戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1            Unraveling the ultimate source of stratospheric (16)O(13)C(18)O enrichments may impose add
2 large and unexpected meridional variation in stratospheric (16)O(13)C(18)O, observed as proportions i
3 stratospheric ozone, estimates of the future stratospheric abundance of ozone-depleting gases were ma
4              Remarkable perturbations in the stratospheric abundances of chlorine species and ozone w
5 ade has seen broad exploratory research into stratospheric aerosol (SA) geoengineering, motivated by
6 ong-term influence of pyroCb activity on the stratospheric aerosol budget.
7 ta imply a negative radiative forcing due to stratospheric aerosol changes over this period of about
8                      We propose a method for stratospheric aerosol climate modification that uses a s
9 idely known solar geoengineering proposal is stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI), which has impacts
10 asurements demonstrate that the "background" stratospheric aerosol layer is persistently variable rat
11              We show that half of the global stratospheric aerosol optical depth following the Kasato
12                On average, 30% of the global stratospheric aerosol optical depth originated in the LM
13 e, we present measurements of perchlorate in stratospheric aerosol particles and confirm that the str
14                  Single-particle analyses of stratospheric aerosol show that about half of the partic
15  Nabro volcano and satellite observations of stratospheric aerosol that they attribute to troposphere
16 ve notable eruptions and associate each with stratospheric aerosol veils.
17 CVs in promoting the impacts of wildfires on stratospheric aerosols and chemistry.
18                                 The observed stratospheric aerosols and gases are fully explained by
19 nsitive marker of climate change; impacts on stratospheric aerosols and O(3) chemistry, which need to
20 he most abundant species in tropospheric and stratospheric aerosols due to high levels of atmospheric
21                                              Stratospheric aerosols from large tropical explosive vol
22      Several independent data sets show that stratospheric aerosols have increased in abundance since
23                                     Although stratospheric aerosols primarily consisted of sulfuric a
24                            The mean age A of stratospheric air determined from CO2 data is approximat
25 ical tropopause and transport ozone rich dry stratospheric air into the tropics.
26 l N2O isotopomers might be useful tracers of stratospheric air parcel motion.
27                  Injected BC warms the local stratospheric air, consequently perturbing transport and
28  resembles model predictions more closely in stratospheric air.
29 imate pollutant concentrations from proposed stratospheric aircraft by 25 to 100 percent.
30 a conserved tracer analogous to exhaust from stratospheric aircraft.
31 oxidation together with a strengthened lower-stratospheric and a weakened upper-stratospheric circula
32 the 13 June Nabro eruption plume was clearly stratospheric and contained both volcanic gases and aero
33 ated J values that are sufficient to explain stratospheric and mesospheric sulfur dioxide (SO2) conce
34  the tropical tropopause layer, and in polar stratospheric and noctilucent clouds.
35  which in turn are central reactants in many stratospheric and tropospheric chemical processes.
36 e constants for key reactions of interest in stratospheric and tropospheric chemistry.
37                                              Stratospheric and tropospheric difluorodichloromethane (
38 r, which may allow for a distinction between stratospheric and tropospheric influences at remote East
39 wave propagation, and thereby affecting both stratospheric and tropospheric NAM-annularity.
40 hemistry, e.g., as greenhouse gases, destroy stratospheric and tropospheric ozone, and control the at
41 B can also have a significant impact on both stratospheric and tropospheric ozone, and discuss the pr
42 surface O(3) due to the presence of abundant stratospheric and upper tropospheric O(3).
43 e-depleting substances are declining and the stratospheric Antarctic ozone layer is recovering.
44                      Kelut eruption in 2014, stratospheric ash-rich aerosols were observed for months
45 sing observations to derive a time-series of stratospheric biomass burning aerosol optical depths ori
46 heric emissions, where we compare zonal-mean stratospheric brightness temperatures at planetographic
47 ubstances (VSLBr) are an important source of stratospheric bromine, an effective ozone destruction ca
48                              Measurements of stratospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitrous oxide (N2
49 following the eruption, and perturbations to stratospheric chemical composition resulting from the in
50 ations, and of the impact of volcanic ash on stratospheric chemistry and radiation.
