth, anisometropia, astigmatism, spherical equivalent, low visual acuity in the worse see

89 Myopia/hyperopia were defined as spherical equivalent < -0.5 diopters (D)/> +0.5 D, and t

90 Myopia and hyperopia were defined as a spherical equivalent <-0.5 diopters and >+0.5 diopters,

91 were defined as 1. Myopia onset (cycloplegic spherical equivalent </= -0.5 diopter in non-myopic chil

92 Myopia was defined as a mean spherical equivalent </=-0.75 diopters.

93 The mean spherical equivalent measured by cycloplegic autorefract

94 phere and cylinder on subjective refraction, spherical equivalent, minimum simulated keratometry valu

95 The final manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) achieved then was compared w

96 square error (MSE), and manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) results of surgeons with >50

97 Manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE) was within +/-0.50 D of the

98 A), keratometry (K), and manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) were evaluated pre- and post

99 ed visual acuity (UCVA), manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE), and Scheimpflug imaging fro

100 le-corrected VA (BSCVA), manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE), endothelial cell count (ECC

101 visual acuity (UDVA, CDVA), mean refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE), keratometry, endothelial ce

102 rative and postoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE), preoperative and postoperat

103 e pre- and postoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE), uncorrected (UDVA) and best

104 as linearly related to preoperative manifest spherical equivalent (MSE) for myopic PRK and LASIK (P<0

105 The outcome measures were the mean spherical equivalent (MSE) of refractive error (dioptres

106 -1.00 and -10.00 diopters (D), with manifest spherical equivalent (MSE) of up to -11.50 D and refract

107 to enrich the families for myopia; the mean spherical equivalent (MSE) refractive error (SD) was -1.

108 ing spatial-frequency filtered noise-on mean spherical equivalent (MSE) refractive error.

109 l risk markers for RE, measured here as mean spherical equivalent (MSE).

110 +/- 4.4 years), eight emmetropes (EMMs; mean spherical equivalent [MSE] refractive error +/- SD: 0.05

111 The effects on refraction (mean spherical equivalent [MSE]) and vitreous chamber depth (

112 The gender- and age-specific prevalence of spherical equivalent myopia in phakic eyes was calculate

113 The sibling risk increases with the level of spherical equivalent myopia in the proband.

114 n and refractive errors, linkage analysis of spherical equivalent, myopia, and hyperopia in the Beave

115 he hypermetropia study, patients with a mean spherical equivalent of < +3.00 D and significant anisom

116 emmetropia, and hyperopia were defined as a spherical equivalent of <=-0.5, >-0.5 and <0.5, and >=0.

117 ractions in the monovision arm showed a mean spherical equivalent of +0.075 D in the distance eye and

118 - 0.11 logMAR and a mean manifest refraction spherical equivalent of -0.06 +/- 0.56 D were found.

119 afety index was 1.25 (0.57), with a manifest spherical equivalent of -0.5 D at 1-year postoperatively

120 Myopia was defined as a mean spherical equivalent of -0.75 diopters or less.

121 Myopia was defined as a spherical equivalent of -1.0 diopters (D) or less, hyper

122 asured at baseline, with myopia defined as a spherical equivalent of -1.00 D or less, emmetropia as -

123 be respected in patients with a preoperative spherical equivalent of -20 D.

124 Affected individuals had a mean dioptric spherical equivalent of -22.00 sphere.

125 cells/mm(2) in patients with a preoperative spherical equivalent of -25 diopters (D).

126 men were significantly more myopic than men (spherical equivalent of -3.73 diopter [D] versus -4.07 D

127 diopters; 796 persons had high myopia (ie, a spherical equivalent of -6 diopters or less).

128 and 39% (4.9) for those aged 75 years with a spherical equivalent of -6 diopters or less.

129 83 and 88% of eyes were within the spherical equivalent of 0.5 D from the target in the sym

130 Refractive status was derived from the spherical equivalent of autorefraction.

131 Moreover, the spherical equivalent of children with INS demonstrated l

132 Myopia was defined as a spherical equivalent of less than or equal to - 0.50 dio

133 en 20 and 40 years, who had at least -0.50 D spherical equivalent of myopia in both eyes, three or mo

134 orefraction data were collected to calculate spherical equivalent of refraction in diopters (D) and f

135 ement of the contact lens to correct for the spherical equivalent of the refractive error.

