ライフサイエンスコーパス: stomatal

1 iversity of biological components regulating stomatal action.

2 lti-faceted role of l-fucose biosynthesis in stomatal and apoplastic defenses as well as in pattern-t

3 Minor indications of stomatal and cuticular Pi uptake were also observed.

4 tly influence WUE, including photosynthesis, stomatal and mesophyll conductances, and canopy structur

5 re likely to work concurrently to coordinate stomatal and mesophyll development for optimal leaf gas

6 the phenotypic variation in photosynthetic, stomatal, and morphological traits in up to 88 wheat wil

7 pathway of basal immunity is independent on stomatal- and salicylic-acid-dependent regulation.

8 duced stomatal conductance caused by reduced stomatal aperture and density resulting in increased att

9 ng to cellular volume changes and consequent stomatal aperture change.

10 ss light stress-triggered local and systemic stomatal aperture closure responses, are dependent on ph

11 nal is perceived and transmitted to regulate stomatal aperture is, however, unknown.

12 Despite these high systemic ROS levels, stomatal aperture size returns to control size within 3

13 emic responses that include rapid changes in stomatal aperture size; these were found to be coordinat

14 , thus identifying the primary regulators of stomatal aperture.

15 nionic flux from guard cells controlling the stomatal aperture.

16 showed reduced sensitivity to ABA, impaired stomatal apertures and hypersensitivity to drought stres

17 tion of these regulatory pathways to improve stomatal behavior and identify novel unexploited targets

18 els have shown great potential in predicting stomatal behavior and improving carbon cycle modeling.

19 ntify novel unexploited targets for altering stomatal behavior and improving crop plant productivity.

20 mesophyll-driven signals that may coordinate stomatal behavior with mesophyll carbon assimilation and

21 In this review we seek to simplify stomatal behaviour by using an evolutionary perspective

22 We predict stomatal behaviour to be more conservative with a higher

23 o manipulating non-foliar photosynthesis and stomatal behaviour to identify novel targets for exploit

24 tion that captures the emergent character of stomatal behaviour.

25 ehensive theoretical basis for understanding stomatal behaviour.

26 Cys residues in vivo, and scavenge NO in the stomatal cells.

27 Moreover, in contrast to ABA, the stomatal closing stimuli, elevated CO(2) and MeJA, did n

28 nd protein phosphorylation in CO(2) -induced stomatal closing.

29 that LCBK1 has a positive regulatory role in stomatal closure after pathogen inoculation.

30 ock-out mutants are defective in ABA-induced stomatal closure and are hypersensitive to ABA during se

31 he phytohormone abscisic acid (ABA) promotes stomatal closure and inhibits light-induced stomatal ope

32 cation of phosphorylated PHS (PHS-P) induces stomatal closure and rescues loss-of-PTI phenotype of lc

33 y and describe a method that predicts Psi at stomatal closure and turgor loss exclusively from this w

34 inct phases and to predict Psi thresholds of stomatal closure and turgor loss.

35 tants, were defective in high CO(2) -induced stomatal closure and, unexpectedly, also in low CO(2) -i

36 calcium (Ca(o) ) is as strong a stimulus for stomatal closure as the phytohormone abscisic acid (ABA)

37 CO(2) may contribute to stomatal closure but additional mechanisms, plausibly in

38 ibition of stomatal opening and promotion of stomatal closure by Ca(o) .

39 vel signaling pathway promoting ABA-mediated stomatal closure by regulating the stability of a subset

40 its phosphorylation by BIK1 are critical for stomatal closure during immune signalling, and OSCA1.3 d

41 nel and its activation mechanisms underlying stomatal closure during immune signalling, and suggests

42 na Ca(2+)-permeable channel OSCA1.3 controls stomatal closure during immune signalling.

43 imposed [Ca(2+) ](cyt) oscillations restored stomatal closure in agb1.

44 of MEA that positively regulates PTI-induced stomatal closure in Arabidopsis.

45 f biotic and abiotic stresses often leads to stomatal closure in plants(1,2).

46 e molecular mechanisms mediating ABA-induced stomatal closure in the past decade.

