ライフサイエンスコーパス: surface potential

1 specific binding of HA protein may alter the surface potential.

2 vapor-liquid interface is influenced by the surface potential.

3 embrane, reducing its negative electrostatic surface potential.

4 n, which has the most physiological membrane surface potential.

5 ntal band structure of atoms in a corrugated surface potential.

6 ifted activation via modification of a local surface potential.

7 ot directly contribute to the relevant local surface potential.

8 ne side by an area of strong electronegative surface potential.

9 not hH1, directly contributes to a negative surface potential.

10 d DNAs in solution was modified to include a surface potential.

11 layer is directed by Li(+) and the electrode surface potential.

12 F the Faraday constant, and phi the membrane surface potential.

13 tinct maxima with respect to pH and membrane surface potential.

14 hieve a more uniform spatial distribution of surface potential.

15 evealed an underlying dependence on membrane surface potential.

16 the Hammett sigma-constant or electrostatic surface potential.

17 iation of lipid headgroups and the monolayer surface potential.

18 oire-structure with locally strongly varying surface potential.

19 Langmuir adsorption type model and creates a surface potential.

20 lar surface and the calculated electrostatic surface potential.

21 f movement is governed by cell stiffness and surface potentials.

22 valent but have very different electrostatic surface potentials.

23 l electrophysiological information from body surface potentials.

24 onstruct epicardial EP information from body surface potentials.

25 acing reveals the presence of dual-wavefront surface potentials.

26 hod which allows direct sampling of cortical surface potentials.

27 ward models were compared with measured body surface potentials.

28 dial potentials are computed from known body surface potentials.

29 utation of epicardial electrograms from body surface potentials.

30 Body surface potentials (384 electrodes) were used to compute

31 A decrease in net cellular negative surface potential achieved by decreasing pH or increasin

32 is a tool for measuring local variations in surface potential across a substrate of interest.

33 head groups significantly contribute to the surface potential across the interface.

34 es a strikingly large negative electrostatic surface potential, adding additional "functional mystery

35 that of CLaNP-5 (+3), reducing the change in surface potential after probe attachment.

36 optimized geometries and ionic electrostatic surface potential analysis, the small but measurable mob

37 ystems, in turn, can be differentiated using surface potential analysis.

38 tified a similar helical motif in GC through surface potential analysis.

39 um channel modified its gating by a combined surface potential and a cooperative subunit interaction

40 These reactions reduced the surface potential and colloidal stability of COOH-MWCNTs

41 work, we demonstrated a relationship between surface potential and EDLC by chemically modifying surfa

42 ols Ca (2+) binding by lowering the electric surface potential and elevating cation concentration at

43 aracterizations including hydrodynamic size, surface potential and entrapment efficacies of CyLiPns w

44 e interplay between cellular hydrophobicity, surface potential and extracellular proteins.

45 Conversely, Ca(2+) raises surface potential and increases the size and aggregation

46 - and helix F that has a basic electrostatic surface potential and is densely populated with lysines

47 rall, this study shows the interplay between surface potential and pseudomagnetic field regarding the

48 We investigate the local surface potential and Raman characteristics of as-grown

49 Electrostatic surface potential and residue conservation analyses in c

50 pectra provide a direct measure of the local surface potentials and a basis for calculating local ove

51 ostatic repulsion, which depends strongly on surface potentials and can be modified through the effec

52 Furthermore, complementary electrostatic surface potentials and inherent helical content of each

53 This effect is linearly correlated with the surface potentials and wetting properties of these SAMs.

54 interfacial charge redistribution (elevated surface potential) and a raised Pt d-band center.

55 nning probe microscopy of chemical identity, surface potential, and mechanical properties provide ins

56 ltaneous nanomapping of infrared absorption, surface potential, and mechanical properties with approx

57 Surface properties including wettability, surface potential, and surface charge density were compa

58 s: the transmembrane potential, the membrane surface potential, and the membrane dipole potential.

59 the Ca(+2)-binding pocket, the electrostatic surface potential, and the stoichiometry of bound divale

60 Changes in surface potential are predicted to give rise to apparent

61 strate-binding groove, generating a negative surface potential, are different.

62 s the THz generation directly relates to the surface potential arising from the surface states, we ca

63 We observed plasmoelectric surface potentials as large as 100 millivolts under illu

64 We find that surface potentials as large as 473 mV are induced under

65 A depolarized inner surface potential, as the membrane loses negative charge

66 sampled by CzrA and causes the electrostatic surface potential at the DNA binding interface to become

67 r, these results highlight the extracellular surface potential at the voltage sensor as an important

68 dipole potential, and the difference in the surface potentials at both sides of the membrane.

