コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 g evidence exists about the effectiveness of spinal manipulation.
2 ocused on the core chiropractic procedure of spinal manipulation.
3 actic care for low back pain, 1088 (83%) had spinal manipulation.
5 ty (P = .16; supported self-management, 2.8; spinal manipulation, 3.0; combined supported self-manage
6 5.5; combined supported self-management with spinal manipulation, 4.8; medical care, 5.9) but not pai
7 y (P = .001; supported self-management, 4.7; spinal manipulation, 5.5; combined supported self-manage
8 disability (supported self-management, 67%; spinal manipulation, 54%; combined supported self-manage
10 erence, -1.1 [95% CI, -1.9 to -0.3]) but not spinal manipulation alone (mean difference, -0.4 [95% CI
11 , vs medical care over 1-year follow-up, and spinal manipulation alone showed no significant differen
13 that cognitive-behavioral therapy, exercise, spinal manipulation, and interdisciplinary rehabilitatio
14 are cognitive-behavioral therapy, exercise, spinal manipulation, and interdisciplinary rehabilitatio
15 s, chronic opioid therapy, physical therapy, spinal manipulation, and multidisciplinary pain treatmen
16 cal nerve stimulation, and ultrasonography), spinal manipulation, and yoga for acute or chronic low b
17 olled trials that investigated the effect of spinal manipulation applied to candidate versus non-cand
18 such as acupuncture, moxibustion, yoga, and spinal manipulation are also gaining popularity in the t
19 ents; assessment of the decision to initiate spinal manipulation as appropriate, uncertain, or inappr
22 at (good evidence for moderate benefits) and spinal manipulation (fair evidence for small to moderate
23 nalysis of the results of 26 RCTs evaluating spinal manipulation for acute and chronic back pain repo
24 t evaluated acupuncture, massage therapy, or spinal manipulation for nonspecific back pain and RCTs p
25 Recent U.S. practice guidelines recommend spinal manipulation for some patients with low back pain
26 ith proven benefits-for acute low back pain, spinal manipulation; for chronic or subacute low back pa
28 effect of osteopathic manual therapy (i.e., spinal manipulation) in patients with chronic and subchr
32 therapies, multidisciplinary rehabilitation, spinal manipulation, massage, and acupuncture for chroni
33 uggests that massage, but not acupuncture or spinal manipulation, may reduce the costs of care after
34 to -0.5]) and supported self-management with spinal manipulation (mean difference, -1.1 [95% CI, -1.9
35 , or combined supported self-management with spinal manipulation (n = 193) compared with guideline-ba
41 or acute and chronic back pain reported that spinal manipulation was superior to sham therapies and t
43 rcise therapy, acupuncture, massage therapy, spinal manipulation, yoga, cognitive-behavioral therapy,