ライフサイエンスコーパス: stomatal conductance

1 ciency (WUE(i) ; CO(2) assimilation rate per stomatal conductance).

2 water-use efficiency (TE(i) ), but not with stomatal conductance.

3 rate (Vcmax ) or leaf nitrogen (Narea ) vs. stomatal conductance.

4 on (CID), a time-integrated trait measure of stomatal conductance.

5 iod of oscillations are likely determined by stomatal conductance.

6 ration specifically and solely for differing stomatal conductance.

7 portant role in regulating ET than declining stomatal conductance.

8 nspirational cooling is curtailed by limited stomatal conductance.

9 2) H offsets, likely by impacting plant leaf stomatal conductance.

10 s linked to reduced photosynthesis rates and stomatal conductance.

11 tance mesophyll-driven signals that regulate stomatal conductance.

12 ency and photosynthetic capacity balanced by stomatal conductance.

13 th modeling photosynthesis, respiration, and stomatal conductance.

14 soil moisture effects on photosynthesis and stomatal conductance.

15 ced stomatal density and correspondingly low stomatal conductance.

16 signature of carbon fixation with a link to stomatal conductance.

17 t of widespread, CO(2)-induced reductions in stomatal conductance.

18 y be conditional on the initial pretreatment stomatal conductance.

19 e increased without concomitantly increasing stomatal conductance.

20 ion, and both fluxes are controlled by plant stomatal conductance.

21 ere is simultaneous stabilizing selection on stomatal conductance.

22 high CO(2) assimilation rates despite lower stomatal conductances.

23 nge parameters (transpiration rate (29.74%), stomatal conductance (35.29%), and photosynthetic rate (

24 ween 15% and 60% deeper rooting, 78% greater stomatal conductance, 36% greater leaf CO2 assimilation,

25 is located in the soil profile), 50% greater stomatal conductance, 59% greater leaf CO2 assimilation,

26 biomass, photosynthetic rate (up to 24.67%), stomatal conductance (7.54%), and soil nutrient uptake.

27 methyl-JA led to only a modest reduction in stomatal conductance 80 min after treatment, whereas ABA

28 to elevated CO2 evolved lower rates of leaf stomatal conductance; a physiological adaptation known t

29 y while simultaneously monitoring changes in stomatal conductance, acoustic emissions (AE), turgor pr

30 Stomatal conductance allows maximum transpiration rates

31 etween 2.0 and 7.4 mumol m(-2) s(-1) higher, stomatal conductance almost double, and transpiration 60

32 g positive correlation between mesophyll and stomatal conductance among cultivars apparently impedes

33 hat plants from line TS4T8An displayed lower stomatal conductance and a higher proline content.

34 displayed reduced but detectable dark period stomatal conductance and arrhythmia of the CAM CO(2) fix

35 evated foliar ABA concentrations and reduced stomatal conductance and assimilation rates in our eight

36 e determined by respiration, photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and atmospheric [CO2 ].

37 ditions, fa plants displayed slightly higher stomatal conductance and carbon assimilation than wild-t

38 gas-exchange analyses showed a reduction in stomatal conductance and CO2 -assimilation rates of the

39 ases under elevated CO(2) because of reduced stomatal conductance and enhanced photosynthesis.

40 e gas exchange measurements revealed reduced stomatal conductance and enhanced water use efficiency c

41 tomatal densities, resulting in lowered leaf stomatal conductance and enhanced water use efficiency.

42 haracteristics on the velocity of changes in stomatal conductance and explore the potential for manip

43 Responses in stomatal conductance and five related traits appear to r

44 lization effect operating through restricted stomatal conductance and improved water-use efficiency.

45 0% reduction in summer precipitation reduced stomatal conductance and increased iWUE, and doubled pre

46 which was largely attributed to declines in stomatal conductance and intercellular [CO2] and led in

47 leaf abscisic acid content and a decrease in stomatal conductance and leaf gas exchange.

48 otypes produced F2 progeny cosegregating for stomatal conductance and leaf temperature.

49 tion on sensitivities of xylem conductivity, stomatal conductance and leaf turgor to water potential.

50 CK mutant plants show both increased overall stomatal conductance and less responsiveness of the stom

51 as disrupted in bdpox and resulted in higher stomatal conductance and lower intrinsic water-use effic

52 Together, these differences cause higher stomatal conductance and lower WUE compared with the com

53 (2) enhanced photosynthesis rate and reduced stomatal conductance and maximal carboxylation rate (V(c

54 n indirect measure of transpiration rate and stomatal conductance and may be valuable in distinguishi

55 provide a direct measure of ecosystem-scale stomatal conductance and mesophyll function, without rel

56 her g(sn) was associated with higher daytime stomatal conductance and net photosynthesis.

