ライフサイエンスコーパス: stance

1 weight standing, 90% body weight single-leg stance).

2 They also performed a control task (quiet stance).

3 ity was concentrated in the swing and end of stance.

4 rmined by sensory input from the limb during stance.

5 torque (T(z)) was investigated during quiet stance.

6 roprioceptive-vestibular interactions during stance.

7 jaw, long, gracile limbs, and a quadrupedal stance.

8 e whole stance and for the 4 subdivisions of stance.

9 ly long execution times and an uncomfortable stance.

10 Most had a characteristic gait and stance.

11 en during the sway task as compared to quiet stance.

12 to the APAs in other phases and during quiet stance.

13 to cause oestrous sows to take up the mating stance.

14 bilateral stimuli are applied during normal stance.

15 ative LR (unloading) within the first 20% of stance.

16 even starting from a neutral or pessimistic stance.

17 s this stance, as well as the next swing and stance.

18 tifying social cues that trigger the correct stance.

19 s stance and until the middle of the current stance.

20 a hard surface, soft surface, and in tandem stance.

21 acity to represent other minds-a mentalistic stance.

22 45%BW compared to + 25%BW (p < 0.01) at 30% stance.

23 y more into line with the Republican Party's stance.

24 MLA drop but also restrict MLA rise in late stance.

25 al cognition but ultimately take an agnostic stance.

26 t with excessive hip and knee flexion during stance.

27 slow gaze away occurred in the beginning of stance.

28 differentially modulating the impulse within stance.

29 relimb and ended when both forelimbs were in stance.

30 care, and a non-directive psychotherapeutic stance.

31 rmal push-off against the ground during late stance.

32 dlimb vs. forelimb lengths on sauropodomorph stance.

33 mean of 35% in early stance and 76% in late stance.

34 tion of percentages of print area and single stance.

35 ns, both pertinent to the control of bipedal stance.

36 s on the Balance Error Scoring System tandem stance.

37 ortening velocity and poorer economy in late stance.

38 necessary to provide stability to the design stance.

39 entions is undermined by the artistic design stance.

40 ack loop between the ritual and instrumental stances.

41 with concurrent monitoring of head and gaze stances.

42 2 (43 %) adopted a pro-mandatory vaccination stance, 13 (46 %) were neutral or had presented argument

43 ough an investigative, non-judging, analytic stance, a focus on evidence-based practice and a curbed

44 wing an investigative, non-judging, analytic stance, a focus on evidence-based practice that curbs th

45 clinical history was defined using epistemic stance, a linguistic construct expressing a writer's deg

46 The artistic design stance, a requisite for artistic understanding, is an at

47 lence of comments shows a generally balanced stance across the community, and a relationship with cat

48 an intervention that encouraged their public stance against conflict at school.

49 arity on nonpolitical features; and 2) their stance agreement on a contentious political topic.

50 causation, content domains, and explanatory stances, all of which have cognitive consequences.

51 etween modalities, with 5% RMSE for step and stance and 10% RMSE for double support.

52 during crouch gait by a mean of 35% in early stance and 76% in late stance.

53 re asked to stand for a 30 s period of quiet stance and a 200 s period of calf vibration.

54 ion of basic exposure to the artistic design stance and artistic understanding.

55 stride length and time, together with longer stance and double-support phases, are associated with in

56 e discharge rate, especially during the late stance and early swing phases, decrease discharge variab

57 knee adduction angular impulse for the whole stance and for the 4 subdivisions of stance.

58 nial measurements so far compiled to examine stance and gait in quadrupedal ornithischians.

59 d consequently, debate continues about their stance and gait.

60 y in the STN and leg muscles during the late stance and lift-off phase of the contralateral leg when

61 l structure is critical to understanding the stance and locomotion of these enormous herbivores and,

62 ators were many health workers' humanitarian stance and positive national commitment to pursuing univ

63 Perturbations were initiated during early stance and randomly delivered to intact and prosthetic s

64 ution are the development of upright bipedal stance and reduction in body hair.

65 Results Statistics reported are for stance and side configurations, respectively.

66 mate load, resilience, and toughness in both stance and sideways-fall loading configurations each had

67 These results were independent of stance and suggest an integrated and coordinated reorgan

68 Estimations of the relative cost of stance and swing matched well with previous simulations

69 o calculate sagittal plane joint work during stance and swing phase.

70 alking along a circular path, adjustments in stance and swing phases are observed, which could alter

71 itioning, the H-reflexes elicited during the stance and swing phases of locomotion (i.e., the locomot

72 ctor neurons, MDN directly controls both the stance and swing phases of the backward stepping cycle.

