コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 kin conductance response or fear potentiated startle.
2 comotor activity, and prepulse inhibition of startle.
3 ression underlying short-term habituation of startle.
4 -irradiation for activity, coordination, and startle.
5 cluding marked attenuation of light-enhanced startle.
6 s assessed by the prepulse inhibition of the startle.
7 -induced prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle.
8 ct on the speed at which fish responded to a startle.
9 ssessed under extinction by fear-potentiated startle.
10 on available on the aged olfactory system is startling.
11 ffect on activity and prepulse inhibition of startle 1-week post-irradiation that dissipated each wee
12 hreat memory, measured with fear-potentiated startle 7 days after acquisition, is attenuated by 60% i
13 -cells abolishes short-latency tail-elicited startles [8, 9], we hypothesized that M-cell activity wa
15 om two different paradigms (fear-potentiated startle, affect-modulated startle) in two independent st
19 Stressed females showed increased acoustic startle and decreased sleep maintenance, indicative of h
21 Abnormal information processing of acoustic startle and depressive-like behaviors are also observed.
24 search in the past decades on habituation of startle and other escape responses, the underlying neura
25 ensitization of BLA manifested as heightened startle and PPI deficits in response to subsequent subth
27 and environmental contributions to baseline startle and PPI showed a substantial single nucleotide p
30 on genetic variants associated with baseline startle and PPI; 2) estimate the single nucleotide polym
31 exposure) on amygdala systems that modulate startle and prepulse inhibition (PPI), an operational me
32 e that could underlie certain core deficits (startle and prepulse inhibition) that are observed in po
33 ated with HDAC4 expression, fear-potentiated startle and resting-state functional connectivity of the
34 ted, low doses of ethanol induced an initial startle and slow ramping of group activity, whereas high
36 n addition to the characteristic 'stiffness, startles and stumbles' of hyperekplexia, apnoea attacks
38 al interaction, cognitive function, acoustic startle, and amphetamine sensitivity, with some sex-depe
39 odify anxiety-related phenotypes (avoidance, startle, and conditioned fear), we induced transient for
40 arly microsurgical approaches demonstrated a startling array of regenerative and morphogenetic proces
43 efCS presented 6 seconds after the US caused startle attenuation (Study2 and 3) and positively valenc
45 at 1 or 4 dpf, showed consistent deficits in startle behavior at 7 dpf, including lower responsivenes
47 nal consequences of exposures, we quantified startle behavior in response to acoustic/vibrational sti
48 The neural circuit underlying the C-start, a startle behavior in which the fish forms a "C"-shaped bo
49 cue of major aspects of adult locomotion and startle behavior required octopamine, but a complementar
51 of older fathers had reduced exploratory and startle behaviors and exhibited similar brain DNA methyl
52 cover a mechanism for generating alternative startle behaviors; local sensory inputs drive inhibitory
53 activity, Rtkn2 for intensity of reaction to startle, Bmp2 for wound healing, Il15 and Id2 for severa
55 ticulospinal Mauthner cells (M-cells) of the startle circuit have been considered to be dedicated to
57 the Mauthner cells (M-cells) in the goldfish startle circuit, which receive visual and auditory input
60 Progress in DNA sequencing has revealed the startling complexity of cancer genomes, which typically
63 ing stimulus), and the effect of an acoustic startle cue on MEPs elicited by cervicomedullary stimula
64 tasks, reaction times were shorter during a startle cue while performing a power grip but not index
68 e is known about circular granular ratchets, startling devices able to convert vertical vibrations in
71 on several diseases such as chronic pain and startle disease by targeting glycine receptors (GlyRs).
75 a1 subunit mutation (Q177K) in a novel mouse startle disease mutant shaky Structural data suggest tha
81 ed PPI disruption without affecting baseline startle; dorsal striatal amylin infusions had no effect.
83 ch combining trial-by-trial facial eye-blink startle electromyography and brainstem- and amygdala-spe
84 riables included slopes for fear-potentiated startle (electromyography) and self-reported risk rating
85 ixed stressors did not affect crash rates in startling events, suggesting that the coping mechanism's
86 l value of startle responding and argue that startle-evoked amygdala responding and its affective mod
87 e Drosophila larval sensorimotor decision to startle, explore, or perform a sequence of the two in re
89 crucial direct link between electromyography startle eye-blink magnitude and neural response strength
95 D in adults, with increased fear-potentiated startle (FPS) serving as a potential intermediate phenot
96 The rapid Defence Cascade (DC) response (startle, freeze) to sudden unexpected stimuli is a poten
99 transient CRFOE during development decreased startle habituation and prepulse inhibition, and increas
100 or synaptic depression presumably underlying startle habituation in rats, using patch-clamp recording
101 ome sequencing, that identified 14 zebrafish startle habituation mutants including mutants of the ver
105 cal syndrome characterized by an exaggerated startle in response to trivial tactile or acoustic stimu
106 (fear-potentiated startle, affect-modulated startle) in two independent studies (N = 43 and N = 55).
