ライフサイエンスコーパス: stereopsis

1 subjective depth bias (i.e., the accuracy of stereopsis).

2 ed light on how the mammalian brain computes stereopsis.

3 ease in our knowledge of the neural basis of stereopsis.

4 D images show the same bias when tested with stereopsis.

5 nce implicating this pathway in fine-grained stereopsis.

6 nism that is important for foveal vision and stereopsis.

7 bly cerebral and not specifically related to stereopsis.

8 pital junction appears to be specialized for stereopsis.

9 ternative measure of sensory binocularity to stereopsis.

10 ey perform very poorly on clinical tests for stereopsis.

11 se duration, fusional function, and distance stereopsis.

12 eurogenesis of ipsilateral RGCs and improved stereopsis.

13 and neurophysiological properties of mantis stereopsis.

14 designed for aiding disparity estimation and stereopsis.

15 nucleus (dLGN), underpinning disparity-based stereopsis.

16 damage due to macular degeneration will have stereopsis.

17 ity sensitivity, a hallmark feature of adult stereopsis.

18 ue to generate the 3D depth percept known as stereopsis.

19 tical correction used for the development of stereopsis.

20 valence of reduced visual acuity and lack of stereopsis.

21 d be an indicator of binocular disparity and stereopsis.

22 development is binocular vision, also called stereopsis.

23 esults was evident for both local and global stereopsis.

24 r than retinal disparity has a role in human stereopsis.

25 9) in both groups and most patients had good stereopsis.

26 but had the highest prevalence of fusion and stereopsis.

27 tereopsis was younger than for those without stereopsis (1.2 vs 2.4 months; P = .002).

28 stereopsis was better than for those without stereopsis (20/40 vs 20/252; P = .0003).

29 Stereopsis - 3D vision - has become widely used as a mod

30 malities included strabismus (40%), abnormal stereopsis (44%), and limited ocular motility (40%).

31 nnot account for the conscious perception of stereopsis, although combining the outputs of many V1 ne

32 re highly concordant with both no measurable stereopsis and an absence of fusional vergence.

33 These findings demonstrate that stereopsis and binocular summation are significantly cor

34 ctory vision at various distances, with good stereopsis and contrast sensitivity.

35 plex in the VEP could be a neural marker for stereopsis and fNIRS demonstrated differences in HbO.

36 without CVFDs are more likely to have normal stereopsis and higher VR-QOL than those with CVFDs.

37 group with most patients having good VA and stereopsis and low incidence of strabismus.

38 between fusion and MVEP symmetry and between stereopsis and MVEP symmetry; the concordance between MV

39 eye assessment history, colour vision, gross stereopsis and non-cycloplegic autorefraction) were cond

40 wing the development of binocular vision and stereopsis and reducing the incidence of strabismus.

41 targets for other visual functions including stereopsis and target tracking.

42 n overview of the importance of the Wulst in stereopsis and the need for further study of the Wulst i

43 The precision of stereopsis and vergence are ultimately limited by intern

44 Motion VEPs, random dot stereopsis, and bifoveal fusion were measured in 94 chil

45 the test rotated, a condition that abolishes stereopsis, and comparing the performance to a monocular

46 ositive family history, subnormal random-dot stereopsis, and hypermetropic anisometropia each pose a

47 nt a standard evaluation of ocular motility, stereopsis, and ocular alignment with alternate prism co

48 ude of exodeviation at distance and at near, stereopsis, and office-based control scores at the first

49 plopia, oscillopsia, blurred visual, loss of stereopsis, and reading fatigue.

50 s the first image-computable model of insect stereopsis, and reproduces key features of both neurophy

51 trast sensitivity, vernier acuity, binocular stereopsis, and visual perception.

52 ns; defocus curve, contrast sensitivity, and stereopsis; and Visual Function Questionnaire-25 and sup

53 , the critical periods for susceptibility of stereopsis are described using four-parameter developmen

54 preprogrammed, and the mechanisms turning on stereopsis are extremely experience-dependent in humans.