73 F test provided further information for the stance and swing phases.

74 ized spatiotemporal features of gait such as stance and swing time.

75 imb functions essential to legged systems in stance and swing.

76 easoning that allegedly underlies the design stance and the segregation of the component stages), sug

77 contributions to sagittal-plane H during mid-stance and transverse-plane H at toe-off.

78 lected starting from the end of the previous stance and until the middle of the current stance.

79 ges in velocity of the center of mass in mid-stance and upward and smaller forward velocity changes n

80 es that a previously unrealised diversity of stances and gaits were employed by quadrupedal ornithisc

81 he moral stance to the intentional and group stances and to shared intentionality.

82 sual input denial, which typically prolonged stances and/or swings, also depended on the phase of the

83 For a stance (and/or a swing of the other paw), visual informa

84 le coactivation during limb loading in early stance, and (2) changes in the magnitude of step to step

85 ted with mechanical stimulation during quiet stance, and 98% responded to stimulation.

86 exposure to an artwork, the artistic design stance, and artistic understanding.

87 Step, stance, and double support durations (gait cycle percent

88 nd longer steps, narrower base of support at stance, and lower variability in EMG parameters than non

89 An evolutionary stance appears to provide support for linguistic nativis

90 sensitivity to context, history, and design stance are crucial to theories of art appreciation.

91 our claim that basic exposure and the design stance are necessary conditions of artistic understandin

92 The early stages of stance are very important in gait pattern recognition be

93 pping and the pattern of affected swings and stances are closely related to the previously described

94 f visual input during a stance prolongs this stance, as well as the next swing and stance.

95 Stance average vGRFs were less asymmetric using J-shaped

96 ped versus C-shaped RSPs resulted in greater stance average vGRFs, slower step frequencies, and longe

97 edial longitudinal arch mobility, single-leg stance balance, range of motion (ROM) (first metatarsoph

98 The use of single stance body weight can be a useful in conjunction with t

99 ient below the threshold level of 85% single stance body weight sustained a pathological fracture.

100 oved economy (force/activation) during early stance, but this benefit was offset by faster shortening

101 al Oncology (ASCO) believes that a proactive stance by the Society to minimize excessive exposure to

102 n some cases increasing support for an issue stance by up to 12 percentage points.

103 Q-TolR complex assumes a proton nonpermeable stance, characterized by the TolQ pentamer's flexure to

104 h as locomotion (reciprocal innervation) and stance (coactivation pattern).

105 one femur from each pair to the single-limb stance configuration (hereafter, stance configuration) a

106 single-limb stance configuration (hereafter, stance configuration) and assignment of the paired femur

107 ral organization switching between swing and stance control for each leg.

108 ements, in a pattern consistent with upright stance control.

109 We show that freezers presented PSI in quiet stance (control task), but they presented loss of PSI (i

110 ying." The notion of ritual and instrumental stances does not resolve this issue, and ignores the ins

111 resulting in an increase in step length and stance duration and a decrease in swing and step cycle d

112 Postural stability was assessed via stance duration and center of pressure (CoP) velocity.

113 The stance duration decreased in the ipsilateral HL, and inc

114 ith modulation of a single control parameter-stance duration-while asymmetric variability consisted o

115 associated with changes to leg force but not stance duration.

116 o forward locomotion, with shorter cycle and stance durations and longer stride lengths.

117 ayed and greater knee extensor moment during stance (e.g., 188.5 vs. 137.5 Nm).

118 The institutional stance emerges early in development and its precursors c

119 STANCE ensures tissue rotation-invariant results, with a

120 e phase/cycle duration relationships for the stance/extension phase decreased, whereas that of the sw

121 e phase/cycle duration relationships for the stance/extension phase increased in the varying limb fro

122 d Pennsylvania have adopted a tougher policy stance favoring the retention of preemptive oil and gas

123 our ability to adopt different motivational stances flexibly during social learning and transmission

124 ed a greater displacement between their fast stance foot and their upper body, relative to the slow s

125 t and their upper body, relative to the slow stance foot, in the ML direction.

126 artitioning the forces acting underneath the stance foot.

127 sis (FEA) was conducted to simulate terminal stance (from heel-off to toe-off) using the designed pro

128 ng motor function characterized by ataxia of stance, gait, speech, and fine motor disturbances.

