戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  including some not detected by conventional stool culture.
2 ildren were found to be infected with NTS by stool culture.
3 osthesis sonicate fluid was positive, as was stool culture.
4 that is not readily recovered in traditional stool culture.
5 non-O157 STEC was also included in a routine stool culture.
6 sidence were associated with higher rates of stool culture.
7 %), 89.4% of which were not accompanied by a stool culture.
8 d <=2 core genome SNVs) to other isolates in stool culture.
9  clinical review and collection of blood and stool cultures.
10 nd compared the results to those of standard stool cultures.
11              The rats were weighed and their stools cultured.
12 st bacillus culture, 275, $1,662, and 124 h; stool cultures, 320, $2,991, and 98 h; ovum and parasite
13 all, among the 77 isolates collected from 10 stool cultures, 74/77 (96%) were clonal (i.e., same ST a
14 d with findings from colonoscopy and biopsy, stool culture analysis, surgery, and cutaneous biopsy, a
15 n place and that fewer laboratories (24% for stool culture and 19% for O&P examinations) rejected spe
16 wed that a minority of laboratories (40% for stool culture and 45% for ova and parasite [O&P] examina
17 mArray GI Panel and tested with conventional stool culture and molecular methods for comparison.
18 (GI) pathogen panels have started to replace stool culture and ova and parasite exam as a rapid and a
19           There is substantial evidence that stool culture and parasitological examinations are of mi
20                         Using cholera cases, stool cultures and CATI records, we identified 238 outbr
21                          Our center replaced stool cultures and other conventional microbiologic meth
22                          Our center replaced stool cultures and other conventional microbiological me
23 9 to April 17, 2009, specimens for blood and stool cultures and serology were collected from suspecte
24              Household contacts of cases had stool cultures and serum Vi antibody measurements to det
25 al reduction in the number of evaluations of stool cultures and the number of parasitological examina
26 nosed cholera after ordering the appropriate stool culture, and the patient improved on an oral antib
27 frequent clinical checks and daily blood and stool cultures, and they were monitored for six addition
28 dults who had stools submitted for bacterial stool culture (BSC) between February to May to Northwest
29                                              Stool cultures can be important in guiding antimicrobial
30              The average length of time from stool culture collection to discharge was 3.4 days in th
31            One volunteer had a late positive stool culture during outpatient follow-up.
32 oenteritis with reference methods, including stool culture, enzyme immunoassays, pathogen-specific PC
33                                We found that stool cultures every 3 months markedly underestimated th
34                             From the routine stool culture, five E. coli-like colonies were selected
35                                 From routine stool cultures, five E. coli-like colonies were screened
36 s, lactoferrin, or calprotectin, or positive stool culture for an invasive or inflammatory bacterial
37                  Rates of reproducibility in stool culture for these pathogens ranged from 56.3 to 77
38 teers experienced purging and had a positive stool culture for V. cholerae.
39                                              Stool cultures from 4 patrons yielded type AC. botulinum
40  laboratory procedures to do rapid tests and stool cultures from study cases.
41       Perirectal surveillance cultures and a stool culture grew Aeromonas species from three patients
42  under contact precautions if their positive stool cultures had not resulted in their being isolated.
43 mmatory diarrhea selects specimens for which stool culture is fivefold more likely to yield an invasi
44 se of its low yield in unselected specimens, stool culture is often cost ineffective.
45 t use of antimicrobials for diarrhea without stool culture may indicate inappropriate antimicrobial u
46                                              Stool culture, measurement of serum vibriocidal antibody
47   Swabs of growth from conventionally plated stool culture media were subjected to the OIA SHIGATOX,
48  from suspicious colonies grown on selective stool culture media.
49  Escherichia coli bacteria isolated from the stool cultures of CR mice were modified to express funct
50 tinations are limited by the need to perform stool cultures on site in a timely manner.
51 ell count are normal; not performing routine stool culture or ovum and parasite examination on specim
52 arrhea on or after October 28 and a positive stool culture or temperature greater than 37.8 degrees C
53                                            A stool culture, oropharyngeal culture, blood viral cultur
54 oscopic procedure (8.4% GI panel versus 9.6% stool culture, P = 0.008) or any abdominal radiology (29
55   Stools of 16 children who had recently had stool cultures positive for this pathogen (population A)
56 olidated laboratory workflow, and simplified stool culture practices, thus reducing the overall cost
57             We report a survey of laboratory stool culturing practices for Vibrio among randomly sele
58  contact precautions based on their positive stool cultures prevented an estimated 35 episodes of MRS
59 e infection was defined as having a positive stool culture result on days 2-7 or day 30 after enrolme
60  subjects had at least 1 positive culture (2 stool culture samples were contaminated by fungus and we
61 ccurate tests of diarrheal etiology, such as stool culture (SCx) or toxin assays for Clostridium diff
62                                     Standard stool culture should be performed in patients with infec
63 dence interval, 1.1 to 1.5), evaluation with stool culture soon after the onset of illness (relative
64 (CDST) to decrease the number of unnecessary stool cultures (STCUL), ova/parasite (O&P) examinations,
65                                Patients with stool cultures submitted were tested on the GI panel (n
66 ent finished, and microbiologic failure as a stool culture that yielded S. sonnei after treatment fin
67 ysis demonstrated 59% of the cost of routine stool culture to be attributable to the identification o
68 e prevalence of O. formigenes, determined by stool culture, was 17% among case patients and 38% among
69 raditionally difficult to recover in routine stool cultures, was detected in two of these culture-neg
70                                        Daily stool cultures were collected for 14 days after challeng
71 bservation period followed by delayed FMT if stool cultures were MDRO positive at day 36.
72 ella GI panel-positive patients who also had stool cultures were missed by culture.
73                                              Stool cultures were performed for only 15,820 episodes (
74 hi isolates from cases and 95 from controls (stool culture) were identified; a carriage frequency of
75         We examined the incremental yield of stool culture (with toxin testing on isolates) versus ou
76 STEC were isolated from 30 (43%) of 70 whose stool cultures yielded bacterial growth (25 E. coli O157
77  defined either by clinical criteria or by a stool culture yielding S Typhimurium.