ライフサイエンスコーパス: stimulus

1 such as a mild footshock (the unconditioned stimulus).

2 iring for long durations in the absence of a stimulus.

3 o inaccurate sensory impressions of the pain stimulus.

4 tely recovers the sinusoidal waveform of the stimulus.

5 ge as well as its specificity to the learned stimulus.

6 lowing genetic perturbation or environmental stimulus.

7 omponents upon reception of an extracellular stimulus.

8 cing K63 ubiquitination during a proteotoxic stimulus.

9 memory that stands in for the percept of the stimulus.

10 t for evidence of streaming of the repeating stimulus.

11 ure to lipopolysaccharide as an inflammatory stimulus.

12 econd visual neuropil, to a projected colour stimulus.

13 ults in avoidance of a previously attractive stimulus.

14 ity with respect to a homeostatic remodeling stimulus.

15 pression of CD69 and CD25 in response to TCR stimulus.

16 r different behavioral responses to the same stimulus.

17 are required for proper orientation to this stimulus.

18 rtainty estimates depend only on the current stimulus.

19 changes in the visual characteristics of the stimulus.

20 rst encounter of an aversive but not neutral stimulus.

21 en it is present simultaneously with another stimulus.

22 gar neurons are insensitive to the same mild stimulus.

23 by context, the visual scene surrounding the stimulus.

24 ifferent frequency components of an acoustic stimulus.

25 ng highest FRs at baseline and following the stimulus.

26 oth the conscious percept and the suppressed stimulus.

27 d immediate reaction to a physically present stimulus.

28 es for sensing both types of thirst-inducing stimulus(4-6).

29 es, as is useful, for example, when multiple stimulus-action mappings must be retained and used.SIGNI

30 varies as a function of time relative to the stimulus, activation state of neighboring cells in the m

31 Enlarging the stimulus amplitude and pulse length, or conversely, decr

32 h expectations are met by a following social stimulus - an upright face - infants are already prepare

33 These variations are complex and depend on stimulus and cognitive state in ways that have yet to be

34 assess in vivo immune responses to an innate stimulus and compare responsiveness between healthy volu

35 n relative power and MSE computed on the pre-stimulus and delay task time windows.

36 lly protected sugars using light as external stimulus and oligopeptide catalysts equipped with an azo

37 robust amplification of the hyperpolarizing stimulus and produces responses that resemble action pot

38 tion when successfully ignoring a distractor stimulus and provide essential foundations for further r

39 tol cycle function regardless of the trigged stimulus and represents a sophisticated and specialized

40 using a binocular OCT system that presents a stimulus and simultaneously captures OCT images of the i

41 isual cortex depending on similarity between stimulus and surround, primarily by modulating recurrent

42 root metabolome responds rapidly to hormone stimulus and that compounds belonging to the same class

43 The identity of the chosen stimulus and the reward outcome were strongly encoded in

44 across the network in the absence of visual stimulus and then generating the required muscle kinemat

45 Data were segmented into epochs around the stimulus and up to 160 epochs per subject were averaged

46 steering responses and coordination between stimulus and wings, pointing to a tight coupling between

47 ening in reaction time evoked by a startling stimulus), and the effect of an acoustic startle cue on

48 re-extend its tentacles after a threatening stimulus, and immersion response time, the time to re-ex

49 This strategy, combining an external stimulus applied to a structurally compliant adsorbent,

50 ode these modalities and transform them into stimulus-appropriate motor behaviors is not known.

51 three-dimensional (3D) shapes under the same stimulus are desirable for promising applications includ

52 ccordingly, in visual cortex, responses to a stimulus are modulated by context, the visual scene surr

53 ukin 6 (IL-6) priming and PGE(2) as a second stimulus as a model for pain chronicity.

54 ency, and by constructing shuffled and cross-stimulus autocorrelograms, and reverse correlations, fro

55 e that appears when observers are aware of a stimulus, but disappears when a stimulus fails to reach

56 ivity at the ear on the side of the attended stimulus, but with slightly different patterns.