111 ases in startle reactivity and reductions in startle inhibition independently of predator stress in b
114 by eye to provide 'ground truth' measures of startle magnitude and freeze duration which were also es
122 e functional consequences of the alpha1S270T startle mutation, which is located at the extracellular
126 dae, eyespots have been shown to function in startling or deflecting predators and to be involved in
127 135 were assessed using the fear-potentiated startle paradigm to assess fear-related phenotypes of PT
128 ons, decreasing latency time in the acoustic startle paradigm, and decreasing the reinforcement of re
129 ceptor function, is responsible for a lethal startle phenotype in a novel spontaneous mouse mutant sh
130 g scores on the Composite Abuse Scale, SPAN (Startle, Physiological Arousal, Anger, and Numbness), Pr
131 sufficient to induce enduring alterations in startle plasticity and anxiety, while forebrain CRFOE du
136 eliefCS immediately following the US-induced startle potentiation and negative valence (Study1); 3 se
137 , apomorphine injection was shown to relieve startle potentiation during nicotine withdrawal and cond
138 unpredictable threat (anxiety) but increased startle potentiation during the predictable condition (f
140 t with previous findings, alprazolam reduced startle potentiation during unpredictable threat but not
141 imulus, US) provoke defensive responses like startle potentiation, while stimuli associated with pain
143 s as diverse as sexual and social signaling, startling predators, and advertising toxicity [1], there
147 hyperekplexia characterized by a generalized startle reaction and agoraphobic behavior, our data prov
150 xtual fear learning in females and increased startle reactivity in males but did not change avoidance
151 ycloserine augmentation reduced cortisol and startle reactivity more than did alprazolam or placebo,
155 bition of the acoustic startle reflex (PPI), startle reactivity, and spontaneous alternation, but did
156 subjects, PPI of acoustic startle response, startle reactivity, habituation, ADHD symptoms, and coca
157 depressogenic effects), emotion-potentiated startle reactivity, impulsivity (linked with suicidal be
158 PRETATION: Bivalent vaccination has led to a startling reduction in vaccine and cross-protective HPV
159 demonstrate that habituation of the auditory startle reflex (hASR) tested at bedside constitutes a no
160 impaired prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle reflex (PPI), startle reactivity, and spontaneou
161 O mice displayed marked deficits in acoustic startle reflex amplitude, as well as significant sensori
162 iate PD/AG phenotypes demonstrated increased startle reflex and increased fear network, as well as ge
163 ated inhibition in vitro as well as acoustic startle reflex and social interaction in vivo of the Fmr
169 was evaluated with a gap detection acoustic startle reflex paradigm, while hearing status was assess
170 n lifting by the tail and lacked an enhanced startle reflex response that are characteristic of other
171 rgic antagonist amisulpride, known to affect startle reflex that is correlated with addiction in huma
172 Prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the acoustic startle reflex was tested in healthy individuals (n=690)
173 ycardia/apnea, feeding problems, hyperactive startle reflex), severe postnatal progressive neurologic
175 the auditory brainstem response and acoustic startle reflex, yet tone detection behavior was nearly n
181 ive into microglia form and function reveals startling regional heterogeneity in number, morphology,
182 y functional calculations indicate that this startling regioselectivity is driven by dispersion inter
184 idence for the strong translational value of startle responding and argue that startle-evoked amygdal
185 -like behavior as measured using potentiated startle responding does not emerge spontaneously during
189 , neurons reduced prepulse inhibition of the startle response (PPI) and enhanced sensitivity to MK801
192 the histamine H1 antagonist meclizine on the startle response and PPI were investigated in healthy ma
193 he pwi phenotype includes a reduced auditory startle response and reduced visual evoked potentials, s
195 vapor, Drosophila show an olfactory-mediated startle response characterized by a transient increase i
196 e exhibit reduced initiation of the acoustic startle response consistent with hearing impairment, sug
198 describe PPI, including that the underlying startle response has a non-Gaussian distribution, and th
205 e been proposed as evolutionary ancestors of startle response neurons of the mammalian reticular form
207 tipsychotics and causes a deficient acoustic startle response similar to that observed in schizophren
208 impairs prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response suggesting an important behavioural rol
210 smaller prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response than goal trackers, suggesting a reduce
211 his patient developed a profound accentuated startle response that did not have a corresponding elect
212 tment where the temperature was not changed: startle response time, the time it took an anemone to re
214 impairments in motor coordination, increased startle response to acoustic stimuli and hypersociabilit
215 y related to the Lebinthini show an acoustic startle response to high-frequency sounds that generates
217 ative valence (Study1); 3 seconds later, the startle response was slightly less potentiated and the r
219 entire sample, there was a reduction in SBR (startle response) during the first minute of clipping.