51 including an interactive parameterization of stratospheric chemistry show how upper stratospheric ozo
52 , the CCMVal models have a fully interactive stratospheric chemistry.
53 cies (BrOx) contributing to tropospheric and stratospheric chemistry.
54  Remote-sensing data have revealed a peak in stratospheric chlorine after 1996, then a decrease of cl
55                            As a consequence, stratospheric chlorine levels are declining and ozone is
56 rted here is a theoretical study of possible stratospheric chlorine reservoir species including isome
57  level, in hydrogen chloride (HCl), the main stratospheric chlorine reservoir, starting around 2007 i
58 and elevates the astrophysical importance of stratospheric chondritic porous interplanetary dust part
59                                    The lower stratospheric circulation and sea-surface temperature ap
60 ned lower-stratospheric and a weakened upper-stratospheric circulation inferred by this analysis.
61  autumn conditions of sea-ice concentration, stratospheric circulation, and sea-surface temperature.
62 that large variations in the strength of the stratospheric circulation, appearing first above approxi
63 on created by rising smoke plumes alters the stratospheric circulation, redistributing ozone and the
64  the large-scale upward motion of the global stratospheric circulation.
65 ng of satellite radiances provides a view of stratospheric climate change during the period 1979-2005
66 r the pronounced changes in tropospheric and stratospheric climate observed during the past few decad
67 s will act as the nucleation sites for polar stratospheric cloud ice and, after sedimentation into th
68 action of hydrogen chloride (HCl) with polar stratospheric cloud ice particles is essential for under
69                                        Polar stratospheric cloud lifetimes required for Arctic denitr
70 ons, acid rain, radiative balance, and polar stratospheric cloud nucleation.
71  due to uptake and/or sedimentation in polar stratospheric cloud particles.
72 eater surface area than typical Arctic polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs).
73 ld winters favourable for formation of polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs).
74 chlorine (Cl) activation occurs on the polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs; liquid and solid particles c
75 NO3-water particles, representative of polar stratospheric clouds, consists of an ice core surrounded
76 erature-dependent isotopic exchange on polar stratospheric clouds.
77                                          The stratospheric CO(2) oxygen isotope budget is thought to
78                    We report observations of stratospheric CO2 that reveal surprisingly large anomalo
79 ossil bones and teeth, which all derive from stratospheric CO2.
80  loss during spring (up to 4.2% of the total stratospheric column).
81 cations for tropospheric oxidizing capacity, stratospheric composition and ozone chemistry.
82  contrast, the photostability of SO(3) under stratospheric conditions suggests that its removal effic
83 imately three times faster than under normal stratospheric conditions.
84                              We quantify the stratospheric contribution to MSU channel 2 temperatures
85 om the influence of tropospheric forcing and stratospheric control, many studies have addressed the p
86 or tropospheric warming (8 to 15 y) than for stratospheric cooling (1 to 3 y).
87 ld have been feasible to detect human-caused stratospheric cooling by 1894, only 34 y after the assum
88 xperienced enhanced tropospheric warming and stratospheric cooling in the 15 to 45 degrees latitude b
89                             This would cause stratospheric cooling, enhancement of the heterogeneous
90 reveal multidecadal tropospheric warming and stratospheric cooling, punctuated by short-term volcanic
91                                        Lower stratospheric cooling-primarily caused by ozone depletio
92 tained global-scale tropospheric warming and stratospheric cooling.
93 e active as greenhouse gases or as agents of stratospheric depletion.
94 ts 7.8-microm methane and 12.2-microm ethane stratospheric emissions, where we compare zonal-mean str
95                                        These stratospheric events also precede shifts in the probabil
96 pic approach documents several high-latitude stratospheric events that are not bipolar, but climatica
97 d sulfuric acids into stable salts to enable stratospheric geoengineering while reducing or reversing
98         This eclipse was the source of three stratospheric gravity waves.
99 rne analysis techniques for the detection of stratospheric gravity waves.
100           Here we show that the D/H ratio of stratospheric H2 develops enrichments greater than 440 p
101 (3)Br and CH(3)Cl, and thereby contribute to stratospheric halogen load.