136 ting for other factors, the 5-year change in spherical equivalent of those 45, 55, 65, and 75 years o

137 measurements and refractive error values (in spherical equivalent) of the cases were obtained, the pe

138 found between the final BCVA and either the spherical equivalent or central macular thickness after

139 ectively (P < .001), while a 1-U increase in spherical equivalent or estimated glomerular filtration

140 legic retinoscopy found a mean difference in spherical equivalent or sphere of less than 0.5 diopters

141 The achieved spherical equivalent outcome was compared with the targe

142 Changes in spherical equivalent over a 5-year period were small.

143 dard group showed significant improvement in spherical equivalent (P < .05), K-readings (P < .05), Q

144 n cycloplegic retinoscopy for the sphere and spherical equivalent (P < 0.0001 for both) but was in go

145 A significantly more myopic spherical equivalent (P < 0.001), worse VA (P < 0.001),

146 e (P = 0.032), axial length (P < 0.001), and spherical equivalent (P < 0.001).

147 Vitreous length predicted postoperative spherical equivalent (P = .03).

148 7), vertical cup-to-disc ratio (P = .51), or spherical equivalent (P = .08).

149 al cell density (P = .053) and the change in spherical equivalent (P = .145) did not differ significa

150 4, P < .0005), but not with age (P = .59) or spherical equivalent (P = .16).

151 tance factor (P = 0.04) and more myopic mean spherical equivalent (P = 0.02).

152 ; >=2.0 D: OR, 3.74 [2.35-5.97], P < 0.001); spherical equivalent (per diopter: OR, 1.43 [1.33-1.53],

153 The change in spherical equivalent peripheral refractive error at 30 d

154 lly different, but highly correlated for the spherical equivalent power (r = 0.92), the cylinder powe

155 The range of differences in spherical equivalent power was large (-8.6 to 4.9).

156 thus producing massive blur while having no spherical equivalent power.

157 The mean spherical equivalent prediction error of the back-calcul

158 Spherical equivalent ranged from -25 to +14 diopters; 79

159 The number of myopic parents (mean spherical equivalent refraction </=-0.75 D) was directly

160 ia was defined as non-cycloplegic subjective spherical equivalent refraction <= - 0.50 diopters.

161 imum angle of resolution [logMAR]), manifest spherical equivalent refraction (D), central corneal thi

162 e observed in postoperative BSCVA (P = .55), spherical equivalent refraction (P = .27), mean keratome

163 Mean age was 10.7+/-3.1 years, average spherical equivalent refraction (SE) was -0.02+/-1.77(-4

164 including age, gender, duration of symptoms, spherical equivalent refraction (SE), internal limiting

165 lur (AAPUB) and push-up to blur (AAMLB), and spherical equivalent refraction (SEQ).

166 This report describes development of spherical equivalent refraction (SER) and axial length (

167 Myopes had spherical equivalent refraction (SER) of the less ametro

168 eal thickness (CT), lens thickness (LT), and spherical equivalent refraction (SER).

169 The manifest spherical equivalent refraction changed on average by +0

170 RPR was calculated by subtracting the foveal spherical equivalent refraction from that obtained at ea

171 Myopia was defined as a spherical equivalent refraction of </=-0.50 diopters (D)

172 Myopia was defined as spherical equivalent refraction of -0.50 D with unaided

173 the patients was 51 +/- 3 years with a mean spherical equivalent refraction of -1.08 +/- 2.62 diopte

174 an increasing myopia with a mean decrease in spherical equivalent refraction of 0.24 diopters per yea

175 group) was defined as the difference in mean spherical equivalent refraction of both eyes obtained by

176 Mean spherical equivalent refraction showed a significant dec

177 Mean (SD) preoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -19.36 (6.7) diopter

178 Mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -7.25+/-1.84 diopter

179 Mean spherical equivalent refraction was reduced (P < 0.0001)

180 Mean spherical equivalent refraction was used as a quantitati

181 ntitative trait association analyses of mean spherical equivalent refraction were performed on 30 mar

182 y with and without correction, age, sex, and spherical equivalent refraction were recorded at the tim

183 sion, hypercholesterolemia, body mass index, spherical equivalent refraction, and C:D ratio, narrower

184 he effect of proband covariates of age, sex, spherical equivalent refraction, index birth order, and

185 perative change in HOA and preoperative mean spherical equivalent refraction, mean astigmatism, and p

186 t spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), spherical equivalent refraction, mean keratometry, kerat

187 Secondary outcome measures included spherical equivalent refraction, visual fields, electror

188 n keratometry, keratometric astigmatism, and spherical equivalent refraction.

189 rs (D) and hyperopia as >/=+2.00 D right eye spherical equivalent refraction.

190 jective refractions or on any combination of spherical equivalent refraction.

191 Average spherical equivalent refractions were -0.13 +/- 0.46 dio

192 The mean preoperative spherical equivalent refractions were -7.48 +/- 5.00 dio

193 Mean (SD) spherical equivalent refractions were as follows: zone I

194 Spherical equivalent refractive data from the right eye

195 traocular surgery, 53.2% were myopic, with a spherical equivalent refractive error > -1 D, 23.4% had

196 ation (P < 0.001), and magnitude of absolute spherical equivalent refractive error (P<0.001).

