ライフサイエンスコーパス: sternal

1 s among patients who expressed a preference (sternal = 75.6%, leg = 74.6%).

2 the other half with intradermal sutures (484 sternal and 516 leg segments).

3 The sternal and clavicular heads were torn in 10 patients, o

4 Sternal and leg wounds were studied prospectively, each

5 nd sacral levels of the skeleton, and showed sternal and pelvic malformations not previously observed

6 Two hundred forty-two patients with sternal and saphenous vein harvest wounds had half of ea

7 The sternal bands articulate with the ribs in two styles, mo

8 lates with the clavicle and differs from the sternal bands in both embryonic HOX expression and patte

9 ticulation styles and the subdivision of the sternal bands into sternebrae were key innovations likel

10 hem as homologs of the interclavicle and the sternal bands of synapsid outgroups.

11 Fusion of the interclavicle and the anterior sternal bands to form a presternum anterior to the first

12 mapping indicates that the interclavicle and sternal bands were independent elements throughout most

13 rax (n = 2), pericarditis (n = 2), dislodged sternal bar (n = 3), and mildly hypertrophic scar (n = 1

14 The sternal bar was removed from 101 patients 6 months after

15 In a lethal rhesus macaque model of EVD, 18 sternal BM samples exposed to the Kikwit strain of EBOV

16 Here we collected human sternal BM samples from over 150 cardiac surgery patient

17 ound infection (involving the sternal wires, sternal bone, and/or mediastinum), and (3) score for add

18 systolic murmur best heard at the left upper sternal border.

19 stolic murmur was detected at the left upper sternal border.

20 B (mouth-to-mouth ventilation), and step C (sternal (cardiac) compressions) into basic life support.

21 stics of Col II and CS obtained from chicken sternal cartilage (CSC) via enzymatic hydrolysis for var

22 Their development overlaps with that of sternal cartilage development in chicks and mice.

23 of a cyanogen bromide (CNBr) (CB) digest of sternal cartilage revealed an alpha1(II)CB11 peptide dou

24 polymerase chain reaction in embryonic skin, sternal cartilage, and tendon, but is barely detectable

25 ll counts, bone marrow colony forming units, sternal cellularity and megakaryocyte numbers in drug tr

26 Transient transfections of chick sternal chondrocytes and fibroblasts with reporter plasm

27 Transient transfections of chick sternal chondrocytes and fibroblasts with reporter plasm

28 r cartilage and perichondrium; articular and sternal chondrocytes expressed p38 isoforms alpha, beta,

29 that Ctgf mRNA was down-regulated in primary sternal chondrocytes from Sox9(flox/flox) mice infected

30 rom engineered cartilage, generated by chick sternal chondrocytes grown in a hollow fiber bioreactor,

31 pase 3/7 activities were examined in primary sternal chondrocytes isolated from 3-day-old neonatal Co

32 Transgenic sternal chondrocytes showed reduced TGFbeta signaling as

33 Smurf2 overexpression in mouse sternal chondrocytes was confirmed by reverse transcript

34 1 transcription following treatment of chick sternal chondrocytes with growth factors was accompanied

35 Primary embryonic chick sternal chondrocytes, which express abundant type II col

36 the Qp/Qs (1/36 v/s 8/20; P=0.001), delayed sternal closure (6/36 v/s 7/20; P=0.001), and extracorpo

37 ediate increase in ventilation after delayed sternal closure (n = 3) or removal of pericardial blood

38 sociated with increased incidence of delayed sternal closure (p = 0.003) and longer duration of mecha

39 ry function may be compromised after delayed sternal closure and that ventilatory support should be i

40 nuously for 30 mins before and after delayed sternal closure in paralyzed ventilated infants.

41 Delayed sternal closure is an effective approach to the manageme

42 study was to establish the impact of delayed sternal closure on expired tidal volume, respiratory sys

43 Studies examining the effect of sternal closure on respiratory function have not been pu

44 rnal closure to assess clinical responses to sternal closure or changes in ventilatory support.