57 ocess in filamentary organs for an arbitrary stimulus by explicitly linking hormone transport to loca

58 orts since the discovery that the electrical stimulus can have dramatic effect on cell behavior.

59 st past research has employed tasks with two stimulus categories, but such designs cannot fully captu

60 where the probability to repeat the previous stimulus category is varied in trial-blocks.

61 here an experimenter provided the slow blink stimulus, cats had a higher propensity to approach the e

62 d stimuli and reported both an estimate of a stimulus color and a measure of memory uncertainty, obta

63 sensory cue, such as a tone (the conditioned stimulus), comes to predict an innately aversive stimulu

64 Our results revealed new rules on stimulus competition and highlighted the impact of hiera

65 te cortex (ACC) corresponding to the noxious stimulus condition.

66 s were superior to the control groups in all stimulus conditions on both days.

67 nonlinearities may be present for different stimulus configurations and acquisition protocols, our r

68 is makes it possible to automatically adjust stimulus configurations based on an individual's viewing

69 : the selectivity of bistability to specific stimulus configurations, and the characteristic log-norm

70 when observing a large variety of ambiguous stimulus configurations.

71 asodilation events could be followed by post-stimulus constrictions driven by the increased degradati

72 nformation, resulting in a modulation of the stimulus content within the receiving population's activ

73 sible for representing stimulus identity and stimulus context with different levels of priority in wo

74 erials are competitive candidates for use in stimulus-controllable chiro-optical devices with high op

75 eir ON and OFF types simultaneously maximize stimulus coverage and information transmission and minim

76 provide a basis for single-trial single-cell stimulus decoding.

77 nce, leading to a stronger representation of stimulus delivery zones on the track.

78 ypes of stimuli: responding to the incentive stimulus depended on NAcC AMPA/NMDA and dopamine D1 rece

79 e in wild-type (WT), but not FX synapses, by stimulus-dependent ATP synthase beta subunit translation

80 We report an unexpected stimulus-dependent diversity in Na(V) channel-mediated i

81 a trained neural network as a collection of stimulus-dependent linear functions enables a locally li

82 of itaconate production on inflammation are stimulus-dependent, and that there are important differe

83 othesis which predicts that spontaneous, but stimulus-dependent, conscious retrieval processes, that

84 whether this input-output transformation is stimulus-dependent.

85 Lipopolysaccharide (LPS), an inflammatory stimulus derived from gram-negative bacteria, is present

86 to associate a neutral cue with an aversive stimulus despite their separation in time by a delay per

87 otion but instead faithfully represented the stimulus' detailed time course, while neurons displaying

88 ioral measures such as speed and accuracy of stimulus detection.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT A key area of

89 owever, many sensory neurons encode multiple stimulus dimensions simultaneously.

90 We show that stimulus-driven and goal-directed influences compete for

91 To assess reflexive, stimulus-driven attention we presented novel sounds from

92 a dissociation between stimulus valence and stimulus-driven behavior.

93 Thus, goal-directed and stimulus-driven factors together determine the fate not

94 Continuous, stimulus-driven modulation of phase stabilities remains

95 Much research focuses on the purely stimulus-driven response, but here, we focus on the goal

96 n voluntary (goal-directed) and involuntary (stimulus-driven) guidance of attention.

97 attention: exogenous attention is automatic, stimulus-driven, and transiently deployed in ~100 ms.

98 articipants (both sexes) to a multi-category stimulus (e.g., a whole person) based on the response to

99 nd less surround suppression, independent of stimulus eccentricity or contrast.

100 We tested whether a purely mechanical stimulus elicited the same behavioral response as a natu

101 ferent and efferent fiber activation by VNS: stimulus-elicited change in breathing rate (DeltaBR) and

102 the visual word form area (VWFA) during both stimulus encoding and response preparation.

103 rrelated signals should be aligned with this stimulus encoding dimension.

104 n of neural responses at the early stages of stimulus encoding.

