戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ion," "cross-reactivity," and "antimicrobial stewardship".
2 bing during hospitalization (fluoroquinolone stewardship).
3 otics is an important tool for antimicrobial stewardship.
4 nd minimal desirable standards of antibiotic stewardship.
5 days following introduction of antimicrobial stewardship.
6 due to these organisms and for antimicrobial stewardship.
7 ect patient treatment and improve antibiotic stewardship.
8 and Prevention's Core Elements of Antibiotic Stewardship.
9 ision-care algorithms, and active antibiotic stewardship.
10 are to identify opportunities for antibiotic stewardship.
11 are opportunities for improved antimicrobial stewardship.
12 ulture bottles to help improve antimicrobial stewardship.
13 rial infections and to facilitate antibiotic stewardship.
14 l antibiotic consumption and a potential for stewardship.
15  promoting responsible antimicrobial use and stewardship.
16 nce has broad implications for antimicrobial stewardship.
17 cuss coordinated approaches to antimicrobial stewardship.
18 nformed therapy decisions and aid antifungal stewardship.
19 ce-based treatment and promote antimicrobial stewardship.
20 as opioid abuse prevention and antimicrobial stewardship.
21 n hospitals with and without fluoroquinolone stewardship.
22 proved clinical management and antimicrobial stewardship.
23 ip Group (ARLG) in the area of antibacterial stewardship.
24 hogens and an integral part of antimicrobial stewardship.
25 ection prevention measures and antimicrobial stewardship.
26 en advocated as a useful tool for antibiotic stewardship.
27 ces of inaction, and the need for antibiotic stewardship.
28 r individual patient outcomes and antibiotic stewardship.
29 global science-business initiative for ocean stewardship.
30 rough infection prevention and antimicrobial stewardship.
31 are opportunities for improved antimicrobial stewardship.
32  not in alignment with prudent antimicrobial stewardship.
33 dhere to the FAIR guiding principles of data stewardship.
34 95% CI 0.23-3.48, p=0.025) during antibiotic stewardship.
35 <0.0001) in the community, during antibiotic stewardship.
36 cteraemia may be of benefit in antimicrobial stewardship.
37 e improve patient outcomes and antimicrobial stewardship.
38 atients; and opinions regarding gift use and stewardship.
39 are to identify opportunities for antibiotic stewardship.
40  is an effective and sustainable approach to stewardship.
41 d and is a challenging subject in antifungal stewardship.
42 velop plans for long-term responsibility and stewardship.
43 stants, are important targets for antibiotic stewardship.
44 n is needed to guide pediatric antimicrobial stewardship.
45       We test a novel approach to antibiotic stewardship.
46 ctive in many areas supporting antimicrobial stewardship.
47          These data may inform perioperative stewardship.
48  optimize resource utilization and radiation stewardship.
49 f asymptomatic bacteriuria aid in antibiotic stewardship.
50   We propose potential solutions that tailor stewardship activities to the needs of the facility and
51 days following introduction of antimicrobial stewardship (adjusted intervention effect -12.12 defined
52 iene, environmental cleaning, and antibiotic stewardship); advanced infection control practices (ie,
53           However, the subject of antifungal stewardship (AFS) has received less attention.
54                                  A CBC-based stewardship algorithm would reduce unnecessary Anaplasma
55 s, mentoring programmes, and social media in stewardship all played a role.
56  Building on its experience of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) advocacy, the Infectious Diseases Soci
57 owever, suitable approaches to antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) in low-income settings are not well st
58 y recognized the importance of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) in the fight to improve outcomes, decr
59  real-time, pharmacist-driven, antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) intervention on patient outcomes.
60 tic allergy testing (AAT) into antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs (AAT-AMS) is not widespread.
61                          However, diagnostic stewardship and antimicrobial stewardship are necessary
62  minireview outlines the roles of diagnostic stewardship and antimicrobial stewardship in the impleme
63 spital networks can help optimize antibiotic stewardship and infection control strategies.
64    This offers an opportunity for diagnostic stewardship and optimization of antimicrobial use.
65          The relationship between antibiotic stewardship and population levels of antibiotic resistan
66 s have important implications for antibiotic stewardship and public health policies and, in particula
67 environmental policy to foster environmental stewardship and public participation, crucial prerequisi
68  be developed in order to improve antibiotic stewardship and reduce the emergence of antibiotic resis
69 s have important implications for antibiotic stewardship and should be considered as new policies for
70                     The impact of diagnostic stewardship and testing algorithms on the utilization an
71                  Implications for antibiotic stewardship and the general improvement of medical decis
72 e healthcare outcomes, improve antimicrobial stewardship, and decrease healthcare costs.
