戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 kin conductance response or fear potentiated startle.
2 comotor activity, and prepulse inhibition of startle.
3 ression underlying short-term habituation of startle.
4 -irradiation for activity, coordination, and startle.
5 cluding marked attenuation of light-enhanced startle.
6 s assessed by the prepulse inhibition of the startle.
7 -induced prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle.
8 ct on the speed at which fish responded to a startle.
9 ssessed under extinction by fear-potentiated startle.
10 on available on the aged olfactory system is startling.
11 ffect on activity and prepulse inhibition of startle 1-week post-irradiation that dissipated each wee
12 hreat memory, measured with fear-potentiated startle 7 days after acquisition, is attenuated by 60% i
13 -cells abolishes short-latency tail-elicited startles [8, 9], we hypothesized that M-cell activity wa
14                                              Startling acoustic stimuli (SAS) can accelerate reaction
15 om two different paradigms (fear-potentiated startle, affect-modulated startle) in two independent st
16                      We found an increase in startle amplitude and plasma corticosterone levels 30 mi
17  in the elevated plus maze or basal acoustic startle amplitude.
18 are represented in such natural sounds, with startle and burrowing behaviors.
19   Stressed females showed increased acoustic startle and decreased sleep maintenance, indicative of h
20 , which has been associated with exaggerated startle and deficient sensorimotor gating.
21  Abnormal information processing of acoustic startle and depressive-like behaviors are also observed.
22 d auditory processing, with reduced acoustic startle and distorted auditory brainstem responses.
23  including a loss of light-enhanced acoustic startle and less stress-induced hypophagia.
24 search in the past decades on habituation of startle and other escape responses, the underlying neura
25 ensitization of BLA manifested as heightened startle and PPI deficits in response to subsequent subth
26 stive association (p < 10(-6)) with baseline startle and PPI in the discovery cohort.
27  and environmental contributions to baseline startle and PPI showed a substantial single nucleotide p
28 a Spectrum project was assessed for baseline startle and PPI.
29 ygenic score for schizophrenia with baseline startle and PPI.
30 on genetic variants associated with baseline startle and PPI; 2) estimate the single nucleotide polym
31  exposure) on amygdala systems that modulate startle and prepulse inhibition (PPI), an operational me
32 e that could underlie certain core deficits (startle and prepulse inhibition) that are observed in po
33 ated with HDAC4 expression, fear-potentiated startle and resting-state functional connectivity of the
34 ted, low doses of ethanol induced an initial startle and slow ramping of group activity, whereas high
35 lementary roles in facilitating the acoustic startle and visceromotor reflexes.
36 n addition to the characteristic 'stiffness, startles and stumbles' of hyperekplexia, apnoea attacks
37 ng (measured by prepulse inhibition (PPI) of startle) and mismatch negativity (MMN).
38 al interaction, cognitive function, acoustic startle, and amphetamine sensitivity, with some sex-depe
39 odify anxiety-related phenotypes (avoidance, startle, and conditioned fear), we induced transient for
40 arly microsurgical approaches demonstrated a startling array of regenerative and morphogenetic proces
41 such as grooming, nest building and acoustic startle as early as 1-2 months of age.
42      Upon repeated exposures, this olfactory startle attenuates with the characteristics of habituati
43 efCS presented 6 seconds after the US caused startle attenuation (Study2 and 3) and positively valenc
44 termination elicit appetitive responses like startle attenuation.
45 at 1 or 4 dpf, showed consistent deficits in startle behavior at 7 dpf, including lower responsivenes
46 ay that is essential for the M-cell-mediated startle behavior in larval zebrafish.
47 nal consequences of exposures, we quantified startle behavior in response to acoustic/vibrational sti
48 The neural circuit underlying the C-start, a startle behavior in which the fish forms a "C"-shaped bo
49 cue of major aspects of adult locomotion and startle behavior required octopamine, but a complementar
50  fiber neurons help activate M-cell-mediated startle behavior.
