コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 on for stenosis associated with degenerative spondylolisthesis).
2 inal stenosis, with and without degenerative spondylolisthesis.
3 lumbar spinal stenosis without degenerative spondylolisthesis.
4 symptomatic spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis.
5 ilar between patients with and those without spondylolisthesis.
6 tients with lumbar stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis, 2 landmark prospective randomized cli
7 White) with lumbar stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis, 21 230 (17.4%) underwent decompressio
8 le degenerative spondylolisthesis (degree of spondylolisthesis, 3 to 14 mm) and symptomatic lumbar sp
10 nducted alongside the Norwegian Degenerative Spondylolisthesis and Spinal Stenosis randomized clinica
11 baseline factors, patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis treated surgically
12 herniation, high signal intensity zone, and spondylolisthesis) and type 1 signal intensity changes a
13 n thoracic level children, the prevalence of spondylolisthesis, and surgical treatment of kyphosis ar
14 eeks of symptoms and spinal stenosis without spondylolisthesis (as confirmed on imaging) were enrolle
15 is, recurrent disc herniations, or low-grade spondylolisthesis at L3-5 were retrospectively reviewed.
16 with stenosis with and without degenerative spondylolisthesis, but the economic value of these surge
17 pinal stenosis, with or without degenerative spondylolisthesis, decompression surgery plus fusion sur
18 80 years of age, who had stable degenerative spondylolisthesis (degree of spondylolisthesis, 3 to 14
20 endplate sclerosis or erosions, osteophytes, spondylolisthesis, facet involvement (narrowing or erosi
21 nagement of lumbar stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis from January 1, 2016, to December 31,
22 pinal stenosis, with or without degenerative spondylolisthesis, has not been substantiated in control
24 with lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis, it is uncertain whether decompression
25 cuum disk, facet involvement, vertebral body spondylolisthesis, joint disorganization and debris, and
26 ing disk degeneration and moderate in rating spondylolisthesis (kappa = 0.55), Modic changes (kappa =
27 Intraobserver agreement was good in rating spondylolisthesis (kappa = 0.66), disk degeneration (kap
28 SS without SPL), lumbar spinal stenosis with spondylolisthesis (LSS with SPL), and spondylolysis (SP)
29 iation (LDH), lumbar spinal stenosis without spondylolisthesis (LSS without SPL), lumbar spinal steno
30 with lumbar spinal stenosis and concomitant spondylolisthesis, lumbar fusion increased symptom resol
31 ho underwent surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis, most of whom had symptoms for more th
33 lvement on radiographs and CT and MR images, spondylolisthesis on CT and MR images, diffuse signal in
34 between a type 1 endplate and vertebral body spondylolisthesis (PPV, 0.28; 95% CI: 0.20, 0.35) were s
36 citis, tumours, structural anomalies such as spondylolisthesis, scoliosis and vertebral segmentation
38 uggest that surgeons performing degenerative spondylolisthesis surgery could rely safely on evidence
41 of symptoms and image-confirmed degenerative spondylolisthesis were offered enrollment in a randomize
42 hort study of 222 patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis who participated in a randomized clini
46 ecompression when operating for degenerative spondylolisthesis with symptomatic spinal stenosis is de