105 By analyzing stimulus-evoked compound nerve potentials, we confirmed

106 (2020) show that stimulus-evoked dopamine responses are enhanced by novel

107 centrality and displaying large ongoing and stimulus-evoked fluctuations without affecting the integ

108 le differences in baseline, prestimulus, and stimulus-evoked response profiles of pyramidal and inhib

109 In contrast, stimulus-evoked responses evolved along sloppy dimension

110 e aware of a stimulus, but disappears when a stimulus fails to reach awareness.

111 oding during navigation through a continuous stimulus feature space as well as mapping of distances i

112 e how downstream circuits can jointly decode stimulus features and their uncertainty from sensory pop

113 patial filter that allows for reconstructing stimulus features from brain signal's features.

114 spatial selective attention and attention to stimulus features such as color versus motion.

115 nsory response tuning: neurons responding to stimulus features were found in naive mice, and training

116 computations used for global integration of stimulus features.

117 f sky color changes may therefore be the key stimulus for conveying morning and evening information t

118 unotherapeutic efficacy of a microbial-based stimulus for innate immune mobilization depends on the c

119 red in the face of an unaltered shear stress stimulus for vasodilatation and reduced resting steady-s

120 primarily determined by sound intensity and stimulus frequency.

121 wo coupled physiological oscillators: i) the stimulus function and ii) the [Ca(2+)](i) changes.

122 mogeneous and therefore depends on whether a stimulus generates inhibition before or after reaching t

123 One stimulus had low luminance contrast and moved with high

124 while the information about the postsaccadic stimulus has also become available.

125 going activity of prefrontal neurons after a stimulus has disappeared is considered a neuronal correl

126 eneral and broadly useful model that matches stimulus history to odor sensation and behavioral respon

127 information and internal representations of stimulus history, functions carried out in higher-order

128 ism that may be responsible for representing stimulus identity and stimulus context with different le

129 d participants' ability to integrate "what" (stimulus identity) and "when" (stimulus timing) informat

130 ulations, even though animals are unaware of stimulus identity.

131 followed from a failure to encode the target stimulus in both AC and dlPFC, but again, these differen

132 ession effect, in which the responses to the stimulus in one eye were reduced when a stimulus was pre

133 actors strongly encoded the direction of the stimulus in single dimension with a temporal signature s

134 were co-presented with an unfamiliar social stimulus in the same environment to further investigate

135 more suppressed by repeated occurrence of a stimulus in the same location.

136 trategy is optimal by repeating the rewarded stimulus in the upcoming trial.

137 e used desiccating stress as an inflammatory stimulus in vivo and found that sub-basal and epithelial

138 larger in the presence of a competing visual stimulus, indicating a role for the mouse SC in visual t

139 ide comprehensive insights into the range of stimulus induced miRNA abundance changes and lay the gro

140 nit or pharmacological inhibition normalizes stimulus-induced and constitutive mRNA translation rate,

141 lyzed in the time-frequency domain to assess stimulus-induced oscillations and cross-layer phase sync

142 For the attended stimulus, we find highest stimulus information content near excitability peaks, an

143 nvestigate the neural codes for representing stimulus information held in different states of priorit

144 ell recording studies find a fraction of the stimulus information in high-dimensional population reco

145 revealed consistent suppression of predicted stimulus information in sensory areas, but how prior kno

146 Stimulus information was not decodable between trials, b

147 pivotal for the encoding and transmission of stimulus information.

148 When the stimulus is a non-social one -inverted face - IDS merely

149 shape remains stable until an external heat stimulus is applied to trigger the scission of the dimer

150 The frequency at which a stimulus is presented determines how it is interpreted.

151 he pupil to respond quickly when that bright stimulus is subsequently brought into view.

152 o determine whether the presence of a social stimulus is sufficient to induce activation of PVH-OT ne

153 When exposed to a subthreshold learning stimulus, juv ELE and juv-adol ELE formed lasting long-t

154 collected RBCs were exposed to a mechanical stimulus known to drastically alter cell deformability (

155 ts and slopes of these functions change with stimulus level.

