ライフサイエンスコーパス: startle response

1 tremor, and seizures (1 case with prominent startle response).

2 ir response times at higher temperatures for startle response.

3 rited disease associated with an exaggerated startle response.

4 and elevated zero maze, but not in the shock-startle response.

5 in prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the acoustic startle response.

6 decreased the precision and amplitude of the startle response.

7 as measured using the prepulse inhibition of startle response.

8 d stimuli and the prepulse inhibition of the startle response.

9 rtle at doses that had no effect on baseline startle response.

10 onset and throughout the development of the startle response.

11 ion in prepulse inhibition (PPI) of acoustic startle response.

12 or prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the acoustic startle response.

13 ic reduction of the norepinephrine-dependent startle response.

14 in prepulse inhibition (PPI) in the acoustic startle response.

15 ts prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the acoustic startle response.

16 modification and reduction of the excitatory startle response.

17 g, difficulty concentrating, and exaggerated startle response.

18 0 suppression and prepulse inhibition of the startle response.

19 ng as assessed by prepulse inhibition of the startle response.

20 ydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA) on the acoustic startle response.

21 nd prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the acoustic startle response.

22 rpuff, but cannot elicit the full behavioral startle response.

23 nditioned inhibition of the fear-potentiated startle response.

24 K3Rs in the BLA facilitates fear-potentiated startle response.

25 s arousal symptoms, specifically exaggerated startle response.

26 behavior instead of the stimulus-appropriate startle response.

27 to antipsychotics, and an abnormal acoustic-startle response.

28 ned extinction, assessed by fear-potentiated startle response.

29 tion of predators and facilitate an acoustic startle response.

30 atory behavior characteristic of an acoustic startle response.

31 udied using prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the startle response.

32 ed interference of positive emotion with the startle response.

33 closely apposed to neurons that initiate the startle response.

34 onents of PPI are a function of the baseline startle response.

35 maze and open field tests, and increased the startle response.

36 ide), on prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response.

37 d tasks and recording of emotion-potentiated startle response.

38 normalize, along with partial rescue of the startle response.

39 t and deficits in prepulse inhibition of the startle response.

40 the afferent neurons (S-cells) mediating the startle response.

41 is prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the acoustic startle response.

42 encoding for rapid and precise initiation of startle responses.

43 10 mg/kg) on prepulse inhibition of acoustic startle responses.

44 impaired learning and memory and exaggerated startle responses.

45 infarcted rats relative to their pre-surgery startle responses.

46 An accelerometer measured startle responses.

47 ow significant differences in their acoustic startle responses.

48 encoding for rapid and precise initiation of startle responses.

49 lfactory-driven chemotaxis and touch-induced startle responses.

50 ise acts as a cue that attenuates subsequent startle responses.

51 he elevated zero maze and an increased shock-startle response 30 and 60 min post-injection.

52 or activity, including climbing behavior and startle response (a measure of sensorimotor integration)

53 t mice, there is an increase in the acoustic startle response, a behavior that is altered in affectiv

54 ay an increase in prepulse inhibition of the startle response, a manifestation of sensorimotor gating

55 Prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the acoustic startle response-a measure of sensorimotor gating-is hig

56 ogical disorder characterized by exaggerated startle responses affecting newborns with the hallmark c

57 other motor activities, as well as acoustic startle responses all reveal a more slowly developing ph

58 ffecting the magnitude or habituation of the startle response (all p > 0.13).

59 For startle response, all animals lengthened their response

60 cs and field potential parameters of C-start startle responses allowed for discrimination between sho

61 cs and field potential parameters of C-start startle responses allowed for discrimination between sho

62 erekplexia is a syndrome of readily provoked startle responses, alongside episodic and generalized hy

63 ma ACTH, locus coeruleus neuronal firing and startle response amplitude.

64 prepulse inhibition (PPI), as well as higher startle response amplitudes.

65 The startle response and adaptability of the startle respons

66 morphisms may predispose to PD by increasing startle response and agoraphobic cognitions.

