ライフサイエンスコーパス: straw

1 e vessels (pellets, 0.25 mL straws or 0.5 mL straws).

2 es by thiol-containing peptides in roots and straw.

3 ving the Cu(2+) ion sorption capacity of the straw.

4 on capacity of Cu(2+) ions by the esterified straw.

5 C) value increased with the addition of rice straw.

6 assing the differences between GM and non-GM straw.

7 an the biochar and citric acid modified rice straw.

8 y, and O-containing functional group of rice straw.

9 olubility and availability compared to wheat straw.

10 culture filtrate of A. niger grown on wheat straw.

11 ng communities grown on wheat straw and rice straw.

12 on and silanization for fabricating drinking straws.

13 rather than autochthonous carbon supply-hemp straws.

14 risk of Cd(II) enrichment in rice grains and straws.

15 (3.65 Mg ha(- 1)), N in roots (0.87%), N in straw (0.85%) and N in grains (1.07%) in irrigated wheat

16 re heavier than straw (Delta(114/110)Cdgrain-straw = 0.10 to 0.51 per thousand).

17 millet straw 33-36% in paddy straw and wheat straw, 16% in maize straw for laccase obtained from cell

18 Freezing was in 0.5 mL straws, 2 cm above LN for 4 min then thawing at 37 degre

19 et straw and sorghum stover, 27-32% in paddy straw, 21% in wheat straw, and 26% in maize straw, while

20 th-occluded carbon (PhytOC) contents in rice straw; (3) Positive correlations between the phytolith p

21 ing digestibility of 54-59% in finger millet straw 33-36% in paddy straw and wheat straw, 16% in maiz

22 and its distribution in roots (37% and 55%), straw (40% and 61%), and grains (30% and 46%) of wheat a

23 Herein, we present STRAW, a web server that offers workflows for reconstruc

24 Wheat straw addition increased the fungal community diversity,

25 d Saccharibacteria, was increased with wheat straw addition.

26 undance of Fusarium was decreased with wheat straw addition.

27 atic C horizontal lineC of pretreated barley straw adsorbent and pi* carbon atom in benzene ring atta

28 aminated water was done by pretreated barley straw adsorbent obtained from raw barley straw after mod

29 ley straw adsorbent obtained from raw barley straw after modification by H3PO4 impregnation and micro

30 Paper straws also showed a notable temperature dependence, wit

31 Two other CO(2)-derived substrates, wheat straw and acetate, are also demonstrated to be effective

32 conducted utilizing actual runoff, DOC from straw and compost, and a suite of TOrCs.

33 dissolved organic carbon (DOC) derived from straw and compost, which are representative materials ob

34 bbles retained (PTR(W25)), PTR without wheat straw and GM (PTR(W0) + GM), and PTR with wheat stubbles

35 tments in rice included combination of wheat straw and GM were conventional till puddled transplanted

36 Celsius increase in winter soil temperature, straw and grain biomass carbon decreased by 6.6 ( +/- 1.

37 cted in northwestern China to assess whether straw and plastic managements in wheat/maize intercroppi

38 Nighttime BBVOC oxidation for rice straw and ponderosa pine fires is dominated by NO(3) (72

39 llulose-degrading communities grown on wheat straw and rice straw.

40 rated degradation of 30-40% in finger millet straw and sorghum stover, 27-32% in paddy straw, 21% in

41 preparations from wheat (Triticum aestivum) straw and subsequently in all monocot samples examined.

42 omass burning source HULIS samples from rice straw and sugar cane leaf burning displayed unambiguous

43 . brasilense with organic mulches (T6: wheat straw and T7: rice husk) substantially improved plant bi

44 ushrooms decreased with the addition of rice straw and the ash levels increased.

45 4-59% in finger millet straw 33-36% in paddy straw and wheat straw, 16% in maize straw for laccase ob

46 s representative of agricultural burns (rice straw) and western wildfires (ponderosa pine).

47 stover, 27-32% in paddy straw, 21% in wheat straw, and 26% in maize straw, while 20% lignin degradat

48 nol generated from corn grain, stover, wheat straw, and biodiesel from soybean.

49 be explained by specific exposures to cows, straw, and farm milk for asthma and exposure to fodder s

50 O3)2-extractable Cd soil pool, and in roots, straw, and grains.

51 ational scenario in which corn stover, wheat straw, and Miscanthus are converted to 1.4 EJ (60 billio

52 ddition resulted in significant increases in straw- and husk-Si.

