ライフサイエンスコーパス: subsurface

1 mobility and oxidation state coexist in the subsurface.

2 g organisms to create ecosystems in the deep subsurface.

3 ing where hydrocarbons may be trapped in the subsurface.

4 large volumes of water are injected into the subsurface.

5 latile occurrence in the surface and shallow subsurface.

6 hemical and microbial processes occurring in subsurface.

7 sphere by burying this greenhouse gas in the subsurface.

8 oth free- and dissolved-phase methane in the subsurface.

9 OM) binds U(IV) and mediates its fate in the subsurface.

10 g and disordering of oxygen vacancies in the subsurface.

11 ve strategy to tackle U contamination in the subsurface.

12 ource optical coherence tomography to reveal subsurface abnormities.

13 A blind thrust fault is interpreted in the subsurface, above the sub-Cenozoic unconformity, bounded

14 pecific gradients or features - particularly subsurface ammonium and nitrite maxima.

15 rs the potential to improve understanding of subsurface anatomy, with positive ramifications for surg

16 n soils as meteoric waters recharge into the subsurface and 2) the coupled carbonate dissolution and

17 hods sample a relatively small volume in the subsurface and are difficult to collect within and near

18 but genuine risk when drilling into the deep subsurface and can have an immediate and significant imp

19 r layers in inducing nonstoichiometry in the subsurface and have significant implications in modulati

20 t that dynamic mixing of waters generated by subsurface and near-surface geological processes may pla

21 relevant for the retention of phages in the subsurface and need to be considered in subsurface phage

22 mated microbial turnover times in the marine subsurface and nitrogen fixation rates in pelagic unicel

23 of coated proppant to sequester NORM in the subsurface and prevent adverse environmental impacts whe

24 ded to fully assess the effects of potential subsurface and surface releases of hydrocarbons on the w

25 d partitioning between the water surface and subsurface and the underlying surficial sediment and the

26 ing and biogeochemical reactions in the deep subsurface and thus may be expected to influence the fat

27 eation behavior of iron(III) (hydr)oxides in subsurface and water treatment systems as well as their

28 eriments allow NMR signals from the surface, subsurface, and core sites to be observed and assigned.

29 and vertically from the water surface, water subsurface, and sediment.

30 work to understand U mobility in the shallow subsurface, and, in particular, emphasizes roles for des

31 plementation of a variety of technologies in subsurface application.

32 Interest in nanomaterials for subsurface applications has grown markedly due to their

33 MICP is of interest in subsurface applications such as sealing leaks around wel

34 oliths were contained within an undisturbed, subsurface archaeological layer of red-slipped pottery,

35 Surface and subsurface are commonly considered as separate entities

36 show that the structural oscillations in the subsurface are induced by the hydrogen oxidation-induced

37 gets, the weathering depths and rates within subsurface are not well understood nor predictable.

38 in the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) subsurface as a result of underground nuclear testing.

39 Eukarya have been discovered in the deep subsurface at several locations in South Africa, but how

40 ectron microscopy to resolve the surface and subsurface at the same time, we show that the hydrogen-C

41 t climate change, the processes and rates of subsurface/atmospheric natural gas exchange remain uncer

42 and temperature sensors, to characterize the subsurface behavior of an endangered population of kille

43 and shallow diving states, and labelling all subsurface behaviour as deep dives or shallow dives disc

44 Our results indicate that subsurface behaviour in short-finned pilot whales is mor

45 otentially providing energy to the overlying subsurface biosphere in the forearc regions of convergen

46 pment of life and sustainability of the deep subsurface biosphere.

47 s perhaps associated with an extensive, deep subsurface biosphere.

48 gic carbon budgets or to meet the demands of subsurface biota.

49 of 87 surface soil samples (0-15 cm) and 23 subsurface boreholes (0-3 m).

50 are important reductants in the contaminated subsurface, but their availability for the reduction of

51 cated by the perturbations introduced to the subsurface by ISCR.