67 ld activity, prepulse inhibition of acoustic startle response and contextual fear conditioning when c

68 at measured prepulse inhibition of the human startle response and habituation of startle magnitude, m

69 -like p11-KO mice would exhibit an augmented startle response and heightened sensitivity to clozapine

70 ic brain lesions enhance the strength of the startle response and impair PPI.

71 out (KO) mice evident as abnormal audiogenic startle response and increased audiogenic seizure suscep

72 gical disorder characterized by an excessive startle response and is typically caused by missense and

73 the histamine H1 antagonist meclizine on the startle response and PPI were investigated in healthy ma

74 he pwi phenotype includes a reduced auditory startle response and reduced visual evoked potentials, s

75 Adult mice showed a diminished acoustic startle response and required higher acoustic stimuli to

76 The cortical silent period, the startle response and the second and third phases of RI w

77 the safety signal to reduce the potentiated-startle response and to extinguish the fear response whe

78 e placebo group, as demonstrated by acoustic startle response and US expectancy ratings.

79 in healthy male subjects with high baseline startle responses and low PPI levels.

80 Implanted cats exhibited acoustic startle responses and were trained to approach their foo

81 e burying task, elevated zero maze, acoustic startle response, and forced swim test.

82 expression recognition, emotion-potentiated startle response, and memory for affect-laden words were

83 ts prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the acoustic startle response, and patients with schizophrenia exhibi

84 onditioning, prepulse inhibition of acoustic startle response, and startle habituation.

85 bituation of an olfactory-mediated locomotor startle response, and we isolated a mutation in the glyc

86 uced dark-period activity, impaired acoustic startle responses, and inappropriate activity during lig

87 s; investigator ratings; PPI of the acoustic startle response; and autonomic, endocrine, and adverse

88 conditioning and prepulse inhibition of the startle response are also disrupted in cdf/cdf mice.

89 as prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the acoustic startle response, are playing an increasingly important

90 ic surge accompanied by an inhibition of the startle response as predicted by the animal model.

91 Behavioral abnormalities included diminished startle response, as measured by prepulse inhibition, an

92 of the previously appreciated scaling of the startle response, as well as a scaling of sound processi

93 The magnitude of the first startle response, as well as the magnitude of startle re

94 ng protocol was used to measure the acoustic startle response (ASR) and prepulse inhibition (PPI) in

95 ef, daily sucrose access on PPI and acoustic startle response (ASR) in OLETF rat and age-matched non-

96 index of fear) were measured in an acoustic startle response (ASR) paradigm in rats.

97 An alerting sound elicits the Acoustic Startle Response (ASR) that is dependent on the sound vo

98 tion of the zebrafish (Danio Rerio) acoustic startle response (ASR).

99 ted reactivity to startling sounds (acoustic startle response; ASR).

100 d hearing sensitivity with enhanced acoustic startle response, auditory brainstem response, and cochl

101 tartle response, as well as the magnitude of startle response averaged across blocks of testing, was

102 as measured by the amplitude of the acoustic startle response before and after noise exposure in a se

103 The startle response (body twitch) was evoked by an abrupt d

104 , 20 kHz) produced an initial characteristic startle response (brisk running) in the hooded Lister ra

105 T1 KO mice display no difference in acoustic startle response but exhibit a deficiency in prepulse in

106 ed a slower central conduction and showed no startle responses, but had normal cochlear function.

107 tion has been shown to affect human eyeblink startle responses, but whether these results depend on m

108 The prepulse inhibition of startle responses by a weaker preceding tone, the inhibi

109 fearful faces, intact modulation of acoustic startle responses by fear-eliciting scenes, and a normal

110 ted in the hindbrain to initiate C-type fast startle responses (C-starts).

111 vapor, Drosophila show an olfactory-mediated startle response characterized by a transient increase i

112 last growth factor 8 (Fgf8): an inconsistent startle response, circular swimming, fused otoliths, and

113 ggered by anxiety, task-specific phobias and startle responses, collectively leading to disability.

