ライフサイエンスコーパス: squamous intraepithelial lesion

1 th no biopsy/normal histology and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.

2 d in a nested case-control study of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions.

3 are stained in both low-grade and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.

4 , and low-grade (LSIL) and high-grade (HSIL) squamous intraepithelial lesions.

5 amous intraepithelial lesions, or high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.

6 7% (95% CI, 2.5%-8.5%; I(2) = 0%) high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.

7 increased risk of progression to high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.

8 ons, and 40 participants (6%) had high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.

9 95% CI, 0.61-1.20) for those with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.

10 s well as in a high proportion of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.

11 most strongly associated with detection of a squamous intraepithelial lesions 4-8 months earlier (odd

12 e, 52 (0.5 percent of all smears); low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, 44 (0.5 percent); high-

13 thelial lesion, 44 (0.5 percent); high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, 6 (0.1 percent); and sq

14 cells of undetermined significance/low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (88.4%) or HPV16 was neg

15 re conducted with histologic anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (A-HSIL) as the dependen

16 Anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (aHSIL) is the immediate

17 HPV, HPV16, and histological anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (aHSIL) were identified

18 to develop in patients with anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (aHSILs) on initial or

19 Eleven of 33 high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and 1 of 12 low-grade s

20 s a risk predictor for virally-mediated anal squamous intraepithelial lesions and cancer (anal diseas

21 ssociated with the development of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and invasive cervical c

22 s may explain the increased risk of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions and invasive cervical c

23 n-regulated in SCCs compared with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and normal squamous epi

24 s of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion) and CIN1+ was also sign

25 gnificance, and 17.0% had high- or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions) and were significantly

26 cells, 149 participants (24%) had low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, and 40 participants (6

27 mavirus infection (HPV), low- and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, and cervical cancer st

28 squamous intraepithelial lesions, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, and SCC specimens.

29 Genital HPV infection and squamous intraepithelial lesions are common among women

30 enrolled women with ICC, high- and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, as well as, HPV-positi

31 Anal squamous intraepithelial lesions (ASIL) or anal intraepi

32 nce interval = 2.4-13.4) more likely to have squamous intraepithelial lesions associated with the det

33 determined significance [ASCUS] or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions) because of an ASCUS Pa

34 on and treatment of biopsy-proven high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (bHSIL) is difficult to

35 Precancerous squamous intraepithelial lesions can be detected by scre

36 Cytological high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (cHSIL) incidence and c

37 roportion increased through ASCUS, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, CIN1, and CIN2 (18%-25

38 Among women with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cytology, HC2 was more l

39 of undetermined significance and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cytology.

40 combinations with either CIN2 or high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cytology; cluster 3 incl

41 cal squamous cells-cannot exclude high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion) for women who were posi

42 arated normal cervical tissues and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions from cervical cancers a

43 ntraepithelial lesions and 1 of 12 low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions had abnormal Fhit expre

44 and treatment of anal histologic high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (hHSIL) prevents anal c

45 analysis of primary normal cervix, low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, high-grade squamous in

46 nce (ASC-US) or as cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) (ASC-H).

47 ficity for a combined endpoint of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) and anal intraepi

48 DNA methylation analysis of anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) biopsies was show

49 avirus (HPV)-associated precancer high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) in human immunode

50 the strategy for the detection of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) or worse.

51 ) spontaneous progression through high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) to carcinoma, and

52 The anal cancer precursor, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL), frequently regre

53 omen have a higher burden of anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) and anal cancer

54 ca, are at high risk for cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) and cervical can

55 ca, are at high risk for cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) and cervical can

56 redict anal HPV16 infection, anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) and, hence, anal

57 elial lesions (LSIL, n = 14), and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) grade 2 (CIN2, n

58 nd serological predictors of anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) in human immunod

59 al human papillomavirus (HPV) and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) in men can infor

60 If left untreated, a subset of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) of the cervix wi

61 High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) or cervical intr

62 pithelial lesions (LSIL), 21 with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL), and 28 with inv

63 traepithelial neoplasia (CIN2-3), high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL), and invasive ce

64 gy (LAST) in low-grade (LSIL) and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL), and the AIN cla

65 al history of its precursor, anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL).

66 ility is high and high-threshold (high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion [HSIL] on cytology) if a

67 lude high-grade lesion [ASC-H] or high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion [HSIL] with positive HPV

68 or managing premalignant lesions (high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions [HSIL]) associated with

69 most instances, women with ASC-H, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, HSIL, and atypical glan

70 Anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs) ablation may re

71 llomavirus can cause preinvasive, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs) as precursors t

72 2173 with low-grade and 1282 with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs) diagnosed cytol

73 etection and determinants of anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs) in men who have

74 e, but more than one third of the high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs) in screening po

75 Anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs) precede anal ca

76 s) and the anal cancer precursor, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs), among young MS

77 illomavirus (HPV)-associated anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs).

78 ancer, anal cancer is preceded by high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs).

79 istically associated with risk of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs).

80 ents with focal intra-anal tissue high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs).

81 cervical cancers and most of the high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs).