52 f the burial process in the sequestration of subsurface C and found our subsurface soils (0-3 m) cont

53 hemical solute concentrations in the shallow subsurface can be spatially highly variable within small

54 Natural gas migration in the subsurface can have environmental implications when gas

55 es is derived, and its strength in revealing subsurface cancer in ex vivo samples is statistically an

56 al visual endoscopy provides no quantitative subsurface cancer information.

57 ing and verification within more traditional subsurface carbon storage reservoirs.

58 This subsurface cell increase coincides with a markedly highe

59 chanical framework to quantify the rheology, subsurface channel geometry, mass flow rate, and spatiot

60 The results underscore that subsurface characteristics and gas flow are the key driv

61 This subsurface chemical imaging is based on tumor-targeted,

62 oncentrated in areas closest to warm, salty, subsurface, circumpolar deep water (CDW), that is, consi

63 and functional coupling of mitochondria with subsurface cisternae (SSC) was affected by aging.

64 closely related genomes and show that these subsurface Clostridiales differ, from the surface derive

65 ering coefficient map can effectively reveal subsurface colorectal cancer and potentially provide a f

66 Studies simulating subsurface conditions have found that oxidative "breaker

67 behavior of fractured cement under realistic subsurface conditions including elevated temperature, hi

68 f oil, water and CO(2) in an oil-wet rock at subsurface conditions of high temperature and pressure.

69 es from a producing hydrocarbon reservoir at subsurface conditions.

70 f existing fractures in response to changing subsurface conditions.

71 Our data further suggests that detectable subsurface consolidation below mammoth tracks correlates

72 Subsurface contamination due to excessive nutrient surpl

73 situ high speed X-ray diffraction to extract subsurface cooling rates following resolidification from

74 Surface and subsurface damages were investigated with optical and sc

75 SPG indices based on subsurface density and principal component analysis of s

76 h serves as a model system for understanding subsurface divalent silicate carbonation reactivity.

77 Surprisingly, we found a very promising subsurface dopant, Si, that had not been identified or s

78 Fe surface, Fe-bcc(111), through surface and subsurface doping.

79 volumes/types of chemicals injected into the subsurface during stimulation.

80 source turnover within this deep terrestrial subsurface ecosystem.

81 in aquifers, generating new understanding of subsurface ecosystems and their capacity to remove conta

82 ch as on early Earth or in contemporary dark subsurface ecosystems, is supported by chemical energy.

83 hallenges in differentiating the surface and subsurface effects.

84 te to recent occurrence of seismic events at subsurface energy exploration sites.

85 researched recently due to its relevance for subsurface engineering applications including sealing le

86 ite this persistent overall influence of the subsurface environment, individual species showed marked

87 ture controls its reactivity and fate in the subsurface environment.

88 in-situ pH, salinity and temperature of the subsurface environment.

89 y and contaminant transport processes in the subsurface environment.

90 ese endospores are likely expelled from warm subsurface environments and subsequently dispersed by oc

91 Greater particle mobility in subsurface environments due to larger size, known as siz

92 val of microbes and other life forms in deep subsurface environments it is necessary to understand th

93 Subsurface environments often contain mixtures of contam

94 The delivery of fermentable substrate(s) to subsurface environments stimulates Fe(III)-bioreduction

95 ents, hydrothermal vent fields, aquifers and subsurface environments such as oil reservoirs where the

96 ar average due to sparse data, especially in subsurface environments where access is limited.

97 ntage over other Thermococcus species in hot subsurface environments where organic substrates are pre

98 ltivated microorganisms has been detected in subsurface environments, and we show that H2, CH4, and C

99 For example, in subsurface environments, mixing of groundwater and injec

100 essed nuclear waste streams and contaminated subsurface environments.

101 f such As-bearing pyrites in low-temperature subsurface environments.

102 chanisms influencing macroscale phenomena in subsurface environments.

103 e for arsenic (As) sequestration in reduced, subsurface environments.

104 t of GR phases on As sequestration in anoxic subsurface environments.

105 hy now permit the study of highly transient, subsurface events in real time.