47 nternal nodes in the absence of ABA elicited stomatal closure in wet bench experiments, but not in ou

48 CPK3 regulates stomatal closure induced by flg22 and is required for re

49 paired stomatal dynamics but does not affect stomatal closure induced by the bacterial elicitor flg22

50 Stomatal closure is one of the main physiological respon

51 esulting in a condensed 49 node and 113 edge stomatal closure network that preserved all dynamics-det

52 The ABA-induced stomatal closure phenotype is, in part, attributed to im

53 Here, we show that stomatal closure to fungal chitin is conferred by the ma

54 1 mutants are hyposensitive to ABA-triggered stomatal closure under light and dark conditions.

55 ne signalling, and OSCA1.3 does not regulate stomatal closure upon perception of abscisic acid-a plan

56 Light period stomatal closure was also perturbed, and the plants disp

57 embolism-driven, but, rather, that onset of stomatal closure was most closely correlated with the hy

58 It is concluded that stomatal closure was not embolism-driven, but, rather, t

59 ought, endogenous ABA did not play a role in stomatal closure, and exogenous ABA applied to live, int

60 of the CaM-based regulation in planta, where stomatal closure, induced by exogenous Ca(2+) ionophore

61 al wounding at ET resulted in COI1-dependent stomatal closure, leading to increased leaf temperature,

62 increases over most monsoon regions, due to stomatal closure-driven evapotranspiration reductions an

63 opening, whereas [CO(2) ] elevation leads to stomatal closure.

64 etween phases I and II coincided with Psi at stomatal closure.

65 ne receptor genes and to positively regulate stomatal closure.

66 channels in guard cells and is required for stomatal closure.

67 quitin ligase COP1 functions in ABA-mediated stomatal closure.

68 mea-6 mutants are hyperactive in PTI-induced stomatal closure.

69 nor seawater sulfate, contributed greatly to stomatal closure.

70 lerance and ABA hypersensitivity in terms of stomatal closure.

71 n factor substrates enhance pathogen-induced stomatal closure.

72 pplied to live, intact leaves did not induce stomatal closure.

73 o strain DC3118 (coronatine deficit)-induced stomatal closure.

74 through a mechanism that was independent of stomatal closure.

75 ed stomatal opening or abscisic acid-induced stomatal closure; however, they did show altered stomata

76 a(2+) -binding proteins that function in the stomatal CO(2) response remain unknown.

77 uple/sextuple ABA receptor mutants show that stomatal CO(2) signaling requires basal ABA and SnRK2 si

78 ese metabolites within the CAM mesophyll and stomatal complex.

79 It shares variable stomatal complexes and epidermal oil cells with angiospe

80 dopsis and their uniquely shaped four-celled stomatal complexes are especially responsive to environm

81 Here, an optimization model for stomatal conductance (g(c) ) that maximizes A while acco

82 in concert with isoprene emissions, even as stomatal conductance (g(s) ) and net photosynthetic carb

83 The approaches used to represent stomatal conductance (g(s) ) in models vary.

84 In ferns, steady-state stomatal conductance (g(s) ) was unresponsive to ABA in

85 The leaf hydraulic conductance (K(leaf) ), stomatal conductance (g(s) ), net assimilation (A), vein

86 osynthetic rate per area (A(area) , +12.6%), stomatal conductance (g(s) , +7.5%), and transpiration r

87 Tepary bean showed the lowest stomatal conductance (g(s)) and photosynthetic rate (A),

88 leaf and external atmosphere is governed by stomatal conductance (g(s)); therefore, stomata play a c

89 Nighttime stomatal conductance (g(sn) ) varies among plant functio

90 ntial (Psi), net CO(2) assimilation (An) and stomatal conductance (gs) due to water deficit were 79,

91 displayed reduced but detectable dark period stomatal conductance and arrhythmia of the CAM CO(2) fix

92 ditions, fa plants displayed slightly higher stomatal conductance and carbon assimilation than wild-t

93 n indirect measure of transpiration rate and stomatal conductance and may be valuable in distinguishi

94 her g(sn) was associated with higher daytime stomatal conductance and net photosynthesis.

95 aused by the assumed strong coupling between stomatal conductance and photosynthesis in current LSMs.