114 e exhibit reduced initiation of the acoustic startle response consistent with hearing impairment, sug

115 el, animals show alterations in the acoustic startle response, consistent with altered neuroanatomica

116 On emotional picture trials, startle responses decreased as a function of cue in the

117 antagonist reduced the exaggerated acoustic startle responses, deficits in prepulse inhibition of ac

118 Fmrp is dispensable at the initial steps of startle response development, it is necessary for the fu

119 the lowest cortisol reactivity and smallest startle response during virtual reality scenes.

120 entire sample, there was a reduction in SBR (startle response) during the first minute of clipping.

121 e disease is characterized by an exaggerated startle response, evoked by tactile or auditory stimuli,

122 e disease is characterized by an exaggerated startle response, evoked by tactile or auditory stimuli,

123 various drugs affect activity, habituation, startle responses, excitability, and optomotor responses

124 measured by prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the startle response, exhibited nonfocal preservative patter

125 The magnitude of the startle response (eye blink) to the first stimulus was a

126 er (1 cm deep, 1 min) had an initial phasic (startle) response (first 5 s) that varied considerably b

127 arvae exhibited increased latency to perform startle responses following defined acoustic stimuli.

128 The significantly greater startle responses for the left eye compared with the rig

129 Citalopram also abolished the increased startle response found in the context of negative affect

130 For speed of initiation of startle responses, FSL would be the more advantageous me

131 describe PPI, including that the underlying startle response has a non-Gaussian distribution, and th

132 r gating is prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the startle response, impairments in which have been demonst

133 male and female mice and decreased acoustic startle response in a sex-dependent manner.

134 The acoustic startle response in B6 mice was also enhanced at 14 days

135 by prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the acoustic startle response in C57Bl6 mice.

136 CVS did not enhance the startle response in cycling females.

137 enhanced prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response in DBA/2J mice, a strain with low basal

138 chromosome transgene decreases the acoustic startle response in female Pnky-knockout mice, demonstra

139 ivation increased prepulse inhibition of the startle response in females.

140 ted to one basic motor output and the C-type startle response in fish.

141 n contrast, MA similarly increased the shock-startle response in Hdc(-)/(-) and Hdc+/+ mice, compared

142 timulus reduces the amplitude of the ensuing startle response in humans and other vertebrates.

143 THC-E-gel consumption increased the acoustic startle response in males but not in females, demonstrat

144 aired with footshock potentiate the acoustic startle response in rats.

145 and is supported by the findings of greater startle response in the patients with recent-onset PTSD.

146 There was a differential asymmetry of startle response in the two subgroups of patients (recen

147 estigation provides evidence for exaggerated startle response in this disorder.

148 tigation was designed to assess the acoustic startle response in treatment-seeking women with sexual

149 with some clinical studies investigating the startle response in Vietnam veterans with PTSD, this inv

150 we show for the first time that the acoustic startle response in zebrafish larvae is modulated by wea

151 response magnitude and levels of exaggerated startle responses in daily life in PTSD participants (t

152 To investigate startle responses in DMD, we used a novel fear-condition

153 lasticity may be key to the evolution of the startle responses in mammals, which use larger populatio

154 iciency and exaggerated acoustic and tactile startle responses in mice bearing point mutations in alp

155 on the magnitude and plasticity of defensive startle responses in mice.

156 measured by inhibitory avoidance, increased startle responses in prepulse inhibition tasks, and incr

157 Latencies of startle responses in sternocleidomastoid and tibialis an

158 onsistent with the physiological defense and startle responses in terrestrial mammals and birds.

159 ents in the open field test, higher baseline startle responses in the course of the prepulse inhibiti

160 han 90 ms) and the frequent co-expression of startle responses in the neck and eye muscles, it has be

161 ine signaling during spontaneous running and startle responses in the transgenic mice, providing a po

162 subcellular astrocyte calcium imaging during startle responses in vivo.