82 nts had invasive cervical cancer, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs; n=166), or low-

83 IN-2 if concurrent with cytologic high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions [HSILs]).

84 is of cervical cancer precursors (high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions [HSILs]).

85 >/=2 years and/or progression to high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (ie, cervical intraepit

86 ex with men, HPV DNA was detected in 19% and squamous intraepithelial lesions in 14%.

87 tions may explain the increased incidence of squamous intraepithelial lesions in HIV-seropositive wom

88 DLS in the detection of low- and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in Papanicolaou test wh

89 tiate low-grade (LSIL) and high grade (HSIL) squamous intraepithelial lesions, in the cervix and anus

90 squamous cells, cannot exclude a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, low-grade squamous intr

91 etermined significance (ASCUS) and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) triage study (ALT

92 positive HPV test, and persistent low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) were significantl

93 also in HIV-infected women with a low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL; benchmark indicat

94 e 16 (HPV-16) can lead to low- or high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL or HSIL).

95 etermined significance (ASC-US) or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) who were triaged

96 etermined significance (ASC-US) or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) who were triaged

97 e compared 66 women diagnosed with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL), 21 with high-gr

98 pecimens, including normal cervix, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL), high-grade SILs

99 pical squamous cells (ASC, n = 5), low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL, n = 14), and hig

100 etermined significance [ASC-US] or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion [LSIL]) and a positive H

101 e is known about the prevalence of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSILs) and the anal ca

102 Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSILs) have been descr

103 undetermined significance (ASCUS), low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSILs), and high-grade

104 thelial lesions (HSILs; n=166), or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSILs); were positive

105 ultivariable analysis, a history of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion (odds ratio [OR], 4.2; 9

106 ng cervical precancer, defined as high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix.

107 In SA, cytology high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or greater (HSIL+) had b

108 ection of HPV16, HPV18, or both or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or worse cytology had be

109 ction of HPV16, HPV18, or both or high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or worse cytology had hi

110 Biopsy-confirmed high-grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions or invasive cancer.

111 e squamous intraepithelial lesion, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, or high-grade squamous

112 and/or recurrent high-grade CIN2+/high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions post-treatment.

113 High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion prevalence was similar d

114 (CTL) responses have a protective effect in squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL) development.

115 Local cervical treatment for squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL) or cervical intrae

116 ollowing outcomes: high-risk HPV prevalence; squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL) or cervical intrae

117 omen with cytologic evidence of a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL) were referred for

118 ction with MY09/MY11/HMB01 HPV primers), and squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL) (by cytological e

119 V) infections, abnormal cervical smears, and squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL) among women with

120 the benign (88%) and precancerous (92%) HPV squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL) and colocalized t

121 been reported to be 1.2-83.3% for low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL) and to be 13.3-83

122 ons between human papillomavirus (HPV), anal squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL), and human immuno

123 n the natural history of the precursor, anal squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL), are limited.

124 Screening methods for anal squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs) are suboptimal.

125 vitamin A (retinol) deficiency and cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs) in human immunod

126 ypes most commonly associated with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs) were 56 and 53.

127 test results, defined as at least low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs), in 774 human im

128 rus (HIV) are at increased risk for cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs), the precursors

129 ory of the precursor to this carcinoma, anal squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs).

130 was normal and 97 specimens from women with squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs).

131 rapy (HAART) on HPV persistence and cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs).

132 infection (by polymerase chain reaction) and squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs).

133 IV infection have a higher risk for cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions than do women without H

134 sed as the lesions progressed from low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions to HSILs and finally to

135 ogression of human papillomavirus-associated squamous intraepithelial lesions to invasive cervical ca

136 cells of undetermined significance-low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion triage study (ALTS).

137 Cells of Undetermined Significance/Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Triage Study (ALTS, 1997

138 Cells of Undetermined Significance/Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Triage Study provided bl

139 s of Undetermined Significance and Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Triage Study who were tr

140 cells of undetermined significance-low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion triage study with the us

141 s of Undetermined Significance and Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Triage Study, in which w

142 etermined Significance (ASCUS) and Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Triage Study.

143 Cells of Undetermined Significance/Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions Triage Study (ALTS), we

144 Cells of Undetermined Significance-Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion) Triage Study and who re

145 logy, the pooled prevalence estimate of anal squamous intraepithelial lesions was 22.4% (95% CI, 17.3

146 An elevated risk for high-grade anal squamous intraepithelial lesions was associated with inf

147 The prevalence of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions was strongly related to

148 grade disease (ie, CIN 2 or 3, or high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion) was 6.09 (3.87-9.60) co

149 nt condom use by their partners, no cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions were detected in 32 pat

150 High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions were identified in 47 (

151 Squamous intraepithelial lesions were present in 15% (17

152 wever, HIV-infected men with high-grade anal squamous intraepithelial lesions were significantly more

153 regression and progression rates of HPV and squamous intraepithelial lesions, were obtained from the

154 observed in HPV-positive cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions when compared with norm

155 s of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions who are at higher and l

156 If left untreated, some cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions will progress to invasi