コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 relatives were particularly likely to report sunburn.
2 e solar spectrum that does not readily cause sunburn.
3 ude, history of phototherapy, and history of sunburn.
4 ile tissue repair utilizing a mouse model of sunburn.
5 lla nor sunscreen alone completely prevented sunburn.
6 biopsy specimens 48 hours after experimental sunburn.
7 in indoor tanning had experienced at least 1 sunburn.
8 and inability to tan than susceptibility to sunburn.
9 f hyperthermia, hypothermia, dehydration, or sunburn.
10 roderma pigmentosum were more susceptible to sunburn.
11 ing effects on the skin beyond the immediate sunburn.
12 y 4% per year of age and by 6% per number of sunburns.
13 rns: OR = 2.0 (95% CI 1.0-4.0) for 4+ severe sunburns.
14 3.1 (95% CI 1.7-5.3) for 4+ severe childhood sunburns.
15 higher lifetime number of severe/blistering sunburns.
16 .007) and those with a history of blistering sunburn (12 of 12 [100%] vs 0; P = .005) were more likel
24 udies have assessed the relationship between sunburn and risk of different skin cancers (melanoma, sq
28 reduce the prevalence of indoor tanning and sunburn and thus prevent future cases of skin cancer.
29 ians to assess a person's risk of developing sunburn and, by extension, the need for sun protection t
30 s of sun behavior in the US reveal extensive sunburning and use of tanning beds in adolescents and ad
31 previous UVR exposure (represented by prior sunburns and signs of actinic skin damage identified by
32 Sunscreen users reported significantly more sunburns and sunbathing vacations and were more likely t
33 n (ie, sun-safety practices and the risk for sunburn) and alerted users to apply or to reapply sunscr
34 ection (ie, protection practices and risk of sunburn) and alerts (to apply or reapply sunscreen and g
35 ma, higher number of nevi, history of severe sunburn, and light hair color were each associated with
36 ide critical protection against skin cancer, sunburn, and photoaging, a genome-wide perspective of ge
37 olet B light (290 to 320 nm) associated with sunburn, and ultraviolet AII light (320 to 340 nm), and
38 ling for age, sex, lifetime number of severe sunburns, and skin type [BCC: odds ratio (OR), 0.7; 95%
40 = 2.0 (95% CI 1.2-3.1) for 4+ severe teenage sunburns; and OR = 3.1 (95% CI 1.7-5.3) for 4+ severe ch
41 causally related, we investigated UV-induced sunburn apoptosis and erythema in mouse skin as a functi
44 adiation on the time course for induction of sunburn (apoptotic) cells and expression of proteins kno
45 wear long-sleeved shirts but less likely to sunburn, apply sunscreen, tan indoors, and receive TBSE
47 of extremity moles, higher susceptibility to sunburn as a child/adolescent, and higher lifetime numbe
48 that UVA makes a greater contribution toward sunburn at temperate latitudes than under the laboratory
49 ancer risk associated with history of severe sunburns at different body sites (face/arms, trunk, and
50 tle is known about the association of severe sunburns at different body sites with skin cancer risk.
51 not risk of SCC and BCC, when compared with sunburns at other body sites (face/arms and lower limbs)
53 ors often exhibited a concurrent tendency to sunburn, avoid sun protection, and avoid skin cancer scr
54 ors often exhibited a concurrent tendency to sunburn, avoid sun protection, and avoid skin cancer scr
55 llment were also independent predictors, but sunburns, baseline sun exposure, and other sun-protectiv
58 ls after ultraviolet radiation (UVR) through sunburn cell (apoptotic keratinocyte) formation is thoug
59 n epidermal cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers or sunburn cell (SBC) formation were observed between pigme
61 We found that the inhibition of UVR-induced sunburn cell formation in PKCepsilon transgenic mice may
64 nduced apoptosis in vitro and in vivo (i.e., sunburn cell formation), whereas it did not affect Fas-i
65 nificant decrease in UV-induced hypertrophy, sunburn cell formation, and apoptosis when the mice were
67 Xpa-/- mice were 7-10-fold more sensitive to sunburn cell induction than wild-type mice, indicating t
68 dependence was seen for epidermal thickness, sunburn cell numbers, dermal thickness, glycosaminoglyca
69 neum thickening, viable epidermal thickening sunburn cell production), as well as dermal alterations
70 tal effects of acute UV irradiation, namely, sunburn cell/apoptosis, inflammation, and a hyperprolife
71 Their skin was analyzed for the presence of sunburn cells (apoptotic keratinocytes) and for Fas and
72 4/Bcl-2 mice developed about 5-10-fold fewer sunburn cells (ie, apoptotic keratinocytes) in the basal
73 hanced the UVB-induced increase in apoptotic sunburn cells 6 h later by 127% and 563%, respectively.