163 This startle response, in which the first movement creates an

164 iated with micro-environmental plasticity of startle response, including Drosophila Hsp90, setting th

165 orphants had no FM1-43 dye uptake and lacked startle response, indicating hair cell dysfunction and g

166 d whether either determines the precision of startle response initiation is not known.

167 The startle response is a useful way to examine the precise

168 The startle response is an attractive behavioral model for s

169 sensorimotor gating, occurs when an auditory startle response is markedly inhibited by a preceding su

170 A pathological startle response is not a recognized feature of DMD, and

171 The amplitude of the acoustic startle response is reliably enhanced when elicited in t

172 Therefore, the startle response is the most likely evolutionary origin

173 dependent changes in timing and precision of startle response latencies.

174 primary SLCs and less frequent, long-latency startle responses (LLCs).

175 connection between the telencephalon and the startle response, mediated by reticulospinal neurons.

176 down of stx4 in zebrafish showed an abnormal startle response, morphological and developmental defect

177 easure of stress in horses, but the initial 'startle' response must be considered when using this par

178 e been proposed as evolutionary ancestors of startle response neurons of the mammalian reticular form

179 observed; however, neither enhanced acoustic startle responses nor limb clenching were seen.

180 Neither the 2 startle responses nor the 2 forms of PPI were significan

181 open field and elevated zero maze and shock-startle response of 12-month-old wild-type mice injected

182 The giant fiber system (GFS) mediates the startle response of Drosophila.

183 bserved in the duration and magnitude of the startle response or in the probability of returning to t

184 n PPI without affecting the magnitude of the startle response or other physiological variables.

185 uency discrimination, prepulse inhibition of startle responses, or fear conditioning with pure tones.

186 ng hyperarousal, benztropine reduced several startle response outcomes across stressed males and fema

187 In the current study, a startle response paradigm was used to investigate gap de

188 , neurons reduced prepulse inhibition of the startle response (PPI) and enhanced sensitivity to MK801

189 Prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response (PPI) is a behavioral phenomenon studie

190 Prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response (PPI) is a cross-species measure of sen

191 sing the prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response (PPI) model, in which an acoustic prepu

192 to be involved in prepulse inhibition of the startle response (PPI), a measure of sensorimotor inhibi

193 disrupts prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response (PPI), paradigms frequently used to stu

194 Startle response, PPI, heart rate response, galvanic ski

195 ale and female mice, it potentiated acoustic startle responses preferentially in males.

196 The startle response and adaptability of the startle response (prepulse inhibition and habituation) h

197 comotor activity, the rotarod test, acoustic startle response, prepulse inhibition, elevated plus-maz

198 The larval zebrafish acoustic startle response provides a powerful system to identify

199 tivity, respiration, tremors, body tone, and startle response, revealed normal responses for Chrna2-n

200 e response suggest that the higher levels of startle response seen in the PTSD subjects may reflect a

201 The amplitude of startle response showed a substantial increase until the

202 tipsychotics and causes a deficient acoustic startle response similar to that observed in schizophren

203 oise to enable conditioning of physiological startle responses (skin conductance response and heart r

204 Here, we examined short-latency startle responses (SLCs) in larval zebrafish and tested

205 midlatency auditory evoked potential and the startle response (SR) have been used as measures of sens

206 A decrease in initial startle response (SR) was also observed in all PPD rats

207 lant-naive control subjects, PPI of acoustic startle response, startle reactivity, habituation, ADHD

208 and applied it to three quantitative traits (startle response, starvation resistance, and chill coma

209 inical studies of shock sensitization of the startle response suggest that the higher levels of start

210 impairs prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response suggesting an important behavioural rol

211 ve neuromodulation, manifest in a diminished startle response suppression by hedonic stimuli.