223 ts prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the acoustic startle response, and patients with schizophrenia exhibi
224 as prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the acoustic startle response, are playing an increasingly important
225 of the previously appreciated scaling of the startle response, as well as a scaling of sound processi
226 el, animals show alterations in the acoustic startle response, consistent with altered neuroanatomica
228 iated with micro-environmental plasticity of startle response, including Drosophila Hsp90, setting th
229 orphants had no FM1-43 dye uptake and lacked startle response, indicating hair cell dysfunction and g
231 tivity, respiration, tremors, body tone, and startle response, revealed normal responses for Chrna2-n
232 lant-naive control subjects, PPI of acoustic startle response, startle reactivity, habituation, ADHD
233 and applied it to three quantitative traits (startle response, starvation resistance, and chill coma
235 this compound tended to reduce the acoustic startle response, which is consistent with an anxiolytic
236 nxiety-like behaviors, and impaired acoustic startle response, which is distinct from the phenotype o
237 roduce persistent elevations in the acoustic startle response, which may reflect anxiety-like signs i
238 reactivity was strongly associated with the startle response, which was also associated with hypervi
239 Prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the acoustic startle response-a measure of sensorimotor gating-is hig
251 s; investigator ratings; PPI of the acoustic startle response; and autonomic, endocrine, and adverse
252 easure of stress in horses, but the initial 'startle' response must be considered when using this par
255 cs and field potential parameters of C-start startle responses allowed for discrimination between sho
256 cs and field potential parameters of C-start startle responses allowed for discrimination between sho
259 response magnitude and levels of exaggerated startle responses in daily life in PTSD participants (t
260 iciency and exaggerated acoustic and tactile startle responses in mice bearing point mutations in alp
261 measured by inhibitory avoidance, increased startle responses in prepulse inhibition tasks, and incr
263 ents in the open field test, higher baseline startle responses in the course of the prepulse inhibiti
267 chanism that can serve to precisely initiate startle responses when speed is critical for survival.
268 erekplexia is a syndrome of readily provoked startle responses, alongside episodic and generalized hy
270 uency discrimination, prepulse inhibition of startle responses, or fear conditioning with pure tones.
271 e immediately before the main pulse inhibits startle responses, though the mechanism for this remains
278 these differences, and we find that both the startle-scaling and sound-scaling components of PPI are
279 Males and females differ specifically in the startle-scaling, but not the sound-scaling, component of
280 i larval inner ear was near normal, acoustic startle stimuli evoked smaller postsynaptic responses in
282 complete chronic cervical SCI responded to a startle stimulus, a test that engages the reticulospinal
283 oluntary release of a planned movement via a startling stimulus that engages the reticulospinal tract
284 nse (shortening in reaction time evoked by a startling stimulus) in the quadriceps femoris muscle in
285 e (a shortening in reaction time evoked by a startling stimulus), and the effect of an acoustic start
286 g of tasks owing, among other things, to its startling structural and functional complexity and its r
287 t cysteine residues are very rare and rather startling structural features which play a variety of fu
289 essed in the elevated-plus maze and acoustic startle test, including marked attenuation of light-enha
290 eld and pre-pulse inhibition of the acoustic startle tests and are significantly more sensitive to th
291 edented reemergence of Zika virus (ZIKV) has startled the world with reports of increased microcephal
292 uld be countered by sudden disturbances that startled them into a net, such as when we dropped a net
294 Eels were 50% less likely and 25% slower to startle to an 'ambush predator' and were caught more tha
296 and gap-prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle to assess tinnitus, we recorded spontaneous acti
297 ar environment of budding yeast undertakes a startling transition upon glucose starvation in which ma
298 ontrol, daily mild stress exposure (acoustic startle), voluntary consumption of moderate-level alcoho