51 of older fathers had reduced exploratory and startle behaviors and exhibited similar brain DNA methyl
52 cover a mechanism for generating alternative startle behaviors; local sensory inputs drive inhibitory
53 activity, Rtkn2 for intensity of reaction to startle, Bmp2 for wound healing, Il15 and Id2 for severa
54 at some species can perform a second type of startle called the S-start [5-7].
55 ticulospinal Mauthner cells (M-cells) of the startle circuit have been considered to be dedicated to
56          We find that pappaa is expressed by startle circuit neurons, and expression of wild-type but
57 the Mauthner cells (M-cells) in the goldfish startle circuit, which receive visual and auditory input
58  (M-cell), the decision-making neuron of the startle circuit.
59                  These findings suggest that startle circuits are particularly sensitive to forebrain
60  Progress in DNA sequencing has revealed the startling complexity of cancer genomes, which typically
61                                            A startle cue decreased intracortical inhibition, but not
62 ad similarly shorter reaction times during a startle cue in all motor tasks.
63 ing stimulus), and the effect of an acoustic startle cue on MEPs elicited by cervicomedullary stimula
64  tasks, reaction times were shorter during a startle cue while performing a power grip but not index
65                                  An acoustic startle cue, a stimulus that engages the reticular syste
66                                  An acoustic startle cue, which engages the reticular system, suppres
67                         Skin conductance and startle data served as objective psychophysiological ind
68 e is known about circular granular ratchets, startling devices able to convert vertical vibrations in
69 dysfunction underlies neuromotor deficits in startle disease and autism spectrum disorders.
70 yRs) have been linked to human hyperekplexia/startle disease and autism spectrum disorders.
71 on several diseases such as chronic pain and startle disease by targeting glycine receptors (GlyRs).
72                             Hyperekplexia or startle disease is a rare clinical syndrome characterize
73                             Hyperekplexia or startle disease is a serious neurological condition affe
74                                        Human startle disease is caused by mutations in glycine recept
75 a1 subunit mutation (Q177K) in a novel mouse startle disease mutant shaky Structural data suggest tha
76  mechanism by which GlyR dysfunction induces startle disease.
77  mechanism by which GlyR dysfunction induces startle disease.
78 it of the glycine receptor (GlyR), cause the startle disease/hyperekplexia channelopathy in man.
79 s disruption triggers a paediatric and adult startle disorder, hyperekplexia.
80                                  There was a startling diversity within and among species in the type
81 ed PPI disruption without affecting baseline startle; dorsal striatal amylin infusions had no effect.
82 all known beta-lactam-based antibiotics with startling efficiency.
83 ch combining trial-by-trial facial eye-blink startle electromyography and brainstem- and amygdala-spe
84 riables included slopes for fear-potentiated startle (electromyography) and self-reported risk rating
85 ixed stressors did not affect crash rates in startling events, suggesting that the coping mechanism's
86 l value of startle responding and argue that startle-evoked amygdala responding and its affective mod
87 e Drosophila larval sensorimotor decision to startle, explore, or perform a sequence of the two in re
88                                          The startle eye-blink is the cross-species translational too
89 crucial direct link between electromyography startle eye-blink magnitude and neural response strength
90         From an evolutionary perspective the startle eye-blink response forms an integral part of the
91                                          The startling finding of this study is that, contrary to the
92                                         This startling finding suggests that M. tuberculosis may gain
93 ts showed an increase in anxiety-potentiated startle following active but not sham rTMS.
94                   Using the fear potentiated startle (FPS) procedure, we examined the effects of fear
95 D in adults, with increased fear-potentiated startle (FPS) serving as a potential intermediate phenot
96     The rapid Defence Cascade (DC) response (startle, freeze) to sudden unexpected stimuli is a poten
97                                          The startling gist is that even though the atoms have no dip
98 ts of a genetic screen to identify olfactory startle habituation (OSH) mutants.