102          Our observations suggest that these stratospheric harbingers may be used as a predictor of t
103                         Through increases in stratospheric humidity, warming may also cause evaporati
104 e records from an array of ice cores suggest stratospheric injection of 14 +/- 2 Tg S associated with
105 las (Indonesia) is the source of the largest stratospheric injection of volcanic gases in the Common
106 (4-9) parts per trillion] [corrected] to the stratospheric input at the tropical tropopause.
107 alculations leads to an improvement in tropo-stratospheric interactions compared to simulations witho
108 n CO2 for CO2 biogeochemical cycle study and stratospheric intrusion flux at the surface are discusse
109   The linkage between La Nina and western US stratospheric intrusions can be exploited to provide a f
110                       Evidence suggests deep stratospheric intrusions can elevate western US surface
111            We show more frequent late spring stratospheric intrusions when the polar jet meanders tow
112  0.1 parts per trillion by volume [pptv]) of stratospheric iodine injection, we use the Whole Atmosph
113 Organization, and are incompatible with zero stratospheric iodine injection.
114                    We report measurements of stratospheric isotope fractionation in such a compound.
115                                Lower and mid-stratospheric long-term trends are negative, and the tre
116 ell as resolving transport phenomena such as stratospheric mixing into the troposphere.
117 mission STS-66 have provided measurements of stratospheric mountain waves from space.
118 ulate the observed isotopic fractionation of stratospheric N2O.
119 ain the 15N/14N and 18O/16O fractionation of stratospheric nitrous oxide (N2O) and reconcile laborato
120  data indicate that present understanding of stratospheric nitrous oxide chemistry is incomplete.
121 ompatible with those determined for the main stratospheric nitrous oxide loss processes of photolysis
122 locity-resolved observations from the SOFIA (Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy) legacy
123 intrusions brought dry and ozone rich air of stratospheric origin deep into the tropics.
124                                   Zonal mean stratospheric overturning circulation organizes the tran
125 f spatiotemporal variations in Earth's lower-stratospheric ozone (LSO) and temperature, which provide
126 ons of increased N(2)O abundance, leading to stratospheric ozone (O(3)) depletion, altered solar ultr
127 s the photochemical coupling between N2O and stratospheric ozone (O3), which can easily be decomposed
128 f increasing greenhouse gases and decreasing stratospheric ozone and is predicted to continue by the
129 y, and may be related to human influences on stratospheric ozone and/or atmospheric greenhouse gas co
130 o a significant decline from 2004 to 2007 in stratospheric ozone below an altitude of 45 km, with an
131 anges to high-latitude atmospheric dynamics, stratospheric ozone change, and tropical sea surface tem
132 on of stratospheric chemistry show how upper stratospheric ozone changes may amplify observed, 11-yea
133 ing (i.e. chlorine and bromine) compounds in stratospheric ozone chemistry and climate forcing is poo
134  sea ice, we show that including interactive stratospheric ozone chemistry in atmospheric model calcu
135                           This suggests that stratospheric ozone chemistry is important for the under
136 terogeneous reactions that are important for stratospheric ozone chemistry under both background and
137 s, which individually impact global climate, stratospheric ozone concentration, or local photochemist
138 rctic, essentially complete removal of lower-stratospheric ozone currently results in an ozone hole e
139 that strong synergistic interactions between stratospheric ozone depletion and greenhouse warming are
140       Due to its significant contribution to stratospheric ozone depletion and its potent greenhouse
141 to be reduced by more realistic treatment of stratospheric ozone depletion and volcanic aerosol forci
142 ities of mid-UV radiation (UVB), a result of stratospheric ozone depletion during the austral spring,
143 t the entire atmosphere, resulting in severe stratospheric ozone depletion for several years.
144 s syndrome to increases in UV radiation from stratospheric ozone depletion needs to be completed.
145 and reduces their potential to contribute to stratospheric ozone depletion or global warming; HFCs do
146 pics-similar to those associated with modern stratospheric ozone depletion over Antarctica-plausibly
147 and summer can be explained as a response to stratospheric ozone depletion over Antarctica.