53 this effect can be mitigated by delaying the straw application to three-leaf stage.

54 esource managers to dependably plan how many straws are needed to safely cryopreserve a genetic line.

55 f a focal species during adaptation to wheat straw as a resource both in monoculture and in polycultu

56 for predicting plant-available As, husk and straw As concentrations were the most significant predic

57 tive, while the mixed use of wheat and wheat straw as feedstocks would be the most cost-effective one

58 Total grain- and straw-As was negatively correlated with pore-water Si, a

59 rice straw was used as the control, the rice straw ash (Sa), biochar (Sa), and modified rice straw (M

60 The rice straw ash prepared by ashing unexpectedly had greater ad

61 In conclusion, rice straw ash shows the greatest potential of being applied

62 In the case of wheat straw, atomic K concentrations of around 3 ppm were obse

63 four common poaceous biomass sources (wheat straw, barley straw, corn stover, and sugar cane bagasse

64 ard barriers increase plant diversity, while straw barrier promotes the plant growth.

65 rting sustainable agriculture and capable of straw-based applications.

66 in contents and lignin properties to develop straw-based construction panels and polymer composites.

67 ent in mitigating fungal growth on wood- and straw-based insulation.

68 o either simple slatted-floor (S) or complex straw-based rearing ecosystem (C).

69 In the current research, a maize straw biochar (MB) and Trichoderma harzianum loaded bioc

70 ts amended with different percentage of rice straw biochar (RC).

71 n of <80 t ha(-1) wood biochar, <40 t ha(-1) straw biochar, or <10 t ha(-1) manure biochar for other

72 other amendments such as, citrus waste, rice straw, biochar and activated carbon.

73 The biosorption capacity of rice straw, biochar, and activated carbon for Pb was 4.44, 1.

74 Wheat straw biochars and ash exhibited equivalent or marginall

75 tion of sugars derived from pre-treated rice straw biomass and differential sensitivities to fermenta

76 to 93.7% of lignin was extracted from wheat straw biomass at varying conditions from 90 degrees C to

77 rter, increase grain yield at the expense of straw biomass, and are more resistant to damage by wind

78 Barley straw (BS), a very low-cost material, has been utilized

79 lkaloid compounds (e.g., imidazoles) in rice straw burning HULIS was consistent with the suppression

80 ted and liquid hot water pretreated rapeseed straw by CARS and show how the framework can be extended

81 inishing diets: conventional concentrate and straw (C) vs silage and organic feed (S).

82 Rice straw can adsorb Cd(II) from wastewater, and modificatio

83 ransvaginal paracentesis removed 4 liters of straw-colored fluid, resulting in significant short-term

84 ell lines, we report that cells from African straw-colored fruit bats (Eidolon helvum) are refractory

85 xoviruses in an urban-roosting population of straw-colored fruit bats in Ghana.

86 majority (70%) of historical accessions had straw-colored hulls, only 30% of contemporary HR weedy r

87 , only 30% of contemporary HR weedy rice had straw-colored hulls.

88 The straw-coloured fruit bat, Eidolon helvum, is Africa's mo

89 mount of reducing sugars released from wheat straw compared with the same system lacking the laccase.

90 d alkyl carbons for both the wheat and maize straws compared with no-sunlight control.

91 arascedosporium genus, isolated from a wheat-straw composting community, that secretes a large and di

92 tes, in comparison with samples grown on oat straw (control).

93 oaceous biomass sources (wheat straw, barley straw, corn stover, and sugar cane bagasse), and lignin

94 ure) and plant residues (rice straw, soybean straw, corn straw) when applied to surface of an acidic

95 process, has been largely overlooked during straw decomposition in mesic ecosystems.

96 egradation when explaining the mechanisms of straw decomposition in mesic ecosystems.

97 ted the mass loss and chemical structures of straw decomposition in response to elevated UV-B radiati

98 tribution of photodegradation to the overall straw decomposition process.

99 per thousand), and grains were heavier than straw (Delta(114/110)Cdgrain-straw = 0.10 to 0.51 per th

100 We examined the ability of rice straw-derived biochar to reduce CH4 emission from paddy

101 runoff was more enhanced by compost DOC than straw DOC (particularly for atrazine, prometon, benzotri

102 how PFAS removal is worst when biodegradable straw DOC is present, indicating larger kinetic limitati

103 Drinking straws due to their non-degradability, large consumption

104 lense and organic mulching (especially wheat straw) effectively mitigated drought stress in wheat by

105 using different proportions of natural wheat straw fiber, bentonite, and silica fume (SF).