129 However, the conditioned change in the stance H-reflex was positively correlated with change in

130 Denial during the first half of a stance has a greater effect than during the second half.

131 This stance has dramatically changed with the recognition of

132 environments, both instrumental- and ritual-stance imitation can emerge from generic learning mechan

133 O fascicle lengthening and shortening during stance in all walking conditions were evident after dene

134 career, Hughlings Jackson adopted a critical stance in his neurological papers, seeking to expose sho

135 ore influential in determining the locomotor stance in Sauropodomorpha during ontogeny, challenging p

136 consist of alternating movements, e.g. swing-stance in stepping, jaw opening and closing during chewi

137 release task was also performed during quiet stance in three positions: in the middle of the sway ran

138 s, including a limb-like substrate-supported stance in which the shoulder and elbow were flexed and t

139 xibly choose between instrumental and ritual stances in social learning.

140 uthors' recommendation "to assume the design stance" in the name of understanding works of art blurs

141 nobservable mental states, the institutional stance interprets social interactions in terms of role-b

142 The artistic design stance is an important part of art appreciation, but it

143 Although I agree that an artistic design stance is important for art appreciation, I suggest that

144 Our overarching stance is that rational nanocarrier design is crucial fo

145 cnemius avoidance" gait pattern reduced late-stance knee contact force by 12 +/- 12% (p = 0.029, pair

146 al receptivity, quantified as the copulatory stance known as lordosis.

147 Stance leg control solely relies on dedicated spinal ref

148 le" strategy involving systematic changes to stance leg hip moment.

149 dback to maintain upright balance, while the stance leg is stabilized by low-level reflexes and a beh

150 power of the body segment, particularly the stance leg strongly correlates with whole-body joint mec

151 Furthermore, joint dynamics of the stance leg were accurately estimated from single sacrum-

152 Segmental analysis confirmed that the stance-leg joint mechanical power exhibits the strong co

153 ta, the whole-body EE was estimated from the stance-leg sagittal power with efficiency coefficients a

154 During stance, LWIs failed to reduce medial peak pressures apar

155 promote network adequacy, but a pro-provider stance may not be inherently pro-consumer or even pro-pa

156 ques help control limb swing velocity.(6) In stance, minimizing antagonist muscle and joint passive f

157 revious qualitative hypotheses regarding the stance of Euparkeria.

158 aucity of outcomes data raises concerns, the stance of not intervening until more is known is not a n

159 isual input during a swing prolongs the next stance of that forelimb.

160 ws sources, rather than with the ideological stance of the content producer, suggesting that active e

161 Sentinel lymph nodes set the stance of the immune system to a localized tumor and are

162 This is consistent with the stance of the Institute of Medicine on guideline develop

163 ated feline soleus (SO) change length during stance of walking when intact SO synergists are actively

164 Depending on one's stance on an issue, such pitfalls may also be turned int

165 or a less punitive and more permissive legal stance on cannabis, such as decriminalisation and legali

166 ge, and clear information on each religion's stance on organ donation.

167 ordable Care Act with a "better reform", his stance on reproductive rights, and his approaches to oth

168 However, little is known about the public's stance on this issue.

169 eural substrate (i.e., a sensory recruitment stance on VWM storage).

170 that the VAA Bot improves knowledge of party stances on issues of great importance to each user.

171 Our results show that researchers' stances on scientific questions are associated with what

172 There are conflicting stances on the use of energy devices and laparoscopy by

173 -mounted IMU data incorporating a single-leg stance partition and gait speed information.

174 1.5%, 2.1%, and 5.9% (r = 0.71), while late-stance peak contact force increased by 1.6%, 0.9% and 3.

175 total) at the thigh, shank, and foot, early-stance peak knee contact force increased by 1.5%, 2.1%,

176 ted for each walking trial for dorsiflexion (stance phase 15-25%) and for plantarflexion (stance phas

177 stance phase 15-25%) and for plantarflexion (stance phase 85-95%), the inclination was less medially

178 During overground or treadmill walking, the stance phase and cycle durations are reduced as speed in

179 ces forward during the midabdominal prolegs' stance phase and is therefore decoupled from visible tra

180 xis was determined for moving windows of 10% stance phase and its orientation reported if the rotatio

181 tralateral forelimb are retracted during the stance phase in locomotion.

182 ee flexion at the heel strike and 50% of the stance phase increased while the peak knee flexion in th

183 nical care, suggesting a focus on correcting stance phase mechanics could potentially improve mobilit

184 inetics and muscle co-contraction during the stance phase of gait.

185 oint active and passive reactions during the stance phase of gait.

