戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  dilation or cannulation) was 1.3% using the subclavian vein.
2 lls (ECs) at the junction of the jugular and subclavian veins.
3 sels only at the junction of the jugular and subclavian veins.
4  hundred thirty catheters were placed in the subclavian vein, 10,958 in the internal jugular and 3,18
5 n the transvenous lead configurations with a subclavian vein (29.0+/-2.5 J, P=.0001) or a superior ve
6                                              Subclavian vein access was used for a superior approach
7 ressure to transport lymph downstream to the subclavian vein against a significant pressure head.
8 n criteria, one of which was randomized (136 subclavian vein and 134 femoral vein).
9 rated venous obstruction at the level of the subclavian vein and abnormal collateral circulation over
10 placed via Seldinger technique into the left subclavian vein and superior vena cava and evaluated for
11 h extended helix was introduced via the left subclavian vein and, after positioning against the right
12 ing vein drained the right jugular and right subclavian veins and joined the left brachiocephalic vei
13 led central venous catheters inserted in the subclavian vein are associated with lower risk of cathet
14 dance increased the overall success rate for subclavian vein cannulation as compared to landmark tech
15 eness of real-time dynamic ultrasound-guided subclavian vein cannulation as compared to landmark tech
16                  Real-time ultrasound-guided subclavian vein cannulation is safer and more efficient
17             Although ultrasound guidance for subclavian vein catheterization has been well described,
18  to determine whether ultrasound guidance of subclavian vein catheterization reduces catheterization
19 ertion failure and complication rates during subclavian vein catheterization.
20                               In this trial, subclavian-vein catheterization was associated with a lo
21                                              Subclavian vein catheters were left in place significant
22 Due to Tortuosity and lack of stamp of right subclavian vein contributed to the decision to perform r
23 racco, Milano, Italy) via the existing right subclavian vein dialysis catheter because of stenosis in
24 ght internal jugular vein in 4, and the left subclavian vein in 2 patients.
25 rted in 2088 jugular, 1733 femoral, and 1681 subclavian veins, in 19 ICUs.
26 ccurred in association with 13 (1.5%) of the subclavian-vein insertions and 4 (0.5%) of the jugular-v
27  be colonized than catheters inserted in the subclavian vein (internal jugular vs. subclavian: hazard
28 t can placement was investigated by adding a subclavian vein lead to the pectoral or abdominal hot ca
29 .9+/-3.2 J) for the abdominal hot can with a subclavian vein lead was lower than the transvenous lead
30                            The addition of a subclavian vein lead with an abdominal hot can improves
31              The addition of a right or left subclavian vein lead with an abdominal hot can reduced t
32 ned in the right atrial appendage (RA), left subclavian vein (LSV), proximal coronary sinus (CSos), a
33                                  The overall subclavian vein occlusion rate was 10 of 13 (77%) <5 kg
34                                              Subclavian vein occlusion remains an important complicat
35 ian artery is sometimes seen adjacent to the subclavian vein on the side of the contrast material inj
36                                              Subclavian vein patency was assessed in 26 patients.
37 ght ventricular apex/outflow tract through a subclavian vein puncture with a redundant loop in the at
38  from the internal jugular vein (IJV) or the subclavian vein (SCV) can result in rare but significant
39                                          The subclavian vein site was associated with fewer catheter-
40                                              Subclavian vein thrombosis (SVT) is usually caused by vi
41          A 79-yr-old woman with asymptomatic subclavian vein thrombosis associated with transvenous p
42 ad dislodgment in 4 requiring correction and subclavian vein thrombosis in 1 patient.
43                        One patient developed subclavian vein thrombosis, and no patients developed ne
44                        One patient developed subclavian vein thrombosis.
45 ; 95% confidence interval [0.30-0.70], I=0%; subclavian vein vs. femoral vein, incidence density rati
46 risons were stratified by alternative sites (subclavian vein vs. internal jugular vein, incidence den
47 heters of the internal jugular, brachial, or subclavian veins were eligible for participation.
48 a closed strategy by primary puncture of the subclavian vein without routine sonographic guidance.