106 in paddy straw and wheat straw, 16% in maize straw for laccase obtained from cell immobilization meth

107 energy distribution of the pretreated barley straw for levofloxacin adsorption was estimated based on

108 When you reach with your straw for the final drops of a milkshake, the liquid for

109 poly(butylene adipate terephthalate) (PBAT) straws for 28 weeks at 10 and 20 degrees C in continuous

110 compared with control samples grown on wheat straw from non selenium-rich areas (141 vs 0.17 mug Se g

111 cies of oyster mushrooms, was grown on wheat straw from the seleniferous belt of Punjab (India) and i

112 dly, strategy for preparing high-performance straws from renewable biomass with improved properties a

113 ve mill waste (OLW) or grape marc plus wheat straw (GMW) were assessed as substrates for the cultivat

114 eas historical weedy rice was separated into straw-hull and black-hull populations.

115 Moreover, the addition of rice straw improved the contents of monosodium glutamate (MSG

116 nt materials such as sand, biochar, and teff straw in a media.

117 from chimneys at hydrothermal vents to soda straws in caves.

118 Fourth, improper disposal of compostable straws in landfills could increase the global warming po

119 g microorganisms more strongly in soils with straw incorporation than in soils without straw, with th

120 creased CH(4) emissions from paddies without straw incorporation, it tended to reduce CH(4) emissions

121 reduce CH(4) emissions from paddy soils with straw incorporation.

122 elative mass loss of the CDA film, foam, and straw increased by 20-25% from 10 to 20 degrees C, and t

123 Our results suggest that rice straw is a potential substitute for sawdust to cultivate

124 ironment, however, fungal growth on wood and straw is an important consideration.

125 In parallel, the resulting barley straw is tailored to: (i) increase straw protein content

126 of assay substrates, and breakdown of wheat straw lignocellulose by recombinant DypB is observed ove

127 iercing-sucking insects like hemipterans use straw-like mouth parts (stylets) to ingest fluid from pl

128 history has three problems: (1) relying on a straw man argument; (2) limitations in their data; and (

129 Charney creates a straw man out of the myth of an immutable genetics, and

130 at our article was misdirected or aimed at a straw man; we argue that this is unlikely, given the wid

131 These findings highlight the importance of straw management practices for sustainable agricultural

132 unting for the interaction between CO(2) and straw management, we estimate that eCO(2) increases glob

133 ly compare the adsorption capacities of rice straw materials prepared with different modification met

134 I) from wastewater, and modification of rice straw may improve its adsorption efficiency.

135 hat Lake cryopreservation medium with 0.5-ml straw may perhaps be an appropriate method to improve th

136 r single- and multiple-cell origin models as straw men that can be improved on and hopefully lead to

137 Taken together, the addition of wheat straw might affect the microbial community through incre

138 aw ash (Sa), biochar (Sa), and modified rice straw (Ms) were prepared by ashing, pyrolysis and citric

139 ree treatments were used in this experiment: straw mulch (SM), plastic film mulch (PM) and convention

140 B)), T2 (DB + A. brasilense), T3 (DB + wheat straw mulch), T4 (DB + rice husk mulch), T5 (DB + plasti

141 astic mulch), T6 (DB + A. brasilense + wheat straw mulch), T7 (DB + A. brasilense + rice husk mulch),

142 grating no tillage with two-year plastic and straw mulching (NTMI2) improved grain yields by 13.8-17.

143 e and its mulching, one HH at 12 DAS fb rice straw mulching @ 4t ha(-1), one HH at 12 DAS fb rice str

144 lching @ 4t ha(-1), one HH at 12 DAS fb rice straw mulching @ 6 t ha(-1)) on weed control, crop growt

145 This study assesses the effects of straw mulching and deep tillage on soil microbial commun

146 ifferent times (30, 180, and 270 days) after straw mulching and deep tillage treatments.

147 supplemental experiment thus confirmed that straw mulching at the seedling stage may lead to yield r

148 ter-fertilizer integration, mulch recycling, straw mulching, and drip irrigation to minimize apple ca

149 l fertilizer (NPK), chemical fertilizer plus straw (NPK + S) and pig manure (OM) on fractions of P an

150 cell walls, including those in the grain and straw of economically important cereals.