212 smaller prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response than goal trackers, suggesting a reduce

213 e reflexes and shorter latencies to onset of startle response than the comparison subjects over the e

214 his patient developed a profound accentuated startle response that did not have a corresponding elect

215 the mutant mice display an impaired acoustic startle response that is not due to an obvious hearing d

216 Although we observed startle responses, the quickening effect was not conting

217 rekplexia, a motor disorder characterized by startle responses, the zebrafish beo mutant should be a

218 sed the duration and magnitude of the calf's startle response, their latency to return to the milk bo

219 e immediately before the main pulse inhibits startle responses, though the mechanism for this remains

220 Ucn may modulate the acoustic startle response through the Ucn-expressing neuron proje

221 tment where the temperature was not changed: startle response time, the time it took an anemone to re

222 ng but not when measured by fear-potentiated startle response to a loud noise.

223 nhibition (PPI) refers to a reduction in the startle response to a strong sensory stimulus when this

224 In prepulse inhibition (PPI), the startle response to a strong, unexpected stimulus is dim

225 impairments in motor coordination, increased startle response to acoustic stimuli and hypersociabilit

226 s ('prepulse') inhibits the amplitude of the startle response to an intense stimulus ('pulse').

227 on in which a weak prestimulus decreases the startle response to an intense stimulus, provides an ope

228 Although the early startle response to cold water stress elicited a pressor

229 y related to the Lebinthini show an acoustic startle response to high-frequency sounds that generates

230 C6A5 present with hypertonia, an exaggerated startle response to tactile or acoustic stimuli, and lif

231 alysis of behavioral data confirmed that the startle response to the airpuff was diminished following

232 The present study examined the eyeblink startle responses to acoustic stimuli of 59 healthy hete

233 Intranasal OXT potentiated acoustic startle responses to negative stimuli, without affecting

234 In prepulse inhibition (PPI), startle responses to sudden, unexpected stimuli are mark

235 ith DMD show similar increased unconditioned startle responses to threat to the mdx mouse, which in t

236 7 in muscle and CNS and exhibits exaggerated startle responses to threat, linked to the deficiency of

237 s showed stronger and more reliable acoustic startle responses (uncued trials) during all acoustic st

238 Measures included acoustic startle response, US expectancy, blood glucose levels, a

239 We evoked startle responses via activation of Channelrhodopsin (Ch

240 The optimum frequency to elicit a startle response was 250 Hz; different from the publishe

241 The eye-blink component of the startle response was assessed bilaterally by using elect

242 The startle response was first detectable at the end of the

243 The subjects' eyeblink startle response was measured in reaction to startle-eli

244 Startle response was measured using electromyograph reco

245 s study, dramatic sensitization of the probe-startle response was observed after shock exposure but n

246 A profound increase in the acoustic startle response was observed in knock-in mice as well a

247 ative valence (Study1); 3 seconds later, the startle response was slightly less potentiated and the r

248 Although the onset and amplitude of the startle response were not altered in fmr1 KO mice until

249 dB SPL) was stronger, and baseline acoustic startle responses were larger, compared with results for

250 Acute acoustic startle responses were measured to investigate THC-induc

251 Enhanced acoustic startle responses were observed among injected compared

252 acilitation vs. attenuation) of the acoustic startle response, were examined.

253 is defined as a reduction in magnitude of a startle response when a startling stimulus is preceded b

254 chanism that can serve to precisely initiate startle responses when speed is critical for survival.

255 The control group had larger startle responses when viewing negative, aversive pictur

256 gical disorder characterized by an excessive startle response which can be caused by mutations in the

257 this compound tended to reduce the acoustic startle response, which is consistent with an anxiolytic

258 nxiety-like behaviors, and impaired acoustic startle response, which is distinct from the phenotype o

259 roduce persistent elevations in the acoustic startle response, which may reflect anxiety-like signs i

260 reactivity was strongly associated with the startle response, which was also associated with hypervi

261 Male neuronal Ca(V)1.2 cKO display impaired startle response with intact pre-pulse inhibition.

262 elevations could be evoked when inducing the startle response with unexpected air puffs.