197 years compared to preoperative values, mean spherical equivalent refractive error (SEQ) increased by

198 The mean preoperative spherical equivalent refractive error (SEQ) was -5.13 D

199 Change in spherical equivalent refractive error (SER) and ocular c

200 eased by 9.8% for each additional diopter of spherical equivalent refractive error (SER) toward myopi

201 orefractor was used to determine cycloplegic spherical equivalent refractive error (SPHEQ).

202 cts, ages 7 to 53 (median 16) years and mean spherical equivalent refractive error -0.68 D (range, -3

203 tion of Myopia Evaluation Trial (COMET; mean spherical equivalent refractive error -2.35 D with no mo

204 ed their association in multivariate models: spherical equivalent refractive error at baseline, paren

205 bjects between 18 and 50 years of age with a spherical equivalent refractive error between +0.50 and

206 0 (exophoria) to 5 (constant exotropia) and spherical equivalent refractive error between -6.00 diop

207 Both the mean and SD for spherical equivalent refractive error decreased between

208 10-year examination, there was a decrease in spherical equivalent refractive error from hyperopia to

209 Fifty-six consecutive patients with spherical equivalent refractive error of at least 6 diop

210 and eyes with amblyopia, ocular disease, or spherical equivalent refractive error outside of -3.00 t

211 lyopia, there is a decrease in amblyopic eye spherical equivalent refractive error to less hyperopia

212 Spherical equivalent refractive error was -2.82 +/- 1.65

213 The mean spherical equivalent refractive error was 3.12 1.87 diop

214 egression models evaluated whether change in spherical equivalent refractive error was associated wit

215 The spherical equivalent refractive error was measured by cy

216 Spherical equivalent refractive error was the single bes

217 2] years; 177 [60.2%] were female; mean [SD] spherical equivalent refractive error, -2.39 [1.00] D).

218 category, after adjusting for age, baseline spherical equivalent refractive error, and type of ambly

219 d vitreous chamber depths, axial length, and spherical equivalent refractive error, was investigated.

220 ost influential factor in emmetropization of spherical equivalent refractive error.

221 e of pubertal development, axial length, and spherical equivalent refractive error.

222 ral and superior-inferior asymmetries in the spherical equivalent refractive errors.

223 Spherical equivalent refractive outcomes and their distr

224 , endothelial cell density (ECD), refractive spherical equivalent, refractive cylinder, and topograph

225 alculated as the difference between the mean spherical equivalent responses obtained at the two dista

226 re (sbeta = -0.085; P < .001), a more myopic spherical equivalent (sbeta = 0.152; P < .001), and pres

227 /- 6.72 mum (P = .001, control group); Delta spherical equivalent +/- SD -0.64 +/- 0.6 diopters (D) (

228 0 patients in the presbyopic age group (mean spherical equivalent SE +2.38 D +/- 0.71 D and mean age

229 Changes in spherical equivalent (SE) and AL were measured, and thei

230 1.5 years; P = .023), to have higher myopic spherical equivalent (SE) at baseline (-3.6 +/- 1.3 D vs

231 opters (D), cylinder of less than 0.75 D and spherical equivalent (SE) between -0.25 and +0.25 D.

232 ll Asian) with no difference in preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) between eyes (-5.3+/-1.8 diopt

233 four myopic children aged 6 to 11 years with spherical equivalent (SE) cycloplegic autorefraction bet

234 y-five children (age range, 6-11 years) with spherical equivalent (SE) cycloplegic autorefraction bet

235 The mean spherical equivalent (SE) in the right eyes was +0.60 di

236 as a 0.25-diopter (D) or more difference in spherical equivalent (SE) or in cylinder power and 2 app

237 uity (BSCVA) with astigmatism (cylinder) and spherical equivalent (SE) over 5 years of follow-up.

238 In each case, the difference between actual spherical equivalent (SE) refraction and that predicted

239 Spherical equivalent (SE) refraction was assessed using

240 AL stabilized at month 3 while ACD and spherical equivalent (SE) stabilized at week 1.

241 ve surgery, the eye with the larger absolute spherical equivalent (SE) value for each participant was

242 ngth (AL) was 23.33 +/- 0.89 mm; the average spherical equivalent (SE) value was -0.27 +/- 0.99 diopt

243 The mean spherical equivalent (SE) was - 0.25 +/- 0.50 D.

244 Average postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) was -0.79+/-0.95 diopters (D).

245 The spherical equivalent (SE) was determined by noncyclopleg

246 e emmetropia was considered if the resulting spherical equivalent (SE) was within +/-1.00 D.