186 he talocrural and subtalar joints during the stance phase of gait.

187 During the stance phase of locomotion, ankle plantarflexion increas

188 degree of crouch, nor one another during the stance phase of locomotion.

189 while subjects were standing and during the stance phase of step initiation.

190 weight exerted on the heel during the early stance phase of the gait cycle.

191 responses occurred overwhelmingly during the stance phase of the step cycle in the ipsilateral foreli

192 and soleus co-contraction (standing and late-stance phase of walking) when compared with sitting and

193 s were applied to the ankle joint during the stance phase of walking, and least-squares system identi

194 roup B, n = 8) of knee hyperextension during stance phase of walking.

195 extension and a delay in the transition from stance phase to swing phase, demonstrating V2b INs are r

196 g phase was statistically higher than during stance phase when varying both loading and motion condit

197 ied between foot-flat and toe-off during the stance phase, and changes in center of mass kinematics w

198 ed internally at the heel strike, 50% of the stance phase, and maximum angle of the swing phase.

199 sulting control law applies control once per stance phase, at the instant of leg touch-down, and depe

200 s were observed between the two lines (short stance phase, little double-support, low leg lift, and l

201 locomotion (stride frequency, stride length, stance phase, swing phase, duty factor) and speed range

202 oot and the ground moves forwards during the stance phase.

203 d distally at the heel strike and 50% of the stance phase.

204 rons provide the hindleg power stroke during stance phase; LUL130 neurons lift the legs at the end of

205 Two other limb mechanisms operate in the stance phase; they counteract distortions of the locomot

206 Peak stance-phase knee and hip extension increased by 12 degr

207 n assistance favorably reduced the excessive stance-phase knee extensor moment present during crouch

208 ntact angle explains 80% of the variation in stance-phase limb loading following the perturbation.

209 26% of the energy used by the limbs and the stance-phase muscles consume the remaining 74%, independ

210 dlegs and the relative duration of swing and stance phases for individual limbs is unchanged compared

211 vered during the early swing, late swing and stance phases of the step cycle in three separate sessio

212 k firing at the transition between swing and stance phases.

213 support moment impulse (p = 0.016), and hip stance positive work (p = 0.029) across walking speeds.

214 d visual dual-task interference effects with stance postural control in healthy young adults.

215 g levels of interactions with tandem Romberg stance postural control, and that interactions within th

216 Our model predictions suggest that upright stance probably evolved for nonthermoregulatory reasons.

217 realignment may improve knee function during stance, probably because of change of lever arm.

218 Denial of visual input during a stance prolongs this stance, as well as the next swing a

219 dy shape and its relationship with locomotor stance (quadruped/biped) changed in ontogeny, hatchling,

220 In toddlers, the stance-related motor pool activity migrates to the sacra

221 ateral and medial changes in velocity in mid-stance, respectively.

222 Such a stance risks stigmatizing COVID-19 vaccine trials in Afr

223 Downstream analyses reveal STANCE's potential in spatial transcriptomics analysis.

224 to physics, this fundamental epistemological stance severely limits the ability of quantum theory to

225 eness varied between ataxia severities, gait/stance showed a robust granular linear scaling across th

226 children aged 6-12 years performed a tandem stance task with and without auditory noise.

227 ity of the center of pressure during bipedal stance tasks.

228 center of pressure sway velocity (Unilateral Stance Test, UST scores) were taken at baseline, immedia

229 zers presented lower PSI levels during quiet stance than non-freezers and HC (P < 0.05).

230 s as first-line agents for Black patients, a stance that should be reconsidered given some evidence o

231 ossible evolutionary origins of the "bifocal stance" that may have enabled a major transition in huma

232 If we take a hard-stance, that dream mentation only occurs during REM slee

233 The bifocal stance theory posits two stances - the ritual and the instrumental - each a learn

234 sedly unique ability to adopt a teleological stance: the understanding of a demonstrator's goal-based

235 y was significantly greater in swing than in stance; the difference was more marked for the nuclear p

236 The central idea of the bifocal stance theory (BST) by Jagiello et al. has substantial r

237 The bifocal stance theory (BST) deploys two copying strategies which

238 The bifocal stance theory (BST) focuses on cultural evolution withou

239 The bifocal stance theory (BST) of cultural evolution has prompted a

240 The bifocal stance theory (BST) of cultural evolution proposes that

241 Jagiello and colleagues offer a bifocal stance theory of cultural evolution for understanding ho

242 The bifocal stance theory posits two stances - the ritual and the in

243 Jagiello et al.'s bifocal stance theory provides a useful theoretical framework fo

244 ther novel, testable predictions for bifocal stance theory.