45 lied in monitoring blood gases after delayed sternal closure to assess clinical responses to sternal

46 4 (11%) died before sternal closure; delayed sternal closure was performed in the remaining 114.

47 res for managing open sternotomy and delayed sternal closure were analyzed retrospectively.

48 ac surgery, chromosomal anomaly, and delayed sternal closure were independently associated with incre

49 amics and respiratory variables occur during sternal closure, often requiring adjustment of inotropic

50 rculatory arrest; and postoperative--delayed sternal closure, sepsis, renal failure, pulmonary hypert

51 During sternal closure, significant increases were noted in pul

52 e leak increased by > or = 10% after delayed sternal closure, thereby invalidating recorded changes i

53 y a mean of 17% and 29%, respectively, after sternal closure.

54 num and subcutaneous wound were taken before sternal closure.

55 Of the 128 patients, 14 (11%) died before sternal closure; delayed sternal closure was performed i

56 In animal models, sternal compressions alone can produce some ventilation

57 l tube, showed essentially no ventilation by sternal compressions alone.

58 in the incidence of intraoperative bacterial sternal contamination, nor postoperative infections, bet

59 ors began treating these wounds with radical sternal debridement followed by closure using muscle or

60 management, and 6 patients required multiple sternal debridements.

61 er of an omphalocele, ectopia cordis, distal sternal defect, pericardial defect, anterior diaphragmat

62 netrance and the expressivity of the rib and sternal defects are increased, suggesting synergistic in

63 The sternal defects seen in hoxb-2 mutant mice are similar t

64 While a majority of these mice had severe sternal defects that compromised their ability to breath

65 thoracic skeleton, including rib fusions and sternal defects.

66 coarctation of the aorta, eye anomalies, and sternal defects.

67 al outline of the lower sternum indicating a sternal deficiency.

68 There was no evidence of systemic toxicity, sternal dehiscence and resistant strains emergence.

69 ting room for bleeding, and mediastinitis or sternal dehiscence requiring surgery were also less in t

70 ing injury to or embolism from prior grafts, sternal dehiscence, phrenic nerve injury, excessive hemo

71 ons, two transient ischemic attacks, and one sternal dehiscence.

72 tasis (12), pleural effusion (13), recurrent sternal depression (5), and pericarditis (3).

73 e of death is likely due to abnormal rib and sternal development, leading to an inability to breathe.

74 Causes included puncture or erosion by a sternal edge in three and tearing at the myocardial-ster

75 lactic regional antibiotic delivery (RAD) to sternal edges during cardiac surgery, it is seldom perfo

76 Ancestrally, synapsids exhibit a single sternal element and previously the earliest report of a

77 ng of the perinatal mouse reveals two paired sternal elements, both composed primarily of cells with

78 he first evolutionary appearance of ossified sternal elements.

79 Sternal experimentation in relation to flight characteri

80 , although cell mixing may occur at the most sternal extremities.

81 ubcutaneous tissue but not extending down to sternal fixation wires), (2) deep wound infection (invol

82 prophylactic systemic antibiotics and rigid sternal fixation.

83 ung contusions, one acetabular fracture, one sternal fracture, and one adrenal hematoma.

84 2 or more rib fractures, ruptured diaphragm, sternal fracture, and pulmonary contusion or laceration

85 nal synostosis, ocular proptosis, precocious sternal fusion, and abnormalities in secondary branching

86 These mice exhibit cranial suture and sternal fusions that are exacerbated when the BAC copy n

87 is sex pheromone in the sixth intersegmental sternal glands of their abdomens.

88 mone from the 5(th) and 6(th) intersegmental sternal glands of virgin queens.

89 ges (total gentamicin of 260 mg) between the sternal halves at surgical closure (n = 753) vs no inter

90 head was torn in two patients, and only the sternal head was torn in three patients.

