ライフサイエンスコーパス: sprayer

1 n the commercially available and a lab-built sprayer.

2 y than when it was delivered intranasally by sprayer.

3 ample sprayer is a conventional Z-spray type sprayer.

4 llows switching between reference and sample sprayer.

5 rate of 20-40 nl/min using an ultra-low flow sprayer.

6 ed onto a glass slide using an HTX pneumatic sprayer.

7 ter portability due to the robustness of the sprayer.

8 g for the slight variation in signal between sprayers.

9 when using a commercial automatic pneumatic sprayer and a sublimator for lipid imaging analyses.

10 ously moving the sample relative to the DESI sprayer and the inlet of the mass spectrometer.

11 ystem that is physically located between the sprayer and the orifice of a mass spectrometer can serve

12 ranges from 80.7 to 94.5% between the three sprayers and is 86.5% overall.

13 ability ranges from 1 to 224% for individual sprayers and peaks of different spectral abundance.

14 Airbrush, automatic sprayer, and sublimation matrix application methods were

15 a sections are analyzed with three lab-built sprayers, and classification accuracy for adenocarcinoma

16 The ions produced by the analyte sprayer are continuously sampled, as opposed to time-sha

17 nce neither the voltage nor positions of the sprayers are changed, the nanospray has greater spray st

18 The sprayers are independently controlled and do not exhibit

19 eal-time the extracted ion current from each sprayer channel.

20 ncluded changing the electrospray ionization sprayer configuration, increasing the sample injection v

21 Small differences in sprayer construction influence the operating conditions

22 A multiple sprayer DESI source capable of analyzing a larger sample

23 In this study, the impact of sprayer design and geometry on performance in desorption

24 parable for both DESI setups, albeit the new sprayer design yields better sensitivity.

25 A miniaturized ion sprayer device is described which is suitable for coupli

26 The results demonstrated that the dual-ESI-sprayer, dual-inlet design provides reference peaks on e

27 al-ESI-sprayer, Y-shaped inlet; and dual-ESI-sprayer, dual-inlet.

28 son between the mass accuracy using dual-ESI-sprayer, dual-nozzle TOF-MS and that obtained using a do

29 r molecular-formula confirmation, a dual-ESI-sprayer, dual-nozzle version of this design was used.

30 r cone (in-spray supercharging) using a dual-sprayer ESI microchip.

31 itivity porous electrospray ionization (ESI) sprayer for the proteomic analysis of a moderately compl

32 low rate, nebulizing gas pressure, and sonic sprayer geometry.

33 ity to lower noise levels with the porous CE sprayer, illustrated by better signal-to-noise ratios of

34 a solvent system of 3:1 v/v ACN:H(2)O, and a sprayer incident angle, alpha, of 35 degrees gave the hi

35 to maximize the conduction of ions from the sprayer into the mass spectrometer.

36 With the dual-sprayer ion source, both sprays are orthogonal to each o

37 mized for low flow rates, whereas the sample sprayer is a conventional Z-spray type sprayer.

38 The reference sprayer is optimized for low flow rates, whereas the sam

39 s spectrometry (DESI-MS) is assessed, as the sprayer is thought to be a major source of variability.

40 ass spectrometry (CE-MS), using a porous tip sprayer, is proposed for the first time for highly sensi

41 A new electrospray dual sprayer, LockSpray, was developed for accurate mass meas

42 The automatic sprayer method also showed more reproducible results and

43 When using CHCA, the optimized automatic sprayer method and humidified sublimation method resulte

44 ng existing delivery systems (drenches, line sprayers, on-line dips) can significantly reduce fruit d

45 -flow-rate APCI and APPI sources with a GDVN sprayer promise new applications for low- and medium-pol

46 Between sprayers, repeatability is 16%, 9%, 23%, and 34% for hig

47 The presented results confirm that the sprayer setup needs to be closely controlled to obtain r

48 ontrolled to obtain reliable data, and a new sprayer setup with a fixed solvent capillary geometry sh

49 were compared with those obtained using dual-sprayer, single-nozzle TOF-MS.

50 le-design combinations, including single-ESI-sprayer, single-nozzle; dual-ESI-sprayer, single-nozzle;

51 single-ESI-sprayer, single-nozzle; dual-ESI-sprayer, single-nozzle; dual-ESI-sprayer, Y-shaped inlet

52 st with negative high voltage applied at the sprayer source.

53 with fixed spatial relationships between the sprayer, surface, and sampling capillary.

54 ed method developed for the automatic matrix sprayer system resulted in approximately double the numb

55 teristics are important to understanding the sprayer system such as nozzles used in agriculture.

56 e of 100 gai/ha in 200 L water using a track sprayer system, residues of these fungicides on the leaf

57 Typically, the sprayer tip must be very close to the entrance orifice o

58 s temperature, the minimum distance from the sprayer tip to the mass spectrometer inlet and therefore

59 hat was centered on a point on-axis from the sprayer tip to the surface.

60 repeatability is compared for five lab-built sprayers using pork liver sections.

61 To assess the impact of sprayer variability on tissue classification using multi

62 ulizing gas (N(2)) pressure of 3.9 bar and a sprayer voltage of 4.5 kV (positive ionization mode) or

63 When an electronic sprayer was used for matrix coating and with a high-pH (

64 ly reported proteomic application of the ESI sprayer, we evaluated preconcentration with SPME and mul

65 Experiments with a sprayer with a fixed solvent capillary position show tha

66 e; dual-ESI-sprayer, single-nozzle; dual-ESI-sprayer, Y-shaped inlet; and dual-ESI-sprayer, dual-inle