ライフサイエンスコーパス: surface coverage

1 ature (e.g., a tube of diameter 20 nm at 16% surface coverage).

2 -phase properties (polymerization method and surface coverage).

3 or the calculation of nonspecific adsorption surface coverage.

4 ypertonic) vehicles led to non-uniform, poor surface coverage.

5 ay result in an extreme nonuniformity of the surface coverage.

6 NR density being high enough to provide full surface coverage.

7 uman CF sputum, likely due to inadequate PEG surface coverage.

8 ulted in higher relative retention and lower surface coverage.

9 led to lower relative retention and greater surface coverage.

10 ite (HOPG) that vary in step-edge height and surface coverage.

11 d become more ordered, on average, at higher surface coverage.

12 ordering of the alkyl tails with increasing surface coverage.

13 not alter the computed threshold of antibody surface coverage.

14 nds once they are bound at their equilibrium surface coverage.

15 of the tether constructs and the particles' surface coverage.

16 t lower particle concentration, and at lower surface coverage.

17 n strongly dependent on the extent of silica surface coverage.

18 riable alkylazide loading representing 2-50% surface coverage.

19 gle or multilayer organization and determine surface coverage.

20 on was determined to be first-order in Ta(V) surface coverage.

21 perature, nanoparticle diameter, and large T surface coverage.

22 obing attachment level or percentage of root surface coverage.

23 peptide and Fn increases with increasing Fn surface coverage.

24 surface coverage to full monolayers at high surface coverage.

25 es semiquantitative determination of citrate surface coverage.

26 the conformation of adsorbed Fn depended on surface coverage.

27 In general, alkyl chain order increases with surface coverage.

28 that diminishes to zero at approximately 25% surface coverage.

29 the thicknesses become less with decreasing surface coverage.

30 s when polyelectrolytes adsorb at incomplete surface coverage.

31 t could be followed as a function of the dye surface coverage.

32 rticularly important at high grafted polymer surface coverage.

33 es with grafted polymer molecular weight and surface coverage.

34 y is controlled by an asymmetry in monolayer surface coverage.

35 ckness and surface assembled monolayer (SAM) surface coverage.

36 leaders displaying an enhanced capacity for surface coverage.

37 owering of surface tension, even for partial surface coverage.

38 s at an air-water interface as a function of surface coverage.

39 the deformation of adsorbed particles at low surface coverage.

40 g and direct surface immobilization for high-surface coverage.

41 the contamination zone even at low bacterial surface coverage.

42 (0) and -64 kJ mol(-1) for Au(delta+) at 33% surface coverage.

43 time, thereby preventing unfavourable oxygen surface coverages.

44 ion, FTIR, NMR, and quantitative analysis of surface coverages.

45 ed liposome deformation at both low and high surface coverages.

46 st-order Langmuir adsorption kinetics at low surface coverages.

47 velop significant yield stress at even lower surface coverages.

48 er the surface confinement or the density of surface coverage (50 vs 100%).

49 ltaic applications should provide an optimal surface coverage, a uniform current density into and/or

50 one single 2.5 nm AuNP by fine-tuning of the surface coverage; a ratiometric pH response was then obs

51 ub, was employed to collect data on the hand surface coverage achieved during hand antisepsis of part

52 or the nature of the electrode, temperature, surface coverage, added buffer base, pH, solvent, and so

53 label, we were able to measure the relative surface coverage after each monomer addition via Rutherf

54 The mean surface coverage after only retrograde 3D endoluminal fl

55 nd self-assembly to pack nanotubes into full surface-coverage aligned arrays.

56 lkyl chain order is shown to be dependent on surface coverage, alkyl chain length, and polymerization

57 XPS showed a clear gradient in surface coverage along the length of the column for the

58 pleted cells, with a 2-fold increase in cell surface coverage and a 3-fold increase in their number o

59 face and PS sputter deposit as a function of surface coverage and Ar(+) ion fluence are addressed.