148 ric N(2)O concentrations have contributed to stratospheric ozone depletion(1) and climate change(2),
149 000 in six major categories (climate change, stratospheric ozone depletion, agricultural intensificat
150 trate the roles of methane, nitrogen oxides, stratospheric ozone depletion, and global warming drivin
151 models forced by greenhouse gases, aerosols, stratospheric ozone depletion, and volcanic eruptions an
152 + Liters) Neptune also has a lower impact in stratospheric ozone depletion, fine particulate matter f
153 ed as contributing to the warming, including stratospheric ozone depletion, local sea-ice loss, an in
154 ride (CH3Cl), compounds that are involved in stratospheric ozone depletion, originate from both natur
155 e to the potential contributions of CH3Br to stratospheric ozone depletion, technologies for the capt
156 powerful greenhouse gas and a major cause of stratospheric ozone depletion, yet its sources and sinks
157 ributors to the anthropogenic enhancement of stratospheric ozone depletion.
158 nt to previously unrecognized mechanisms for stratospheric ozone depletion.
159 d chlorine, respectively, which can catalyze stratospheric ozone depletion.
160 loride (CH(3)Cl) significantly contribute to stratospheric ozone depletion.
161 radiation indicate that the eruptions led to stratospheric ozone depletion.
162 romethane (CH3Cl) plays an important role in stratospheric ozone destruction, but many uncertainties
163 N(2)O), a greenhouse gas that contributes to stratospheric ozone destruction.
164 e gas that contributes to climate change and stratospheric ozone destruction.
165                                        Polar stratospheric ozone has decreased since the 1970s due to
166 eloped a method for diagnosing the amount of stratospheric ozone in these UT parcels using the compac
167 on precipitation and severe depletion of the stratospheric ozone layer in the Northern Hemisphere.
168                             Accordingly, the stratospheric ozone layer is expected to recover.
169                          The recovery of the stratospheric ozone layer relies on the continued declin
170                  The threat N2O poses to the stratospheric ozone layer, coupled with the uncertain fu
171 source of odd-hydrogen radicals, destroy the stratospheric ozone layer, such that Earth's surface rec
172        The recognition that CFCs destroy the stratospheric ozone layer, with consequent enormous cons
173  known remaining anthropogenic threat to the stratospheric ozone layer.
174  2005 in the USA, because it can deplete the stratospheric ozone layer.
175 e by the Montreal Protocol in protecting the stratospheric ozone layer.
176 unted for when studying the evolution of the stratospheric ozone layer.
177  known to affect ENSO strength by modulating stratospheric ozone levels (OEI = 6 and (17)O = 3.3 per
178 ), and third and fourth quartile mean annual stratospheric ozone levels but increased with second, th
179 x, clear sky and issued ultraviolet indices, stratospheric ozone levels, and outdoor air temperature
180 , contributing, on average, 10% of the lower stratospheric ozone loss during spring (up to 4.2% of th
181 n dominate (~73%) the halogen-mediated lower stratospheric ozone loss during summer and early fall, w
182 , controlled substances due to their role in stratospheric ozone loss, also occur as dissolved contam
183 le the 1991 eruption of Pinatubo resulted in stratospheric ozone loss, it was due to heterogeneous ch
184 on and destruction, photooxidant cycling and stratospheric ozone loss.
185 ntemporary cities to calculate the impact on stratospheric ozone of a regional nuclear war between de
186  upon the same reaction network that reduces stratospheric ozone over the Arctic.
187  of the Montreal Protocol and the associated stratospheric ozone recovery might therefore manifest, o
188 redicting radiative forcing due to Antarctic stratospheric ozone recovery requires detecting changes
189             Furthermore, we demonstrate that stratospheric ozone recovery, resulting from the Montrea
190             This usage carries potential for stratospheric ozone reduction due to Br atom catalysis,
191 ll force SAM into its positive phase even if stratospheric ozone returns to normal levels, so that cl
192 ugh a photochemical reaction network linking stratospheric ozone to carbon dioxide and to oxygen.