156 This behavior suggests that stimulus localization depended on hand assignment, not v

157 stimuli and this effect generalized to other stimulus locations indicating a centrally mediated compo

158 rrently encodes spatial (auditory and visual stimulus locations), decisional (causal inference), and

159 exes) monitored the orientation of a grating stimulus, making spatial frequency task irrelevant.

160 ns using a within task design with identical stimulus material for both unexpected action and unexpec

161 Biophysical cues, such as electrical stimulus, mechanical feature, and surface topography, en

162 tions are accompanied by a pro-proliferative stimulus mediated by AKT signaling.

163 ity transfer effects, when switching between stimulus modalities.

164 e BCIs, regarding training effects and cross-stimulus-modality transfer effects, when switching betwe

165 After the presentation of a visual stimulus, neural processing cascades from low-level sens

166 n both NCM and Field L2 were stronger when a stimulus occurred as deviant with low probability than w

167 iant with low probability than when the same stimulus occurred as standard with high probability.

168 When humans indicate on which hand a tactile stimulus occurred, they often err when their hands are c

169 t conditioning, cue conditioning (to an odor stimulus) occurred independently of sleep, a differentia

170 perception between two interpretations of a stimulus-occurs when observing a large variety of ambigu

171 ronal activation caused by the physiological stimulus of novel object placement.

172 inferred from the PIPR (pupil size following stimulus offset).

173 g phenomenon that light is an ideal external stimulus on the layered In(2) O(3) system, and its elect

174 ee text] are very effective in centering the stimulus on the retina.

175 enigmatic response patterns associated with stimulus onset and offset.

176 -30 Hz), ramping up slowly over 500 ms after stimulus onset and peaking at ~800 ms, around response s

177 is applied to power spectra of the LFPs near stimulus onset revealed a broadband component (1-100 Hz)

178 ived direction already emerged before visual stimulus onset, suggesting that the prestimulus state of

179 li, but only at relatively long delays after stimulus onset.

180 mages only if they occurred up to 2 s before stimulus onset.

181 edictability was manipulated by changing the stimulus-onset-asynchrony (SOA deviants) for given tones

182 nment, not direct manipulation of the signal stimulus or receivers.

183 ns in comparison to predictions based on the stimulus or running speed.

184 he accumulated displacement of flow during a stimulus, or encoding the speed of the flow.

185 the selectivity of a neuron in layer 2/3 for stimulus orientation and direction is thought to arise f

186 The learning of stimulus-outcome associations allows for predictions abo

187 mulated, but not when direct experience with stimulus-outcome associations is available.

188 xtinction or reversal of previously acquired stimulus-outcome associations.

189 nce response (SCR) and declarative memory of stimulus-outcome contingencies during a differential pav

190 nfluenced by the ordinal relationship of the stimulus pairs, specifically symbolic distance (the diff

191 lations whose phase and strength varied with stimulus pattern, as for SC (Stitt et al., 2013).

192 mplex signaling pathways that all start with stimulus perception.

193 spatiotemporal frequency domains with equal stimulus power, while the asymmetric response functions

194 ering an unexpected local variability in the stimulus preferences of individual neurons in A1 and oth

195 e single-neuron mechanisms for processing of stimulus presentation frequency in PPC.

196 d actor's body posture emerged shortly after stimulus presentation, followed by OMA selectivity.

197 tional connectivity of a familiar contextual stimulus presented 10 min prior to sedation for imaging.

198 al transfer functions relating instantaneous stimulus pressure to instantaneous spike rate, with no o

199 station of learning that is revealed, not in stimulus processing but in the blank interval between st

200 Thus, D1 MSNs modulate stimulus processing, rather than motivated responses or

201 motion are among the most important encoded stimulus properties, revealing many parallels between ps

202 ing and compressive nonlinearity over a wide stimulus range.