96 O(2) (chi) - an index of adjustments in both stomatal conductance and photosynthetic rate to environm

97 chi, is an index of adjustments in both leaf stomatal conductance and photosynthetic rate to environm

98 signaling mechanisms for the manipulation of stomatal conductance and the enhancement of drought tole

99 , accumulated less biomass, and showed lower stomatal conductance and transpiration, narrower xylem v

100 ed water-use efficiency (WUE) due to reduced stomatal conductance caused by reduced stomatal aperture

101 An abundance of evidence suggests that stomatal conductance declines under high VPD and transpi

102 c signaling is involved in the regulation of stomatal conductance in response to rapid changes in amb

103 Stomatal conductance is determined by both anatomical fe

104 Time-resolved stomatal conductance measurements using intact plants, a

105 which is a parameter derived from an optimal stomatal conductance model and which is inversely relate

106 y and parsimoniously than the existing JULES stomatal conductance model.

107 l limitations to photosynthesis, rather than stomatal conductance or respiration.

108 SOX simulates leaf stomatal conductance responses to climate for woody plan

109 carbon-modeling community needs to reexamine stomatal conductance schemes and the soil-vegetation int

110 did not affect CO(2) /H(2) O gas exchange or stomatal conductance significantly, indicating that neit

111 tions of enhanced photosynthesis and reduced stomatal conductance to WUE trends and to assess consist

112 state conditions of shade to sun transition, stomatal conductance was the major limitation, resulting

113 ynthesis was widespread, while reductions in stomatal conductance were modest and restricted to speci

114 allow for substantial reductions in maximum stomatal conductance without affecting photosynthesis ar

115 s, even modest increases in vein density and stomatal conductance would require substantial reconfigu

116 O(2) assimilation relative to water loss via stomatal conductance), is needed.

117 ciency (WUE(i) ; CO(2) assimilation rate per stomatal conductance).

118 y while simultaneously monitoring changes in stomatal conductance, acoustic emissions (AE), turgor pr

119 , including chloroplast movement, changes in stomatal conductance, and altered organ positioning.

120 Consequently, hydraulic conductance, stomatal conductance, and assimilation capacities should

121 nts as indicated by significantly lower mean stomatal conductance, as well as marginally significantl

122 educed CO(2) assimilation, transpiration and stomatal conductance, but did not affect isoprene emissi

123 namics of COS uptake is mainly controlled by stomatal conductance, but the leaf internal conductance

124 Water potential, stomatal conductance, loss of xylem hydraulic conductanc

125 In this study, we measured sap flow, stomatal conductance, meteorological and soil characteri

126 )C, the delta(2)H correlated negatively with stomatal conductance, whereas no correlation was observe

127 d O(3) stress parameterizations in a coupled stomatal conductance-photosynthesis model to assess thei

128 water-use efficiency (TE(i) ), but not with stomatal conductance.

129 soil moisture effects on photosynthesis and stomatal conductance.

130 ced stomatal density and correspondingly low stomatal conductance.

131 signature of carbon fixation with a link to stomatal conductance.

132 Tighter stomatal control mediated by higher ABA accumulation dur

133 Optimal stomatal control models have shown great potential in pr

134 tive measures of WUE shows the importance of stomatal control of fluxes in this highly variable rainf

135 release, is a key factor in the inverted CAM stomatal cycle.

136 is a major player in infiltration, and plant stomatal defense in closing the stomata as a perception

137 However, g(m) was not related to abaxial stomatal densities (SD(aba) ) and mesophyll cell wall th

138 t but was positively correlated with adaxial stomatal densities (SD(ada) ), stomatal ratio (SR), meso

139 We found that Marsileaceae have very high stomatal densities and, like angiosperms but unlike all

140 Quantification of trichome and stomatal densities in the ILs revealed four genomic regi

141 me and daytime leaf gas exchange, as well as stomatal density (SD) and size during early-, mid-, and

142 These results suggest that stomatal density and a little-studied angiosperm trait,

143 , creating plants with substantially reduced stomatal density and correspondingly low stomatal conduc

144 Low stomatal density rice lines were more able to conserve w

145 Loss of MYOXI-I decreases stomatal density, owing to an inability to accurately or

146 s had higher wood specific gravity and lower stomatal density, whereas flooded species had wider vess

147 e evolutionary origins of genes that specify stomatal development and function.