55 This conclusion supports the clinical use of stereopsis as a screening test for bilateral monocular f

56 eved 20/20 vision in both eyes with improved stereopsis as well.

57 , the improvement of the binocular function (stereopsis), as well as decreased fixational saccade amp

58 , breast-feeding is associated with enhanced stereopsis at age 3.5 y, as is a maternal DHA-rich anten

59 Furthermore, the IXT-ptosis group had worse stereopsis at distance (p = 0.01).

60 For children without stereopsis at first presentation, sequential patching yi

61 Patients without stereopsis at first visit had better stereopsis outcomes

62 rived of normal binocular vision can recover stereopsis at least partially.

63 rea V1, suggesting a possible limit for fine stereopsis at the earliest level of cortical processing.

64 further evidence for qualitatively immature stereopsis based on relative disparity at 4-6 months of

65 a, the critical period for susceptibility of stereopsis begins at 10.8 months and peaks at 20 months.

66 s, the critical period for susceptibility of stereopsis begins at 2.4 months and peaks at 4.3 months.

67 s no statistically significant difference in stereopsis between the 2 treatment groups: Frisby (conta

68 gh AC/A accommodative esotropia; evidence of stereopsis, binocularity (on Worth 4-dot testing), or im

69 ereoanomalous showed substantial recovery of stereopsis, both on psychophysical tests with stimuli th

70 ity, 46% of children gained binocular fusion/stereopsis, but the quality of fusion gained was greater

71 ements are usually not conjugate, precluding stereopsis, but they maintain a wide region of binocular

72 sis, we can predict whether they can achieve stereopsis by using alternate retinal loci at further ec

73 Human stereopsis can operate in dense "cyclopean" images conta

74 reopsis (chi(2) = 2.143, p = 0.143) and near stereopsis (chi(2) = 0.671, p = 0.413).

75 observed between the two groups for distance stereopsis (chi(2) = 2.143, p = 0.143) and near stereops

76 propose that mice use a distinct strategy of stereopsis compared with primates by using a broad range

77 uential treatment (5.12 [IQR, 4.00-7.51] log stereopsis) compared with simultaneous treatment (8.01 [

78 the variables of visual acuity gain or loss, stereopsis, contrast sensitivity, high-order aberrations

79 sequent to prey detection, processes such as stereopsis could work to determine the distance to the p

80 ordination of eye movements is essential for stereopsis (depth perception) and to prevent double visi

81 ld of view, illumination, resolution, color, stereopsis, effect on head motion, and user interface.

82 t the final exam, 12 patients had measurable stereopsis, eight had strabismus, and three had undergon

83 High acuity stereopsis emerges during an early postnatal critical pe

84 nocular response properties and behaviorally stereopsis emerges.

85 et the critical period for susceptibility of stereopsis extends through late infancy and early childh

86 It is well known for its ability to use stereopsis for estimating the distance of objects.

87 s, daily periods of binocular vision rescued stereopsis from the 10-fold reduction observed with cont

88 VA and stereopsis gains following binocular treatment with Cure

89 ive whose clinical tests indicated a lack of stereopsis) had measurable stereopsis of several thousan

90 While stereopsis has been demonstrated for one invertebrate, t

91 , a lack of techniques to probe invertebrate stereopsis has prevented any further progress for three

92 computational, and psychophysical studies of stereopsis have assumed that the perceived surface struc

93 ith the view that before the abrupt onset of stereopsis, human infants may detect the differences bet

94 ly after rather than before the emergence of stereopsis (i.e., when the binocular connections are rel

95 patients) offered observation alone. Median stereopsis improved by 0.4 log units in those who achiev

96 o 0.08 +/- 0.05 at 6 months (p < 0.001), and stereopsis improved from 494.3 +/- 874.5 to 60.7 +/- 28.

97 VA in both eyes, IOD, and stereopsis improved similarly between groups, even after

98 anisms, both offer identical predictions for stereopsis in almost every viewing condition, making it

99 n and highlight the importance of evaluating stereopsis in future studies.