60 adsorbates exhibit relative disorder at low surface coverage and become more ordered, on average, at

61 stant (0.0032 s(-1)) which indicate enhanced surface coverage and better charge transfer properties o

62 e origin of LSPR signals strongly depends on surface coverage and can be specified by simultaneously

63 For systems with surface coverage and concentrations of model mucins mimi

64 ts present rate due to changes in impervious surface coverage and current management practices, many

65 he rate of lithium growth to provide uniform surface coverage and dendrite suppression, respectively,

66 a dependence of SOA numbers on nonanoic acid surface coverage and dissolved organic matter concentrat

67 erformance were assessed through microscopic surface coverage and flux recovery analysis.

68 The studied monolayers were evaluated by DNA surface coverage and further information was obtained by

69 ption isotherms indicate nearly quantitative surface coverage and Kd = 310 nM for the peptide-surface

70 at monodentate complexes are dominant at low surface coverage and pH >/= 6.5 and that bidentate compl

71 .5 and that bidentate complexes form at high surface coverage and pH < 6.

72 alpy for H 2 adsorption over a wide range of surface coverage and quantum effects influence diffusion

73 luorophore-labeled, which may affect the DNA surface coverage and reactivity of the nanoparticle and/

74 ropolymerization allows facile tuning of the surface coverage and redox (capacitive) properties of th

75 ic acid on TiO(2), including measurements of surface coverage and speciation, and its impact on nanop

76 On the other hand, the electroactive surface coverage and stability of microsomal films were

77 approximately 1.5-1.1 eV) demonstrating high surface coverage and superior optoelectronic properties

78 the surface but did not perturb the maximal surface coverage and the adsorption enthalpy.

79 on of uniform perovskite films with complete surface coverage and the demonstration of efficient, sta

80 T electrodes, as a consequence of the sparse surface coverage and the low intrinsic capacitance of th

81 Information about the surface coverage and the nature, if any, of organosiloxa

82 lization, which consequently diminishes cell surface coverage and toxicity of amylin oligomers.

83 sulfide or thioacetate precursors have lower surface coverages and are more defective than SAMs deriv

84 polymeric stationary phases with alkylsilane surface coverages and bonding chemistries typical of act

85 of imaging, we directly measure DNA and drug surface coverages and kinetics simultaneously for multip

86 en-bonded citrate chains, bilayer formation, surface coverage, and chirality.

87 ed both indirectly by changes in the peptide surface coverage, and directly, probably, due to changes

88 s to ultraporous dendritic structures, large surface coverage, and small particle size.

89 ycle, the bead concentration, the particles' surface coverage, and the DNA construct.

90 nificantly with increased biofilm thickness, surface coverage, and total biomass, as well as with a d

91 he quantitation of IR intensities to extract surface coverages, and the use of probe molecules to ide

92 at room temperature revealed that as the CO surface coverage approaches 100%, the originally flat te

93 Inferred maximum protein surface coverages ( approximately 0.025 nm(-2)) from mea

94 and lateral mobility of biotin, and the SAv surface coverage are all found to influence the average

95 iated proton fluxes generated at such sparse surface coverages are thought to be sufficiently high en

96 heory for the description of the equilibrium surface coverage as a function of the bulk (analyte) con

97 the semi-2D perovskites display an ultrahigh surface coverage as a result of the unusual film self-as

98 ation state) and with controllable, very low surface coverages (as low as 2 orders of magnitude below

99 ments of vibrational spectra at submonolayer surface coverage, as low as a few percent of a monolayer

100 This model examines the building blocks of surface coverage assays, including heterogeneous binding

101 ed to other types of magnetic particle-based surface coverage assays, our strategy was found to offer

102 he performance of various implementations of surface coverage assays.

103 dy was to assess prospectively the degree of surface coverage at 3-dimensional (3D) endoluminal compu

104 stals on granular limestone with the maximum surface coverage at lower pH and in the presence of mult

105 The magnetic particle surface coverage at the limit of detection was determine

106 nger irradiation times and resulted in lower surface coverage at the same wavelength (330 nm).

107 taxane on Au (111) surfaces as a function of surface coverage based on atomistic molecular dynamics (

108 It is important that these effects of surface coverage be incorporated dynamically in the micr

109 present an integrated mathematical model for surface coverage bead-based assays.