148 eview focuses on genetic regulation of grass stomatal development and prospects for the future, highl

149 Likewise, comparisons of stomatal development are limited to Arabidopsis and a fe

150 Grass stomatal development follows a trajectory strikingly dif

151 Furthermore, local perturbation of stomatal development has little influence on global two-

152 ycles, our knowledge of the genetic basis of stomatal development is limited mostly to the model dico

153 Arabidopsis stomatal development requires asymmetric cell division,

154 irectly transduces osmotic stress to repress stomatal development to improve plant water-use efficien

155 metabolism, and biological processes such as stomatal development, which are differentially regulated

156 E9 (EPFL9), also known as Stomagen, promotes stomatal development.

157 Stomatal development: shared and diverged mechanisms for

158 that describes probabilistic two-dimensional stomatal distributions based upon spatial autocorrelatio

159 levels result in aberrant root meristem and stomatal divisions, mimicking phenotypes of plants with

160 results in ABA hyposensitivity and impaired stomatal dynamics but does not affect stomatal closure i

161 he principal selective pressures involved in stomatal evolution, thus identifying the primary regulat

162 metabolism, genes and signals that determine stomatal function and patterning, and the recent work th

163 at mesophyll airspace formation is linked to stomatal function in both monocots and eudicots.

164 light the importance of soil water status on stomatal functions and plant water-use efficiency, and s

165 Root and stomatal functions rapidly recover from water limitation

166 We suggest that the interplay between stomatal gaseous exchange and photosynthesis is complex,

167 ounds: Glb1 and Glb2 scavenge NO produced in stomatal guard cells following ABA supply; plants overex

168 tified component of phototropin signaling in stomatal guard cells is discussed.

169 model can reproduce several key patterns of stomatal-hydraulic trait covariations.

170 dational but minimally replicated results of stomatal hydromechanics across species.

171 ylates phytosphingosine and thereby promotes stomatal immunity against bacterial pathogens.

172 Among direct transcriptional targets of the stomatal initiating factor SPEECHLESS, a pair of genes,

173 Stomatal kinetic responses to ABA have not been consider

174 Stomatal kinetics are underutilised.

175 th mesophyll carbon assimilation and explore stomatal kinetics as a possible target to improve A and

176 Stomatal kinetics were responsive to ABA in fern.

177 Stomatal kinetics, particularly for closure, responded t

178 affinities, whereas its guard cell shape and stomatal ledges are angiospermous.

179 ue a decline in the chlorophyll content (non-stomatal limitation), whereas the observed differences b

180 etween water conditions were mainly due to a stomatal limitation.

181 cent defined by BREAKING OF ASYMMETRY IN THE STOMATAL LINEAGE (BASL) and BREVIS RADIX family (BRXf) p

182 process, we focused on the spirals of young stomatal lineage ground cells of Arabidopsis leaf epider

183 y protein BASL (BREAKING OF ASYMMETRY IN THE STOMATAL LINEAGE) in the simplifying context of cultured

184 In the terminal division of the stomatal lineage, however, these two proteins appear to

185 fined, localized phenotypes in the root cap, stomatal lineage, or entire lateral roots.

186 regulate ACD orientation in the Arabidopsis stomatal lineage.

187 Many stomatal models predicting chi include the influence of

188 review, we explore how the contributions of stomatal morphology and distribution can affect photosyn

189 Environmental stimuli-triggered stomatal movement is a key physiological process that re

190 By contrast, CO(2) -regulated stomatal movement kinetics were not clearly affected in

191 our results indicate that TARK1 functions in stomatal movement only in response to biotic elicitors a

192 atal closure; however, they did show altered stomatal movement responses to bacteria and biotic elici

193 ins that link photosynthetic metabolism with stomatal movement, and that protect CAM plants from hars

194 Stomatal movement, which regulates gas exchange in plant

195 sted to trigger a CO(2) -sensing response by stomatal movement.

196 sma membrane accumulation and alterations in stomatal movement.

197 ght signaling component in the modulation of stomatal movement.

198 ith proteins predicted to be associated with stomatal movement.

