コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 lth risks faced by individuals receiving sex steroid treatment.
2 ecovery of thymic function after a course of steroid treatment.
3 esses, duration of Crohn disease, and use of steroid treatment.
4 cations for evaluating patients on high-dose steroid treatment.
5 as used when patients did not respond to the steroid treatment.
6 e bone marrow at diagnosis or received prior steroid treatment.
7 glucocorticoid-sensitive 6TG1.1 cells before steroid treatment.
8 ses in group B; none were reversible despite steroid treatment.
9 eficient states such as diabetes, and during steroid treatment.
10 individuals with asthma and persist despite steroid treatment.
11 chronic rejection and was down-regulated by steroid treatment.
12 n challenge and decrease in asthmatics after steroid treatment.
13 midine incorporation was observed 24 h after steroid treatment.
14 vents similar to those who received laser or steroid treatment.
15 e, who showed a partial clinical response to steroid treatment.
16 ed with longer periods of active uveitis and steroid treatment.
17 es as observed in dry eye patients following steroid treatment.
18 ar inflammation was mild and reversible with steroid treatment.
19 edication, no late retransplantation, and no steroid treatment.
20 ulointerstitial inflammation, which prompted steroid treatment.
21 r cataract surgery and postoperative topical steroid treatment.
22 on with progressive symptoms despite ongoing steroid treatment.
23 al iNOS levels may reflect responsiveness to steroid treatment.
24 asis of the need or not for systemic cortico-steroid treatment.
25 rtality among patients who do not respond to steroid treatment.
26 mber amplifications, AR splice-variants, and steroid treatment.
27 and AHR that were partially reversible with steroid treatment.
28 utochthonous hepatitis E that resolved under steroid treatment.
29 venting AECOPD requiring both antibiotic and steroid treatment.
30 tion language, or type, dose, or duration of steroid treatment.
31 30 rejection episodes (73.3%) resolved with steroid treatment.
32 cial effect is synergistically enhanced with steroid treatment.
33 d retinal ganglion cells during intravitreal steroid treatment.
34 completely unresponsive to IVIG or high-dose steroid treatment.
35 nt) but progressed in three patients without steroid treatment.
36 r steroid treatment but can progress without steroid treatment.
37 t, ERbeta mRNA levels were unaffected by any steroid treatment.
38 and persisted despite the cessation of oral steroid treatment.
39 assist efforts to reduce the side effects of steroid treatments.
40 eas NO concentrations were not influenced by steroid treatment (3.0 +/- 0.4 ppm and 2.9 +/- 0.2 ppm,
41 trations were also higher in patients not on steroid treatment (3.4 +/- 0.2 ppm) than in steroid-trea
45 to standard treatment and may substitute for steroid treatments aimed at controlling disease activity
46 n graft survival was seen compared with both steroid treatment alone (P < 0.05) and steroid combined
48 ophthalmologist) and evaluated likelihood of steroids treatment among CSC versus matched control pati
50 utations in NPHS2 do not respond to standard steroid treatment and have a reduced risk for recurrence
52 significant association between duration of steroid treatment and status of complete recovery (P < .
53 ss the association between biologics use and steroids treatment and COVID-19 severity and 90-day mort
54 d after correcting for possible confounders, steroid treatment, and acute graft-vs-host disease statu
55 te rejection, which were reversed with bolus steroid treatment, and four were donor-specific antibody
56 ences, especially after cessation of topical steroid treatment, and in individuals with identified ri
57 of diabetes, history of cancer, concomitant steroid treatment, and low CD4 lymphocyte count at RTX i
58 iseases involving bone marrow, no history of steroid treatment, and no other risk factors for osteone
60 nically recognized as asthma, was quelled by steroid treatment, and was unmasked following corticoste
61 id a post-hoc analysis of the 3 year inhaled Steroid Treatment As Regular Therapy (START) study, done
63 tinal thickness was significantly lower with steroid treatment at 3 months (P = 0.04), 6 months (P <
64 aging approach revealed that bevacizumab and steroid treatment blocked leukocyte infiltration into im
66 ons in 10 patients regressed (in nine, after steroid treatment) but progressed in three patients with
69 immediately recovered following cessation of steroid treatment, concurrent with restoration of the th
70 tivation and found that both denervation and steroid treatment contribute to the shift in inactivatio
71 utrophilic airway inflammation murine model, steroid treatment could not suppress neutrophilic inflam
72 r, or Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection, oral steroid treatment decreased Glut1 and PiT2 levels in blo
73 oxide, blood eosinophil counts, and inhaled steroid treatment did not influence cough parameters.