247 Distributions and mean spherical equivalent (SE) were calculated for main affec

248 Fourteen eyes (26.9%) had spherical equivalent (SE) within +/-0.5 D of emmetropia

249 pia status was defined using sphere (SPH) or spherical equivalent (SE), and analyses assessed the ass

250 l pneumatonometry (IOPs), axial length (AL), spherical equivalent (SE), and central corneal thickness

251 32 and 36 months, and changes in cycloplegic spherical equivalent (SE), axial length (AL), visual acu

252 in corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), spherical equivalent (SE), flat keratometry, steep kerat

253 th groups were matched for age, preoperative spherical equivalent (SE), mean keratometry, and percent

254 Refractive error, expressed as spherical equivalent (SE), was coded as a continuous tra

255 n age and difference in absolute interocular spherical equivalent (SE).

256 regression approach and correlated NBSL with spherical equivalent (SE).

257 Myopia and high myopia were defined as spherical equivalents (SE) of less than -0.5 diopter (D)

258 ho underwent cycloplegia, 58% had hyperopia (spherical equivalent [SE] >/=+0.50 diopter [D]), mean of

259 Myopic eyes (spherical equivalent [SE] <-0.5 diopter [D]) were less l

260 tive myopic and myopic-astigmatism eyes with spherical equivalent (SEQ) ranging between - 10.00 to -

261 The mean postoperative spherical equivalent (SEQ) was -0.99+/-1.00 diopters (D)

262 Analyses were based on spherical equivalent (SEQ), anisometropia, astigmatism,

263 The baseline mean spherical equivalent similarly did not differ significan

264 On average, manifest refraction gave a spherical equivalent that was 1.04 D more plus than auto

265 In addition, for every 1 D increase in spherical equivalent, there was a 30% increase of having

266 automatic refractor, continuous measures of spherical equivalent, total astigmatism, and corneal ast

267 Preoperative Tracey refraction spherical equivalent (TRSE), angle alpha, and spherical

268 The spherical equivalent value with non-cycloplegic PlusOpti

269 The mean sphere and spherical equivalent values also improved significantly

270 fects explained 16% (95% CI, 15%-18%) of the spherical equivalent variance, respectively.

271 temporal approach according to the change in spherical equivalent, visual acuity, and endothelial cel

272 (SIA), changes in corneal aberrations and in spherical equivalent, visual acuity, endothelial cell de

273 Overall change in spherical equivalent was +0.43 diopters (D; range, -1.17

274 Mean spherical equivalent was -0.04 +/- 0.321 D 3 months post

275 Postoperative mean spherical equivalent was -0.17 +/- 0.34 diopter.

276 Mean preoperative spherical equivalent was -0.2 +/- 2.5 Diopter (D) (-4.0D

277 Refractive spherical equivalent was -0.3 +/- 2.8 D (n = 27) preoper

278 to 20/25, and the mean attempted enhancement spherical equivalent was -0.50+/-0.86 D.

279 Spherical equivalent was -1.82 +/- 2.7 diopters (D) and

280 Mean postoperative spherical equivalent was -3.4 +/- 1.2 diopters.

281 The mean +/- SD refractive spherical equivalent was -4.72 +/- 3.32 diopters (D), an

282 The mean spherical equivalent was -8.93 +/- 5.69 diopters.

283 The mean refractive error in spherical equivalent was -9.03 +/- 5.11 diopters (D) and

284 Mean spherical equivalent was 0.05 +/- 0.32 D 3 months postop

285 and 2, respectively, and mean postoperative spherical equivalent was 0.44 +/- 1.8 D and -1.8 +/- 4.2

286 Mean spherical equivalent was 0.65 diopter (D) and 0.51 D, an

287 Mean preoperative spherical equivalent was 1.54 +/- 2.59 diopters (D) and

288 Spherical equivalent was associated with age (towards hy

289 studies showed that each diopter increase in spherical equivalent was associated with increased odds

290 er-seeing eye; the corrected acuity with the spherical equivalent was not more than 1 line less than

291 The decrease in spherical equivalent was significantly greater in stages

292 The spherical equivalent was significantly more myopic and t

293 ren with hyperopia between +3.00D and +6.00D spherical equivalent were randomly assigned to glasses v

294 The change between final and baseline mean spherical equivalents were -0.05 D, 0 D, -1.05 D for the

295 In the multifocal arm, the mean distance spherical equivalents were -0.279 D and -0.174 D in the

296 Mean (+/-SE) 3-year increases in myopia (spherical equivalent) were -1.28 +/- 0.06 D in the PAL g

297 ]; WFO: mean, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.35-0.69]), and spherical equivalents (WFG: mean, -4.45 [95% CI, -4.99 t

298 irment rose with increasing axial length and spherical equivalent, with a cumulative incidence (SE) o

299 Overall, 62.1% of eyes had spherical equivalent within +/-0.5 D and 80.9% within +/

300 and with variance in the manifest refraction spherical equivalent within +/-0.5 diopter (D) for a min