69 ges in lipid head groups generate electrical surface potentials at cell membranes, and changes in the

70 he calculated values for their electrostatic surface potentials at the center of the rings.

71 hilic monomer gave stable dispersions with a surface potential below -40 mV and, and polymers with mo

72 This approach is quantitative for surface potentials below 25 mV, and does not require pri

73 used, showing that a positive electrostatic surface potential between the active sites of the fusion

74 iscrepancy between experimental and computed surface potentials, both methods demonstrate that the ve

75 n about spatio-temporal dynamics of the body surface potential (BSP) during atrial excitation.

76 e extracellular media modulated the cellular surface potential but not the hydrophobicity which remai

77 DeltaG(obs) also varied linearly with surface potential, but the slope was smaller than the ex

78 nd that the probe only perturbs the membrane surface potential by <2%.

79 how that it is possible to detect changes in surface potential by an electrophysiological approach; t

80 idues of the JMD influence the electrostatic surface potential by controlling the position of neighbo

81 teractions, limiting modulation of the local surface potential by the gate electrode and resulting in

82 for salt-induced depolarization of the cell-surface potential, Ca(2+) spikes and waves, Na(+)/H(+) a

83 The electrostatic surface potential calculated from the model is typical f

84 Electrostatic surface potential calculations identify a nearly continu

85 tern of conserved residues and electrostatic surface potential calculations suggest that the OB and/o

86 erfacial reactivity and transport, while the surface potential can be used to determine the "chemical

87 egion was linearly related to changes in the surface potential caused by anion adsorption.

88 at the microscopic level, and heterogeneous surface potential caused by radioactivity is reported.

89 fundamental difference in the electrostatic surface potentials, cavity polarities, and shapes of the

90 The voltage dependence of the extra surface potential change and charge movement were found

91 arization potential, as substantiated by the surface potential change assessed by Kelvin probe force

92 n of both charge movement and the non-linear surface potential change at voltages above -40 mV, and s

93 action (E-C) coupling altered the non-linear surface potential change in a parallel manner.

94 These results suggest that the non-linear surface potential change is closely associated with move

95 the Ag layer, the magnitude and sign of the surface potential change on the SiNW depends on the flow

96 The non-linear surface potential change remained after the sarcoplasmic

97 ly, the potentiometric dye reports a dynamic surface potential change that occurs on the myoplasmic f

98 e of both charge movement and the non-linear surface potential change.

99 was added to the liposome solution the POPC surface potential changed from 0 mV to +37 mV, and for P

100 As UV irradiation occurs, the positive surface potential changes and shifts the depth of the de

101 n and demonstrate that SEBS has a repeatable surface potential comparable to glass.

102 finity for F-actin, we identified a positive surface potential conserved among headpiece domains that

103 tion because of the unavoidable decay of the surface potential contrast between oppositely polarized

104 be force microscopy, we demonstrate that the surface potential contrast of BiFeO3 films can be recove

105 Inner surface potential data for calcite, as measured with a c

106 strength, the internal energy (excluding the surface potential) decreases substantially as the DNA is

107 The relationship between epicardial and body surface potentials defines the forward problem of electr

108 int potential represent the overall/averaged surface potential difference across the nanopore.

109 Both the larger surface potential difference and the conductive surface

110 oximately 8.5 mV hyperpolarization in ocular surface potential difference.

111 n the proposed architecture, the variance of surface-potential difference can be determined by electr

112 we proposed a planar nano-gap structure for surface-potential difference monitoring.

113 a data mining algorithm made mapping of the surface potential distribution across the capacitor poss

114 provides a complete and detailed map of the surface potential distribution of graphene domains of di

115 e compared the structural rearrangements and surface potential distributions within each protein doma

116 variance between simulated and measured body surface potential distributions.

117 we show that time-dependent anisotropies in surface potential driven by competitive ion adsorption c

118 atively explained by the changes in membrane surface potential due to exclusion of kosmotropes from (

119 substrate, we detected negative and positive surface potentials during monochromatic irradiation at w

120 K for the sites that contribute to the local surface potential effect is near pH 7.

121 he pheromones to synthetic vesicles of known surface potential, effective charges and intrinsic parti

122 K) in SVHP, which creates a similar positive surface potential, endowed SVHP with specific affinity f

123 eloped helium spin-echo technique to measure surface potential energy landscapes.