106 provide the most reliable representations of subsurface fault behavior, as they produce geologically

107 ed previously, showing the importance of the subsurface Fe atoms in N(2) reduction reactions.

108 ing bacteria in biogeochemical weathering of subsurface Fe(II)-silicate minerals at the Luquillo Crit

109 We studied river-subsurface fissure water systems and identified Eukarya

110 Subsurface floats as deep as 800 m are trapped within th

111 profiling gliders, and acoustically-tracked subsurface floats enables the documentation of its dynam

112 orrelated to FL, and the correlation between subsurface flow and ICSLs was quadratic.

113 Earthquake swarms attributed to subsurface fluid injection are usually assumed to occur

114 We sampled subsurface fluids from scCO2 -water separators at a natu

115 en ancient bishofite-enriched evaporites and subsurface fluids.

116 of groundwater with materials placed in the subsurface for contaminant remediation.

117 h demonstrating the importance of the deeper subsurface for plant water and nutrient relations.

118 ignificant complexity and sex differences in subsurface foraging behavior, and underscore the importa

119 grating movement and acoustic variables, (b) subsurface foraging occurs in bouts, with distinct perio

120 numerical methods for flow and transport in subsurface fractured porous media.

121 to degrade plant-related compounds, whereas subsurface genomes only show the ability to process simp

122 nd depth, so as to ultimately understand the subsurface geomechanical processes and provide insight i

123 The subsurface geometry of this interaction has not been ful

124 tomography method to obtain high-resolution subsurface geophysical structure in Long Beach, CA, from

125 Subsurface groundwater-surface water mixing zones (hypor

126 is work demonstrates strict criteria for the subsurface halogenation of cinnamaldehyde and the broad

127 no significant association between depth and subsurface heat stress.

128 Here we show that regions with strong subsurface heterogeneity have enhanced present and futur

129 rological models, one of them accounting for subsurface heterogeneity.

130 hich is known to produce particularly strong subsurface heterogeneity.

131 gical models do not adequately consider this subsurface heterogeneity.

132 d environments, the microbial communities in subsurface high-CO2 ecosystems remain relatively unexplo

133 important; thus, thermal reactions involving subsurface hydrogen are the primary reaction mechanisms

134 eter-to-decimeter scales and are compared to subsurface hydrogen concentrations observed by Dawn's Ga

135 In addition, we find that subsurface hydrogen noticeably alters reaction barriers,

136 phase atomic hydrogen, surface hydrogen, and subsurface hydrogen reacting with adsorbed CO.

137 In the reaction involving surface or subsurface hydrogen, we investigate four possible pathwa

138 dels provides a clue as to understanding the subsurface hydrogeological process responding to the oil

139 physically-based model with coupled surface-subsurface hydrologic interactions are captured by simpl

140 The influence of subsurface hydrologic processes is particularly importan

141 t areas associated with persistent access to subsurface hydrologic resources may provide important re

142 ient retention and confirmed root-associated subsurface hydrological retention as a driving factor.

143 Further, we investigated the influence of subsurface hydrological retention, attributed to the arc

144 ss a wide climatic gradient, indicating that subsurface hydrology mediates species' experience of dro

145 ation and reconnection driven by surface and subsurface hydrology, resulting in both adaptive and non

146 We exemplify a plethora of subsurface, i.e., "in-chip" microstructures for microflu

147 This study demonstrates subsurface in vivo mapping of tumor pO(2) distributions

148 tends down through the crust and much of the subsurface, including those microbial ecosystems located

149 dy, key questions remain on life in the deep subsurface, including whether it is endemic and the exte

150 iltration of rainfall into Kilauea Volcano's subsurface increased pore pressure at depths of 1 to 3 k

151 able management with controlled drainage and subsurface-irrigation (SI) has been identified as a Bene

152 e drainage (FD) and controlled drainage with subsurface-irrigation.

153 ages of the corn, prior to activation of the subsurface-irrigation.