91 an abandoned subcutaneous array experienced sternal heating that subsided on premature cessation of

92 ifferences among the groups in occurrence of sternal infection (1.3%, 2.6%, and 1.4%, respectively; P

93 .2%, reoperation for bleeding 3.8%, and deep sternal infection 0.8%.

94 d ventilation, prolonged postoperative stay, sternal infection, and bleeding) after adjustment for co

95 y and morbidities (stroke, reoperation, deep sternal infection, ventilation >48 hours, postoperative

96 s, one Q wave myocardial infarction, and one sternal infection.

97 Mediastinitis and sternal infections were not observed among patients unde

98 ocardial infarction, neurologic events, deep sternal infections, and atrial fibrillation), the level

99 he primary outcome was a composite of death, sternal infections, prolonged ventilation, cardiac arrhy

100 Preservation of sternal integrity allows patients to recover earlier, re

101 edge in three and tearing at the myocardial-sternal interface in four.

102 he shoulder mobility at the pivotal clavicle-sternal joint in marsupial and placental gliders.

103 or maintenance of intervertebral, carpal and sternal joints, and the joint fusion process commences a

104 rd Ornithuromorpha, alongside a fully formed sternal keel and enlarged caudal projections, both criti

105 a midline ridge, a possible precursor of the sternal keel, in Pygostylia.

106 In all cases, the sternal lesion was absent at discharge and/or at later f

107 nd therapeutic approaches to rapidly growing sternal lesions in pediatricpatients because recognizing

108 s of childhood (SELSTOC) are rapidly growing sternal lesions that tend to resolve spontaneously.

109 We present five cases of rapidly growing sternal lesions whose clinical and radiological features

110 e primary sites of persistence being tonsil, sternal lymph node, and inguinal lymph node.

111 on that spans the suprasternal notch and the sternal manubrium, these dual-sensing devices allow meas

112 We analyzed all cases of sternal masses in pediatric patients seen between 2012 a

113 Thus, we suggest that in turtles, the sternal morphogenesis is prevented in the ventral mesenc

114 Through a review of sternal morphology across Synapsida, we reconstruct the

115 er extremity (n = 4), intrathoracic (n = 3), sternal (n = 34), breast (n = 3), chest wall (n = 18), a

116 al edema, adenopathy, pleural effusion, or a sternal or lung abnormality).

117 p (P <.05) between age or sex and pattern of sternal ossification (normal vs asynchronous).

118 e of asynchronous ossification of one of the sternal ossification centers 1-4 (P >.003) and of occurr

119 Missing sternal ossification centers occur most commonly at segm

120 midline and bifid sternum as well as delayed sternal ossification.

121 .7 years) were retrospectively evaluated for sternal ossification.

122 wound infections (29%), mediastinitis (16%), sternal osteomyelitis (6%), and pericarditis (6%).

123 bypass surgery that had been complicated by sternal osteomyelitis caused by the Staphylococcus aureu

124 serious infection (bacteremia and associated sternal osteomyelitis, infective endocarditis) caused by

125 A transverse anterior sternal osteotomy was used on most patients.

126 Here, we introduce a skin-like, wireless sternal patch that captures changes in cardiac mechanics

127 n either side; however, unlike the ribs, the sternal precursors do not originate from the somites.

128 tein levels and signaling in murine neonatal sternal primary chondrocytes.

129 The patient was examined with ultrasound, sternal radiographs, CT and MRI.

130 age and injury to the heart and lungs during sternal re-entry and cardiac dissection.

131 ntial for injury to previous bypass graft on sternal re-entry.

132 ingle-graft group (P=0.005), and the rate of sternal reconstruction was 1.9% versus 0.6% (P=0.002).

133 under fasting (M1), after surgery, 3 h after sternal recumbency (M2), after rescue analgesia (M3) and

134 heral vascular access may be compromised and sternal reentry is more likely to result in cardiac inju

135 ollar incision aided by a specially designed sternal retractor.

136 y projecting sternum; bizarre, paddle-shaped sternal ribs; and a full gastral basket - the first reco

137 f occurrence of asynchronous ossification at sternal segment 2 (P <.018).

