ライフサイエンスコーパス: surgical debridement

1 o manage and is frequently treated using non-surgical debridement.

2 t liposomal amphotericin B), and 24 required surgical debridement.

3 infection are early recognition and complete surgical debridement.

4 s successfully treated with voriconazole and surgical debridement.

5 re prone to severe infection and may require surgical debridement.

6 needle aspiration, and one who had undergone surgical debridement.

7 , prolonged antibiotic therapy, and repeated surgical debridement.

8 ) were studied before and 2 months after non-surgical debridement.

9 s, as well as guide the inexact procedure of surgical debridement.

10 mplanted devices, drainage of abscesses, and surgical debridement.

11 n PONF due to early antibiotic treatment and surgical debridement.

12 y collected from all patients during initial surgical debridement.

13 fasciitis despite antimicrobial therapy and surgical debridements.

14 ravenous antibiotics and had between 1 and 4 surgical debridements.

15 use of antimicrobial gel/mouthrinse; 6) non-surgical debridement; 7) use of systemic antibiotics; an

16 ctive) option was to provide SIT and perform surgical debridement (additional 0.89 euros per 1% fewer

17 ed, 11 treatment strategies (non-surgical or surgical debridement alone or combined with adjunct ther

18 nd gastrointestinal zygomycosis and required surgical debridement and a prolonged course of amphoteri

19 idity and mortality rates despite aggressive surgical debridement and antibiotic therapy.

20 t experts treat this infection with combined surgical debridement and antifungal medication.

21 is favorable in reported cases, with prompt surgical debridement and antifungal therapy.

22 gressive therapy, which includes disfiguring surgical debridement and frequently adjunctive toxic ant

23 translational implant-associated pig model, surgical debridement and injection of clindamycin-releas

24 d biopsies but rather should be admitted for surgical debridement and intraoperative cultures.

25 has been reported with the use of aggressive surgical debridement and systemic antifungal therapy.

26 Surgical debridement and transient fixating with straigh

27 c regimens for necrotizing fasciitis include surgical debridement and treatment with cell wall-active

28 Subsequently, despite surgical debridement and treatment with Itraconozaole am

29 All patients had surgical debridement and were severely ill.

30 therapy in this setting without concomitant surgical debridement and wound coverage.

31 Infection control, early surgical debridement, and antibiotic therapy are now the

32 with aggressive fluid replacement, emergent surgical debridement, and general supportive measures.

33 ource exposure and required hospitalization, surgical debridement, and prolonged antimicrobial therap

34 ld likely reduce the necessity for extensive surgical debridement as well as secondary wound closure

35 biomarker data) and the necessary number of surgical debridements (based on presentation biomarkers)

36 njured U.S. service members, obtained during surgical debridements before delayed wound closure, were

37 Acute staphylococcal PJIs treated with surgical debridement between 1999 and 2017, and a minima

38 ovine tendon collagen) (COLL) versus control surgical debridement (DEBR) or COLL versus expanded poly

39 Aggressive surgical debridement/digit amputation and selected use o

40 Following surgical debridement, EMP was placed into the bony defec

41 After surgical debridement, enamel matrix derivative (EMD) was

42 owed a military-like treatment schedule with surgical debridements every 24 to 72 hours.

43 The number of surgical debridements, flap use, or duration of antibiot

44 mly assigned to treatment consisting of open surgical debridement followed by the placement of DFDBA

45 F and vasopressor-dependent shock undergoing surgical debridement from 2010 to 2014 were identified a

46 ve antibiotic therapy can be considered when surgical debridement has been delayed or is incomplete,

47 olar furcation sites to both closed and open surgical debridement have not been shown to result in si

48 ration of antibiotic therapy and the role of surgical debridement in treating chronic osteomyelitis a

49 ents required eye exenteration and extensive surgical debridement, in addition to intravenous amphote

50 ntial and should be continued at least until surgical debridement is complete and the patient shows s

51 Early surgical debridement is crucial for improved outcomes an

52 by direct endoscopic necrosectomy, and then surgical debridement is reasonable, although approaches

53 Surgical debridement is typically required for joint inf

54 onfidence interval, 0.05-1.1, P=0.07), while surgical debridement (odds ratio, 2.2; 95% confidence in

55 An emergency surgical debridement of all the sinuses was done with ri

56 e effectiveness of a buccal SFA used for the surgical debridement of deep intraosseous defects compar

57 The surgical debridement of intraosseous periodontal defects

58 g courses of antibiotics in conjunction with surgical debridement of necrotic infected tissues.

59 sence of active bowel disease, and extensive surgical debridement of perineal lesions is often necess

60 positive control) were given 24 hours before surgical debridement of RPE in rabbits.

61 Initial treatment involves non-surgical debridement of the implant surface.

62 Surgical debridement of the scleral nodule was performed

63 ice (45.7% vs 83.2%, P < .001), or undergone surgical debridement on admission (4.3% vs 61.3%, P = .0

64 re and histology) and treat (often requiring surgical debridement or resection, and/or prolonged anti

65 nd the start of rifampin within 5 days after surgical debridement (OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.08 - 3.65) were

66 in in acute staphylococcal PJIs treated with surgical debridement, particularly in knees.

67 ulcers if it is applied topically after the surgical debridement process which is intended to reset

68 ulcers if it is applied topically after the surgical debridement process, which is intended to reset

69 Surgical debridement, reducing pressure from weight bear

70 Surgical debridement, reducing pressure from weight bear

71 Immediate start of rifampin after surgical debridement should probably be discouraged, but

72 recorded for each site clinically and after surgical debridement to characterize defect morphology,

73 ed (allocation 1:1), patients with DFO after surgical debridement to either a 3-week or a 6-week cour

74 zed (allocation 1:1) patients with DFO after surgical debridement to either a 3-week or a 6-week cour

75 s; 111 (33.8%) furcations were determined at surgical debridement to have a furcation invasion of Ham

76 Surgical debridement, ventilator support, vasopressors,

77 The median number of surgical debridement was 1 (range, 0-2 interventions).

78 Not providing SIT and performing only non-surgical debridement was both least costly and least eff

79 Surgical debridement was performed.

80 The median number of surgical debridements was 1 (range, 0-2 interventions).

81 betic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) who underwent surgical debridement, we investigated whether a short (3

82 betic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) who underwent surgical debridement, we investigated whether a short (3

83 erapeutic potential if added topically after surgical debridement, which resets chronic wounds into a

84 For cases with stable implants, surgical debridement with implant retention combined wit

85 All patients with EOSII underwent surgical debridement with implant retention.

86 s or for salvage therapy after endoscopic or surgical debridement with residual necrosis burden.