154 rces for active microbial populations in the subsurface is a challenging but highly informative compo

155 guish between the surface bone layer and the subsurface layer, comprised of a brain tissue mimic modi

156 diverse microbial community in smectite-rich subsurface layers in the hyperarid core of the Atacama,

157 al enhancement to the materials' surface and subsurface layers, there is need for hyperpolarization a

158 on the solar radiation penetrating into the subsurface layers, which induces differential heating in

159 ly offset Raman spectroscopy (SORS) to probe subsurface layers.

160 t the source of those hydrocarbons, although subsurface leakage from a nearby gas well directly into

161 ght into the biochemical cycles that support subsurface life under the extreme condition of CO2 satur

162 on around a particular tree could reveal the subsurface location, or direction, of soil and soil-gas

163 d viral diversity from five deep terrestrial subsurface locations (hydraulically fractured wells), ex

164 ric currents, suggesting that the associated subsurface magnetic field is twisted; and (iii) intensif

165 der conditions roughly analogous to the near-subsurface Martian environment.

166 various chemical processes involving surface-subsurface mass transport such as heterogeneous catalysi

167 es, which is a current and critical need for subsurface material applications and implication paradig

168 neral-bound Fe(II) generated through ISCR of subsurface material from two field sites.

169 aring minerals as well as dithionite-reduced subsurface materials.

170 ent phytoplankton bloom results in transient subsurface maxima or pulses in the sinking mass flux.

171 t-, and labor-intensive; whereas traditional subsurface methods sample a relatively small volume in t

172 tion on the in-situ carbon sources of active subsurface microbes and reinforced the importance of aut

173 It is not understood how subsurface microbial communities are assembled and wheth

174 Our results indicate that subsurface microbial communities predominantly assemble

175 llenging but highly informative component of subsurface microbial ecology.

176 at isotopes present an incomplete picture of subsurface microbial processes.

177 l activity, but assembly processes governing subsurface microbiomes remain a critical uncertainty in

178 matured shale source rocks were utilized by subsurface microorganisms, leading to accumulation of mi

179 nced imaging applications such as geological subsurface modelling or biomedical tissue analysis.

180 odeling of these soil profiles suggests that subsurface N(2) pulses leading to surface emission rates

181 ly require intervention, but others, such as subsurface nanoglistenings, calcifications, or discolora

182 The most common subsurface nanomaterial failures include colloidal insta

183 Subsurface natural gas release from leaking oil and gas

184 ganics (AEOs) fraction containing NAs in the subsurface near an oil sands tailings pond.

185 taneously in explanted human atria (n=11) by subsurface near-infrared optical mapping (NIOM; 0.3 mm(2

186 ed ENSO asymmetry is largely proportional to subsurface nonlinear dynamical heating (NDH) along the e

187 tion and capturing the winter reemergence of subsurface nutrient anomalies in the extratropics, which

188 rystal reveals that, right before light-off, subsurface O builds up within (111) terraces.

189 t, as predicted by a statistical forecast of subsurface ocean temperatures and consistent with the ir

190 In our model, subsurface ocean warming associated with variations in t

191 h between El Nino and La Nina is caused by a subsurface ocean wave propagating from western Pacific t

192 ansformations of mercury (Hg) species in the subsurface of a HgCl(2)-contaminated former industrial s

193 nd resulting hydrothermal fluid paths in the subsurface of Brothers submarine volcano north of New Ze

194 are hosted in those mesopores located at the subsurface of the MOF crystals.

195 c zones are the water-saturated flow-through subsurfaces of rivers which are characterized by the sim

196 iches, such as the marine versus terrestrial subsurface, often expands the understanding of the genet

197 by 10-40 degrees C, mimicking the cooling in subsurface oil reservoirs subjected to seawater injectio

198 which suggested that denitrification in the subsurface, particularly in the riparian zone, is limiti

199 Deep Chlorophyll Maxima (DCMs) are subsurface peaks in chlorophyll-a concentration that may

200 res much of the variation that occurs during subsurface periods.

201 to the nearest opportunity for direct use or subsurface permanent storage.

202 the subsurface and need to be considered in subsurface phage tracer studies.