124 ce microscopy is leveraged to show many-fold surface potential enhancement in fractured surfaces rela

125 Calculating the electrostatic surface potential (ESP) of a biomolecule is critical tow

126 Differences between the body surface potential extrema predicted with homogeneous for

127 A continuous tract of positive surface potential flanking the active site suggests an R

128 s, reducing perovskite surface roughness and surface potential fluctuations associated with surface s

129 The electrostatic surface potential for a calculated model of chicken deox

130 has allowed calculation of the electrostatic surface potential for it and two other comparably modele

131 , which allows for separating the changes in surface potential from a true capacitance change.

132 -75 degrees C to account for the increase in surface potential from deprotonation.

133 In both stages, anisotropic surface potentials generate electrostatic torques that a

134 cally, we observed that a chemically induced surface potential gradient across hematite (alpha-Fe2O3)

135 logous pseudotyped vector with a more acidic surface potential, HAdV-C5/D30K, does not display a simi

136 non-destructive information readout method, surface potential has never been paid enough attention b

137 Indirect determinations of the surface potential have been experimentally attempted man

138 The ITO/SAM/SHSAM surface potential imposed by the dipolar SAMs causes ban

139 We show that the distinct surface potentials imposed by three different terminatio

140 states can be induced and controlled by the surface potential in a dielectric double gyroid (DG) pho

141 Surface potential in a topological matter could unpreced

142 Calculations of electrostatic surface potential in the active site further suggest tha

143 y at least partly due to the higher positive surface potential in the DNA-binding region of the A dom

144 -dielectric interface and hence, the minimum surface potential in the semiconductor, does not exceed

145 ing the presence of a negative electrostatic surface potential in the vicinity of the binding site.

146 These changes alter the electrostatic surface potential in two regions and likely confer speci

147 Further, complementarity of the surface potentials in a pair of fractured crystal shards

148 We measured electrocorticographic cortical surface potentials in eight human subjects during overt

149 lex relationship between epicardial and body-surface potentials in the context of regionally abnormal

150 Electrostatic surface potentials in the vestibule of the nicotinic ace

151 area to determine their contribution to the surface potential indexing maintenance.

152 at hydrolyzed adsorbates are responsible for surface-potential inversions, and we find strong correla

153 Hence, surface potential is a good indicator for surface modifi

154 ect transistor (MOSFET) takes place when the surface potential is approximately twice the bulk potent

155 kely due to pi-pi interactions) and that the surface potential is better compensated when counterion

156 The calculated sign of the surface potential is in agreement with that from experim

157 We propose that the surface potential is modulated by direct charge donation

158 nd electrostatic balance, a noncomplementary surface potential is not a barrier to binding.

159 Surface potential is one of the most important propertie

160 anoporous conducting polymer electrode whose surface potential is probed via electrochemical impedanc

161 on of an ultrashort pulse after which the DC surface potential is screened with a second optical pump

162 This suggests that one reason the membrane surface potential is tuned in vivo is to facilitate prot

163 The electrostatic surface potential is variable, so that the surface of P.

164 However, this surface potential is yet to be exploited in topological

165 By spatially resolving this variation in surface potential it is possible to measure the presence

166 However, to account for changes in surface potential, it is necessary to add a battery to t

167 based nanoscale imaging to resolve the local surface potential landscapes of Bi2Te3 nanowires (NWs) a

168 We propose that the PS surface potential leads to an accumulation of hydronium

169 he influence of pH, ionic strength, membrane surface potential, lipid saturation, and urea on each.

170 ctopic activation, together with pseudo-body surface potential map ECGs in 2 of them.

171 In comparing the electrostatic surface potential map of SVHP to that of other villin-ty

172 alculation of the inverse solution from body surface potential mapping (sometimes known as ECG imagin

173 Bipolar EGMs and body surface potential mapping do require HDF filtering to de

174 Repolarization was measured by ECG and body surface potential mapping during sinus rhythm, exercise,

175 In body surface potential mapping maps, HDF filtering increased

176 characterization in electrogram (EGM), body surface potential mapping, and electrocardiographic imag

177 METHODS AND EGM, body surface potential mapping, and electrocardiographic imag

178 er mapping and ablation of VT, 120-lead body surface potential mappings were obtained during implanta

179 pig hearts, estimating activation from body surface potential maps during sinus rhythm and localizin

180 Surface potential maps simultaneously recorded with topo

181 rals and QTd in 12-lead ECG and 64-lead body-surface potential maps were evaluated for their ability

182 From 4 other anesthetized pigs, 64-lead body surface potential maps were recorded during sinus rhythm

183 ocardial and epicardial activation from body surface potential maps.