99 transient CRFOE during development decreased startle habituation and prepulse inhibition, and increas
100 or synaptic depression presumably underlying startle habituation in rats, using patch-clamp recording
101 ome sequencing, that identified 14 zebrafish startle habituation mutants including mutants of the ver
102 eizure susceptibility and decreased acoustic startle habituation.
103  GlyRs that are responsible for a hereditary startle-hyperekplexia disease.
104 ry and prepulse inhibition (PPI) of acoustic startle in Grin1 mutant mice.
105 cal syndrome characterized by an exaggerated startle in response to trivial tactile or acoustic stimu
106  (fear-potentiated startle, affect-modulated startle) in two independent studies (N = 43 and N = 55).
107                                     However, startle-induced astrocytic Ca(2+) signals did not preced
108               A 14-month-old child developed startle-induced episodes of generalized rigidity and myo
109 Ca(2+) signals did not precede corresponding startle-induced hemodynamic changes.
110 G protein-coupled receptor activation and by startle-induced neuromodulatory responses.
111 ases in startle reactivity and reductions in startle inhibition independently of predator stress in b
112                 Prepulse inhibition (PPI) of startle is being explored both as an indicator of target
113 vermis has a crucial role in a delay tactile startle learning paradigm in mice.
114 by eye to provide 'ground truth' measures of startle magnitude and freeze duration which were also es
115 tive affective states often show potentiated startle magnitude and freeze duration.
116          Tests included measures of acoustic startle magnitude and habituation, PPI, MMN, autonomic i
117                    Removal of BACE1 affected startle magnitude, balance beam performance, pain respon
118 rating valence information into differential startle magnitude.
119 it/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms on startle measures were examined.
120  for a conserved neural pathway for acoustic startle modulation between humans and rodents.
121                       We examined the alpha1 startle mutation S270T, at the extracellular end of the
122 e functional consequences of the alpha1S270T startle mutation, which is located at the extracellular
123                                         Many startle mutations are known, but it is hard to correlate
124  heteromeric GlyRs are less affected by many startle mutations than homomers.
125 ume novel, palatable foods and to approach a startling object.
126 dae, eyespots have been shown to function in startling or deflecting predators and to be involved in
127 135 were assessed using the fear-potentiated startle paradigm to assess fear-related phenotypes of PT
128 ons, decreasing latency time in the acoustic startle paradigm, and decreasing the reinforcement of re
129 ceptor function, is responsible for a lethal startle phenotype in a novel spontaneous mouse mutant sh
130 g scores on the Composite Abuse Scale, SPAN (Startle, Physiological Arousal, Anger, and Numbness), Pr
131 sufficient to induce enduring alterations in startle plasticity and anxiety, while forebrain CRFOE du
132 insic and extrinsic modulatory mechanisms in startle plasticity and sensorimotor gating.
133 of the serotonin 5-HT5A receptor in goldfish startle plasticity and sensorimotor gating.
134 ity in males but did not change avoidance or startle plasticity.
135                       Low-GSK did not affect startle potentiation across conditions.
136 eliefCS immediately following the US-induced startle potentiation and negative valence (Study1); 3 se
137 , apomorphine injection was shown to relieve startle potentiation during nicotine withdrawal and cond
138 unpredictable threat (anxiety) but increased startle potentiation during the predictable condition (f
139                    High-GSK had no effect on startle potentiation during unpredictable threat (anxiet
140 t with previous findings, alprazolam reduced startle potentiation during unpredictable threat but not
141 imulus, US) provoke defensive responses like startle potentiation, while stimuli associated with pain
142 to warn of a chemical defence and others, to startle predators.
143 s as diverse as sexual and social signaling, startling predators, and advertising toxicity [1], there
144 ocomotor hyperactivity; sensorimotor gating (startle prepulse inhibition) was unaffected.
145  showed that SB-699551 also reduced baseline startle rates (i.e., without prepulse).
146 periments showed a dose-dependent decline in startle rates in prepulse conditions.
147 hyperekplexia characterized by a generalized startle reaction and agoraphobic behavior, our data prov
148 dexed by skin conductance (experiment 1) and startle reactions (experiment 2).