110 ween 250 and 350 K for the three phases with surface coverages between 3.61 and 4.89 mumol/m(2).

111 and are relatively insensitive to changes in surface coverage, bonding chemistry, and temperature.

112 ibited low resistance to replacement at high surface coverages, but higher resistance at lower covera

113 efficiency of initial adhesion and bacterial surface coverage by >85%.

114 uilibrium constant by 5-fold and the maximal surface coverage by nearly 2-fold.

115 number of granules per cell and the granule surface coverage by proteins.

116 ption energies of reactive intermediates and surface coverage by spectator (blocking) species.

117 the source of the identified ROO(*), because surface coverage by surfactant or proteins could inhibit

118 surface, leading to a quantifiable change in surface coverage by the antibody.

119 ng full microkinetic models to determine the surface coverages by adsorbed species and the degrees of

120 the first report of an improved equation for surface coverage calculation using column breakthrough d

121 A set of equations for surface coverage calculation was developed and applied t

122 to nanoparticles, absolute quantification of surface coverage can be inaccurate at times because of l

123 -Planck equations, the SCD and therefore the surface coverage can be noninvasively quantified.

124 H2)3)(CH3NH3)3Pb3I10 compound with excellent surface coverage can be obtained from the antisolvent dr

125 ct of chain length of the alkanethiol on the surface coverage, charge-transfer resistance, and double

126 PtCr displayed higher degrees of endothelial surface coverage compared with PVDF-HFP surfaces.

127 rge transfer coefficient (alpha) of 0.5, and surface coverage concentration (Gamma) of 3.45x10(-)(1)(

128 The electron transfer coefficient (alpha), surface coverage concentration (Gamma), number of electr

129 The high yield and molecular surface coverage confirm the efficacy of Schiff base che

130 d attachment efficiencies using the measured surface coverages corroborate these findings.

131 e underlying catechol content, the final DNA surface coverage could be specified.

132 By reducing surface coverage (down to ~4 x 10(-12) mol cm(-2); the l

133 The importance of surface coverage effects was highlighted by evaluating t

134 Surface coverage efficiency was evaluated in vitro by al

135 model incorporates various phenomena such as surface coverage, external and internal sorption, surfac

136 techniques that yield spectra and changes in surface coverage for each set of kinetically differentia

137 roscopic enhancements in spray retention and surface coverage for natural and synthetic non-wetting s

138 ostructuring in which the CMs provide higher surface coverage for the immobilization of antibodies pr

139 As an example, we have measured the surface coverage for thiol-modified single-strand deoxyr

140 cilliforms and show that there is a critical surface coverage fraction at which collective effects ar

141 In addition, we estimated the SAM surface coverage fraction from the surface tension measu

142 doption, by demonstrating 10% greater tissue surface coverage fraction, 1.6x faster imaging throughpu

143 sfer coefficient alpha, and the redox-active surface coverage Gamma*.

144 The nanoparticle surface coverage (Gamma(NP)) and the stability of the ad

145 by cyclic voltammetry (CV) to determine the surface coverage (Gamma) by CoPc.

146 The value of surface coverage (Gamma) was calculated that indicated i

147 thodes, i.e. electrocatalytically active BOD surface coverage (Gamma), heterogeneous electron transfe

148 The high value of surface coverage GOx-GQD|CCE (1.8x10(-9) mol/cm(2)) and

149 HEMA amplification for CT detection based on surface coverage has been obtained that displays a corre

150 the adsorption free energy for extremely low surface coverages (Henry limit) requires the use of a te

151 Mo(110) are presented with respect to metal-surface coverage, heteroatom incorporation, and temperat

152 We find that at low surface coverage (i.e., low bound protein density), I-BA

153 network) resulted in (i) increased bacterial surface coverage, (ii) effective degradation of matrix-b

154 oad size distribution of the exosomes on the surface coverage, (ii) the fact that their size is compa

155 py and was found to increase with increasing surface coverage in a manner similar to stationary phase

156 r which it decreased rapidly with increasing surface coverage in the AgNC monolayer.