57 We found that trees experienced lower stomatal conductance and photosynthesis and higher isopr

58 aused by the assumed strong coupling between stomatal conductance and photosynthesis in current LSMs.

59 f water sources were associated with reduced stomatal conductance and photosynthesis, suggesting that

60 chi, is an index of adjustments in both leaf stomatal conductance and photosynthetic rate to environm

61 O(2) (chi) - an index of adjustments in both stomatal conductance and photosynthetic rate to environm

62 re, delayed senescence, and greatly enhanced stomatal conductance and photosynthetic rate, especially

63 owever, rising atmospheric CO2 also modifies stomatal conductance and plant water use, processes that

64 s-of-function pro mutant exhibited increased stomatal conductance and rapid wilting under water defic

65 F. kuroshium decreased leaf stomatal conductance and rate of xylem sap-conduction ar

66 re of gad2 mutants, which results in greater stomatal conductance and reduces water-use efficiency co

67 Stomatal conductance and SLA showed adaptive plasticity

68 g grapevine (Vitis vinifera) in concert with stomatal conductance and stem and petiole hydraulic meas

69 The influence of foliar ABA on stomatal conductance and stomatal aperture was highly pr

70 rough PYR/RCARs for whole-plant steady-state stomatal conductance and stomatal closure induced by env

71 stomatal density were able to maintain their stomatal conductance and survive drought and high temper

72 signaling mechanisms for the manipulation of stomatal conductance and the enhancement of drought tole

73 constrained owing to large uncertainties in stomatal conductance and the lack of catchment-scale mea

74 f photosynthesis happens in the shade, where stomatal conductance and thus [O3 ] deposition is lower

75 orum, wild-type fungus causes an increase in stomatal conductance and transpiration as well as a decr

76 nd physiological factors (assimilation rate, stomatal conductance and transpiration) were measured fr

77 , accumulated less biomass, and showed lower stomatal conductance and transpiration, narrower xylem v

78 han C4 species, coincident with decreases in stomatal conductance and transpiration.

79 y stimulating photosynthesis and by reducing stomatal conductance and transpiration.

80 educed drought tolerance, and show increased stomatal conductance and wider stomatal apertures compar

81 ound that all stresses caused a reduction in stomatal conductance and yield.

82 ults indicate that most plant taxa decreased stomatal conductance and/or maximum photosynthetic capac

83 pecific mass and, during drought, have lower stomatal conductances and higher water-use efficiencies.

84 erature), stomata microscopy image analysis (stomatal conductance), and fluorescence image analysis (

85 nthetic capacity, (ii) variable decreases in stomatal conductance, and (iii) that increases in yield

86 , including chloroplast movement, changes in stomatal conductance, and altered organ positioning.

87 nts allows photosynthetic operation at lower stomatal conductance, and as a consequence, transpiratio

88 Consequently, hydraulic conductance, stomatal conductance, and assimilation capacities should

89 lays circadian rhythms in stomatal aperture, stomatal conductance, and CO(2) assimilation, each of wh

90 rease in total open stomatal area, increased stomatal conductance, and increased transpiration were o

91 duced soil moisture, photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance, and increased trichome density and

92 Measurements of A, stomatal conductance, and intercellular [CO2] were colle

93 er midday leaf temperatures, a higher midday stomatal conductance, and maintained turgor pressure at

94 EPC capacity were tracked by net CO2 uptake, stomatal conductance, and online delta13C signal; all de

95 ined strongly in leaf hydraulic conductance, stomatal conductance, and photosynthetic rate, whereas p

96 immediate effects of O(3) on photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, and photosynthetic transcript abun

97 ss to investigate xylem sap sulfate and ABA, stomatal conductance, and sulfate transporter (SULTR) ex

98 WUE increased in drought, primarily because stomatal conductance, and thus water loss, declined more

99 The effects of cry on stomatal conductance are largely indirect and involve th

100 gnaling genes, coinciding with a decrease in stomatal conductance as an early avoidance response to d

101 nstantaneous measures of photosynthesis, and stomatal conductance as well as with a long-term proxy (

102 nspiration efficiency because of their lower stomatal conductance, as demonstrated by increases in de

103 nts as indicated by significantly lower mean stomatal conductance, as well as marginally significantl

104 In particular, stomatal conductance at night (g(sn) ) is surprisingly p

105 We also established that stomatal conductance at night was on average 5 times gre

106 There were no significant differences in stomatal conductance between leaves from wild-type and t

107 absence of other limitations) and to reduce stomatal conductance, both effects leading to an increas

108 attributable to ~25% lower transpiration and stomatal conductance but equivalent CO(2) assimilation.