73 provements in diagnostic testing, antibiotic stewardship, and drug pipelines.
74 ents improve patient outcomes, antimicrobial stewardship, and length of hospital stay.
75 ntibiotic and possibly proton pump inhibitor stewardship, and prescribing prophylactic vancomycin and
76 e crisis, the implications for antimicrobial stewardship, and some novel opportunities to limit resis
77 d hospital leadership support for antibiotic stewardship appears to drive the establishment of ASPs.
78  successful introduction of an antimicrobial stewardship approach in Malawi.
79 out sufficient resources to incorporate both stewardship approaches.
80  improved patient outcomes and antimicrobial stewardship are anticipated.
81 mes in men with NGU and better antimicrobial stewardship are likely to arise from the introduction of
82 er, diagnostic stewardship and antimicrobial stewardship are necessary to ensure that these technolog
83                   The goals of antimicrobial stewardship are undermined when reported allergy to peni
84 n of resistance, combined with antimicrobial stewardship, are key interventions to combat the spread
85 immediate global action to improve ecosystem stewardship as a major solution to climate change.
86                        Reports of antibiotic stewardship (AS) integration into the > 1000 United Stat
87 ure identification panel (BCID) coupled with stewardship-based education on interpretation.
88                             As antimicrobial stewardship becomes a mandatory aspect of healthcare in
89                  The automated antimicrobial stewardship BPA effectively reduced antibiotic use and d
90                  The automated antimicrobial stewardship BPA effectively reduced antibiotic use and d
91 sectors have been inconsistent at antibiotic stewardship, but it is unclear which sector has most inf
92 allergy labels directly impact antimicrobial stewardship by leading to use of less effective and broa
93 ado created a unique method of antimicrobial stewardship, called handshake stewardship, that effectiv
94                          Thus, antimicrobial stewardship campaigns to reduce fluoroquinolone use, par
95 ely unquantified, making rational antibiotic stewardship challenging.
96                                   Antibiotic stewardship combined with infection prevention comprises
97 ues, monitoring questions, and antimicrobial stewardship concerns.
98 eraged to foster transnational environmental stewardship, critical to advancing global sustainability
99 ted to impact patient care and antimicrobial stewardship decisions.
100 r improving both patient care and antibiotic stewardship, despite the tendency for positive results w
101 acquired infection prevention, antimicrobial stewardship, disease surveillance, and outbreak response
102 educes apparent AU variation and may enhance stewardship efforts by providing adjusted comparisons to
103 eating this common condition, and antibiotic stewardship efforts in transplantation may help preserve
104                    Our findings suggest that stewardship efforts to minimize and improve fluoroquinol
105                    Our findings suggest that stewardship efforts to minimize and improve fluoroquinol
106  improved patient care, utility in targeting stewardship efforts, and feasibility in hospitals with e
107 rical treatment guidelines and antimicrobial stewardship efforts.
108 tory care is useful to prioritize antibiotic stewardship efforts.
109    Small hospitals need to become a focus of stewardship efforts.
110 d healthcare system to prioritize antibiotic stewardship efforts.
111 rating industry involvement in antimicrobial stewardship efforts.
112 r patient outcomes and support antimicrobial stewardship efforts.
113 aetiologies, implementation of antimicrobial stewardship guidelines across Europe is necessary to lim
114 ischarge, and hospitals with fluoroquinolone stewardship had twice as many new fluoroquinolone starts
115 ch of the national attention with regards to stewardship has focused on primary care providers, there
116                          However, antibiotic stewardship has focused overwhelmingly on hospitalized p
117                           Poor antimicrobial stewardship has resulted in an abundance and diverse ran
118 patient-days) before and after antimicrobial stewardship implementation were measured.
119 t the urgent need for enhanced antimicrobial stewardship in a high-growth industry with broad links t
120           We evaluated whether antimicrobial stewardship in ICUs could reduce antimicrobial consumpti
121                                Antimicrobial stewardship in ICUs with coaching plus audit and feedbac
122         Implementing effective antimicrobial stewardship in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) is asso
123 tcomes indicate that effective antimicrobial stewardship in long-term care is supported by incorporat
124 ld effectively and safely improve antibiotic stewardship in patients with clinically suspected ventil
125 mprove clinical management and antimicrobial stewardship in patients with less frequent Gram-negative
126  for further research specific to antibiotic stewardship in surgical care.