193 at simulated changes in solar irradiance and stratospheric ozone was used to investigate the response
194 h this, models project a gradual increase in stratospheric ozone with the Antarctic ozone hole expect
195 orocarbons (CFCs) contribute to depletion of stratospheric ozone, CFC-containing metered-dose inhaler
196        To assess the effect of this trend on stratospheric ozone, estimates of the future stratospher
197  measures of compounds' abilities to deplete stratospheric ozone, have been a key regulatory componen
198 t may have coincided with a dramatic drop in stratospheric ozone, possibly due to a global temperatur
199 , augments the greenhouse effect, diminishes stratospheric ozone, promotes smog, contaminates drinkin
200 ve a key role in regulating tropospheric and stratospheric ozone, while some hHNPs bioaccumulate and
201 mical reactions-specifically those producing stratospheric ozone-and providing the major source of he
202                              Implicated as a stratospheric ozone-depleting compound, methyl bromide (
203 t to the regulation of both tropospheric and stratospheric ozone.
204 ce in the Archean, prior to the formation of stratospheric ozone.
205 esterlies, largely in response to changes in stratospheric ozone.
206 e through radiative warming and depletion of stratospheric ozone.
207 for most of the anthropogenic destruction of stratospheric ozone.
208 gas that also plays a role in the cycling of stratospheric ozone.
209 se gases, tropospheric sulfate aerosols, and stratospheric ozone.
210 long-lived greenhouse gas that also destroys stratospheric ozone.
211 o periodic enhanced UV-B due to depletion of stratospheric ozone.
212 tent greenhouse gas (GHG) that also depletes stratospheric ozone.
213               The sodium/iron ratio in these stratospheric particles is higher and the magnesium/iron
214 ydrospheric isotope exchange with water, and stratospheric photochemistry.
215 ulations, which did not adequately represent stratospheric plume rise.
216 he OWBCs substantially weaken the wintertime stratospheric polar vortex by enhancing the upward plane
217 mbers of 1 and 2, subsequently weakening the stratospheric polar vortex in mid-winter (January-Februa
218 nd of plausible CMIP trajectories, while the stratospheric polar vortex shows robust strengthening, b
219  can be traced to recent trends in the lower stratospheric polar vortex, which are due largely to pho
220 sit the momentum transported, disturbing the stratospheric polar vortex, which can lead to a breakdow
221     Therefore, an accurate representation of stratospheric processes in climate models is necessary t
222 culation, determining boundary conditions to stratospheric processes, which in turn influence troposp
223                                              Stratospheric profiles of SF(5)CF(3) suggest that it is
224 hemistry and auroral chemistry dominates the stratospheric radiative heating at middle and high latit
225                                   The Dome C stratospheric reconstruction provides independent valida
226                 Two mechanisms, the top-down stratospheric response of ozone to fluctuations of short
227 s and our ability to test simulations of the stratospheric response to emissions of greenhouse gases
228  summer 1831 CE and immediately prior to the stratospheric S fallout.
229                     An unusually cold Arctic stratospheric season occurred in 2011, raising the quest
230 simpler isotopic distillation model reveal a stratospheric signature in the (17)O-excess record at Vo
231                            Thus, although no stratospheric source needs to be invoked, the data indic
232  be produced from a combination of different stratospheric sources (sulfur dioxide and carbonyl sulfi
233     Results include the detection of two new stratospheric species, the methyl radical and diacetylen
234  composed of ethane and forms as a result of stratospheric subsidence and the particularly cool condi
235                                              Stratospheric subsidence at the edges of the disturbance
236 spheric field measurements and models of the stratospheric sulfate aerosol layer led to the suggestio
237  tropical eruption, requires revision of the stratospheric sulfate injection mass that is used for pa
238       Moreover, we will show height-resolved stratospheric sulfur dioxide and volcanic aerosol enhanc
239                                 About 10% of stratospheric sulfuric acid particles larger than 120 nm
240 e next few decades could cause up to half of stratospheric sulfuric acid particles to contain metals
241 cecraft reentries can be clearly measured in stratospheric sulfuric acid particles.
242                         For changes in lower stratospheric temperature between 1979 and 2011, S/N rat
243 llite-based measurements of tropospheric and stratospheric temperature change.
244 i-correlation between tropospheric and lower stratospheric temperature is confirmed-the lower stratos
245 n 1860 had not been global, and high-quality stratospheric temperature measurements existed for North
246  into question our understanding of observed stratospheric temperature trends and our ability to test
247 fferences are unclear, model biases in lower stratospheric temperature trends are likely to be reduce
248 The spatial distribution of tropospheric and stratospheric temperature trends for 1979 to 2005 was ex
249                          In contrast, global stratospheric temperature trends have much higher signal
250 ozone depletion through decreasing the lower stratospheric temperature.
