戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 o receive the intervention before or after a standardized patient.
2  likely to contextualize care for individual standardized patients.
3 at contextual errors can be identified using standardized patients.
4 se of other performance assessments, such as standardized patients.
5 linical evaluation exercises, and the use of standardized patients.
6 nology was converted into keywords shared by standardized patients.
7     Surgical residents were rated by trained Standardized Patients according to a behaviorally anchor
8                                      We used standardized patients and high-fidelity mannequins to si
9             Subjective, multiple-choice, and standardized patient assessments, although reliable, und
10                                              Standardized patient cases in nutrition counseling for c
11 gitally encoded guideline recommendations to standardized patient data extracted from hospital inform
12 ithin 6 weeks of treatment as indicated by a standardized patient diary.
13 days after discharge from surgery along with standardized patient education was implemented across al
14                                        Eight standardized patient educators were trained in collabora
15  with a nutrition intervention session using standardized patient educators.
16 s were assessed using 4 previously validated standardized patient encounters performed by each partic
17 likely to probe for contextual issues in the standardized patient encounters than students who did no
18 eted the Dry Eye Questionnaire 5 (DEQ-5) and Standardized Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED),
19 ommunication skills during an audio-recorded standardized patient evaluation visit at median follow-u
20 ts (Mini-CEX [clinical evaluation exercise], standardized patient examinations) when ratings occur im
21  internal and family medicine along with the standardized patient experience receives excellent ratin
22 rkship included 4 nutrition sessions and the standardized patient experience, whereas the Family Medi
23 erkship included 1 nutrition session and the standardized patient experience.
24                                 Twenty-seven standardized patients generated 226 independent RELATE r
25 ) in first-person bereavement narratives and standardized Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) tota
26                                          The standardized patient image series included 9 images, of
27                                              Standardized patient information was collected by questi
28 eived 3 simulated office visits, each with a standardized patient instructor (SPI) portraying a patie
29  individualized communication training using standardized patient instructors while patients received
30 (eg, the use of patient-centered counseling, standardized patient instructors, role playing, or a com
31  from the 2019 to 2020 cohort year to assess standardized patient interrater reliability (IRR).
32                 Clinical evaluation included standardized patient interview and medical record query
33 omen with acute asthma were evaluated with a standardized patient interview and medical record review
34                                        Using standardized patients ("mystery clients"), we assessed c
35 ased simulations as well as encounters with 'standardized' patients, nurses or physician colleagues.
36 comprehensive clinical examination using the standardized patient/objective structured clinical exami
37     Detection of the melanoma moulage on the standardized patient occurred more often by trained stud
38 es that use newer refractive technologies in standardized patient populations would help address the
39 linical care and clinical research to obtain standardized patient-reported drug allergy history.
40 ngaged in simulated clinical encounters with standardized patients representing those with low socioe
41 ester Quality of Life Instrument (MMQL) is a standardized patient self-report instrument designed to
42 n Occupational Performance Measure (COPM), a standardized patient self-report of function.
43  exercise, physicians saw a 52-year-old male standardized patient (SP) (presenting as Black or White)
44                                              Standardized patients (SPs) evaluated each resident's cl
45                          METHODS/Unannounced standardized patients (SPs) presenting with classic pulm
46     Specifically, we trained Black and White standardized patients (SPs) to be "activated" or "typica
47 ata from vignette interviews and unannounced standardized patients (SPs).
48 essful way of involving patients; the use of standardized patients to teach breast examination improv
49  of these, 116 were randomly selected to see standardized patients, to complete vignettes, or both.
50 tudy, between September 2019 and April 2022, standardized patients used the RELATE rating scale to ev
51 o were asked to independently reflect on the standardized patient videos did not show any significant
52 nagement of patient scenarios, presented via standardized patient videos of actors portraying patient
53  who received special training and acted as "standardized patients" visited a random sample of pharma
54 nowledge assessments and over 2000 anonymous standardized patient visits to providers in India to exa
55                        During audio-recorded standardized patient visits, intervention clinicians had
56 lity of clinical practice as measured by the standardized patients was 73% correct (95% CI, 72.1% to
57           Interactions between providers and standardized patients were assessed against internationa
58 to determine their preferred treatment for a standardized patient with large varices and examined the
59 y to develop appropriate treatment plans for standardized patients with contextual issues (69% [95% C
60 r developing appropriate treatment plans for standardized patients with medical issues (54% [95% CI,