戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 g evidence exists about the effectiveness of spinal manipulation.
2 ocused on the core chiropractic procedure of spinal manipulation.
3 actic care for low back pain, 1088 (83%) had spinal manipulation.
4 3.0; combined supported self-management with spinal manipulation, 2.8; medical care, 3.0).
5 ty (P = .16; supported self-management, 2.8; spinal manipulation, 3.0; combined supported self-manage
6 5.5; combined supported self-management with spinal manipulation, 4.8; medical care, 5.9) but not pai
7 y (P = .001; supported self-management, 4.7; spinal manipulation, 5.5; combined supported self-manage
8  disability (supported self-management, 67%; spinal manipulation, 54%; combined supported self-manage
9 54%; combined supported self-management with spinal manipulation, 65%; medical care, 54%).
10 erence, -1.1 [95% CI, -1.9 to -0.3]) but not spinal manipulation alone (mean difference, -0.4 [95% CI
11 , vs medical care over 1-year follow-up, and spinal manipulation alone showed no significant differen
12 ysical therapists and chiropractors provided spinal manipulation and supported self-management.
13 that cognitive-behavioral therapy, exercise, spinal manipulation, and interdisciplinary rehabilitatio
14  are cognitive-behavioral therapy, exercise, spinal manipulation, and interdisciplinary rehabilitatio
15 s, chronic opioid therapy, physical therapy, spinal manipulation, and multidisciplinary pain treatmen
16 cal nerve stimulation, and ultrasonography), spinal manipulation, and yoga for acute or chronic low b
17 olled trials that investigated the effect of spinal manipulation applied to candidate versus non-cand
18  such as acupuncture, moxibustion, yoga, and spinal manipulation are also gaining popularity in the t
19 ents; assessment of the decision to initiate spinal manipulation as appropriate, uncertain, or inappr
20                                          The spinal manipulation clinical prediction rule can be used
21                                 Outcome from spinal manipulation depends on a patient's status on the
22 at (good evidence for moderate benefits) and spinal manipulation (fair evidence for small to moderate
23 nalysis of the results of 26 RCTs evaluating spinal manipulation for acute and chronic back pain repo
24 t evaluated acupuncture, massage therapy, or spinal manipulation for nonspecific back pain and RCTs p
25    Recent U.S. practice guidelines recommend spinal manipulation for some patients with low back pain
26 ith proven benefits-for acute low back pain, spinal manipulation; for chronic or subacute low back pa
27                                              Spinal manipulation has small clinical benefits that are
28  effect of osteopathic manual therapy (i.e., spinal manipulation) in patients with chronic and subchr
29               The proportion of chiropractic spinal manipulation judged to be congruent with appropri
30 -quality evidence), massage, acupuncture, or spinal manipulation (low-quality evidence).
31 nt therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, or spinal manipulation (low-quality evidence).
32 therapies, multidisciplinary rehabilitation, spinal manipulation, massage, and acupuncture for chroni
33 uggests that massage, but not acupuncture or spinal manipulation, may reduce the costs of care after
34 to -0.5]) and supported self-management with spinal manipulation (mean difference, -1.1 [95% CI, -1.9
35 , or combined supported self-management with spinal manipulation (n = 193) compared with guideline-ba
36                 This effort has helped bring spinal manipulation out of the investigational category
37 propriate than were patients who did undergo spinal manipulation (P = 0.01).
38  inappropriate decisions to use chiropractic spinal manipulation should be decreased.
39                                              Spinal manipulation therapy (n = 201), supported self-ma
40                             The concept that spinal manipulation therapy (SMT) outcomes are optimized
41 or acute and chronic back pain reported that spinal manipulation was superior to sham therapies and t
42                 Patients who did not undergo spinal manipulation were less likely to have a presentat
43 rcise therapy, acupuncture, massage therapy, spinal manipulation, yoga, cognitive-behavioral therapy,