コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 retroviral drugs (zalcitabine, didanosine or stavudine).
2 more convenient (specifically didanosine and stavudine).
3 minotransferase levels among patients taking stavudine.
4 d to 5-fold) to didanosine, zalcitabine, and stavudine.
5 sted of zidovudine plus either didanosine or stavudine.
6 sed resistance to AZT, ddI, zalcitibine, and stavudine.
7 received 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, or 2.0 mg/kg/day of stavudine.
8 stance, the primary candidates for replacing stavudine.
9 , 2',3'-dideoxycytidine, dideoxyinosine, and stavudine.
11 /day), 3TC (Lamivudine 50 mg/kg/day) or D4T (Stavudine 10 mg/kg/day) for 5 days, and cortices, hippoc
12 aboratory) occurred in 104 (67%) children on stavudine, 103 (65%) on zidovudine, and 105 (64%), on ab
13 occurred more frequently in those receiving stavudine (12% in the stavudine group compared with 4% i
18 F and 253 (84%) of 301 in patients receiving stavudine (95% confidence interval, -10.4% to 1.5%), exc
20 exhibited low-level cross-resistance to both stavudine and lamivudine in drug susceptibility assays.
23 ir with nelfinavir, each coadministered with stavudine and lamivudine, in 653 antiretroviral therapy-
24 ir versus nelfinavir, each administered with stavudine and lamivudine, in 653 antiretroviral-naive, h
25 reverse-transcriptase inhibitors, especially stavudine and lamivudine, was associated with possible m
26 ween specific drugs and HIV lipohypertrophy, stavudine and zidovudine have been implicated in the dev
27 two daily regimens: 600 mg of zidovudine (or stavudine) and 300 mg of lamivudine, or that regimen wit
28 49.3%) to thymidine analogues (zidovudine or stavudine), and 3683 (47.4%) to protease inhibitors.
29 avir every 8 h with 200 mg nevirapine, 40 mg stavudine, and 150 mg lamivudine, each given twice daily
30 ation [three HAART drugs (3-plex; indinavir, stavudine, and ddI)] at their clinical plasma concentrat
32 a first regimen failure, 0.55); didanosine, stavudine, and efavirenz (hazard ratio, 0.63); or zidovu
36 tients were on therapy (lopinavir/ritonavir, stavudine, and lamivudine) with plasma HIV RNA <50 copie
37 e three-drug regimens containing didanosine, stavudine, and nelfinavir (hazard ratio for a first regi
38 ree-drug regimens beginning with didanosine, stavudine, and nelfinavir (hazard ratio for regimen fail
39 for cross-resistance between zidovudine and stavudine, and they suggest a possible effect of zidovud
40 ur previous observations of NRTIs, abacavir, stavudine, and zalcitabine increased HIV-1 mutation freq
42 t not efavirenz combined with didanosine and stavudine) appeared to delay the failure of the second r
44 stavudine placebo twice daily) (n = 286) or stavudine at standard doses twice daily (plus emtricitab
45 l Treatment Guidelines recommend phasing-out stavudine because of its risk of long-term toxicity.
46 in resistance to zidovudine and >250-fold to stavudine) but not to other nucleoside reverse transcrip
48 increase at 3 years compared to patients on stavudine-containing regimens (2.1 vs 11.7 mg/dL, P < .0
49 ddC) > didanosine (ddI metabolized to ddA) > stavudine (d4T) >> lamivudine (3TC) > tenofovir (PMPA) >
51 drug substitutions and regimen switches from stavudine (d4T) and zidovudine (AZT) regimens have been
52 e was found to regain sensitivity to AZT and stavudine (D4T) as a consequence of a pharmacologically
53 e safety, tolerance, and pharmacokinetics of stavudine (d4T) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-in
54 ing zidovudine were randomized either to add stavudine (d4T) or didanosine (ddI) to their current reg
55 alcitabine (ddC), didanosine (ddI), 3TC, and stavudine (d4T) were determined, using an enzymatic assa
56 gant multistep continuous flow synthesis for stavudine (d4T), a potent nucleoside chemotherapeutic ag
57 ent effects of the first-line ART containing stavudine (d4T), azidothymidine (AZT) and TDF on death a
60 rminating 2'-3'-didehydro 3'-deoxythymidine [stavudine (D4T)] and 2'-3'-dideoxyinosine [didanosine (d
61 avir, lopinavir, zidovudine (AZT), abacavir, stavudine, didanosine (ddI), and lamivudine] individuall
64 dine or emtricitabine, abacavir, zidovudine, stavudine, didanosine, and tenofovir and a specific GSS
65 e susceptibilities of PERV RT to lamivudine, stavudine, didanosine, zalcitabine, and zidovudine were
66 idence interval, 1.91-6.20]) or who received stavudine-didanosine combination therapy (odds ratio, 2.