203 to believed to hinder the migration of NP in subsurface porous media, may under certain physicochemic

204 nts, including rice, release oxygen into the subsurface, precipitating reduced metals, such as iron (

205 use principles of pore-space utilization and subsurface pressure constraints together with analogs of

206 er, how these surface signals are related to subsurface prey fields is unknown.

207 eleased by landslides, little is known about subsurface processes comprising the rest of their energy

208 climatic drought severity (i.e., rainfall), subsurface processes explained variation in drought vuln

209 onsidering geologic evolution and history of subsurface processes in studying microbial colonization

210 The enhanced subsurface processes in the central equatorial Pacific c

211 The results indicate that subsurface processes were especially strong in the summe

212 The faults record the subsurface propagation of the Main Himalayan Thrust (MHT

213 hydrological sciences, the heterogeneity of subsurface properties, such as hydraulic conductivities

214 ility compared with regions with homogeneous subsurface properties.

215 hanging salinity and redox conditions in the subsurface rather than by mixing with a high-Ra source.

216 to model cap rock formation, the details of subsurface reactions (including the role of microorganis

217 o hydraulic fracturing additives and related subsurface reactions, such as through the reaction of sh

218 Fe(II)-rich clay minerals found in subsurface redox transition zones (RTZs) can serve as im

219 ain and the formation of dislocations in the subsurface region via a surface diffusion and trapping p

220 ental electronic processes that occur at the subsurface regions of inorganic solid photocatalysts.

221 in South Africa, but how organisms reach the subsurface remains unknown.

222 vel comammox Nitrospira from the terrestrial subsurface, representing one clade A and one clade B com

223 nergy and carbon-storage technologies in the subsurface require novel means to control undesired flui

224 st amounts of old, geologic methane (CH4) in subsurface reservoirs.

225 The subsurface rock density is inferred from the measured de

226 can store more water and less rainfall feeds subsurface runoff.

227 Trees could provide a similar subsurface sample where roots act as the "sampler' and a

228 ion results indicated that water surface and subsurface samples were dominated by low-density polypro

229 e, and aluminum (Al) in the soil solution of subsurface samples, whereas less such effect was found u

230 orce the idea that grain-size disposition in subsurface sandy sediments drives the interstitial fluxe

231 imens, we report the first use of quantified subsurface scattering coefficient maps acquired by swept

232 We generate subsurface scattering coefficient maps with a novel wave

233 We hypothesized that natural subsurface scCO2 reservoirs, which serve as analogs for

234 Two longstanding goals in subsurface science are to induce fractures with a desire

235 studies using artificial solutions, natural subsurface seawater (SSW), and, for the first time, samp

236 Subsurface sediments (10-15 cm below seafloor) were coll

237 xidizing (anammox) bacteria in ~80,000-y-old subsurface sediments from the Arctic Mid-Ocean Ridge.

238 allenging for microbiota that live in marine subsurface sediments or igneous basement to obtain suffi

239 AFFF-derived PFASs associated with soils and subsurface sediments remain largely unknown.

240 Microorganisms in marine subsurface sediments substantially contribute to global

241 In nonbioturbated surface sediments and in subsurface sediments, bacterial and archaeal communities

242 y formation of authigenic arsenian pyrite in subsurface sediments.

243 ose in nonbioturbated surface and underlying subsurface sediments.

244 an opportunity to detect subtle signals from subsurface seismic sources that would have been conceale

245 the measurements-based weathering rates from subsurface shale are high, amounting to base cation expo

246 As a more realistic subsurface simulation, this work demonstrates strict cri

247 Application of this approach to subsurface soil gas samples from remediated sites of und

248 sequestration of subsurface C and found our subsurface soils (0-3 m) contained considerably more C t

249 Ss, which may be incompletely extracted from subsurface solids by analytical methods developed for an

250 >2500 years, indicating the benzene was from subsurface sources such as natural hydrocarbon migration

251 oordinated surface square site adjacent to a subsurface stacking fault.

