ライフサイエンスコーパス: subscapular

1 0.76 mm (95% CI: -0.17, 1.70) higher sum of subscapular and triceps skinfold thickness, and 0.17 kg/

2 adiposity at age 3 y measured by the sum of subscapular and triceps skinfold thicknesses (SS + TR) a

3 Adiposity, assessed by the sum of subscapular and triceps skinfold thicknesses (SSF) from

4 nee-heel length, midupper arm circumference, subscapular and triceps skinfold thicknesses, and change

5 mass index (BMI), waist to height ratio, and subscapular and triceps skinfold thicknesses, and obesit

6 standardized body mass index (BMI z), sum of subscapular and triceps skinfolds, fat mass index (FMI),

7 ence (waist and hip) and skinfold-thickness (subscapular and triceps) measurements to lipid and insul

8 x, and sum of skinfold thicknesses (triceps, subscapular, and suprailiac) was performed in an 11-y co

9 t ratio (beta, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.01-0.12), and subscapular (beta, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.06-0.18) and triceps

10 ar secular trends for skinfolds (triceps and subscapular), BMI, and waist circumference between US ad

11 isolated and immortalized BEC injected into subscapular fat pads spontaneously formed duct-like stru

12 Subscapular implantation of the 1.1B4 cell line improved

13 isolated complete tears of infraspinatus and subscapular muscle tendons.

14 Subscapular nerve involvement was uncommon (in 3% of sho

15 One shoulder (3%) had subscapular nerve involvement.

16 type of fat and either cortical or posterior subscapular opacity.

17 65 boys with a sum of skinfold thicknesses (subscapular- plus triceps-skinfold thicknesses) >/= 50 m

18 with body mass index, fat mass, triceps and subscapular skin-fold thickness, waist circumference, he

19 thickness (-0.25 mm; 95% CI: -0.44, -0.06), subscapular skinfold thickness (-0.20 mm; 95% CI: -0.33,

20 mass index, waist circumference, weight, and subscapular skinfold thickness in men; in women, these a

21 waist circumference, waist : hip ratio, and subscapular skinfold thickness were measured or calculat

22 not different, retroperitoneal fat mass and subscapular skinfold thickness were significantly higher

23 ist-to-hip ratio (WHR), waist circumference, subscapular skinfold thickness, and ratio of triceps to

24 In forward-regression analysis, subscapular skinfold thickness, body weight, triceps ski

25 Subscapular skinfold thickness, but not triceps skinfold

26 skinfold thickness, and ratio of triceps to subscapular skinfold thickness, we recruited 48 normoten

27 thickness, body mass index, body weight, and subscapular skinfold thickness.

28 determine whether the sum of the triceps and subscapular skinfold thicknesses (SF sum) is more strong

29 The sum of the triceps plus subscapular skinfold thicknesses averaged 28.6+/-7.0 mm

30 percentile reference curves for triceps and subscapular skinfold thicknesses by using the same natio

31 .05); within the trunk region, abdominal and subscapular skinfold thicknesses were 30-40% greater in

32 At birth, neonatal triceps and subscapular skinfold thicknesses were measured by traine

33 :height ratio, abdominal height, triceps and subscapular skinfold thicknesses, body mass index, and c

34 mates at the triceps site but similar median subscapular skinfold thicknesses.

35 erence, waist circumference, and triceps and subscapular skinfold thicknesses.

36 d on the basis of the average of triceps and subscapular skinfold thicknesses.

37 for triceps and -0.02 mm (-0.79 to 0.75) for subscapular skinfold thicknesses; and -0.02 standard dev

38 that was loaded by BMI, waist-to-hip ratio, subscapular skinfold, triglycerides, HDL, homeostasis mo

39 distribution in men and correlated only with subscapular skinfolds in women.

40 ng for chronologic age, was triceps, biceps, subscapular, suprailiac, and thigh (SEE = 2.87), and for

41 h (SEE = 2.87), and for girls it was biceps, subscapular, suprailiac, thigh, and calf (SEE = 3.51).

42 XA, and subcutaneous fat at triceps, biceps, subscapular, suprailiac, thigh, and calf sites was measu

43 BMI, waist/hip circumference, biceps/triceps/subscapular/suprailiac skinfold thickness) were conducte

44 went fibula free flap, 22 patients underwent subscapular system free flap, and 2 patients underwent c

45 The biceps, triceps, suprailiac, subscapular, thigh, calf, and abdominal skinfold thickne

46 ty, comprising waist circumference, ratio of subscapular to triceps skinfolds, and DXA-derived trunk

47 observed in waist-to-hip ratio, although the subscapular-to-triceps skinfold ratio was slightly but s

48 hical region, diabetes, body mass index, and subscapular-to-triceps skinfold ratio).

49 3/y (95% CI: 0.01, 0.05/y) greater change in subscapular-to-triceps skinfold-thickness ratio and a 0.

50 (BMI; in kg/m(2)), skinfold-thickness ratio (subscapular-to-triceps), waist circumference, and height

51 /hip ratio correlated significantly with the subscapular/ triceps skinfold ration in women only.