100 parity limit predicts the presence of coarse stereopsis in humans with macular degeneration (MD), whi

101 r, some of these patients even use this poor stereopsis in judging the size of stereoscopically prese

102 We used random dot stereograms to test for stereopsis in male and female mice, and they were able t

103 We thus definitively demonstrate stereopsis in mantises and also demonstrate that the ana

104 f periods of binocular vision could preserve stereopsis in monkeys reared with optical strabismus.

105 ar vision largely preserves local and global stereopsis in monkeys reared with optical strabismus.

106 d 8 weeks of age, the presumed onset-age for stereopsis in monkeys.

107 day, several weeks before the onset age for stereopsis in monkeys.

108 ral upper disparity limit as a predictor for stereopsis in populations with retinal damage.

109 ne example is depth perception via binocular stereopsis in the praying mantis, a predatory insect.

110 his poor stereopsis, we investigated whether stereopsis in these subjects could support size constanc

111 easible to measure distant visual acuity and stereopsis in this age group.

112 hances stereo acuity (i.e., the precision of stereopsis) in young adults with normal vision Here we a

113 Mantis stereopsis, in contrast, does not require figure motion

114 severity of glaucoma, the mean threshold of stereopsis increased as seen with both Titmus and Frisby

115 Binocular stereopsis is a powerful visual depth cue.

116 Stereopsis is a ubiquitous feature of primate mammalian

117 Stereopsis is a valuable feature of human visual percept

118 Thus, the resolution of human stereopsis is not limited by the optics of the well-focu

119 Binocular stereopsis is one of the primary cues for three-dimensio

120 eeks) of misalignment after the emergence of stereopsis is sufficient to drastically reduce the funct

121 position of features in the retinal images; stereopsis is the percept of depth from disparity.

122 Stereopsis is the perception of depth based on small pos

123 Stereopsis is the primary cue underlying our ability to

124 that the critical immaturity limiting infant stereopsis is the well-known insensitivity of the infant

125 ocular image disparities, a prerequisite for stereopsis, is a matter of conjecture.

126 ise revealed the properties of the recovered stereopsis: It has reduced resolution and precision, alt

127 explanations, both based on the geometry of stereopsis, lead to two diametrically opposed hypotheses

128 presence of CVFDs was associated with worse stereopsis levels (odds ratio, 4.49; P = 0.021).

129 ile esotropes before the known onset age for stereopsis may be important for maintaining better binoc

130 eye position, critical for the perception of stereopsis, may be mediated via the rSC.

131 he balance toward the weak eye) and improves stereopsis more so than the push-only protocol, which so

132 For example, in mammals with stereopsis, neurons at the first stages of binocular vis

133 ns within RSNs involved in binocular fusion, stereopsis, ocular movement, emotional processes and soc

134 ity within RSNs related to binocular fusion, stereopsis, oculomotor control, emotional processes, and

135 ram (AmblyoPlay((R))) on visual acuity (VA), stereopsis, oculomotor control, motor proficiency, and p

136 turity is responsible for the poor binocular stereopsis of human infants.

137 omalous retinal correspondence and defective stereopsis of microstrabismus appear to be consequences

138 dicated a lack of stereopsis) had measurable stereopsis of several thousand are seconds or better.

139 y status, including depth of suppression and stereopsis of those treated with binocular therapy.

140 Albinos who do not demonstrate stereopsis on clinical tests can have stereoscopic perce

141 4.5 years of age a masked examiner assessed stereopsis on these patients using 3 different tests: (1

142 t differences between the two groups in near stereopsis or exodeviation magnitude (p > 0.05).

143 Linear (for stereopsis) or logistic (for surgery) regression was use

144 4 mo were more likely to achieve high-grade stereopsis, or stereoscopic vision, than were children w

145 at 4-6 months of age.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Stereopsis, our ability to sense depth from horizontal i

146 Bifocals did not improve stereopsis outcomes compared with single-vision lenses.

147 without stereopsis at first visit had better stereopsis outcomes with sequential treatment (5.12 [IQR

148 entation, sequential patching yielded better stereopsis outcomes.