67 lamivudine-nevirapine, stavudine-zidovudine, stavudine-didanosine, stavudine-saquinavir, stavudine-ne
69 viral therapy duration, smoking, statin use, stavudine/didanosine/zidovudine exposure, time-updated b
71 roviral therapy (ART) (P = .02), duration of stavudine exposure (P < .01), low-density lipoprotein ch
72 profiles associated with past zidovudine or stavudine exposure or any interactions between ART drug
73 prior to combination antiretroviral therapy, stavudine exposure was independently associated with hyp
74 -1 resistance mutations following first-line stavudine failure from 35 publications comprising 1,825
77 were previously untreated (ART naive) or on stavudine for more than 2 years with viral load less tha
79 in the tenofovir DF group compared with the stavudine group (9 [3%] of 299 vs 58 [19%] of 301, P<.00
82 tly in those receiving stavudine (12% in the stavudine group compared with 4% in the zidovudine group
84 he risk for death alone was 26% lower in the stavudine group than in the zidovudine group, but the co
85 cell counts were 30 cells/mm3 higher in the stavudine group than in the zidovudine group; this diffe
86 ion error, 156 children were analysed in the stavudine group, 158 in the zidovudine group, and 164 in
88 vir, compared with 29% of patients receiving stavudine, had undetectable residual viremia (P=.07).
90 s compared with starting with didanosine and stavudine (hazard ratio, 0.68), and significantly delaye
91 05 (64%), on abacavir (p=0.63; zidovudine vs stavudine: hazard ratio [HR] 0.99 [95% CI 0.75-1.29]; ab
93 ir and abacavir have replaced zidovudine and stavudine in antiretroviral regimens, thymidine analog r
94 vudine or a regimen including didanosine and stavudine in combination with either nelfinavir or efavi
95 ganization guidelines on the substitution of stavudine in first-line ART in resource-limited settings
96 sition, involving both abdominal obesity and stavudine-induced peripheral lipoatrophy, might contribu
99 arms that included different combinations of stavudine, lamivudine (3TC), nevirapine (Nvp), nelfinavi
100 enz was highly effective and comparable with stavudine, lamivudine, and efavirenz in antiretroviral-n
103 For patients on the first-line regimen of stavudine, lamivudine, and nevirapine the benefits of vi
104 th the WHO-recommended first-line regimen of stavudine, lamivudine, and nevirapine to second-line ant
105 hat significantly more children who received stavudine, lamivudine, nevirapine, and nelfinavir had pl
106 the initiation of therapy and treatment with stavudine, lamivudine, nevirapine, and nelfinavir were a
107 binations: lamivudine-zidovudine, lamivudine-stavudine, lamivudine-saquinavir, lamivudine-nevirapine,
108 erase domain were associated with failure of stavudine-lamivudine-nevirapine (d4T/3TC/NVP; P < .01),
109 ed were zidovudine/lamivudine (66% of PYFU), stavudine/lamivudine (17.6%), and stavudine/didanosine (
110 er 12 months in HIV-positive adults starting stavudine/lamivudine/nevirapine in Malawi, using Sanger,
111 to receive either tenofovir DF (n = 299) or stavudine (n = 303), with placebo, in combination with l
112 ther tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (n=55) or stavudine (n=45), by use of an HIV RNA assay with a limi
113 for tenofovir DF [n = 170] vs +134 mg/dL for stavudine [n = 162], P<.001), total cholesterol (+30 mg/
114 the four-drug regimen containing didanosine, stavudine, nelfinavir, and efavirenz and the groups that
115 stavudine-didanosine, stavudine-saquinavir, stavudine-nevirapine, lamivudine-zidovudine-saquinavir,
117 ir in combination with either didanosine and stavudine or zidovudine and lamivudine with therapy invo
118 ART-naive individuals to receive didanosine-stavudine or zidovudine-lamivudine, combined with efavir
119 h dolutegravir+lamivudine+zidovudine/(one on stavudine) (OR=19.4, 95%CI 5.1-74.3) or dolutegravir+lam
121 her 200 mg of emtricitabine once daily (plus stavudine placebo twice daily) (n = 286) or stavudine at
123 o women with HIV-1 infection who were taking stavudine presented with lactic acidosis and elevated le
125 rial dysfunction among children who received stavudine regardless of exposure to other medications (o
127 stavudine-zidovudine, stavudine-didanosine, stavudine-saquinavir, stavudine-nevirapine, lamivudine-z
128 zidovudine-saquinavir, lamivudine-zidovudine-stavudine, stavudine-zidovudine-nevirapine, lamivudine-z
129 oside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) stavudine (STV) in mouse cancer models, MMTV-HER2/Neu an
130 ant to the nucleoside analogs lamivudine and stavudine, suggesting that mutations conferring resistan
131 susceptibility to group 1 drugs (zidovudine, stavudine, tenofovir, and adefovir) increased when M184V
133 tase inhibitor (NRTI) backbones (zidovudine, stavudine, tenofovir, or abacavir, plus lamivudine or em
136 in many patients (63%) after interruption of stavudine treatment; these patients could resume stavudi
137 ed inhibition by zidovudine triphosphate and stavudine triphosphate and, to a lesser extent, lamivudi
141 Exposure to lamivudine and to lamivudine-stavudine were also associated with an increased risk of
142 , and tolerability compared with twice-daily stavudine when used with once-daily didanosine and efavi
143 ial resistance to AZT, ddI, zalcitibine, and stavudine, whereas a combination of four mutations confe
144 and three-drug combinations of lamivudine or stavudine with other antiretroviral drugs were evaluated
145 (80%) and 95 (81%) ART-naive children in the stavudine, zidovudine, and abacavir groups, respectively
149 amivudine-saquinavir, lamivudine-nevirapine, stavudine-zidovudine, stavudine-didanosine, stavudine-sa
150 saquinavir, lamivudine-zidovudine-stavudine, stavudine-zidovudine-nevirapine, lamivudine-zidovudine-n