ライフサイエンスコーパス: spinal anesthesia

1 ; and update risk assessment associated with spinal anesthesia.

2 cedures has resulted in more frequent use of spinal anesthesia.

3 safety and decreased complication rates from spinal anesthesia.

4 us RF ablation was performed with general or spinal anesthesia.

5 CPP during CPR conducted in the presence of spinal anesthesia.

6 han 30, were privately insured, and received spinal anesthesia.

7 ial procedures, such as a lumbar puncture or spinal anesthesia.

8 SF was obtained during the administration of spinal anesthesia.

9 ynamic hyperinflation at isotime points with spinal anesthesia.

10 ive (fentanyl 25 mug, intrathecal L(3)-L(4)) spinal anesthesia.

11 Spinal anesthesia abolishes the catecholamine release th

12 A total of 666 patients (83.8%) assigned to spinal anesthesia and 769 patients (95.5%) assigned to g

13 were enrolled; 795 were assigned to receive spinal anesthesia and 805 to receive general anesthesia.

14 ed local anesthetic in caudal, epidural, and spinal anesthesia and is widely used clinically to manag

15 tients presenting for elective surgery under spinal anesthesia and patients scheduled for lumbar punc

16 heduled for elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia and were randomized to either the acup

17 y, blood and CSF were sampled at the time of spinal anesthesia, and participants were assessed daily

18 ic, randomized superiority trial to evaluate spinal anesthesia as compared with general anesthesia in

19 The effects of spinal anesthesia as compared with general anesthesia on

20 It can occur following uncomplicated spinal anesthesia as well as unintended dural puncture d

21 tive alternatives to bupivacaine in day-case spinal anesthesia but more safety and outcome data are r

22 plied in the operating room under general or spinal anesthesia by a trained surgeon.

23 therapy was performed with the patient under spinal anesthesia by using a clinical 1.5-T MR unit.

24 eview highlights recent advances in day-case spinal anesthesia; considerations in selecting local ane

25 Spinal anesthesia enhanced cycling exercise tolerance in

26 Spinal anesthesia for hip-fracture surgery in older adul

27 surgery procedures has redefined the role of spinal anesthesia for outpatients.

28 The safety and efficacy of epidural or spinal anesthesia for spinal surgery continue to be demo

29 Two women in labor received intrapartum spinal anesthesia from the same anesthesiologist approxi

30 curred in 132 of 712 patients (18.5%) in the spinal anesthesia group and 132 of 733 (18.0%) in the ge

31 curred in 130 of 633 patients (20.5%) in the spinal anesthesia group and in 124 of 629 (19.7%) in the

32 entrations (p < .05) that were absent in the spinal anesthesia group.

33 uggestions on ways to improve the quality of spinal anesthesia in the outpatient setting, particularl

34 The continued popularity of spinal anesthesia is due to the safety, effectiveness an

35 ed for postdural puncture headache following spinal anesthesia; it has not been studied for accidenta

36 his article is to review current practice of spinal anesthesia regarding technique and medication use

37 The risk/benefit ratio of spinal anesthesia should be individualized.

38 edication use; review recent applications of spinal anesthesia to subspecialty care in outpatient, ca

39 Spinal anesthesia using 2-chloroprocaine offers fast ons

40 rance time was significantly prolonged after spinal anesthesia with fentanyl (639 +/- 87 s vs. 423 +/