109 delta(13) C, the response is via changes in stomatal conductance but is modified by carry-over effec

110 educed CO(2) assimilation, transpiration and stomatal conductance, but did not affect isoprene emissi

111 namics of COS uptake is mainly controlled by stomatal conductance, but the leaf internal conductance

112 800 mg/kg reduced net photosynthesis by 12%, stomatal conductance by 15%, and relative chlorophyll co

113 lowland rice varieties characterized by high-stomatal conductance can play a key role in enhancing pr

114 ed water-use efficiency (WUE) due to reduced stomatal conductance caused by reduced stomatal aperture

115 relative water content, photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, chlorophyll content, and antioxida

116 concentration responses but exhibit reduced stomatal conductance compared with ecotype Columbia at a

117 cum) flacca ABA-deficient mutants had higher stomatal conductance compared with wild-type plants.

118 nd thus it remains unclear whether nighttime stomatal conductance confers a functional advantage.

119 nts were more tolerant to drought with lower stomatal conductance, consistent with its function as an

120 Due to nocturnal stomatal conductance, COS uptake by vegetation continued

121 ponses, indicating that esca (and subsequent stomatal conductance decline) does not result from decre

122 An abundance of evidence suggests that stomatal conductance declines under high VPD and transpi

123 Under drought, stomatal conductance decreased at similar levels in the

124 Dead trees showed reduced stomatal conductance (delta(13)C: - 26.21 +/- 0.11 per m

125 ct in 1970, indicating a gradual increase in stomatal conductance (despite rising levels of atmospher

126 her leaf photosynthetic rate, WUE, and lower stomatal conductance due to higher light intensity suppo

127 te the dynamics of water potential, ABA, and stomatal conductance during the imposition of water stre

128 trongly supported simple empirical models of stomatal conductance, even though we have also known for

129 cy (Wi; the ratio of net CO2 assimilation to stomatal conductance for water vapor) of trees and C3 gr

130 ccurred relative to turgor loss, declines of stomatal conductance g(s) , and hydraulic conductance K(

131 he widely documented phenomenon of nighttime stomatal conductance g(sn) could lead to substantial wat

132 her mesophyll conductance (g (m)), yet their stomatal conductance (g (s)) was lower than that of fern

133 Here, an optimization model for stomatal conductance (g(c) ) that maximizes A while acco

134 Night-time stomatal conductance (g(night)) occurs in many ecosystem

135 l representation of the relationship between stomatal conductance (g(s) ) and assimilation is crucial

136 in concert with isoprene emissions, even as stomatal conductance (g(s) ) and net photosynthetic carb

137 similation (A) to transpiration (E), of A to stomatal conductance (g(s) ) and of sensitivities of E a

138 The approaches used to represent stomatal conductance (g(s) ) in models vary.

139 In ferns, steady-state stomatal conductance (g(s) ) was unresponsive to ABA in

140 diurnal dynamics of net photosynthesis (A), stomatal conductance (g(s) ), and T(can) , as well as th

141 The leaf hydraulic conductance (K(leaf) ), stomatal conductance (g(s) ), net assimilation (A), vein

142 lular to ambient CO(2) (chi) is modulated by stomatal conductance (g(s) ).

143 osynthetic rate per area (A(area) , +12.6%), stomatal conductance (g(s) , +7.5%), and transpiration r

144 starch (58.6% spring, 84.3% FACE), decreased stomatal conductance (g(s) , 27.2% spring, 21.1% FACE),

145 revious studies showed that heterogeneity in stomatal conductance (g(s)) across a leaf could affect t

146 Tepary bean showed the lowest stomatal conductance (g(s)) and photosynthetic rate (A),

147 ize worldwide experimental data to show that stomatal conductance (g(s)) decreases with elevated carb

148 CO(2) ([CO(2)]) have been shown to decrease stomatal conductance (g(s)) for a wide range of species

149 water availabilities highlighted a role for stomatal conductance (g(s)) in adaptation to dry environ

150 Stomatal conductance (g(s)) is constrained by the size a

151 * Stomatal conductance (g(s)) is constrained by the size a

152 tomatal size (SS) and density (SD) influence stomatal conductance (g(s)) kinetics, and whether variat

153 -1) (enveloping atmospheric levels) enhanced stomatal conductance (g(s)) to a variable extent in most

154 esis (A) typically adjusts more quickly than stomatal conductance (g(s)), which is dependent on chang

155 d need for high K(leaf) resulting from lower stomatal conductance (g(s)).