184 in the D-E loop structure and electrostatic surface potentials may be important for determining bind

185 ed quantification method using electrostatic surface potential measured by Kevin probe and the iterat

186 Electrostatic surface potentials measured by EPR of IMTSL-PTE show a r

187 Body surface potential measurements (384 electrodes) were use

188 urements, surface reconstruction studies and surface potential measurements indicates that zwitterion

189 heart-surface electrical activity from body-surface potential measurements.

190 between channels and were consistent with a surface potential mechanism, but those on deactivation p

191 mperature-programmed desorption and scanning surface potential microscopy, supported by first-princip

192 This variation in the substrate surface potential modifies the interface charge doping t

193 n EHD1 EH create a region of strong positive surface potential near the NPF binding pocket.

194 atio) are consistent with the changes in the surface potentials near the junction, and the current-vo

195 sing ab initio molecular dynamics and find a surface potential of -18 mV with a maximum interfacial e

196 ine) that reverse the negative electrostatic surface potential of a bilayer reverse membrane binding

197 s correlates with the negative electrostatic surface potential of a carbonyl/carbamate oxygen atom pr

198 troduce a method for diagnosing the electric surface potential of a semiconductor based on THz surfac

199 The surface potential of all three polymers remained zero up

200 the plasma membrane is most negative, with a surface potential of approximately -35 mV, followed by t

201 The surface potential of CPe liposomes remains negative acro

202 Comparison between the electrostatic surface potential of CRABP-I and II revealed the presenc

203 ute at least partly to the observed negative surface potential of fullerene aggregates and, combined

204 PR) approach for assessing the electrostatic surface potential of lipid bilayers that is based on a r

205 ned by the planar lipid bilayer method), the surface potential of lipid monolayers (determined by the

206 o 1,000 mV from ion translocation rates, the surface potential of lipid monolayers, and molecular dyn

207 The size, shape, and surface potential of MfpA mimics duplex DNA.

208 s that in the presence of the DNA layer, the surface potential of PCBDR has a greater change in respo

209 1) and E1K (L-FR1) altered the electrostatic surface potential of the antigen binding site, allowing

210 We verify that the surface potential of the carrier nanomaterial plays an i

211 The electrostatic surface potential of the catalytic cavity has both a pos

212 ring plastoquinone and close to the positive surface potential of the complex, can function in cyclic

213 force microscope were shown to have reduced surface potential of the DNA immobilized sensors before

214 Furthermore, the electrostatic surface potential of the hGX interfacial-binding surface

215 hatidylglycerol ([L-]max) corresponding to a surface potential of the lipid bilayer in the absence of

216 ns and cations indicates that overcoming the surface potential of the membrane/protein PSII complex m

217 he partitioning was enhanced by the negative surface potential of the membranes and was well describe

218 ronment of Eu(3+) in these nanodrops and the surface potential of the nandrops are comparable to thos

219 in changes of both the electron affinity and surface potential of the semiconductor.

220 Analysis of the electrostatic surface potential of the Siah1 dimer reveals that the be

221 oduces an increase in the surface charge and surface potential of the substrates, which is reflected

222 This suggests that the electrostatic surface potential of the two proteins is very different

223 The surface potential of the vapor-liquid interface of pure

224 hydration free energy produces an effective surface potential of water in the range -0.4 to -0.5 V.

225 We present the first computation of the surface potential of water using ab initio molecular dyn

226 Liposomes had surface potentials of -42.4 to -46.1mV with no significa

227 static shielding decreases (ENS) values, yet surface potentials of CAPRIN1 in the two condensates can

228 The electrostatic surface potentials of CB[6], CB[7], and CB[8] and their

229 ferent pH-neutral NaCl solutions and applied surface potentials of nickel (vs. Ag|AgCl electrode in s

230 Here, we demonstrate that the local surface potentials of NPs of bismuth vanadate (BiVO(4))

231 ) receptor was affected by negative electric surface potentials of proteoliposomes controlled by the

232 water electrolysis on ceria, the increase in surface potentials of the adsorbed OH(-) and incorporate

233 Comparing the electrostatic surface potentials of the ECDs suggests a charge compati

234 The electrostatic surface potentials of the human GART domain and Escheric

235 lly, the presence of a stabilizing, negative surface potential on colloidal aggregates of C60 in wate

236 the relationship between surface charge and surface potential on edge surfaces cannot be described u

237 , His(146), and His(158) A swath of positive surface potential on either side of the active site pock

238 zmann equation yielded the dependence of the surface potential on the density of adsorbed TAT.

239 lectrons, which we can relate to the average surface potential on the gold core.

240 with topography reveal a significantly high surface potential on the sidewalls of MACE-synthesized p

241 litatively correlates with the electrostatic surface potentials on the interacting proteins.