157 sity decreases quadratically with decreasing surface coverage, in HD-SFG, the scaling is linear, and

158 zation induced by the NHC (after scaling for surface coverage) increases with the increasing acidity

159 leucine) amino acids varied with changing Fn surface coverage, indicating that the conformation of ad

160 Endothelial cationic ferritin surface coverage, investigated using large-scale digital

161 The results show that surface coverage is a function of pH and decreases with

162 wer investment in chloroplasts if their cell surface coverage is also reduced.

163 exciting light intensity as the nanoparticle surface coverage is increased.

164 ately replaced, it is possible, provided the surface coverage is low enough, to obtain a Nernstian 2e

165 erved persistence of the dangling OD at full surface coverage is related to hydrophobicity-induced dr

166 The measured crystal surface coverage is sufficient to inhibit further hemozo

167 Aptness of surface coverage is vital to biosensor studies in the se

168 s and the length of the intermediate chain), surface coverage, laser excitation wavelength.

169 nm emission, whereas a low Au-S CN and a low surface coverage led to weak charge transfer, an achiral

170 he library were evaluated with regard to the surface coverage, midpeak potential, and voltammetric pe

171 struction of guidelines for molecular weight/surface coverage necessary for kinetic prevention of pro

172 bility, local surface diffusion coefficient, surface coverage/occupancy) that are directly associated

173 ave been fabricated lithographically, with a surface coverage of <1% of the underlying insulating sur

174 compound, on average, from a nominal initial surface coverage of 0.1 g/m(2) per analyte.

175 isochore giving isosteric enthalpies at zero surface coverage of 12.29 +/- 0.53 and 12.44 +/- 0.50 kJ

176 on that a single monolayer corresponded to a surface coverage of 13 pmol cm(-2).

177 f 13.3 +/- 0.3 mug/cm(2) (corresponding to a surface coverage of 18.5% by the nanoparticles).

178 Desorption experiments show a surface coverage of 2.26 x 10(-10) mol/cm(2).

179 surface concentration was tuned to obtain a surface coverage of 3.1 x 10(12) molecules cm(-2).

180 on transfer rate constant of 6.5 s(-)(1) and surface coverage of 3.1x10(-)(1)(1) mol cm(-)(2).

181 d longer adsorption times, a HEWL multilayer surface coverage of 550 pmol cm(-2) was formed, on the b

182 tron spectroscopy were used to determine the surface coverage of adsorbed Fn from isolated molecules

183 on the highly hydrophilic surface where the surface coverage of adsorbed peptides is negligible or o

184 he polymer first increased until a threshold surface coverage of AgNC was reached, after which it dec

185 link the genesis of Bronsted acidity to the surface coverage of aluminum and silicon on silica and a

186 A surface coverage of antibisphenol A aptamer of 1.84 x 10

187 etection limit is equivalent to a fractional surface coverage of approximately 2%, thus making eLoaD

188 g time, laser intensity, size of Au-NPs, and surface coverage of Au-NPs.

189 The surface coverage of benzenethiol as a function of time w

190 -OEC is progressive and reaches a saturation surface coverage of ca. 70% on highly oriented pyrolytic

191 for the first time on a SAM to calculate the surface coverage of carbon atoms after each stepwise add

192 cacy was evaluated by nonspecific adsorption surface coverage of crude bovine serum proteins.

193 edle-like 1D structures, because of the high surface coverage of crystals with a unique continuous fi

194 ies, and with substantial improvement on the surface coverage of crystals, this method might be suita

195 e was measured to be 75 mV vs. NHE, (ii) the surface coverage of CtCDH was found to be 0.65 pmol cm(-

196 verse group of polymer coatings, homogeneous surface coverage of different microgeometries featuring

197 al-time PCR-based method for determining the surface coverage of dithiol-capped oligonucleotides boun

198 obtained in a 46% overall yield, have a high surface coverage of DNA (64.8 +/- 6.4 pmol/cm2), and as

199 The surface coverage of DNA molecules can be conveniently co

200 oughout the chemical transformation, and the surface coverage of DNA was quantified.

201 Maximum surface coverage of DNA-mediated assembly was determined

202 The surface coverage of functionalized electrodes was estima

203 We quantitatively determine the surface coverage of hydrogen atoms during nanowire growt

204 y, such capabilities can be applied to study surface coverage of immobilized molecules.