203 Neurons exhibited selectivity for stimulus rank during learning, but not before or after.

204 lected invariant information about a learned stimulus relationship.

205 ial frequency information of the presaccadic stimulus remained present for ~200 ms after the saccade,

206 Information about the presaccadic stimulus remains available, while the information about

207 The spatial coordinate system in which a stimulus representation is embedded is known as its refe

208 nce of reward, there was either no change in stimulus representation or a decreased representation wh

209 nto activity that recapitulated the previous stimulus representation.

210 ormation to guide behavior, we must know how stimulus representations are transformed throughout the

211 h population coupling exhibit more long-term stimulus response variability than neurons with low popu

212 e affective states, a habit driven by strong stimulus-response associations, or a compulsion driven b

213 earn and exploit multiple concurrent sets of stimulus-response associations.

214 decision making via adaptive combination of stimulus-response learning and the use of a cognitive ma

215 mation, but could not be explained by simple stimulus-response rules.

216 ters the duration, but not the magnitude, of stimulus responses across much of the striatum, via quan

217 hts possibilities for further biomimetic and stimulus-responsive fiber applications.

218 Here, we describe the performance of a novel stimulus-responsive nanoparticulate platform for the tar

219 rentiation, and the formation of functional, stimulus-responsive neural networks.

220 a mechanically defective response to weight stimulus resulting in stem collapse after just 3 months.

221 rthermore, an intention to act with a bright stimulus results in preparatory pupil constriction, whic

222 previously learned but currently irrelevant stimulus-reward associations, a phenomenon termed "value

223 and female human participants first learned stimulus-reward associations.

224 ) and adapt their behaviour upon reversal of stimulus-reward contingency ('rule switch').

225 Stimulus sampling and action were separated by a delay p

226 e rate-detection mechanism allows continuous stimulus sampling over a wide dynamic range.

227 for similar release sites, together encoding stimulus-secretion coupling over a large range of synapt

228 alse memory beyond a view, is an artifact of stimulus selection.

229 These neurons are more stimulus selective and phase locked to 30- to 80-Hz gamm

230 increased spontaneous activity and decreased stimulus selectivity in IC, whereas suppression had no e

231 nd that when actor rats have fully learned a stimulus-self-reward association, adding a cue that pred

232 Such exposure increases stimulus sensitivity and information encoded in cell pop

233 pyramidal neuron hyperactivity and increased stimulus sensitivity in the vibrissa motion detection ta

234 ely and negatively valent polar-extremity of stimulus sets reported in the literature.

235 These traits persisted across a range of stimulus sets, differing by the polar-extremity of their

236 Under a single stimulus, several cellu-robots form predetermined comple

237 are dictated by tuning in a high-dimensional stimulus space defined by form, texture, color, depth, a

238 epresentation that is nonlinearly related to stimulus space.

239 y nor perception are appropriately scaled in stimulus space; instead, they are based on a transformed

240 We also found that OFC value coding was stimulus specific, as opposed to coding value independen

241 MRI) to reveal that prior expectations evoke stimulus-specific activity selectively in the deep layer

242 mushroom bodies, the output regions exhibit stimulus-specific activity.

243 the differential effects of PVs and SSTs in stimulus-specific adaptation, forward suppression and tu

244 We found a stimulus-specific enhancement of the neuronal representa

245 In both MPC and MTL, stimulus-specific identifiable exemplars led to greater

246 f endogenous activity influences circuit and stimulus-specific processing and behavior as well.

247 lanation, no other cerebellar area exhibited stimulus specificity, including the oculomotor vermis, a

248 presence of an additional T cell-activating stimulus, staphylococcal enterotoxin B, Abs to CTLA-4 an

249 nipulate expectations independently of local stimulus statistics.

250 th in the absence and presence of the social stimulus, strongly reduced network strength, global effi

251 more, LFS for 30 min before a pro-convulsive stimulus successfully prevented seizure generalization.

