ライフサイエンスコーパス: subvalvular

1 lleled real-time visualization of valves and subvalvular anatomic features from a single volume acqui

2 (2.6 +/- 0.7 vs. 1.6 +/- 0.6, p < 0.001) and subvalvular apparatus (3.2 +/- 0.6 vs. 2.3 +/- 0.7, p <

3 has been suggested that preservation of the subvalvular apparatus and more optimal timing of surgery

4 gical techniques for the preservation of the subvalvular apparatus and valve implantation.

5 The merits of retaining the subvalvular apparatus during mitral valve replacement fo

6 preservation only, complete retention of the subvalvular apparatus during mitral valve replacement re

7 valve replacement (MVR) with sparing of the subvalvular apparatus had comparable results to mitral r

8 ce of maximizing AL opening by targeting the subvalvular apparatus in future repair algorithms for se

9 If repair is not feasible, the subvalvular apparatus should be preserved.

10 he anterior, posterior, or both areas of the subvalvular apparatus should be preserved; and 3) the su

11 Although preservation of the subvalvular apparatus with MVR has a theoretical advanta

12 estores the physiologic configuration of the subvalvular apparatus, and results in significantly redu

13 y of the clinical use of preservation of the subvalvular apparatus, the physiologic studies examining

14 y from apical and lateral distraction of the subvalvular apparatus, with late annular dilatation.

15 56 who had CABG/MVR with preservation of the subvalvular apparatus.

16 aintaining the integrity of the mitral valve subvalvular apparatus.

17 al regurgitation and the preservation of the subvalvular apparatus; 2) whether the anterior, posterio

18 leaflets in the presence of commissural and subvalvular calcification) and evaluated uneven distribu

19 compared the efficacy of reducing annular or subvalvular dimensions to gain more mechanistic insight

20 leaflets, degree of commissural disease and subvalvular disease involvement, with each component gra

21 ent acute IMR nor alter ischemic valvular or subvalvular geometric perturbations.

22 output increase is inversely related to the subvalvular gradient magnitude.

23 However, only the exercise subvalvular gradient predicted cardiac output response.

24 A subvalvular gradient was measured in each patient that r

25 80+/-26 mm Hg; exercise: 90+/-25 mm Hg) and subvalvular gradients (rest: 37+/-13 mm Hg; exercise: 60

26 Although subvalvular gradients in patients with aortic stenosis h

27 nge in exercise cardiac output and total and subvalvular gradients.

28 o may benefit from MV repair with additional subvalvular intervention or MV replacement rather than r

29 (3), commissural area ratio >/=1.25 (3), and subvalvular involvement (3).

30 +/-1.3%; P<0.01) and cross-sectional area of subvalvular lesions (7.7+/-2.2x10(5) um(2) versus 4.6+/-

31 ective of this study is to ascertain whether subvalvular papillary muscle repair in conjunction with

32 Subvalvular papillary muscle repair plus restrictive mit

33 Subvalvular papillary muscle repair plus restrictive mit

34 mission to the hospital for heart failure is subvalvular papillary muscle repair plus restrictive mit

35 This was followed by subvalvular papillary muscle repair plus restrictive mit

36 s most capable of correcting the annular and subvalvular perturbations accompanying acute left ventri

37 n (MVR/SVP), and 318 had replacement without subvalvular preservation (MVR/NoSVP).

38 patients had repair, 68 had replacement with subvalvular preservation (MVR/SVP), and 318 had replacem

39 Subvalvular pressure gradients are universally present i

40 We tested whether subvalvular repair by severing second-order mitral chord

41 Comprehensive annular and subvalvular repair improves long-term reduction of both

42 Nonrandomized studies suggest that subvalvular repair is associated with longer survival, b

43 We describe a subvalvular repair technique addressing posterior papill

44 left ventricular remodeling is possible when subvalvular techniques are combined with traditional rin

45 ease recurrence and inclusion of concomitant subvalvular techniques in this subset of patients will b

46 Subvalvular techniques to alleviate leaflet restriction

47 flet thickening, mobility, calcification and subvalvular thickening (Abascal score).