245 In late stance, these tapes also inhibited MLA rise (LD by 29%,

246 n the control group; Stride time (p = 0.03), stance time (p = 0.04) and swing time (p = 0.04) were hi

247 tension (lower extremity strength), unipedal stance time (static balance), and maximal step length (d

248 subjects' perceived exertion and intact-limb stance time when they carried load.

249 locity, cadence, stride length, stride time, stance time, and swing time were calculated in terms of

250 aled significant disparities in stride time, stance time, and the trajectories of the centre of press

251 iding good predictions of peak vertical GRF, stance time, contact length and vertical centre of mass

252 f peak vertical ground reaction force (GRF), stance time, contact length and vertical centre of mass

253 city, stride frequency, symmetry, percentage stance time, stride length, and step width.

254 n stride time with a concomitant increase in stance time.

255 gaits characterized by increased percentage stance times and shorter stride lengths.

256 factors, lower stride frequencies and longer stance times compared to mammals at self-selected speeds

257 discuss adopting a legal rather than a moral stance to enforce ethical standards.

258 Bullot & Reber (B&R) put forth a design stance to fuse psychological and art historical accounts

259 ; LUL130 neurons lift the legs at the end of stance to initiate swing.

260 tic, and evolutionary relations of the moral stance to the intentional and group stances and to share

261 gest that explicating "fidelity" reveals the stances to be heuristic explanatory strategies: first-pa

262 d contralateral responses peaking during the stance-to-swing transition and swing phase of the ipsila

263 foot's ability to roll forward at the end of stance, toe springs may also have some effect on natural

264 The natural history of our moral stance told here in this commentary reveals the close ne

265 ate alcohol policies that adopted a punitive stance toward pregnant women who drink alcohol did not r

266 Finding the right stance toward technology requires great balance and sens

267 some people more likely to take a strategic stance toward their goals, and can this tendency be cult

268 ay help physicians to take a more empathetic stance toward their patients' requests and to devise mor

269 cutors might know and adopt an interrogative stance toward them.

270 impact on those with a favourable or neutral stance towards climate activism.

271 Such a passive stance towards dietary chemicals, probably costly in the

272 in emission levels necessitates a proactive stance towards ecological sustainability, encompassing i

273 the vestibular control of uprightness during stance using galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) under

274 Normal quiet stance was associated with intermediate values.

275 n, arguing that the evolution of the bifocal stance was driven by an explosion in cultural complexity

276 tor functions, weight-support and posture in stance was the only obvious one.

277 s muscle, a hindlimb muscle activated during stance, was used to identify extent of atrophy.

278 Taking a dynamic stance, we consider cognitive tests as functions that tr

279 entify the optimum threshold level of single stance weight bearing to predict fracture and compared t

280 ct the corrective strategies during the next stance, well in advance of foot touchdown.

281 ward slip-like treadmill perturbation during stance were recorded in ten healthy young adults and ten

282 the journal's research reports and editorial stance were sometimes inflected with colonial attitudes,

283 f the paretic ankle was decreased during mid-stance when compared to the non-paretic side; a change i

284 In contrast to the mentalistic stance, which helps us predict and explain unconstrained

285 tside foot slips during early, mid-, or late stance while following 1.0- or 2.0-m radius semicircular

286 stoichiometric ECL-emissive units in a cubic stance; while the aliphatic vertices of ZnPC helped it s

287 pport postural changes, particularly a wider stance width and restricted shoulder sway for golfers wh

288 Swinging with a narrower stance width at address (r = - 0.62, p = 0.02) with more

289 While stance width changes the mechanical state of the body, t

290 However, when stance width was increased so that the body was more sta

291 d leg and varus/valgus angle, toe-out angle, stance width, weight transfer, and shoulder sway.

292 three segments was reduced by increasing the stance width.

293 wards with eyes closed standing with various stance widths and sitting.

294 tion across a range of head orientations and stance widths in healthy humans.

295 (COP) was measured during 4 minutes of quiet stance with eyes opened.

296 similar to feedback that stabilizes upright stance with near-minimum muscle activation, but was not

297 The participants performed a single-leg stance with unanticipated horizontal perturbations in fo

298 implications of the instrumental and ritual stances with regard to various evolutionary explanations

299 thy young adults stood in normal and Romberg stances with six vibrating actuators positioned on the t

300 d peak negative LR 10% earlier in normalized stance, with a 10% shorter interval between positive and