77 as associated with the delayed initiation of steroid treatment for GVHD (0.95 months vs 3.0 months; P
78 ned subgroup analysis of a trial of low-dose steroid treatment for septic shock, patients with commun
79 ization of serum calcium level and pulses of steroid treatment for the most probable underlying cause
81 ne average at 2 months was 56.0 for the oral steroid treatment group and 57.6 dB for the intratympani
84 that is chronic in nature or uncontrolled by steroid treatment have shown good response to immunosupp
85 clonal bands (OCB) and beneficial effects of steroid treatments have provoked the hypothesis that EL
86 89 demonstrated a survival disadvantage with steroid treatment (I2 = 14%; relative benefit, 0.89 [CI,
88 The initial rejection episode responded to steroid treatment in 93.4% (tacrolimus) and 63.8% (CsA-M
89 the use of biomarkers and symptoms to adjust steroid treatment in a T2-low severe asthma-enriched coh
92 several side effects limit the usefulness of steroid treatment in humans leading to the quest for dev
96 ined, whereas IL-13 levels were abrogated by steroid treatment in neonatal HDM-exposed mice and in EB
97 lofazimine outperforms ICB dose reduction or steroid treatment in reversing lethality of irAEs, but u
98 ps and then tested the rats during week 2 of steroid treatment in the eight-arm radial-arm version of
100 We examined the role of denervation and steroid treatment in the shift of the voltage dependence
101 vertigo, recent evidence suggests that early steroid treatment in vestibular neuritis may improve lon
102 well as topical and anterior subconjunctival steroid treatments in uveitis induced by the intravitrea
104 osite effects on Lep transcript abundance to steroid treatments, indicating that these transcriptiona
106 parameters were used to show that intensive steroid treatment induces thymic involution and a profou
107 gh RSV-induced exacerbation was resistant to steroid treatment, inhibition of TNF-alpha and MCP-1 fun
108 of a net change in cell activity with acute steroid treatment is consistent with the possibility tha
109 s from early B-lineage cells,and response to steroid treatment is critical to successful ALL therapy.
113 d therapy; however, the efficacy of systemic steroid treatment is under debate and serious adverse ef
116 oretical analysis of the data suggested that steroid treatment leads to receptors with a greater stab
118 y not only increase our understanding of the steroid treatment mechanism but also help us to better m
119 steroids for non-irAE-related reasons or no steroid treatment (median [IQR] OS, 21.3 [9.3 to 58.2] m
122 ational follow-up of the Multicenter Uveitis Steroid Treatment (MUST) randomized clinical trial compa
124 systemic therapy in the Multicenter Uveitis Steroid Treatment (MUST) Trial and Follow-up Study, 125
126 educing AECOPD requiring both antibiotic and steroid treatment (n = 1,113; cumulative incidence analy
134 r133, we also evaluated the effects of acute steroid treatment on levels of phosphorylated CREB (pCRE
136 used to determine the effects of axotomy and steroid treatment on ribosomal transcription and process
139 periods (4 weeks) and may perpetuate despite steroid treatment or the immediate use of fast-acting im
140 rse-effect profile than conventional topical steroid treatments or other medical or surgical therapie
141 sk factors include bisphosphonate treatment, steroid treatment, osteoporosis, and head/neck radiation
142 predictive for lower capsulotomy rates with steroid treatment over NSAIDs (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.52-0.88
145 2) but no optic neuropathy, diabetes, recent steroid treatment, previous decompression, or muscle sur
148 le disease and with the level of maintenance steroid treatment required to control inflammatory activ
150 V acute graft-versus-host disease related to steroid treatment shows a trend toward a protective effe
154 raftment (T3), at GvHD onset (T4), and after steroid treatment (T5) in 40 patients (7 Hodgkin's Disea
155 d in 54% of biopsies) was less responsive to steroid treatment than rejection without endarteritis, a
158 ous history of weight gain and 2 of systemic steroid treatment; these can be referred to as pseudotum
159 luid parameters was observed after high-dose steroid treatment, thus arguing for an inflammatory-medi
161 nd after 2 weeks of systemic glucocorticoid (steroid) treatment to identify immunological differences
163 and biases of recent low-dose (physiologic) steroid treatment trials limit their ability to provide
165 Despite similar baseline clinical severity, steroid treatment was associated with decreased 28-day s
171 with a random intercept for the site, early steroid treatment was not significantly associated with