251                                       Higher stratospheric temperatures accelerate catalytic reaction
252          A new data set of middle- and upper-stratospheric temperatures based on reprocessing of sate
253                                              Stratospheric temperatures on Saturn imply a strong deca
254 la: see text], computed for tropospheric and stratospheric temperatures over 1979 to 2018.
255                       Anomalously high lower stratospheric temperatures were recorded for 4 months at
256 e weak because the instrument partly records stratospheric temperatures whose large cooling trend off
257 or quasi-liquid layer, at the ice surface at stratospheric temperatures.
258 ures using MSU channel 4, which records only stratospheric temperatures.
259 nhancing ozone loss rates at relatively warm stratospheric temperatures.
260 or the response of tropospheric oxidants and stratospheric thermal and mass balance.
261 lar vortex show correlations with long-lived stratospheric tracer and bulk isotope abundances opposit
262 dynamical variability will also affect other stratospheric tracers and needs to be accounted for when
263  concentrations were analyzed to investigate stratospheric transport rates.
264 th the Kuwae volcano, and likely not a large stratospheric tropical eruption, requires revision of th
265 ipses, from which we derive a time series of stratospheric turbidity.
266                                              Stratospheric volcanic aerosols reflect sunlight, which
267 ratures are sensitive to regional changes in stratospheric volcanic and tropospheric mineral aerosols
268                   However, identification of stratospheric volcanic eruptions in the geological recor
269 on about 445 million years ago suggests that stratospheric volcanic eruptions may have contributed to
270                      High quality records of stratospheric volcanic eruptions, required to model past
271 ere we present a new 2600-year chronology of stratospheric volcanic events using an independent appro
272  climate, but how climate change affects the stratospheric volcanic sulfate aerosol lifecycle and rad
273 overed in ice core sulphate originating from stratospheric volcanism.
274                      Subsequently, the polar stratospheric vortex weakened significantly, resulting i
275 e ozone profiles retrieved during the Sudden Stratospheric Warming (SSW) event registered in Spring 2
276 he winter polar stratosphere known as Sudden Stratospheric Warming (SSW) events are well recognized f
277             Ultraviolet irradiance modulates stratospheric warming and ozone production, and influenc
278  In contrast, global-mean radiative forcing, stratospheric warming and surface cooling from infrequen
279 mission and transport are impacted by sudden stratospheric warmings (SSWs), which establish a negativ
280  Extreme polar vortex events known as sudden stratospheric warmings can influence surface winter weat
281 ger time scales, and may help to explain why stratospheric water vapor appears to have been increasin
282                                              Stratospheric water vapor concentrations decreased by ab
283                                 Even the low stratospheric water vapor content provides an important
284                             Hence, lowermost stratospheric water vapor exerts a first order effect on
285 ric temperature, implying the existence of a stratospheric water vapor feedback.
286 s from analysis of observations showing that stratospheric water vapor increases with tropospheric te
287                     These findings show that stratospheric water vapor is an important driver of deca
288               More limited data suggest that stratospheric water vapor probably increased between 198
289                            We show here that stratospheric water vapor variations play an important r
290 tionation imprints the isotopic signature of stratospheric water vapor, which may allow for a distinc
291  (+0.03 +/- 0.01 watts per square metre) and stratospheric water vapour (+0.011 +/- 0.001 watts per s
292 er Boulder, Colorado, USA shows increases in stratospheric water vapour concentrations that cannot be
293                                              Stratospheric water vapour is a powerful greenhouse gas.
294  hydrogen interacts with methane, ozone, and stratospheric water vapour, leading to an indirect 100-y
295 s feature lower-level stretched vortices and stratospheric wave reflection.
296  from poor vertical resolution and Jupiter's stratospheric wind velocities have not yet been determin
297 asi-biennial oscillation (QBO) of equatorial stratospheric winds and the amplitude of the Madden-Juli
298 hm and is robust to the natural diversity in stratospheric winds.
299 tion in this region is a critical control of stratospheric WV.
300 l vertically over great distances, modifying stratospheric zonal jets, exciting wave activity and tur

 
Page Top