151 r 12 weeks (GC-1g); and (3) 3 g daily (60-75 straws of spaghetti) for 2 weeks (GC-3g).

152 We investigated 13 on-the-market drinking straws of varying formulations, characterizing their phy

153 Wood chips or particles as well as shredded straw offer desired thermal insulation qualities.

154 Thus, we investigated the effects of wheat straw on soil bacterial and fungal communities by adding

155 vere soil-borne disease, the effect of wheat straw on the disease remains unclear.

156 0 sec) and storage vessels (pellets, 0.25 mL straws or 0.5 mL straws).

157 rug use (OR, 3.43), sharing cocaine snorting straws (OR, 2.89), and being unaware of their HCV status

158 different biochar types (derived from wood, straw, or manure), and their interactions with biochar a

159 Thus, the application of fertilizer and straw, or organic manure may enhance inorganic and organ

160 Increasing SOC through straw organic amendments enhances PIC accumulation in th

161 cubated CDA-based materials (film, foam, and straw), paper straws, polyethylene (PE) films, and poly(

162 n of potassium chloride (KCl) salt and wheat straw particles in a laminar premixed CH(4)/air flame wi

163 w pellets, wheat straw pellets, oilseed rape straw pellets, and rice husk) during pyrolysis by collec

164 e feedstock (miscanthus straw pellets, wheat straw pellets, oilseed rape straw pellets, and rice husk

165 f biochar from diverse feedstock (miscanthus straw pellets, wheat straw pellets, oilseed rape straw p

166 sed materials (film, foam, and straw), paper straws, polyethylene (PE) films, and poly(butylene adipa

167 ability and properties of recalcitrant wheat straw polymers.

168 The papaya straws post-functionalization were biodegradable (~28 da

169 The rice straw powder (Sp) from the direct pulverization of rice

170 Drinking straws present a simple form factor for evaluating mater

171 teaming up with plant breeding companies and straw processing companies to use the major advances in

172 ng barley straw is tailored to: (i) increase straw protein content to make it suitable for the develo

173 uddled transplanted rice (PTR) with no wheat straw (PTR(W0)), PTR with 25% wheat stubbles retained (P

174 ass and to exploit the variability of barley straw quality and composition.

175 aired and included conventional tillage with straw removed (CT0), conventional tillage with straw ret

176 rop were conventional tillage (CT) with rice straw removed (CTW(R0)), zero tillage (ZT) with rice str

177 lage with straw retained (CTS), no-till with straw removed (NT0), no-till with straw retention (NTS),

178 with straw retention (NTS), subsoiling with straw removed (SS0), and subsoiling with straw retained

179 moved (CTW(R0)), zero tillage (ZT) with rice straw removed (ZTW(R0)) and ZT with rice straw retained

180 1%, compared to conventional tillage without straw residue and annual new plastic mulching (CTI).

181 ication combined with incorporation of wheat straw residues (F + R).

182 observed in paddy and finger millet-treated straws respectively, over the controls corroborating eff

183 nonlabeled and uniformly (13)C labeled wheat straw, respectively, and characterized by heteronuclear

184 liprole were 11.3 and 9.4 days for grain and straw, respectively.

185 raw removed (CT0), conventional tillage with straw retained (CTS), no-till with straw removed (NT0),

186 ith straw removed (SS0), and subsoiling with straw retained (SSS).

187 ice straw removed (ZTW(R0)) and ZT with rice straw retained as surface mulch (ZTW(R100)).

188 -till with straw removed (NT0), no-till with straw retention (NTS), subsoiling with straw removed (SS

189 fixation efficiency (CFE) were observed for straw retention treatments.

190 Straw return is an effective strategy to alleviate soil-

191 the impact of genetically modified (GM) crop straw return on soil ecosystems is crucial as GM crops b

192 oration with fertilizer, and fertilizer with straw return treatments.

193 ultivation practices (i.e. fertilization and straw return) since the early 1980s were the main driver

194 ter amendments and reduced-till coupled with straw return, estimated at 0.31 to 0.83 Mg CO2 -equivale

195 ustainable goal in China's mollisols region, straw returning, optimized nitrogen fertilization and no

196 Antioxidant aqueous rice straw (RS) extract was obtained by a combined ultrasound

197 PLA were obtained, incorporating or not rice straw (RS) valorised fractions: active extract (es) into

198 In the study, rice straw (RS, low-quality) and alfalfa hay (AH, high-qualit

199 However, at harvest time paddy grain and straw samples were found free from residues.

200 Wheat and maize straw samples with and without soil contact were exposed

201 The smart straws show color change with pH variation (3-11), makin

202 The straws show high water resistance (~8 h), mechanical str

203 The straws showed higher performance than paper straws with

204 PE films and PBAT straws showed no measurable degradation at either temper

205 f ethanol from corn grain, stover, and wheat straw shows extremely wide variances with a national ave

206 rewood, charcoal, crop residue, sawdust, and straw/shrubs/grass).