156 leaf and external atmosphere is governed by stomatal conductance (g(s)); therefore, stomata play a c

157 density, with a trend for decreased maximum stomatal conductance (G(smax) ) per unit leaf area.

158 Nocturnal stomatal conductance (g(sn) ) represents a significant s

159 Nighttime stomatal conductance (g(sn) ) varies among plant functio

160 Here, we conducted a Bayesian analysis of stomatal conductance (g) (N=5013) from 16 species in the

161 ective of this study was to determine if low stomatal conductance (g) increases growth, nitrate (NO3

162 conditions, transgenic plants showed higher stomatal conductance, gas exchange, and shoot growth.

163 logical traits including maximum theoretical stomatal conductance (gmax ) and leaf vein density (Dv )

164 iological measurements including operational stomatal conductance (gop ), saturated (Asat ) and maxim

165 ases in diurnal photosynthetic rate (A') and stomatal conductance ( gs' ), and maximum rate of electr

166 two key mechanisms: first, through decreased stomatal conductance (gs ) and increased soil water cont

167 periods of high moisture availability, when stomatal conductance (gs ) and photosynthesis can increa

168 and is a major constraint on light-saturated stomatal conductance (gs ) and photosynthetic rate (Amax

169 s examined diel changes in assimilation (A), stomatal conductance (gs ) and transpiration (E) on matu

170 A strong correlation between A and stomatal conductance (gs ) is well documented and often

171 Daytime canopy stomatal conductance (gs ) per unit leaf area was 12% hi

172 Both photosynthesis (A) and stomatal conductance (gs ) respond to changing irradianc

173 Here, we measured responses of stomatal conductance (gs ) to irradiance, CO2 , and vapo

174 component parts, photosynthesis (Asat ) and stomatal conductance (gs )) for legumes Cicer arietinum,

175 nse of maize to elevated [CO2 ] is decreased stomatal conductance (gs ).

176 including measures of water potential (Psi), stomatal conductance (gs) and frond stipe hydraulic cond

177 ic conductance (Kleaf ), photosynthesis (A), stomatal conductance (gs) and nonstructural carbohydrate

178 carbon fixation by photosynthesis (Asat) and stomatal conductance (gs) are not related to Narea-in di

179 ntial (Psi), net CO(2) assimilation (An) and stomatal conductance (gs) due to water deficit were 79,

180 Stomatal conductance (gs) typically declines in response

181 lant dry mass, net photosynthetic rate (PN), stomatal conductance (gs), intercellular CO2 (Ci), chlor

182 ause, or compensate for, reduced mean canopy stomatal conductance (GS), keeping transpiration (EC) an

183 distinguishes species that rapidly decrease stomatal conductance (gs), thereby maintaining high wate

184 their carbon-for-water balance by regulating stomatal conductance (gS).

185 that selection for higher anatomical maximum stomatal conductance (gsmax ) involves a trade-off to mi

186 Whole-rosette stomatal conductance (Gst) measurements revealed that le

187 of EPF2 reduced stomatal density and maximum stomatal conductance (gw(max) ) sufficiently to increase

188 with lower hydraulic conductivity and higher stomatal conductance, had a LER declining more rapidly t

189 sic acid (ABA)-mediated metabolic control of stomatal conductance have been suggested to be recent, b

190 ression showed lower rates of water loss and stomatal conductance, higher relative water content, and

191 ncluding enhanced photosynthesis and reduced stomatal conductance, impact regional and global climate

192 Guard2 faithfully reproduces the kinetics of stomatal conductance in Arabidopsis thaliana and its dep

193 gaseous signal ethylene in the modulation of stomatal conductance in Arabidopsis thaliana by CO(2) /a

194 ncreased chloroplast Ca concentration, lower stomatal conductance in leaves and enhanced Ca allocatio

195 ximately half is attributed to a decrease in stomatal conductance in order to conserve water in respo

196 Elevated CO2 decreased stomatal conductance in P. smithii, contributing to high

197 control percent loss of conductance through stomatal conductance in response to drought, because the