127 d, second, whether it improves antimicrobial stewardship in the era of increasing numbers of urinary
128  of diagnostic stewardship and antimicrobial stewardship in the implementation of rapid molecular inf
129                                    Second is stewardship, including supporting countries to use funds
130                   A multi-faceted outpatient stewardship intervention achieved reductions in overall,
131                    A multifaceted outpatient stewardship intervention achieved reductions in overall,
132 diseases (ID) consultation and antimicrobial stewardship intervention have been shown to improve the
133 ies evaluating rapid diagnostic testing plus stewardship intervention have consistently demonstrated
134 iations between a primary care antimicrobial stewardship intervention in 2009 and primary care prescr
135 s for CAUTI might be an important antibiotic stewardship intervention in hospitals.
136 examined the effect of a national antibiotic stewardship intervention limiting the use of 4C antibiot
137 A mixed persuasive-restrictive 4C antibiotic stewardship intervention was initiated in all population
138 ectrum antimicrobial use associated with the stewardship intervention.
139 teremia to 7 days is an important antibiotic stewardship intervention.
140 m bacteraemia associated with a primary care stewardship intervention.
141 microbial therapy is an important target for stewardship intervention.
142 e and after implementation of MALDI-TOF plus stewardship intervention.
143          These data can inform the design of stewardship interventions and the selection of viral tes
144                   Primary care antimicrobial stewardship interventions can improve antimicrobial pres
145 he optimal approach to conducting antibiotic stewardship interventions has not been defined.
146 ntal implementation study of 2 antimicrobial stewardship interventions in a hematological malignancy
147 ment of antimicrobial policy and appropriate stewardship interventions specific for the COVID-19 pand
148 port the importance of developing antibiotic stewardship interventions specifically targeting UC sett
149                               Hospital-based stewardship interventions targeting fluoroquinolone pres
150 WaRe) classification could facilitate simple stewardship interventions that are widely applicable glo
151  control of overall MDRO burden will require stewardship interventions that take into account both pr
152 ht opportunities for community antimicrobial stewardship interventions to improve antibiotic use by a
153 treatment should be targeted with antibiotic stewardship interventions to improve UTI treatment.
154                             No antimicrobial stewardship interventions were described.
155               All scenarios demonstrate that stewardship interventions, facilitated by changes in cli
156 ibiotic prescribing, implementing antibiotic stewardship interventions, obtaining financial resources
157 se that could be used for local and national stewardship interventions.
158 istance stewardship policy, and interpreting stewardship interventions.
159                                Antimicrobial stewardship is advocated to reduce antimicrobial resista
160                                   Antibiotic stewardship is challenging in hematological malignancy p
161 nnecessary use of antifungals via antifungal stewardship is critical to limit multidrug resistance em
162                                    Handshake stewardship is distinguished by: (1) the lack of prior a
163                A key challenge in antibiotic stewardship is figuring out how to use antibiotics thera
164                       At present, antibiotic stewardship is informed by a 'use it and lose it' princi
165                                Antimicrobial stewardship is needed to ensure prompt appropriate clini
166                                   Diagnostic stewardship is needed to implement appropriate tests for
167                                Antibacterial stewardship is the coordinated effort to improve the app
168                    Rapid AST led to improved stewardship measures but did not impact clinical patient
169                                    Radiation stewardship measures included US utilization process mea
170  as well as infection control and antibiotic stewardship measures.
171                 We recommend that antibiotic stewardship models need to evolve from infection special
172 e turnaround times and enhance antimicrobial stewardship, multiple point-of-care assays have been dev
173 ic infectious diseases (including antibiotic stewardship), nursing, pharmacy, a patient advocate and
174 ic infectious diseases (including antibiotic stewardship), nursing, pharmacy, a patient advocate, and
175 ults suggest that sustained support for IPLC stewardship of Amazon forests is critical.
176  broad multicenter collaboration and careful stewardship of biorepository specimens.
177 016, the National Toxicology Program assumed stewardship of BMDExpress.
178 ment in planning and executing fieldwork and stewardship of cultural heritage.
179 g a fresh look at a familiar challenge: best stewardship of donor organs.
180                                       Better stewardship of land is needed to achieve the Paris Clima
181 eded to inform next steps in the responsible stewardship of this process, from the perspective of tra
182      This metric may be useful for assessing stewardship opportunities and impact.
183 ries' patterns of antibiotic consumption and stewardship opportunities.