199 pk mutants that function in CO(2) control of stomatal movements and support the results of classical

200 isolated cpk quintuple mutants and analyzed stomatal movements in response to CO(2) , light and absc

201 By contrast, stomatal movements of agb1 mutants and agb1/gpa1 double-

202 A) plays a central role in the regulation of stomatal movements under water-deficit conditions.

203 of guard cell genes involved in controlling stomatal movements was also perturbed in rPPC1-B These f

204 BA during seed development, germination, and stomatal movements, and integrates ABA- and light-regula

205 al mechanisms that influence the rapidity of stomatal movements.

206 to calculate instantaneous carbon gain from stomatal opening (the gain function).

207 CAM species show an inverted pattern of stomatal opening and closing across the diel cycle, whic

208 d with the characteristic inverse pattern of stomatal opening and closing during CAM.

209 a) SINE1 and SINE2 play an important role in stomatal opening and closing.

210 l Galpha subunit, GPA1, showed inhibition of stomatal opening and promotion of stomatal closure by Ca

211 gh to boost bacterial chemotaxis through the stomatal opening and toward photosynthetic products with

212 arding the extent to which red-light-induced stomatal opening arises from direct guard cell sensing o

213 ntal and internal signals that drive inverse stomatal opening at night.

214 ns severely impairs high temperature-induced stomatal opening but has no effect on the induction of h

215 oach to understand high temperature-mediated stomatal opening in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana).

216 , chloroplast movement, leaf flattening, and stomatal opening in Arabidopsis.

217 he visible light spectrum, red light induces stomatal opening in intact leaves.

218 nditions that result in red-light-stimulated stomatal opening in isolated epidermal peels and enlarge

219 acking CIPK23 were found to exhibit impaired stomatal opening in response to blue light but no defici

220 did not display differences in light-induced stomatal opening or abscisic acid-induced stomatal closu

221 3 quintuple mutants, in correlation with the stomatal opening phenotype.

222 and support a model in which TARK1 regulates stomatal opening postelicitation.

223 However, light-mediated stomatal opening remained unaffected, and ABA responses

224 ted Arabidopsis mutants, and discovered that stomatal opening response to red light is correlated wit

225 We therefore conclude that CIPK23 promotes stomatal opening through activation of K(+) (in) channel

226 uced a K(+) conductance and accelerated both stomatal opening under light exposure and closing after

227 ion of many aspects of physiology, including stomatal opening, rate of photosynthesis, carbohydrate m

228 metric division of young epidermal cells and stomatal opening, respectively, and may affect the plant

229 s components involved in blue light-mediated stomatal opening, suggesting cross talk between light an

230 Low concentrations of CO(2) cause stomatal opening, whereas [CO(2) ] elevation leads to st

231 on of nonphotochemical quenching and rate of stomatal opening.

232 stomatal closure and inhibits light-induced stomatal opening.

233 zes the carbon gain relative to a penalty of stomatal opening.

234 nd, unexpectedly, also in low CO(2) -induced stomatal opening.

235 Basic stomatal optimality theory posits that stomatal regulati

236 to transpiration and evaluate its impacts on stomatal optimization by incorporating the direct carbon

237 We developed an analytical stomatal optimization model based on xylem hydraulics (S

238 The classical theory of stomatal optimization stipulates that stomata should act

239 In R. diphyllum, blue light triggered stomatal oscillations.

240 required for asymmetric divisions and proper stomatal pattern, but the cellular mechanisms that orien

241 Stomatal patterning is regulated by the EPIDERMAL PATTER

242 tion brassinosteroid, floral abscission, and stomatal patterning phenotypes, respectively.

243 CO(2) ], such as nitrogen use efficiency and stomatal patterning.

244 s little influence on global two-dimensional stomatal patterning.

245 ions in ABI1 and AHG3 partly rescue the cop1 stomatal phenotype and the phosphorylation level of OST1

246 Our findings indicate that evolution in stomatal physiology was a prerequisite for high photosyn

247 surization, make functional contributions to stomatal pore initiation and enlargement.

248 and guard cells, which ultimately determine stomatal pore size and porosity to water and CO(2) excha

249 Stomatal pores are vital for the diffusion of gasses int

250 The quantitative and spatial coordination of stomatal pores in the epidermis and airspaces in the und

251 e promotes guard cell expansion, which opens stomatal pores to facilitate leaf cooling.