149         CRHOEdev induced robust increases in startle reactivity and reductions in startle inhibition
150 xtual fear learning in females and increased startle reactivity in males but did not change avoidance
151 ycloserine augmentation reduced cortisol and startle reactivity more than did alprazolam or placebo,
152  significant group differences were found in startle reactivity or habituation measures.
153 ales nor females exhibited any impairment in startle reactivity or prepulse inhibition.
154 aine users (DCU) display alterations of PPI, startle reactivity, and habituation.
155 bition of the acoustic startle reflex (PPI), startle reactivity, and spontaneous alternation, but did
156  subjects, PPI of acoustic startle response, startle reactivity, habituation, ADHD symptoms, and coca
157  depressogenic effects), emotion-potentiated startle reactivity, impulsivity (linked with suicidal be
158 PRETATION: Bivalent vaccination has led to a startling reduction in vaccine and cross-protective HPV
159 demonstrate that habituation of the auditory startle reflex (hASR) tested at bedside constitutes a no
160 impaired prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle reflex (PPI), startle reactivity, and spontaneou
161 O mice displayed marked deficits in acoustic startle reflex amplitude, as well as significant sensori
162 iate PD/AG phenotypes demonstrated increased startle reflex and increased fear network, as well as ge
163 ated inhibition in vitro as well as acoustic startle reflex and social interaction in vivo of the Fmr
164             Prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the startle reflex has been suggested as a candidate endophe
165  expression levels and attenuated PPI of the startle reflex in healthy control subjects.
166                          The auditory evoked startle reflex is a conserved response resulting in neur
167 sponses or pupil dilation, modulation of the startle reflex is valence specific.
168 ct seems unaffected in HSP patients, because startle reflex onsets were normal.
169  was evaluated with a gap detection acoustic startle reflex paradigm, while hearing status was assess
170 n lifting by the tail and lacked an enhanced startle reflex response that are characteristic of other
171 rgic antagonist amisulpride, known to affect startle reflex that is correlated with addiction in huma
172    Prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the acoustic startle reflex was tested in healthy individuals (n=690)
173 ycardia/apnea, feeding problems, hyperactive startle reflex), severe postnatal progressive neurologic
174                          It makes use of the startle reflex, a defensive response elicited by an imme
175 the auditory brainstem response and acoustic startle reflex, yet tone detection behavior was nearly n
176 and anxiety were assessed using the acoustic startle reflex.
177 ning and prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle reflex.
178 thdrawal was measured by potentiation of the startle reflex.
179          Prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startling reflex (PPI; a marker of psychotic-like behavi
180 lexia, which is characterised by exaggerated startle reflexes, muscle hypertonia and apnoea.
181 ive into microglia form and function reveals startling regional heterogeneity in number, morphology,
182 y functional calculations indicate that this startling regioselectivity is driven by dispersion inter
183                                              Startling reports described the paradoxical triggering o
184 idence for the strong translational value of startle responding and argue that startle-evoked amygdal
185 -like behavior as measured using potentiated startle responding does not emerge spontaneously during
186 and blunted circadian variations in baseline startle responding.
187 ffecting the magnitude or habituation of the startle response (all p > 0.13).
188 tion of the zebrafish (Danio Rerio) acoustic startle response (ASR).
189 , neurons reduced prepulse inhibition of the startle response (PPI) and enhanced sensitivity to MK801
190          Prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response (PPI) is a behavioral phenomenon studie
191 morphisms may predispose to PD by increasing startle response and agoraphobic cognitions.
192 the histamine H1 antagonist meclizine on the startle response and PPI were investigated in healthy ma
193 he pwi phenotype includes a reduced auditory startle response and reduced visual evoked potentials, s
194 e placebo group, as demonstrated by acoustic startle response and US expectancy ratings.
195 vapor, Drosophila show an olfactory-mediated startle response characterized by a transient increase i
196 e exhibit reduced initiation of the acoustic startle response consistent with hearing impairment, sug
197  the lowest cortisol reactivity and smallest startle response during virtual reality scenes.