138 Asynchronous ossification of inferior sternal segment 5 was recorded separately.

139 Of the 916 superior four sternal segments (four segments in each of 229 patients)

140 Four superior sternal segments were considered normal if they were oss

141 ossification, as compared with the remaining sternal segments, was demonstrated or if ossification wa

142 eft internal mammary artery graft is done by sternal-sparing approaches or by robotic-assisted, endos

143 6.9% vs. leg sutured = 32.6%; p = 0.001, and sternal stapled = 14.9% vs. sternal sutured = 3.7%; p =

144 9%; p = 0.99, and sternal sutured = 0.4% vs. sternal stapled = 2.5%; p = 0.128).

145 her, raising questions about how specialized sternal structures evolved in birds and how they are rel

146 = 9.3% vs. leg stapled = 8.9%; p = 0.99, and sternal sutured = 0.4% vs. sternal stapled = 2.5%; p = 0

147 ; p = 0.001, and sternal stapled = 14.9% vs. sternal sutured = 3.7%; p = 0.00005).

148 cting injury, (4) chest wall tenderness, (5) sternal tenderness, (6) thoracic spine tenderness, and (

149 202 consecutive patients who underwent trans-sternal thymectomy for symptomatic myasthenia gravis fro

150 improvement, compared to conventional trans-sternal thymectomy, neither the pathologic diagnosis (pr

151 use ancestral character estimations to trace sternal trait acquisition through the bird stem group, a

152 Self-limiting sternal tumors of childhood (SELSTOC) are rapidly growin

153 Trans-sternal ultrasound scans of the thymus were performed at

154 ing sternotomy and adverse interactions with sternal wires remain unclear.

155 rom electrical noise due to interaction with sternal wires, and failure to terminate spontaneous or i

156 es), (2) deep wound infection (involving the sternal wires, sternal bone, and/or mediastinum), and (3

157 tricular tachycardia (20%); leg wound (15%); sternal wound (5%); pneumonia (5%); gastrointestinal com

158 d for a debridement procedure of an infected sternal wound after a cardiac surgery.

159 nd have reduced the mean hospital stay after sternal wound closure of these critically ill patients.

160 elation to flap choices, hospital days after sternal wound closure, and incidence rates of morbidity

161 th objective clinical improvement, including sternal wound closure, improved liver function, and subs

162 arization and a composite including MACE and sternal wound complication (SWC).

163 The rate of sternal wound complication was 3.5% in the bilateral-gra

164 ry endpoints were bleeding complications and sternal wound complications up to 6 months after surgery

165 There were more sternal wound complications with bilateral internal-thor

166 in diabetic patients despite higher risk of sternal wound complications.

167 d be considered in patients at high risk for sternal wound complications.

168 Using the principles of sternal wound debridement and early flap coverage, the a

169 /753 [6.5%] vs 46/749 [6.1%]; P = .77), deep sternal wound infection (14/753 [1.9%] vs 19/749 [2.5%];

170 .0 [7.2]; P = .67), or rehospitalization for sternal wound infection (23/753 [3.1%] vs 24/749 [3.2%];

171 control group, respectively, in superficial sternal wound infection (49/753 [6.5%] vs 46/749 [6.1%];

172 2 cardiac surgical patients at high risk for sternal wound infection (diabetes, body mass index >30,

173 evention of S. aureus bacteremia and/or deep sternal wound infection (including mediastinitis) throug

174 esity was a risk factor only for superficial sternal wound infection (P < .001; odds ratio, 2.3), leg

175 rd increased pulmonary complications or deep sternal wound infection (P = .65).

176 Management of deep sternal wound infection (SWI), a serious complication af

177 d a significant reduction in mortality after sternal wound infection and have reduced the mean hospit

178 e the first reported case of a postoperative sternal wound infection and pneumonia caused by in a hea

179 at higher risk for postoperative superficial sternal wound infection and renal failure.