198 c signaling is involved in the regulation of stomatal conductance in response to rapid changes in amb

199 availability of CO2 in the event of reduced stomatal conductance in response to short-term water sho

200 bi1, after taking unsaturation into account, stomatal conductance increased with increasing VPD, cons

201 t was shown that they also exhibited reduced stomatal conductance, increased NCED mRNA and elevated s

202 Given that stomatal conductance increases under subambient concentr

203 two possible mechanisms: first that reduced stomatal conductance inhibits the diffusion of oxygen to

204 Reduced stomatal conductance is a common plant response to risin

205 Observational evidence demonstrates that stomatal conductance is co-regulated by soil moisture an

206 Stomatal conductance is determined by both anatomical fe

207 i.e., a higher leaf water potential at which stomatal conductance is reduced by 50% (Psi(gs50)).

208 Stomatal conductance is regulated by ABA and emerged as

209 O(2) assimilation relative to water loss via stomatal conductance), is needed.

210 ), compared with wild-type, we found reduced stomatal conductance kinetics.

211 ant height, spike length, 1000 grain weight, stomatal conductance, leaf chlorophyll content, water us

212 Ecosystem modeling suggests that divergent stomatal conductance, leaf sizes and stem life span betw

213 sition of O(3) into vegetation is related to stomatal conductance, leaf structural traits, and the de

214 d parameters, including chlorophyll content, stomatal conductance, leaf temperature, reduced wilting,

215 Water potential, stomatal conductance, loss of xylem hydraulic conductanc

216 hylogenetic nodes are associated with higher stomatal conductance, lower photosynthetic rate (when CO

217 ing strategies targeting high yield and high stomatal conductance may have inadvertently selected for

218 ariables (such as canopy water potential and stomatal conductance) may mediate longer-term changes in

219 Time-resolved stomatal conductance measurements using intact plants, a

220 In this study, we measured sap flow, stomatal conductance, meteorological and soil characteri

221 which is a parameter derived from an optimal stomatal conductance model and which is inversely relate

222 Using an established stomatal conductance model, we explain the changes in in

223 y and parsimoniously than the existing JULES stomatal conductance model.

224 Neither the stomatal conductance nor the kinetic responses to dark,

225 lue light specific, cry1 cry2 showed reduced stomatal conductance not only in response to blue light,

226 we show that while era1 suppressed the high stomatal conductance of abi1-1 and ost1, the ERA1 functi

227 assimilation rates will reach a maximum and stomatal conductance of each species should be constrain

228 The increased TE and reduced whole leaf stomatal conductance of gpa1 can be primarily attributed

229 sition over much of the 20th century reduced stomatal conductance of leaves, thereby increasing intri

230 ns in K(+) channel activities and changes in stomatal conductance of the slac1 Cl(-) channel and ost2

231 ensity (D) determine maximum leaf diffusive (stomatal) conductance of CO(2) (g(c(max))) to sites of a

232 e, in situ variation of water potential, and stomatal conductance) of three Ranunculus species differ

233 Stomatal conductance often closely correlates with A and

234 high photosynthesis in combination with low stomatal conductance or leaf nitrogen, and selection on

235 l limitations to photosynthesis, rather than stomatal conductance or respiration.

236 d, but little is known of genetic effects on stomatal conductance or their consequences.

237 mer conserved soil water by limiting maximum stomatal conductance per unit leaf area, but also, at le

238 While the stomatal conductance phenotype of phot1 phot2 was blue l

239 d O(3) stress parameterizations in a coupled stomatal conductance-photosynthesis model to assess thei

240 ter conditions since the 1980s have enhanced stomatal conductance, photosynthetic assimilation rates

241 otosynthetic carbon flux and in turn adjusts stomatal conductance, photosynthetic CO2 and photorespir

242 n of network modules with dynamic changes in stomatal conductance, photosynthetic rate, and photosyst

243 such as soil moisture content (r = 0.51) or stomatal conductance (r = 0.62).

244 ecies was positively correlated with maximal stomatal conductance (r(2) = 0.20) and net CO(2) assimil

245 d for other species, and result from active (stomatal conductance) rather than passive (nectar evapor

246 Finally, a delay in stomatal conductance recovery during the period of stres

247 eties had higher net carbon assimilation and stomatal conductance relative to vegetable types.