198  describe PPI, including that the underlying startle response has a non-Gaussian distribution, and th
199  male and female mice and decreased acoustic startle response in a sex-dependent manner.
200                      CVS did not enhance the startle response in cycling females.
201 ted to one basic motor output and the C-type startle response in fish.
202 d whether either determines the precision of startle response initiation is not known.
203                               Therefore, the startle response is the most likely evolutionary origin
204 dependent changes in timing and precision of startle response latencies.
205 e been proposed as evolutionary ancestors of startle response neurons of the mammalian reticular form
206 n PPI without affecting the magnitude of the startle response or other physiological variables.
207 tipsychotics and causes a deficient acoustic startle response similar to that observed in schizophren
208  impairs prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response suggesting an important behavioural rol
209 ve neuromodulation, manifest in a diminished startle response suppression by hedonic stimuli.
210  smaller prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response than goal trackers, suggesting a reduce
211 his patient developed a profound accentuated startle response that did not have a corresponding elect
212 tment where the temperature was not changed: startle response time, the time it took an anemone to re
213            In prepulse inhibition (PPI), the startle response to a strong, unexpected stimulus is dim
214 impairments in motor coordination, increased startle response to acoustic stimuli and hypersociabilit
215 y related to the Lebinthini show an acoustic startle response to high-frequency sounds that generates
216                                              Startle response was measured using electromyograph reco
217 ative valence (Study1); 3 seconds later, the startle response was slightly less potentiated and the r
218 elevations could be evoked when inducing the startle response with unexpected air puffs.
219 entire sample, there was a reduction in SBR (startle response) during the first minute of clipping.
220  tremor, and seizures (1 case with prominent startle response).
221                                          For startle response, all animals lengthened their response
222 e burying task, elevated zero maze, acoustic startle response, and forced swim test.
223 ts prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the acoustic startle response, and patients with schizophrenia exhibi
224 as prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the acoustic startle response, are playing an increasingly important
225 of the previously appreciated scaling of the startle response, as well as a scaling of sound processi
226 el, animals show alterations in the acoustic startle response, consistent with altered neuroanatomica
227                                         This startle response, in which the first movement creates an
228 iated with micro-environmental plasticity of startle response, including Drosophila Hsp90, setting th
229 orphants had no FM1-43 dye uptake and lacked startle response, indicating hair cell dysfunction and g
230                                              Startle response, PPI, heart rate response, galvanic ski
231 tivity, respiration, tremors, body tone, and startle response, revealed normal responses for Chrna2-n
232 lant-naive control subjects, PPI of acoustic startle response, startle reactivity, habituation, ADHD
233 and applied it to three quantitative traits (startle response, starvation resistance, and chill coma
234                   Measures included acoustic startle response, US expectancy, blood glucose levels, a
235  this compound tended to reduce the acoustic startle response, which is consistent with an anxiolytic
236 nxiety-like behaviors, and impaired acoustic startle response, which is distinct from the phenotype o
237 roduce persistent elevations in the acoustic startle response, which may reflect anxiety-like signs i
238  reactivity was strongly associated with the startle response, which was also associated with hypervi
239    Prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the acoustic startle response-a measure of sensorimotor gating-is hig
240 ir response times at higher temperatures for startle response.
241 tion of predators and facilitate an acoustic startle response.
242 atory behavior characteristic of an acoustic startle response.
243 udied using prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the startle response.
244 ed interference of positive emotion with the startle response.
245 closely apposed to neurons that initiate the startle response.
246 maze and open field tests, and increased the startle response.
247 ide), on prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response.
248 d tasks and recording of emotion-potentiated startle response.
249 onents of PPI are a function of the baseline startle response.
250  to antipsychotics, and an abnormal acoustic-startle response.
251 s; investigator ratings; PPI of the acoustic startle response; and autonomic, endocrine, and adverse
252 easure of stress in horses, but the initial 'startle' response must be considered when using this par
253 primary SLCs and less frequent, long-latency startle responses (LLCs).
