ライフサイエンスコーパス: spinal stenosis

1 ited evidence suggested no effectiveness for spinal stenosis.

2 or radiculopathy, and 8 trials were done for spinal stenosis.

3 ly immediately caudal to the site of maximal spinal stenosis.

4 itative criteria for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis.

5 I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis.

6 ameters and cutoff values to describe lumbar spinal stenosis.

7 mbar surgery occurred in older patients with spinal stenosis.

8 graphy but very similar for the diagnosis of spinal stenosis.

9 are performed in the US each year for lumbar spinal stenosis.

10 echniques used to treat patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

11 ffer advantages over open surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.

12 such as bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome or spinal stenosis.

13 betes mellitus (48.9% vs 26.7%; P<.001), and spinal stenosis (20.8% vs 7.2%; P =.002).

14 are widely used to treat symptoms of lumbar spinal stenosis, a common cause of pain and disability i

15 Lumbar spinal stenosis affects approximately 103 million people

16 Among persons with lumbar spinal stenosis and concomitant spondylolisthesis, lumba

17 In patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis, it i

18 ent for 222 of 267 patients with symptomatic spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis.

19 assigned 400 patients who had lumbar central spinal stenosis and moderate-to-severe leg pain and disa

20 omitant lumbar fusion in persons with lumbar spinal stenosis and spondylolisthesis remain unclear.

21 on small numbers of trials (particularly for spinal stenosis), and most trials had methodological sho

22 sks of prostate cancer, androgenic alopecia, spinal stenosis, and hypertension; and context-dependent

23 in identifying patients with radiculopathy, spinal stenosis, and malingering.

24 complications, including basilar impression, spinal stenosis, and secondary neoplasm.

25 Background Assessment of lumbar spinal stenosis at MRI is repetitive and time consuming.

26 etween 50 and 80 years of age who had lumbar spinal stenosis at one or two adjacent vertebral levels

27 ase, including fracture, basilar impression, spinal stenosis, bone tumor, and osteoarthrosis.

28 tomatic and radiographic degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis, decompressive laminectomy improved symp

29 o undergo operations for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS).

30 In the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis, epidural injection of glucocorticoids p

31 In a series of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis followed up for up to 3 years without op

32 The first decompression operation for spinal stenosis has the best opportunity for a good outc

33 ts of epidural steroid injections for lumbar spinal stenosis have not been demonstrated.

34 revalence of the clinical syndrome of lumbar spinal stenosis in US adults is approximately 11% and in

35 e frequency of complex fusion procedures for spinal stenosis increased while the frequency of decompr

36 Lumbar spinal stenosis is a prevalent and disabling cause of lo

37 ement of degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis is controversial.

38 enerative spondylolisthesis with symptomatic spinal stenosis is debated.

39 Surgical decompression of spinal stenosis is most successful for patients with sev

40 Operations for lumbar spinal stenosis is the most often performed surgical pro

41 grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis is unknown.

42 Surgery for spinal stenosis is widely performed, but its effectivene

43 Neurogenic claudication, caused by lumbar spinal stenosis, is the most common reason for spinal su

44 Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and sagittal imbalance are relativ

45 cisions for patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) are challenging, and nonsurgical g

46 The clinical syndrome of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a common diagnosis in older adu

47 dure for the treatment of symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).

48 ma compared with open laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).

49 iction in epilepsy, brain metastases, lumbar spinal stenosis, lumbar disc herniation, childhood hydro

50 following patient-reported outcome measures: Spinal Stenosis Measure (SSM) symptom severity (higher s

51 ic evaluation of basilar impression (n = 7), spinal stenosis (n = 12), and the tumor stage (n = 9).

52 y deep learning for interpretation of lumbar spinal stenosis on MRI scans showed a marked reduction i

53 potentially associated with radiculopathy or spinal stenosis, or back pain potentially associated wit

54 ntervention results in improved function for spinal stenosis patients.

55 including carpal tunnel syndrome and lumbar spinal stenosis, raise suspicion and may afford a means

56 Norwegian Degenerative Spondylolisthesis and Spinal Stenosis randomized clinical trial, which showed

57 ts of epidural corticosteroid injections for spinal stenosis (SOE, low to moderate).

58 The economic value of spinal stenosis surgery at 2 years compares favorably wi

59 The outcome of spinal stenosis surgery is more closely associated with

60 isthesis, 3 to 14 mm) and symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis to undergo either decompressive laminect

61 ents with degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis treated surgically showed substantially

62 gnosis in 78.0% of the patients, and central spinal stenosis was the primary diagnosis in 22.0% of th

63 Interpretation involves grading lumbar spinal stenosis, which is repetitive and time consuming.

64 reement of radiologists for reporting lumbar spinal stenosis with and without DL assistance.

65 in and signs or symptoms of radiculopathy or spinal stenosis with magnetic resonance imaging (preferr

66 spondylolisthesis (LSS without SPL), lumbar spinal stenosis with spondylolisthesis (LSS with SPL), a

67 Patients with image-confirmed spinal stenosis, with and without degenerative spondylol

68 Among patients with lumbar spinal stenosis, with or without degenerative spondyloli

69 pression surgery in patients who have lumbar spinal stenosis, with or without degenerative spondyloli

70 mptomatic and radiologically verified lumbar spinal stenosis without degenerative spondylolisthesis.

71 history of at least 12 weeks of symptoms and spinal stenosis without spondylolisthesis (as confirmed

72 ery for lumbar disc herniation (LDH), lumbar spinal stenosis without spondylolisthesis (LSS without S