74 owed a dose-dependent increase in numbers of sunburn cells and TUNEL-positive cells although their pr
75 in the numbers of morphologically identified sunburn cells and TUNEL-positive cells was detected as e
76 anced the UVB-induced increases in apoptotic sunburn cells at 6 h by 214% and 467%, respectively, and
78 ddition to C1q, we detected C3 deposition on sunburn cells in both wild-type and C1q-deficient mice,
81 lated the formation of UVB-induced apoptotic sunburn cells in the epidermis by 96, 120, and 376%, res
84 p21(WAF1/CIP1)-positive cells, and apoptotic sunburn cells may play a role in the inhibitory effects
85 three strains, as was apoptosis measured as sunburn cells or as keratinocytes containing active casp
86 o, no difference in the rate of clearance of sunburn cells was found in C1q-deficient mice from three
87 of UVB-induced DNA damage and the numbers of sunburn cells were not significantly different in the EG
89 imidone dimer, (2) reduced the appearance of sunburn cells, (3) induced extensive hyperplasia and inc
91 orter wavelengths (320-345 nm) elicited more sunburn cells, although these differences did not reach
92 reases in morphologically distinct apoptotic sunburn cells, and decreases in the number of epidermal
93 by gavage exhibited less inflammation, fewer sunburn cells, and reduced 8-oxoguanine lesions than ski
94 d by the formation of CPDs and the number of sunburn cells, was resolved more rapidly in the skin of
95 cell carcinomas and suppressed formation of sunburn cells, which are DNA-damaged keratinocytes under
97 reduces UV-induced apoptotic keratinocytes, "sunburn cells." Consequently, Gadd45a-null mice are more
98 evi: OR = 1.9 (95% CI 0.9-3.9) for 3+ severe sunburns compared with none in the last 5 years; OR = 2.
99 orbic acid has been shown to protect against sunburn, delay the onset of skin tumors, and reduce ultr
100 er, the innate immune mechanisms controlling sunburn development are not considered relevant in NMSC
102 of chronically irradiated skin to an acute "sunburn dose" of ultraviolet-B also produced significant
104 7.9%-86.0%) of indoor tanners had at least 1 sunburn during the preceding year compared with 53.7% (9
105 t, hours spent in the summer sun, blistering sunburns during adolescence, and moles, all increased me
106 on whether ultraviolet radiation, including sunburns, early childhood and adolescent sun exposure, a
108 traviolet radiation dose-response curves for sunburn/erythema and suppression of the contact hypersen
112 density, hair color, tanning ability, adult sunburns, family history, other cancer prior to baseline
115 omen who experienced at least one blistering sunburn (hazard ratio = 2.17, 95% confidence interval =
117 relative risk of SCC associated with painful sunburn history was significantly higher for homozygous
118 VR exposures during childhood and adulthood, sunburn history, and sunlamp use, but we found no signif
120 mily history), sun exposure-related factors (sunburns, history of skin cancers and actinic lesions),
124 tes, a single dose of UVR that mimicked mild sunburn in humans induced clonal expansion of the melano
125 In 2015, indoor tanning was associated with sunburn in the adjusted model: 82.3% (95% CI, 77.9%-86.0
126 Thirty-one percent of relatives reported sunburn in the previous summer, compared with 41% of con
128 ion of XRCC1 genotype and lifetime number of sunburns in SCC [likelihood ratio test (2 d.f.), P < 0.0
130 e was no significant difference in number of sunburns in the past 3 months (mean, 0.60 in the treatme
132 y, as well as more likely to report multiple sunburns in the past year (aPR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.00-1.45)
139 ed melanomagenesis and strongly suggest that sunburn is a highly significant risk factor, particularl
143 mmon mucocutaneous findings were generalized sunburn-like erythema without scale, conjunctivitis, and
144 f patients presenting with acute generalized sunburn-like erythema, conjunctivitis, systemic symptoms
145 vity of skin types I/II for a given level of sunburn may play a role in their greater sensitivity to
146 elp reduce the risk for skin cancer, prevent sunburns, mitigate photoaging, and treat photosensitive
147 Additionally, lifetime number of severe sunburns modestly altered the effects of the CTLA4 haplo
150 xperimental evidence regarding the effect of sunburns on cutaneous malignant melanoma and the possibl