207 correlations between phytolith contents and straw SiO2 contents and between phytolith contents and p

208 Straw size did not have any significantly effect on GPx

209 was to investigate the effects of tempol and straw size on rooster sperm post-thaw quality and fertil

210 , 10, 15 and 20 muM tempol (in two different straw size, 0.25 and 0.5).

211 S was observed in the group treated with 0.5 straw size.

212 ter, cattle manure) and plant residues (rice straw, soybean straw, corn straw) when applied to surfac

213 organic mulches (grape pruning debris (GPD), straw (STR), and spent mushroom compost (SMC)) and two c

214 ent in controlling fungal growth on wood and straw subjected to different moisture conditions.

215 Hydrolysis of pretreated wheat straw suggested that this mechanism of synergism is oper

216 ch as carbon dioxide and ozone, and tailored straw suitable for industrial manufacturing, open a new

217 Thirty-two lambs were fed with barley straw supplemented by a concentrate alone, or a concentr

218 In the case of cyantraniliprole in grain and straw, there was a 91.1 and 89.1% decrease, respectively

219 erial and fungal communities by adding wheat straw to consecutive watermelon soil in the greenhouse c

220 The effects of adding cropped rice straw to substrate formulas on the proximate composition

221 recorded digestibility of 13-15% across all straws treated with laccase.

222 Early straw treatment prompted a rapid microbial response to n

223 The methods and timing of straw treatments have a significant impact on soil micro

224 Straw treatments notably altered soil microbial function

225 nd to ferment hydrothermally pretreated rice straw under simultaneous saccharification and fermentati

226 nd the introduction of progressively shorter straw varieties.

227 farm exposure, that is, exposure to cows and straw vs no exposure at all.

228 char was prepared from eucalyptus wood, teff straw was derived from teff stem, and sand was obtained

229 rts, Cd isotopes were markedly fractionated: straw was isotopically heavier than roots (Delta(114/110

230 Rice straw was substituted for sawdust at five different rati

231 Barley straw was thermochemically modified with citric acid (CA

232 r (Sp) from the direct pulverization of rice straw was used as the control, the rice straw ash (Sa),

233 The performances of biochar and teff straw were assessed based on the operation parameters an

234 groups on the surface of the modified barley straw were primarily responsible for the sorption of Cu(

235 trogen concentration and uptake by grain and straw were significantly influenced by both irrigation s

236 microbial effects of GM versus non-GM maize straw were similar, suggesting crop residue type under c

237 decomposition rates of both wheat and maize straws when in contact with soil.

238 nt residues (rice straw, soybean straw, corn straw) when applied to surface of an acidic soil.

239 straw, 21% in wheat straw, and 26% in maize straw, while 20% lignin degradation was observed when pu

240 tructive assessment of quality parameters of straw wine.

241 degree, sugars content and total acidity in straw wine.

242 ydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) resulted in the only straw with a net-negative global warming potential.

243 ding of wood chips or particles, or shredded straw with an aerated slurry which offers the potential

244 owed (1) Increased Si concentrations in rice straw with increasing application rates of silicate fert

245 cal strength (~14 MPa), fizzing, and plastic straws with low strength (~22 MPa) and non-biodegradabil

246 straws showed higher performance than paper straws with low water resistance (~30 mins), mechanical

247 th straw incorporation than in soils without straw, with the opposite pattern for methane-producing m

248 bient radiation by 9-16% for wheat and maize straws without soil contact after 12 months.

249 The effect of supplementation of wheat straw (WS) with raw/detoxified mahua cake (MC) on yield

250 est and significant grain (6.0 t ha(-1)) and straw yield (10.8 t ha(-1)) pooled over the years amidst

251 rameters with a grain yield of 6.1 t ha(-1), straw yield of 10.6 t ha(-1), respectively.

252 h rate, net assimilation rate, and grain and straw yields compared to the later sowing (June 3).