149 type of optical correction did not influence stereopsis outcomes.

150 Daily periods of binocular vision preserved stereopsis over 16 weeks of optical strabismus for one o

151 ent and both visual impairment and defective stereopsis (p = 0.035).

152 aneous treatment (8.01 [IQR, 5.65-9.21]) log stereopsis, P = 0.046).

153 Infant and adult stereopsis performance approached, but did not reach, th

154 epair on fixational eye movements (FEMs) and stereopsis recovery in patients with fusion maldevelopme

155 The main cue to distance, stereopsis, relies on the slight offsets between the ima

156 Thus, the roles of different visual areas in stereopsis remain poorly defined.

157 Binocular stereopsis requires the convergence of visual informatio

158 Participants with normal stereopsis showed facilitative and suppressive binocular

159 ts that they may use a distinct strategy for stereopsis.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Binocular vision allow

160 failed the distant visual acuity test or the stereopsis test.

161 had a positive response to at least 1 of the stereopsis tests.

162 igher percentage of participants with normal stereopsis than the non-CVFD group (61% vs. 21%, respect

163 were also more likely to achieve high-grade stereopsis than were children whose mothers did not eat

164 heless, some individuals with MD have coarse stereopsis that is useful for eye-hand coordination.

165 turational factors indicated by the onset of stereopsis (the ability to detect depth in an image on t

166 es in depth is largely informed by binocular stereopsis, the ability to decode depth from the horizon

167 Praying mantids use stereopsis, the computation of distances from disparitie

168 complexity of one of the critical links for stereopsis, the correspondence problem.

169 are thought to form the neural substrate for stereopsis, the mere existence of disparity-selective ne

170 Stereopsis, the perception of depth based on the dispari

171 Human stereopsis, the perception of depth from differences in

172 Stereopsis, the perception of depth from small differenc

173 oacuity tests to measure depth perception as stereopsis threshold in seconds of arc.

174 Here we provide evidence for the recovery of stereopsis through perceptual learning, the repetitive p

175 Assessments included VA (LogMAR), stereopsis (Titmus Fly), oculomotor parameters (saccadic

176 By limiting stereopsis to measuring the distance of moving objects a

177 ovements, consistent with a shift from using stereopsis to other monocular cues, such as motion or po

178 Here we ask whether the precision of stereopsis varies with professional experience with prec

179 y of amblyopia, strabismus angle, nystagmus, stereopsis, vergence, and subject age.

180 udies evaluating the correlation of BiS with stereopsis, visual field expansion, and quality of life

181 The median visual acuity for patients with stereopsis was better than for those without stereopsis

182 Stereopsis was log transformed for statistical analysis.

183 Stereopsis was measured in patients with an intact fello

184 In both groups, stereopsis was similar at the initial and final visits,

185 The median age at surgery for patients with stereopsis was younger than for those without stereopsis

186 Furthermore, for those without stereopsis, we can predict whether they can achieve ster

187 To identify neuronal mechanisms underlying stereopsis, we characterized interactions between inputs

188 ate the functional consequences of this poor stereopsis, we investigated whether stereopsis in these

189 rocedure: Patient demographics, VA, IOD, and stereopsis were compared between groups.

190 on procedures: Patient demographics, VA, and stereopsis were compared.

191 of deviation at near and far, diplopia, and stereopsis were evaluated.

192 Color vision, visual fields, and stereopsis were impaired in most participants who were a

193 ith MD (n = 25, male and female) have coarse stereopsis when the distance between intact retinal loca

194 Individuals have stereopsis when the separation between intact retinal lo

195 ial contrast sensitivity, eye alignment, and stereopsis with Gabor and random dot targets.

196 NS had improvement in visual acuity but poor stereopsis with part-time patching and required longer d

197 iplopia and improves binocular alignment and stereopsis, without significant complications.

198 ience during early infancy severely disrupts stereopsis, yet the critical period for susceptibility o