184 esholds may provide quantitative targets for stewardship-optimizing the control of resistance while a
185 sion persists about the specific set of land stewardship options available and their mitigation poten
186 t of rapid AST on clinical and antimicrobial stewardship outcomes in real-world practice.
187 maceutical companies invest in antimicrobial stewardship, outlines why they are well suited to help a
188  was made actionable by an expert antibiotic stewardship panel and implemented across hospitals.
189 anism identification and dedicating pharmacy stewardship personnel time on the total hospital costs.
190 menting MALDI-TOF and of dedicating pharmacy stewardship personnel time to interventions, the total h
191 uture surveillance efforts and antimicrobial stewardship policies.
192  resistance, designing antibiotic resistance stewardship policy, and interpreting stewardship interve
193 otic resistance and for designing antibiotic stewardship policy.
194 Antibiotic Stewardship Programs, we analyzed stewardship practices as reported in the 2015 National H
195 should be a vital component of antimicrobial stewardship practices.
196 arn, act globally, and share best antibiotic stewardship practices.
197  on guidelines that follow the antimicrobial stewardship principle.
198                                   Antibiotic stewardship principles such as the restriction of antibi
199 ting (BLAST) is recommended by antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) guidelines, yet few studies ha
200 l diagnostics with and without antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) intervention, and rapid diagno
201 e-escalation comments and daytime antibiotic stewardship program (ASP) intervention.
202                                Antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) physicians and/or pharmacists
203 r rapid platforms coupled with antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) real-time notification (RTN) h
204 valuating standard care (STD), antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP), environmental cleaning (ENV),
205 n for an effective hospital-based antibiotic stewardship program (ASP).
206  conjunction with an effective antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP).
207          Engaging intensivists in antibiotic stewardship program efforts is crucial to sustain the ef
208 d with local leaders for targeted antibiotic stewardship program interventions.
209            Data were collected by antibiotic stewardship program personnel at each hospital, deidenti
210  study evaluating the impact of a diagnostic stewardship program that aimed to optimize BCx use in a
211 f a unique in-person pediatric antimicrobial stewardship program was associated with a significant in
212           This education-based antimicrobial stewardship program was effective in decreasing the inci
213 bility, acceptability, and cost savings of a stewardship program where resources are limited.
214 ditionally evaluate the acceptability of the stewardship program.
215 eveloped and prospectively applied in a mock stewardship program.
216 sessed the effectiveness of an antimicrobial stewardship programme aiming to reduce inappropriate ant
217                      An effective antifungal stewardship programme is essential to control drug resis
218                            The antimicrobial stewardship programme led to a reduction in mean antibio
219 eloping and evaluating paediatric antibiotic stewardship programmes on the basis of the AWaRe index.
220 guidelines, antibiotic formulary, antibiotic stewardship programmes, public health interventions, inf
221 vely affect local and national antimicrobial stewardship programmes.
222 es it a worthwhile addition to antimicrobial stewardship programmes.
223 of medication-related errors, antiretroviral stewardship programs (ARVSPs) are needed to enhance pati
224 trated that the combination of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) and rapid organism identifica
225 s authorities have recommended Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASP) to curb the selection of AMR
226 ower with mRDT in studies with antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, .51-.79),
227                                Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) are a key national initiativ
228                         Though antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) are in place for patient saf
229                                Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) are recommended by the Cente
230             As the workload of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) continues to increase, ASPs
231                        Data on antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) facilitated via telehealth i
232  de-labeling into a new arm of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) has become an increasing glo
233                                   Antibiotic stewardship programs (ASPs) have demonstrated success at
234                                   Antibiotic stewardship programs (ASPs) improve antibiotic prescribi
235 ld experience from established antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) on how institutions can comp
236                                Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) positively impact patient ca
237                                Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) promote the principle of de-
238 s authorities have recommended antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) to curb the selection of AMR
239 in 2015 as a tool for hospital antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) to track and compare AU with
240                                Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) using audit and feedback in
241                                   Antibiotic stewardship programs are designed to address these issue
242 , particularly given the new requirement for stewardship programs by the Centers for Medicare and Med
243                                   Antibiotic stewardship programs have been playing an increasingly i
244                                   Antibiotic stewardship programs have traditionally focused on reduc
245 ciated with the implementation of successful stewardship programs in LTCFs.