248 The role of guard cell photosynthesis in stomatal conductance responses is a matter of debate, an

249 SOX simulates leaf stomatal conductance responses to climate for woody plan

250 a mesophyll-driven signal coordinates A and stomatal conductance responses to maintain this relation

251 Stomatal conductance rhythms were similarly approximatel

252 carbon-modeling community needs to reexamine stomatal conductance schemes and the soil-vegetation int

253 did not affect CO(2) /H(2) O gas exchange or stomatal conductance significantly, indicating that neit

254 obal scale, land plants have regulated their stomatal conductance so as to allow the CO2 partial pres

255 grees of complexity and varying time scales: stomatal conductance, soil respiration, ecosystem produc

256 metrics such as leaf area, senescence state, stomatal conductance, soil texture, soil moisture, and w

257 In both cases, the whole-plant stomatal conductance, stunted growth phenotype, and leaf

258 Targeted genetic modification of stomatal conductance, such as in EPF2OE, is a viable app

259 Takanari had 30%-40% higher stomatal conductance than Koshihikari; however, the pres

260 er, species from moister climates have lower stomatal conductance than others grown under the same co

261 ), capacitance, turgor loss point, and lower stomatal conductance than their C(3) relatives.

262 es resulted in hysteresis in the recovery of stomatal conductance; this was most pronounced in herbac

263 te, M conductance to CO(2) diffusion (g(m)), stomatal conductance to gas diffusion (g(s)), and the g(

264 These mutants show compromised responses of stomatal conductance to irradiance.

265 sensitive to Psi(l) and that the response of stomatal conductance to Psi(l) is closely correlated wit

266 n xylem ABA concentration and a reduction in stomatal conductance to the same final levels as the wil

267 basis of interspecific variation in maximum stomatal conductance to water (g(max) ), as defined by s

268 categorize the genotypes and predict maximum stomatal conductance to water vapor (Anatomical g(smax))

269 eal for representing fitness when optimizing stomatal conductance to water vapor and carbon dioxide.

270 tio of photosynthetic carbon assimilation to stomatal conductance to water, is a dynamic trait with t

271 tions of enhanced photosynthesis and reduced stomatal conductance to WUE trends and to assess consist

272 icient and under water-deficient conditions, stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, plant hydrauli

273 both phot1 phot2 and cry1 cry2 have reduced stomatal conductance, transpiration, and photosynthesis,

274 I4 negatively impacted chlorophyll content, stomatal conductance, transpiration, photosynthesis, and

275 Increased stomatal conductance under BL reduced photosynthetic lim

276 cy trade-off, such that species with greater stomatal conductance under high water availability (g(ma

277 versed the mortality selection favoring high stomatal conductance under normal and doubled precipitat

278 and in contribution to a plant's control of stomatal conductance under water stress.

279 Optimality-based models of stomatal conductance unify biophysical and evolutionary

280 The stomatal conductance values varied severalfold among the

281 rigated production in very hot environments, stomatal conductance varies genetically over a wide rang

282 Notably, photosynthesis and stomatal conductance vary diurnally, and the circadian c

283 mperature, because of endogenous controls on stomatal conductance via circadian regulation.

284 Sensitivity analyses determined that stomatal conductance was a significant physiological fac

285 Stomatal conductance was lower (-34%) and soil moisture

286 at elevated [CO2 ] in both cultivars, while stomatal conductance was lower.

287 state conditions of shade to sun transition, stomatal conductance was the major limitation, resulting

288 Surprisingly, stomatal conductance was typically lower in the C3 than

289 ophyll conductance with photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, water use efficiency, and leaf mas

290 Leaf photosynthesis, respiration, and stomatal conductance were measured at 90 and 120 d after

291 ynthesis was widespread, while reductions in stomatal conductance were modest and restricted to speci

292 )C, the delta(2)H correlated negatively with stomatal conductance, whereas no correlation was observe

293 As expected, elevated [CO2] reduced the stomatal conductance, which preserved soil moisture and

294 rbon assimilation, along with higher adaxial stomatal conductance, which would also support greater e

295 ed from both salt regimes and showed reduced stomatal conductance while Thellungiella displayed no ob

296 Salinity reduced foliar area and stomatal conductance; while net photosynthetic rate and

297 gy, water and carbon cycles assume decreased stomatal conductance with elevated atmospheric CO2 conce

298 allow for substantial reductions in maximum stomatal conductance without affecting photosynthesis ar

299 s, even modest increases in vein density and stomatal conductance would require substantial reconfigu

300 to represent the effects of soil moisture on stomatal conductance yielded unrealistic diurnal and sea