252 cale flow provide a new method for designing subsurface strategies to maximize potential production o

253 We present the first deep subsurface stratigraphic structure based on data collect

254 nse, wide-aperture arrays and illuminate the subsurface stratigraphy and faults down to ~1200 m, show

255 Further, the surface metric underestimated subsurface stress by an average of 39.3%, across all dep

256 While moraine subsurface structure and internal processes are likely t

257 ction can be diagnosed by asymmetries in the subsurface structure of the Chicxulub crater.

258 Here we report on the geology and subsurface structure of the landing site to aid in situ

259 Scattering of seismic waves can reveal subsurface structures but usually in a piecemeal way foc

260 ighly turbid layers mask chemically distinct subsurface structures.

261 etely retained the pathogenic E. coli in the subsurface, suggesting that utilizing sand mixed with bi

262 rge reservoirs of natural gas in the oceanic subsurface sustain complex communities of anaerobic micr

263 Because of the complexity of the subsurface systems and the parameters affecting stray ga

264 ed nuclear waste and present in contaminated subsurface systems represents a major environmental chal

265 ove prediction of U transport in surface and subsurface systems.

266 isotopes as process tracers in contaminated subsurface systems.

267 to mitigate the seismic risk associated with subsurface technologies.

268 nic teleconnection between AMOC strength and subsurface temperature in the EEA impacted the intensity

269 MOC to the WAM, we generated a new record of subsurface temperature variability over the last 21 kyr

270 ve correlation between AMOC strength and EEA subsurface temperatures caused by changes in ocean circu

271 essure, and high salinity) that exist in the subsurface that far exceed those present in biological a

272 ith the creation of acidic conditions in the subsurface, the potential for generation of undesirable

273 hese results provide a direct measure of the subsurface thermal history and demonstrate its importanc

274 ed by examining the evolution of surface and subsurface thermohaline properties, and an analysis of v

275 se repeat multibeam sonar surveys to image a subsurface tidewater glacier face and document a time-va

276 the inaccessibility of nearly all of Earth's subsurface to direct observation.

277 cles decreased from the water surface to the subsurface to sediment, and high-density particles had t

278 cline potentially play a significant role in subsurface transport of mass, heat, and salt in the glob

279 cal and hydrological processes governing the subsurface transport of PFASs at a former fire training

280 , which can influence their retention during subsurface transport.

281 describe nanoparticle (NP) transport in the subsurface underpins environmental risk assessment and s

282 work tests the shallow and deep hypothesis: subsurface vertical chemical contrasts regulate nitrate

283 ls' decay, specifically probed by the oxyl's subsurface vibration, parallels that of the photocurrent

284 Current studies on the controls of subsurface vulnerability do not consider the transient b

285 e bed to uplift, isolating the terminus from subsurface warming and allowing the ice sheet to advance

286 cean teleconnection system, characterized by subsurface warming and freshening in the Indian Ocean.

287 Here we show that greater subsurface warming induced by the longer period of reduc

288 This suggests that oceanic forcing by subsurface warming may also have contributed to ice-shee

289 es(16), with a reduction of the AMOC causing subsurface warming throughout much of the Atlantic basin

290 etermination of both porewater chemistry and subsurface water flow are needed in order to develop mor

291 At the site scale, access to deep subsurface water, evidenced by stem water stable isotope

292 aches phytoplankton primarily when iron-rich subsurface waters enter the euphotic zone.

293 Along the Pacific coast, upwelling brings subsurface waters with low Omega and pH to the surface w

294 Landing Mirror Experiment suggests that the subsurface wave is likely driven by lunar tidal gravitat

295 This suggests that measurements of subsurface wave propagation are sufficient to diagnose b

296 ng is a response to roughly 16% weakening of subsurface Weddell Gyre outflow.

297 1% in the form of micro-cavities at the weld subsurface where peak volumetric strain and triaxiality

298 steady flow of surface organisms to the deep subsurface where some survive and adapt and others peris

299 ing the transformations of Hg species in the subsurface, which complicates source tracing application

300 se, significant amounts have degraded in the subsurface, yielding mineral precipitates as byproducts.