254              Here, we examined short-latency startle responses (SLCs) in larval zebrafish and tested
255 cs and field potential parameters of C-start startle responses allowed for discrimination between sho
256 cs and field potential parameters of C-start startle responses allowed for discrimination between sho
257  in healthy male subjects with high baseline startle responses and low PPI levels.
258                   The prepulse inhibition of startle responses by a weaker preceding tone, the inhibi
259 response magnitude and levels of exaggerated startle responses in daily life in PTSD participants (t
260 iciency and exaggerated acoustic and tactile startle responses in mice bearing point mutations in alp
261  measured by inhibitory avoidance, increased startle responses in prepulse inhibition tasks, and incr
262                                 Latencies of startle responses in sternocleidomastoid and tibialis an
263 ents in the open field test, higher baseline startle responses in the course of the prepulse inhibiti
264 subcellular astrocyte calcium imaging during startle responses in vivo.
265                                    We evoked startle responses via activation of Channelrhodopsin (Ch
266                            Enhanced acoustic startle responses were observed among injected compared
267 chanism that can serve to precisely initiate startle responses when speed is critical for survival.
268 erekplexia is a syndrome of readily provoked startle responses, alongside episodic and generalized hy
269                   For speed of initiation of startle responses, FSL would be the more advantageous me
270 uency discrimination, prepulse inhibition of startle responses, or fear conditioning with pure tones.
271 e immediately before the main pulse inhibits startle responses, though the mechanism for this remains
272 encoding for rapid and precise initiation of startle responses.
273 lfactory-driven chemotaxis and touch-induced startle responses.
274 ise acts as a cue that attenuates subsequent startle responses.
275 encoding for rapid and precise initiation of startle responses.
276 impaired learning and memory and exaggerated startle responses.
277 fety learning, with 22.5% of the variance in startle retention accounted for by REM sleep.
278 these differences, and we find that both the startle-scaling and sound-scaling components of PPI are
279 Males and females differ specifically in the startle-scaling, but not the sound-scaling, component of
280 i larval inner ear was near normal, acoustic startle stimuli evoked smaller postsynaptic responses in
281              Control subjects responded to a startle stimulus similarly across tasks.
282 complete chronic cervical SCI responded to a startle stimulus, a test that engages the reticulospinal
283 oluntary release of a planned movement via a startling stimulus that engages the reticulospinal tract
284 nse (shortening in reaction time evoked by a startling stimulus) in the quadriceps femoris muscle in
285 e (a shortening in reaction time evoked by a startling stimulus), and the effect of an acoustic start
286 g of tasks owing, among other things, to its startling structural and functional complexity and its r
287 t cysteine residues are very rare and rather startling structural features which play a variety of fu
288 elevate anxiety-like behavior in an acoustic startle task.
289 essed in the elevated-plus maze and acoustic startle test, including marked attenuation of light-enha
290 eld and pre-pulse inhibition of the acoustic startle tests and are significantly more sensitive to th
291 edented reemergence of Zika virus (ZIKV) has startled the world with reports of increased microcephal
292 uld be countered by sudden disturbances that startled them into a net, such as when we dropped a net
293 h PTSD symptoms (N=187) and fear-potentiated startle to a safety signal (N=135).
294  Eels were 50% less likely and 25% slower to startle to an 'ambush predator' and were caught more tha
295 ck to induce anxiety and anxiety potentiated startle to assess anxiety.
296  and gap-prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle to assess tinnitus, we recorded spontaneous acti
297 ar environment of budding yeast undertakes a startling transition upon glucose starvation in which ma
298 ontrol, daily mild stress exposure (acoustic startle), voluntary consumption of moderate-level alcoho
299 ovian conditioned stimulus (fear-potentiated startle) was enhanced.
300 tor (CRF)-dependent mechanism] that regulate startle, which is exaggerated in PTSD.

 
Page Top