205 Quantifying the surface coverage of immobilized oligonucleotides on meta

206 ows the noninvasive determination of SCD and surface coverage of individual conical nanopores.

207 okinetic model allows for predictions of (i) surface coverage of intermediates, (ii) WGSR apparent ac

208 of the NP structures were controlled by the surface coverage of landed silver ions.

209 The surface coverage of NeutrAvidin is affected by the space

210 give equivalent results for determining the surface coverage of oligonucleotides bound onto 13 or 30

211 The surface coverage of protein G increased with pore size,

212 ms were measured to determine the saturation surface coverage of pyrene relative to C18 chains and to

213 Monolayer immobilization chemistry and surface coverage of reactive ssDNA probes were studied b

214 SWNT suspensions is directly related to the surface coverage of SDS on the SWNT surface that simulta

215 en-fold coordination within a typically high surface coverage of square pyramidal TiO5 units.

216 The control of the surface coverage of ssDNA as well as the achieved speed

217 s particularly striking since the fractional surface coverage of SWNTs is only approximately 1% and S

218 Moreover, the surface coverage of the intermediate enzyme-substrate co

219 This phase shift correlates exactly with the surface coverage of the invading cells.

220 ition states were expressed as a function of surface coverage of the most abundant surface intermedia

221 the CNT surface and suggests nearly complete surface coverage of the nanotubes with DNA.

222 High surface coverage of the nonafluorohexylsilane enhanced t

223 f the probes could be controlled through the surface coverage of the nonfluorescent Raman tags (RTags

224 These changes are assigned to the surface coverage of the NP by the ssDNA aptamers and sub

225 Depending on the surface coverage of the P3HT nanoribbons by AuNRs, these

226 Depending on surface coverage of the Pd catalyst, the reaction is con

227 as successfully corrected for the fractional surface coverage of the pillars and the transmittance of

228 We study the effect of the surface coverage of the stainless steel surface by NPs o

229 a limiting factor, especially since the low surface coverage of the SWNT network results in large fl

230 on quartz substrates and in system II on the surface coverage of the underlying AgNC monolayers.

231 f different capping agents and the extent of surface coverage of these capping agents on the CdSe QD

232 ouble-layer structure induced by a saturated surface coverage of underpotential deposited H (H(upd)).

233 Our results suggest that the increased surface coverage of VR-SIM could also provide added valu

234 dsorption in the CNT/Hb network with average surface coverage of were found to be 0.19 mM and 4.8x10(

235 rate of ~1 Hz with a sensitivity in terms of surface coverage of ~1 ng/cm(2).

236 e and rapid assembly with an effective SWCNT surface coverage of ~99% as characterized by capacitance

237 lms in their carboxylate forms with limiting surface coverages of 8 (+/- 2) x 10(-8) mol/cm2.

238 l were used to distinguish between different surface coverages of lithium deposits.

239 the cytoplasmic surface of myelin at various surface coverages of myelin basic protein (MBP) indicate

240 Low surface coverages of oxygen lead to the highest selectiv

241 The relative surface coverages of the different aptamers were determi

242 phate backbone increases (decreases) the DNA surface coverage on an areal basis at high (low) ionic s

243 V was used for each case to estimate polymer surface coverage on an areal basis using a linear dielec

244 The influence of the surface coverage on the kinetics of metal-catalyzed reac

245 opt helical conformations, exhibited ordered surface coverage on the nanotubes and allowed systematic

246 n be collected for adsorbed species with low surface coverages on microelectrodes with a geometric ar

247 bilayers due to the increment of the enzyme surface coverage onto the channel.

248 ed selectively, either by decreasing the dye surface coverage or by changing the electrolyte environm

249 her adopting the appropriate values for each surface coverage or by estimating error bounds for diffe

250 studying structures of molecules with a low surface coverage or less ordered molecular moieties.

251 eutic applications requires determination of surface coverage (or density) of DNA on nanomaterials.