246 is modeled upon the success of antimicrobial stewardship programs now mandated by the Joint Commissio
247 ions for hospital formularies and antibiotic stewardship programs regarding positioning of these agen
248                                Antimicrobial stewardship programs should focus on diagnostic difficul
249 To limit aggregate fluoroquinolone exposure, stewardship programs should target both inpatient and di
250   This study demonstrates that antimicrobial stewardship programs support, and do not compete with, i
251 ntion's Core Elements of Hospital Antibiotic Stewardship Programs, we analyzed stewardship practices
252 e should consider implementing antimicrobial stewardship programs.
253 ng appropriate antibiotic use via antibiotic stewardship programs.
254 rm best when integrated within antimicrobial stewardship programs.
255 t provides support for outpatient antibiotic stewardship programs.
256          These data support the expansion of stewardship programs/interventions beyond the walls of h
257 s for implementing effective, automated test stewardship protocols.
258 re, there is a significant need for improved stewardship related to diagnostic testing for and treatm
259                  Implementing MALDI-TOF plus stewardship review and intervention decreased mortality
260 ts to control C difficile through antibiotic stewardship should account for ribotype distributions an
261                                Antimicrobial stewardship should be a central component of C difficile
262 o mitigate their ill effects; and antibiotic stewardship should be a part of every surgeons' practice
263  Consequently, efforts to improve antibiotic stewardship should be coupled with improving hygiene con
264                            TJC antimicrobial stewardship standards demonstrate actions being taken at
265 sion (TJC) recently issued new antimicrobial stewardship standards, consisting of 8 elements of perfo
266                We aimed to inform antibiotic stewardship strategies in a level 3 neonatal intensive c
267  inform rational antimicrobial treatment and stewardship strategies, and models for market reform and
268 quantify this impact under four hypothetical stewardship strategies.
269  on AMR that might help inform antimicrobial stewardship strategies.
270 quinolone prescribing across 3 antimicrobial stewardship strategy types.
271 e and appropriateness across 3 antimicrobial stewardship strategy-types.
272 tibiotic prescribing an important antibiotic stewardship target.
273 ng, pragmatic interventions on antimicrobial stewardship targeting providers and caregivers substanti
274 g models (diagnosis-related group carve-out, stewardship taxes, transferable exclusivity voucher, and
275 ll hospitals when constructing an antibiotic stewardship team, obtaining appropriate metrics of antib
276 ngle time-outs without input from antibiotic stewardship teams are insufficient to optimize prescribi
277 n addition to exploring the effectiveness of stewardship techniques in community hospitals, the ARLG
278  is a high-priority target for antimicrobial stewardship that has not been described for cancer patie
279 tutional initiatives) will enable the robust stewardship that is needed to address the current crisis
280  antimicrobial stewardship, called handshake stewardship, that effectively decreased hospital anti-in
281 developed different approaches to antibiotic stewardship-the USA, South Africa, Colombia, Australia,
282 tive new antibiotics to improving antibiotic stewardship through financial mechanisms and regulation.
283 o existing pressures and shift towards ocean stewardship through incorporation of niche innovations w
284 vide a vital component for use in laboratory stewardship to curtail unnecessary respiratory viral tes
285 NPVs, MRSA nares screening may be a powerful stewardship tool for de-escalation and avoidance of empi
286 Vs with MRSA nares screening maybe used as a stewardship tool for de-escalation as well as avoidance
287 NPVs, MRSA nares screening may be a powerful stewardship tool for deescalation and avoidance of empir
288 s with MRSA nares screening may be used as a stewardship tool.
289 sts without residency or prior antimicrobial stewardship training were trained to conduct prospective
290 e private practice dentists and OS in dental stewardship using a community-based program.
291 e private-practice dentists and OS in dental stewardship using a community-based program.
292 e in mortality associated with antimicrobial stewardship using audit and feedback in the ICU setting.
293            After adjustment, fluoroquinolone stewardship was associated with fewer patients receiving
294                                Antimicrobial stewardship was delivered using in-person coaching by ph
295                                Antimicrobial stewardship was implemented in four academic ICUs in Tor
296                                   Antibiotic stewardship was not improved by a rapid, highly sensitiv
297 derstand shifts in selective pressure due to stewardship, we use publicly available data to estimate
298 ZO shortage and the importance of antibiotic stewardship when mitigating drug shortages.
299                                              Stewardship will have a crucial role in limiting unneces
300 tures of change towards 'corporate biosphere stewardship', with significant potential for upscaling.

 
Page Top