252 of the tracers entered the leaf through the stomatal pores, small amounts of silver precipitation we

253 This remarkable correlation between stomatal porosity (or diffusive conductance to water vap

254 terative asymmetric cell divisions (ACDs) in stomatal progenitors, which generate most of the cells i

255 with adaxial stomatal densities (SD(ada) ), stomatal ratio (SR), mesophyll surface area exposed to I

256 ion of GLS to the iaa5,6,19 mutants restores stomatal regulation and normal drought tolerance.

257 dy makes an unanticipated connection between stomatal regulation and nuclear envelope-associated prot

258 logical importance of basal ABA signaling in stomatal regulation by CO(2) and, as hypothesized here,

259 Basic stomatal optimality theory posits that stomatal regulation maximizes the carbon gain relative t

260 piration, the transport of water and CO(2) , stomatal regulation, and CAM biochemistry are highlighte

261 logical processes including wound signaling, stomatal regulation, and pollen tube growth.

262 rought of key fitness-related traits such as stomatal regulation, shoot hydraulic conductance (K(shoo

263 ringae pathovar tomato strain DC3000-induced stomatal reopening, and TARK1 OE plants were insensitive

264 to control size within 3 h, and the systemic stomatal response can be retriggered within 6 h.

265 The stomatal response to blue light is highly sensitive, rap

266 Here, we measured the stomatal response to changes in vapor pressure differenc

267 and capacitance, as well as the kinetics of stomatal response to changes in VPD.

268 as a coordinated stress-specific whole-plant stomatal response.

269 oil biogeochemistry that may have impaired a stomatal response.

270 he evolutionary reconstruction of functional stomatal responses across vascular land plant lineages.

271 tes different aspects related to hydraulics, stomatal responses and carbon economy under drought.

272 re, we review recent work on the rapidity of stomatal responses and present some of the possible anat

273 We report that these stomatal responses are absent in Lygodium japonicum (Sch

274 Blue light stomatal responses may have contributed to this divergen

275 Rapid and coordinated systemic stomatal responses occur in the crop plant soybean and c

276 espite contrasting hydraulic strategies, the stomatal responses of angiosperms and gymnosperms to soi

277 In contrast, we observed stomatal responses to a low fluence of blue light in Reg

278 angiate orders that have not been tested for stomatal responses to a low fluence of blue light.

279 sing moisture availability may be related to stomatal responses to aridity.

280 Plant water potential Psi is regulated by stomatal responses to atmospheric moisture demand D and

281 Stomatal responses to changes in leaf water status are i

282 y that link xylem hydraulic functioning with stomatal responses to climate.

283 ferns previously studied, exhibit wrong-way stomatal responses to excision.

284 antify the penalty and how well they predict stomatal responses to the environment.

285 uing research to fully resolve mechanisms of stomatal responses to water status should focus on sever

286 tractable and reliable mechanistic model of stomatal responses to water status.

287 In addition to stomatal responses, there is a prompt accumulation of pr

288 chrome B, ROS production, and rapid systemic stomatal responses.

289 (ROS) signals; transcriptomic, hormonal, and stomatal responses; as well as plant acclimation.

290 peting positive and negative feedbacks among stomatal sensitivity to carbon dioxide concentrations, s

291 safety and efficiency combined with greater stomatal sensitivity triggered by ABA production and lea

292 ts from studies investigating the effects of stomatal shape, size, density and patterning on photosyn

293 protocol by performing exemplary analyses on stomatal shapes in the model nematodes Caenorhabditis an

294 ow that sorghum activates a swift and robust stomatal shutdown to preserve leaf water content when wa

295 erstanding the interactions of ABA and other stomatal signaling pathways are reviewed here.

296 T and gas exchange analyses with measures of stomatal size and patterning in a range of wild, domesti

297 ) family of secreted peptides: EPF1 enforces stomatal spacing, whereas EPIDERMAL PATTERNING FACTOR-LI

298 hips between home-climate, gas exchange, and stomatal traits.

299 an 400 million years of co-evolution between stomatal, vascular and photosynthetic tissues.

300 e I review historical and recent advances in stomatal water relations.