252 ulus), comes to predict an innately aversive stimulus, such as a mild footshock (the unconditioned st

253 coding the spatial frequency of a stationary stimulus that changed from one visual hemifield to the o

254 Exercise provides a robust physiological stimulus that evokes cross-talk among multiple tissues t

255 on suppressing the threat-response during a stimulus that predicts the absence of threat (safety)(2-

256 cells with a focal and transient electrical stimulus that promotes the release of exosomes carrying

257 inemia in settings of secondary inflammatory stimulus that upset marrow homeostasis such as TBI.

258 hen animals did not respond to the incentive stimulus, the induced excitation was suppressed for most

259 Just before the new stimulus, this latent trace was reignited into activity

260 grate "what" (stimulus identity) and "when" (stimulus timing) information about an expected target.

261 any factors, including reward structures and stimulus timing.

262 ported sharing the feelings expressed in the stimulus to a greater degree, and felt more pleasure dur

263 ther carbonates-it could provide an economic stimulus to capture and storage technologies.

264 al oxidative stress must precede the insulin stimulus to cause insulin resistance, explaining why sho

265 The principal molecular stimulus to gluconeogenesis and ketogenesis is activatio

266 transformation from high-dimensional sensory stimulus to low-dimensional decoded representation.

267 Previous work using a visual impulse stimulus to perturb the memory network has implicated su

268 he exact mechanism by which an environmental stimulus to skin results in local and systemic effects i

269 The latency from the end of an effective stimulus to the start of head movement decreased with re

270 Here we employed stimulus-to-cell-type mapping using single-cell RNA sequ

271 polarization and asynchronous release during stimulus trains are unaffected by Synaptotagmin-1 knocko

272 kin conductance response to both conditioned stimulus types differentiated patients from comparison s

273 ariability of individual neurons is tuned to stimulus uncertainty, that this tuning is specific to th

274 presented and patients responded to a target stimulus until they became unresponsive.

275 are selectively excited by the unconditioned stimulus (US) during fear conditioning.

276 d this CeA-GPe circuit conveys unconditioned stimulus (US)-related information during classical fear

277 The pre-conditioning test stimulus, using mechanical/thermal quantitative sensory

278 of behavior requires a dissociation between stimulus valence and stimulus-driven behavior.

279 rudimentary aesthetic sense is found in the stimulus valuations and cost-benefit decisions made by p

280 Optimal decision-making requires that stimulus-value associations are kept up to date by const

281 e predict the quantitative impact of natural stimulus variability on human performance given biologic

282 predicting the fundamental limits imposed by stimulus variability on sensory-perceptual precision.

283 gher processing levels are less sensitive to stimulus variation than lower processing levels, as in t

284 Our haptic stimulus was delivered to the wrists at an intensity tha

285 For the method, a hypertonic stimulus was designed to create volume differences betwe

286 A full-field flicker stimulus was presented onto the retina to induce a vascu

287 the stimulus in one eye were reduced when a stimulus was presented simultaneously to the other eye.

288 ation or a decreased representation when the stimulus was viewed at a fixed temporal frequency.

289 For the attended stimulus, we find highest stimulus information content n

290 representation of the repetitively presented stimulus when it was associated with a reward.

291 o RBPs, triggered differentially by the same stimulus, which exerts a synergistic effect on PDCD4 exp

292 The visual stimuli were presented in a stimulus window that was also varied in size.

293 Pairing a second stimulus with a reward led to a similar enhanced represe

294 n signaling system, connecting environmental stimulus with cellular and physiological response.

295 yapatite were beneficial for tactile and air stimulus with high to moderate certainty.

296 However, pairing an agriculture stimulus with increasing enforcement of existing fisheri

297 constantly comparing the expected value of a stimulus with its experienced outcome.

298 tory of partial association with an aversive stimulus, with potential implications for understanding

299 llowing an aversive mechanical or blue light stimulus, worms respond first by briefly moving, and the

300 grate simultaneously occurring features of a stimulus, yet the mechanisms by which this integration o