252 nd increased affinity for the sorbent at low surface coverage; parallel cation exchange and cooperati

253 d to investigate the effects of temperature, surface coverage, polymerization method (surface or solu

254 s of high-density C22 stationary phases with surface coverage ranging from 3.61 to 6.97 micromol/m2 a

255 ity docosylsilane (C22) stationary phases at surface coverages ranging from 3.61 to 6.97 mumol/m(2).

256 ounts of total sites, i.e., surface area and surface coverages, rather than structural differences be

257 nding-site model through the analysis of the surface coverage ratio of the short peptide on the senso

258 In the binding-site models, the surface coverage ratio of the short peptide on the senso

259 on optimizing other experimental conditions (surface coverage ratio, pH, and flow rate), the electroc

260 e success of the modification process with a surface coverage reaching 92% for the antibody layer.

261 balance (QCM) technique, focused on the high surface coverage regime and modeled the adsorbed particl

262 igh Au-S coordination number (CN) and a high surface coverage resulted in strong Au(I) -ligand charge

263 a simple, universal method for forming high surface coverage SAMs on ferromagnetic thin (< or =100 n

264 The results show that high surface coverage SAMs with low surface-oxide content can

265 The effect of antibody surface coverage (sigma(s)) of NC on binding simulations

266 molecular composition of the monolayer and a surface coverage similar to that expected from literatur

267 ale void- or cave-like pockets, high-exposed surface coverage sites, and positive charge streams in s

268 ycrystalline perovskite thin films with full surface coverage, small surface roughness, and grain siz

269 atures for device performance including high surface coverage, small surface roughness, as well as co

270 Thus, HS-ssDNA surface coverage steadily decreased with MCU exposure ti

271 es depending on PAE particle size ratio, DNA surface coverage, stoichiometric ratio, and thermal anne

272 nearly two orders of magnitude higher tissue surface coverage than destructive and labor-intensive fr

273 bI3 film with micrometer grain size and high surface coverage that enables photovoltaic devices with

274 Upon increasing the monolayer surface coverage, the dangling OD stretching mode showed

275 ics and direct measurements of the molecular surface coverage, the tip radius, tip-SAM adhesion force

276 ain length but are strongly dependent on the surface coverage; these observations are contrary to wha

277 gs of 0.03-0.7 mmol g(-1) (~2-50% of maximal surface coverage) through a direct synthesis, co-condens

278 f adsorbed Fn from isolated molecules at low surface coverage to full monolayers at high surface cove

279 Comparison of the Ni surface coverage to the concentration of free (uncomplex

280 At a low antibody surface coverage, up to 4% of the immobilized antibodies

281 agreement with that derived from 100% lipid surface coverage using conventional SFG.

282 Overall ~55% decrease in relative biofilm surface coverage was achieved for both species.

283 l crosslinker, was used and greater than 90% surface coverage was achieved for protein immobilization

284 The surface coverage was found to depend on the length and f

285 at DODA C18 chains were more ordered as DODA surface coverage was increased.

286 The impact of nanoparticle shape and surface coverage was investigated alongside the choice o

287 analysis, optimized by adjusting the aptamer surface coverage, was 67 +/- 1 nA muM(-1) cm(-2), and th

288 redox potential, electron transfer rate, and surface coverage were determined.

289 the Gibbs free energy of adsorption, and the surface coverage were optically measured by our electric

290 Furthermore, maximum observed surface coverages were far below those predicted by geom

291 uniform two-dimensional layer with complete surface coverage whereas gel-phase bilayers induce a net

292 isosteric enthalpies of adsorption (at small surface coverage), which in turn depend on the identity

293 By modifying the nanoparticle surface coverage, which can be controlled experimentally

294 and surrounding fluid in the limit of a low surface coverage, which can be used to extract shape inf

295 se of the relative SERS intensity versus the surface coverage, which has not been achieved by convent

296 nent SAM shows remarkable differences in the surface coverage, which strongly depends on the surface

297 optimization, we proved that tuning the NSs surface coverage with DNA linked to nanoparticles is cru

298 The EC-STM imaging revealed uniform surface coverage with sufficient stability to undergo re

299 sed for the objective quantification of hand surface coverage with the hand rub.

300 Primary outcome was the hand surface coverage with the hand rub: Hand scans were cate