242 ble net electrostatic charges, equivalent to surface potentials on the order of hundreds to tens of t

243 h hidden attractors to induce the autonomous surface potential oscillation.

244 VP26 and VP28 reveals opposite electrostatic surface potential properties of them.

245 , I=0.12 M, and anionic lipid content = 40% (surface potential, psi o =-30 mV), conditions for which

246 erage calcium activities can be decoded from surface potentials recorded by high-density transparent

247 We conclude that ligand-induced changes in surface potential (reflecting the binding event) and in

248 t that displays a differential electrostatic surface potential, relative to neighboring sites, and th

249 are three kinds of membrane potentials: the surface potentials, resulting from the accumulation of c

250 Analysis of surface potentials revealed a basic platform underneath

251 We found that the surface potential reverses its sign when water is replac

252 n effects on GluR6 receptors did not reflect surface potential screening or ion-agonist competition a

253 Kv1.l gating properties both by altering the surface potential sensed by the channel's activation gat

254 Kv1.1 gating properties both by altering the surface potential sensed by the channel's activation gat

255 We have used the method of surface potential sensitive second harmonic generation (

256 nset of stomatal closure, whereas electrical surface potentials shifted concurrently with stomatal cl

257 Body surface potentials showed a single minimum for both sing

258 icate very high structural and electrostatic surface potential similarities between the two yeast iso

259 s the result of a highly basic electrostatic surface potential, since a homologous pseudotyped vector

260 The surface potential (SP) of graphene is directly measured

261 to surface band bending effects, whereas the surface potential step exhibits properties analogous to

262 ble to various surface parameters, including surface potential, structural modifications including mo

263 Raman spectroscopy and mapping corroborate surface potential studies.

264 logy and gradients of negative electrostatic surface potential support a mechanism by which PEP-19 in

265 is a ring of intense positive electrostatic surface potential surrounding the primarily hydrophobic

266 di-4-ANEPPS are consistent with a change in surface potential that can be modeled with the Gouy-Chap

267 DNA surface arising from the large negative surface potential; the surface concentration increases s

268 ell as 29 viral proteins present at the cell surface, potential therapeutic targets.

269 ated ion binding constants, the Gouy-Chapman surface potential (theta) is calculated.

270 how that these films substantially alter the surface potential; thus, they provide a platform for sil

271 the Gouy-Chapman expression for the charged surface potential to obtain equilibria of protons and ca

272 build a triple layer model (TLM) that links surface potentials to adsorbate populations, via equilib

273 Here, we report a TMPRSS2-responsive surface-potential-tunable peptide-conjugated probe (EGTP

274 fect Ni2+ blockade indicating the absence of surface potential under physiological ionic conditions.

275 tiotemporal distribution of the ionic liquid surface potential, upon DC or AC (square wave) biasing,

276 The resulting surface charge density and surface potential values are in quantitative agreement w

277 The model could also fit pH-dependent surface potential values that are consistent with measur

278 The CD portals and cavities exhibit low surface potential values, whereas the regions around the

279 biomolecular detection through monitoring of surface-potential variation.

280 is to trace chemical- and location-specified surface potential variations as shifts of the XPS Cd 3d(

281 ml to 10 mug/ml resulting in a change of the surface potential was registered by the fabricated devic

282 licin structure and dynamics on the membrane surface potential, we have used solid-state NMR to inves

283 that length and van der Waals electrostatic surface potential were the most influential features on

284 adsorbent separation distances or of protein surface potentials were found to yield reasonable semiqu

285 Body-surface potentials were generated from these epicardial

286 Body surface potentials were generated from these epicardial

287 ng that amelogenin aggregation occurred when surface potentials were minimal.

288 Body surface potentials were simulated from epicardial record

289 Measured body surface potentials were used to noninvasively compute ep

290 rises an area with a different electrostatic surface potential when comparing isozymes.

291 c I-V measurements reflected a slow shift in surface potential () which was dependent on extracellula

292 is quantitatively explained by the membrane surface potential, which becomes more negative with incr

293 he target protein results in a change in the surface potential, which generates a signal response of

294 surrounded by a substantial electropositive surface potential, which is likely to stabilize the inte

295 cin E1 channel domain depend on the membrane surface potential, which is regulated by the anionic lip

296 the anthracene faces bear a strong negative surface potential, which may be the cause for this cyclo

297 kines reveal only minor areas of correlating surface potential, which must be reconciled with promisc

298 ddition, membrane proteins contribute to the surface potential with their charged residues.

299 Mapping surface potential with time-resolved Kelvin probe force

300 conserved but also exhibit strongly opposing surface potentials, with the helicase surface being posi