180 in-hospital stays as well as the absence of sternal wound infection are the main advantages of this

181 al infarction, repeat revascularization, and sternal wound infection between propensity score-matched

182 Acute cholecystitis and sternal wound infection caused an inordinate risk of com

183 We describe a case of sternal wound infection caused by Trichosporon inkin wit

184 between race and the risk of stroke or deep sternal wound infection for either AVR or MVR.

185 rnotomy (p = 0.008) and patients treated for sternal wound infection from 1988 to 1992 (p = 0.024).

186 The mortality of sternal wound infection has dropped to < 10%.

187 However, concerns about sternal wound infection have discouraged the use of BIMA

188 upport in 73%; shock occurred in 8% and deep sternal wound infection in 1.3%.

189 ysis, there was no significant difference in sternal wound infection in 63 of 753 patients randomized

190 f these difficult cases, a classification of sternal wound infection is presented.

191 arction (new Q wave) rate was 0.6%, and deep sternal wound infection occurred in 1%.

192 Sternal wound infection occurred in one patient.

193 The primary end point was sternal wound infection occurring through 90 days postop

194 th no intervention did not reduce the 90-day sternal wound infection rate.

195 urgical technique with no additional risk of sternal wound infection related to age.

196 ne use of prophylactic systemic antibiotics, sternal wound infection still occurs in 5% or more of ca

197 ks of cardiovascular events, but the risk of sternal wound infection was increased (risk difference,

198 Of these, only sternal wound infection was significantly more frequent

199 Additional procedures for recurrent sternal wound infection were necessary in 5.1% of patien

200 ve CVA (adjusted OR, 1.06; P=.765), risks of sternal wound infection were substantially increased in

201 epsis/septicemia, 0.5% [n=99]; isolated deep sternal wound infection, 0.5% [n=96]; isolated harvest/c

202 414 [2.4%] versus 13 of 414 [3.1%]; P=0.279; sternal wound infection, 7 of 414 [1.7%] versus 13 of 41

203 y, deep sternal wound infection, superficial sternal wound infection, infection at the saphenous vein

204 tes of flap closure complications, recurrent sternal wound infection, or death.

205 re was no difference in operative mortality, sternal wound infection, or total complications between

206 y, stroke, kidney failure, reoperation, deep sternal wound infection, prolonged mechanical ventilatio

207 , Society of Thoracic Surgeons measure: deep sternal wound infection, renal failure, prolonged ventil

208 major morbidity (stroke, renal failure, deep sternal wound infection, reoperation, prolonged ventilat

209 analyzed included operative mortality, deep sternal wound infection, superficial sternal wound infec

210 With the exception of sternal wound infection, the perception among clinicians

211 accident (CVA), postoperative bleeding, and sternal wound infection, were defined prospectively.

212 of a radial artery, but did increase risk of sternal wound infection.

213 ngestive heart failure, arrhythmias, or deep sternal wound infection.

214 ut not for renal replacement therapy or deep sternal wound infection.

215 ications with the possible exception of deep sternal wound infections (11 [1.3%] vs. 3 [0.4%], p = 0.

216 Clinical prediction models for deep sternal wound infections (DSWI) after coronary artery by

217 Overall, deep sternal wound infections (DSWIs) were uncommon but more

218 lue of topical vancomycin and gentamicin for sternal wound infections (SWI) prophylaxis was further q

219 The small increase in the risk of deep sternal wound infections does not affect the majority of

220 ate modeling BITA increased the risk of deep sternal wound infections only in emergent cases and in o

221 The incidence of sternal wound infections was 7.3% (morning) and 3.0% (af

222 Flap advancements for sternal wound infections were performed in five patients

223 Three patients had sternal wound infections with organisms different from t

224 Disease outbreaks usually involve sternal wound infections, plastic surgery wound infectio

225 Mean hospital stay after sternal wound reconstruction declined from 18.6 days (19

226 and surgical site infections, including deep sternal wound, thoracotomy, and harvest/cannulation site

227 Neither leg nor sternal wounds had a statistically significant differenc