戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 sts as the initial gravity signal susceptor (statolith).
2 tire cell or that of sedimenting organelles (statoliths).
3 he idea of a so-called 'static' or 'settled' statolith.
4 tion of hydrodynamic forces to the motion of statoliths.
5 ound compartments that appear to function as statoliths.
6 fect of gravity and displace the presumptive statoliths.
7                                          The statoliths accelerated sooner, and the channeling effect
8 e amyloplasts, all of the starch granules of statolith amyloplasts were encompassed by a fine filamen
9 locate significantly less volume to putative statoliths (amyloplasts) than do columella cells of Eart
10 rm compact aggregates with gap sizes between statoliths approaching <30 nm.
11                                  Sedimenting statoliths are postulated to produce a directional signa
12 s shoots, starch was removed from the starch statoliths by placing 45-day-old intact barley plants (H
13                                          The statoliths can form compact aggregates with gap sizes be
14 brane (PM) domains in close proximity to the statoliths, correlating with their movements.
15  as they approached the lower cell membrane, statoliths crossing the cell's central region remained s
16 esults strongly support the view that starch statoliths do indeed serve as the gravisensors in cereal
17                       To determine if starch statoliths do, in fact, act as gravisensors in cereal gr
18 biochemical signal involves a combination of statolith-driven motion of the cytosol, statolith-induce
19                                        These statoliths exhibited a significantly lower average veloc
20 crose was fed to the dark pretreated, starch statolith-free pulvini during gravistimulation in the da
21                                   The starch statolith hypothesis of gravity sensing in plants postul
22 l growth of plants, and the classical starch-statolith hypothesis proposed more than a century ago po
23                                   The starch-statolith hypothesis proposes that starch-filled amylopl
24 es a molecular interpretation for the starch-statolith hypothesis: the organelle-movement-triggered m
25 dea that sedimenting amyloplasts function as statoliths in gravitropism.
26  plants and provides support for the role of statoliths in gravity perception.
27 oposes that starch-filled amyloplasts act as statoliths in plant gravisensing, moving in response to
28  the hypothesis that amyloplasts function as statoliths in shoots as well as roots.
29 y sense the direction of gravity by means of statoliths in specialized cells.
30  plants postulates that the sedimentation of statoliths in specialized statocytes (columella cells) p
31  have analyzed the sedimentation kinetics of statoliths in the central S2 columella cells of Arabidop
32 n of statolith-driven motion of the cytosol, statolith-induced deformation of the ER membranes, and a
33 duction of the kinetic energy of sedimenting statoliths into a biochemical signal involves a combinat
34 ER contact sites indicate that the weight of statoliths is sufficient to locally deform the ER membra
35 stimulation can elicit feedback control over statolith mass by changing the size, number, and groupin
36     However, no tests have yet determined if statolith mass is regulated to increase or decrease grav
37                                              Statoliths moved by laser tweezers against the ER bounda
38 llowing 90 degrees rotation of the root, the statoliths moved downward along the distal wall and then
39 umella cells suggest that the low-resistance statolith pathway in the cell periphery corresponds to t
40 m SW-grown plants typically contain 50 to 60 statoliths per cell, whereas rhizoids from APW-grown pla
41 izoids from APW-grown plants contain 5 to 10 statoliths per cell.
42                          How gravity-induced statoliths repositioning is translated into asymmetric a
43 ontrol loop as a mechanism for modulation of statolith responsiveness to inertial acceleration.
44                     Quantitative analysis of statolith sedimentation behavior was accomplished using
45 these results are consistent with the starch-statolith sedimentation hypothesis for gravity sensing.
46 gle-dependent variation in PIN asymmetry and statolith sedimentation in the columella.
47 ption/transduction pathway that occurs after statolith sedimentation, but before auxin transport.
48 ponse of roots (NGR) proteins polarize along statolith sedimentation, thus providing a plausible mech
49            At 4 degrees C, starch-containing statoliths sedimented normally in both wild-type and the
50 ntra-aggregate sliding motions of individual statoliths suggest a contribution of hydrodynamic forces
51 , we visualized the NGR1 localization on the statolith surface and plasma membrane (PM) domains in cl
52 ring the subsequent sedimentation phase, the statoliths tend to move at a distance to the cortical en
53             These results support the starch-statolith theory of graviperception in higher plants and
54 ating plastids, known as amyloplasts, act as statoliths to facilitate downstream gravitropism.
55 ed by sedimentation of starch-rich plastids (statoliths) to the bottom of the central root cap cells.
56 h-resolution electron tomography analysis of statolith-to-ER contact sites indicate that the weight o
57 ation of the columella cells accelerates the statoliths toward the central cytoplasm within <1 s of r
58                                         When statolith trajectories traversed the complete width or l
59                        In addition, although statoliths undergoing distal-to-side sedimentation began
60 try) of internal calcified structures called statoliths, with elemental analyses (X-Ray Fluorescence
61 try) of internal calcified structures called statoliths, with elemental analyses (X-Ray Fluorescence