151 I: 1.00, 1.28; P = 0.051), getting a painful sunburn once (RR = 1.24, 95% CI: 0.98, 1.57; P = 0.073)
152 e beneficial in treating victims from severe sunburn or exposure to other chemical agents known to tr
154 .05; 95% CI, 1.03-1.07; P < .001), number of sunburns (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.00-1.10; P = .047), and hi
155 ; 95% CI, 1.02-1.07; P < .001) and number of sunburns (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.00-1.11; P = .04) were sta
156 % CI, 2.79-11.99]), greater number of severe sunburns (OR, 2.59 [95% CI, 1.31-5.10]), light eye color
158 atitude, history of phototherapy, history of sunburn, or occupational exposure were used as measures
159 ly of sun sensitivity and teenage and recent sunburns: OR = 2.0 (95% CI 1.0-4.0) for 4+ severe sunbur
160 l factors, time spent in the sun, and severe sunburns over three time periods and were asked to count
161 among individuals with history of blistering sunburn (P = .019), and prevalent MCPyV SSW infections p
165 dge, no study has prospectively investigated sunburn patterns over age periods from childhood to adul
166 for epidemiological evidence that childhood sunburn poses a significant risk of developing this pote
167 when assessing sun protection due to its low sunburning potential, but it generates reactive oxygen s
168 B (UVB) radiation from the sun can result in sunburn, premature aging and carcinogenesis, but the mec
172 tify candidate eicosanoids formed during the sunburn reaction in relation to its clinical and histolo
176 , we examined whether experimentally induced sunburn reactions in mice could be prevented by blocking
177 es have suggested that repeated inflammatory sunburn reactions, which include the induction of cycloo
181 skin cancer and suggest that the etiology of sunburn-related SCC may be significantly different by XR
182 ental studies with mouse models suggest that sunburn resulting from exposure to excessive UV light an
183 atistically significant increase in clinical sunburn scores compared with baseline and had higher pos
184 ia and New Zealand to describe patients with sunburns severe enough to warrant admission to specialis
185 d not block infiltration of macrophages into sunburned skin; and (ii) RA did decrease autologous and
187 rcinomas in the 5 years prior to enrollment, sunburns, sun sensitivity, and recreational sun exposure
189 Family history of melanoma, number of severe sunburns, sunburn susceptibility, hair color, and Fitzpa
190 Originally developed to protect against sunburn, sunscreen has been assumed to prevent skin canc
191 tory of melanoma, number of severe sunburns, sunburn susceptibility, hair color, and Fitzpatrick skin
192 studies on hair color, eye color, number of sunburns, tanning ability and number of non-melanoma ski
193 21.0%Delta; women: -28.5%Delta) and, in men, sunburn tendency was associated with less wrinkling.
196 not alter the erythemal response, either the sunburn threshold or the resolution of erythema, as asse
198 lved from beach products designed to prevent sunburn to more cosmetically elegant skincare products i
199 low, and stable high) of individual lifetime sunburn trajectories with similar shapes were estimated
200 ppression of CHS (P < 0.001), and a moderate sunburn (two minimal erythema doses [2 MED]) was suffici
202 ction to first summer sun for 1 hour (severe sunburn vs. tan odds ratio (OR)=12.27, 95% confidence in
203 factors, overall baseline history of severe sunburn was more apparently associated with risk of mela
206 w that skin aging and reported experience of sunburns was proportional to the degree of penetrance fo
207 ugh the absolute risk of SCC associated with sunburns was similar across genotypes, the relative risk
208 ng factors (e.g., lifetime number of painful sunburns), we found a modest increase in risk of SCC (od
209 o achieve a tan, and history of a blistering sunburn were associated with a higher risk of developing
213 n associated with an increased prevalence of sunburn, which is an established skin cancer risk factor
215 , we compared the protection from cumulative sunburn with two sunscreens labeled SPF 6, but with diff
217 screen, protective clothing, shade; multiple sunburns within the past year; previous full-body skin e
218 screen, protective clothing, shade; multiple sunburns within the past year; previous full-body skin e