ライフサイエンスコーパス: surgical intervention

1 acuity, and transient hypotony (requiring no surgical intervention).

2 xercise restriction (if deemed high risk for surgical intervention).

3 spitalizations, and medical, endoscopic, and surgical interventions).

4 lution of subretinal fluid in the absence of surgical intervention.

5 hat increase mortality and often necessitate surgical intervention.

6 ease and is followed by strongly recommended surgical intervention.

7 aortic growth, rate of growth, and need for surgical intervention.

8 g to whether they were monitored or received surgical intervention.

9 gnificantly less than those who did not have surgical intervention.

10 ents with PC/PGL to allow for a more precise surgical intervention.

11 ociated with more adverse outcomes requiring surgical intervention.

12 87.5% (n=56/64) of eyes with MG required surgical intervention.

13 course of disease and, perhaps, the need for surgical intervention.

14 ly 1 patient with HPVG required an immediate surgical intervention.

15 mated survival of 85% at 5 years after first surgical intervention.

16 in the decision-making process for possible surgical intervention.

17 eoadjuvant and adjuvant settings, along with surgical intervention.

18 ully treated without appendicectomy or other surgical intervention.

19 NA hypermethylation in CD patients requiring surgical intervention.

20 with HPVG that do not necessarily require a surgical intervention.

21 nvolved margins and 13.2% underwent a second surgical intervention.

22 tly led to intestinal obstructions requiring surgical intervention.

23 Three of 11 patients did not respond to surgical intervention.

24 erebellar nuclei as a therapeutic target for surgical intervention.

25 tive treatment and hence reduce the need for surgical intervention.

26 inoma (HCC), but disparities exist in use of surgical intervention.

27 d describe a clinical momentum that promotes surgical intervention.

28 ma, tumor, or infection may not heal without surgical intervention.

29 nti-inflammatory rescue treatment or primary surgical intervention.

30 e, patients with CD should be considered for surgical intervention.

31 rome in the mouse without pharmacological or surgical intervention.

32 disease in an immune-competent host prior to surgical intervention.

33 Of those referred, 1276 (87.0%) underwent surgical intervention.

34 c diameter, growth rate, and eligibility for surgical intervention.

35 ssion to severe TR and the need for a second surgical intervention.

36 ral for surgery and receipt of a recommended surgical intervention.

37 d conservative treatment and rarely requires surgical intervention.

38 ate therapeutic decision making and targeted surgical intervention.

39 ing of seizures and to improve therapies for surgical intervention.

40 episode of intestinal obstruction requiring surgical intervention.

41 dy surface area burns requiring at least one surgical intervention.

42 ccur in rare cases, most cases require early surgical intervention.

43 ker and thus reduced the need for additional surgical intervention.

44 the likelihood of nonsurgical management vs surgical intervention.

45 hen weight loss is not the major goal of the surgical intervention.

46 tology and normalize with pharmacological or surgical intervention.

47 ration because the latter requires immediate surgical intervention.

48 ng to the requirement of hospitalization and surgical intervention.

49 esection for diverticulitis, a discretionary surgical intervention.

50 offer strong recommendations for or against surgical intervention.

51 in which transection of nerves necessitates surgical intervention.

52 life-threatening condition, requiring urgent surgical intervention.

53 WON who are too ill to undergo endoscopic or surgical intervention.

54 involved margins and 7.5% underwent a second surgical intervention.

55 ocular disturbances that require medical or surgical intervention.

56 ion that has been traditionally treated with surgical intervention.

57 Infective endocarditis (IE) often requires surgical intervention.

58 asia diagnosed via anterior HR-OCT, prior to surgical intervention.

59 patients demonstrated glaucoma, 1 requiring surgical intervention.

60 sified by whether they received a corrective surgical intervention.

61 ial anatomic triggers appear to benefit from surgical intervention.

62 ate therapeutic decision making and targeted surgical intervention.

63 responsible for hepatic failure after major surgical intervention.

64 aceutical therapy, deployment of devices and surgical interventions.

65 rgely outside the reach of pharmaceutical or surgical interventions.

66 Seven reliable reviews (64%) assessed surgical interventions.

67 of anatomical structures in complex visceral-surgical interventions.

68 imary hemolysis events, 24 were treated with surgical interventions.

69 vere diseases leading to hospitalization and surgical interventions.

70 ave no suitable transgenic animal models for surgical interventions.

71 rome of the arm and had to receive multistep surgical interventions.

72 creased systemic burden from higher rates of surgical interventions.

73 he conduct and reporting of meta-analyses of surgical interventions.

74 and the cost-effectiveness of fairly simple surgical interventions.

75 s a common but unpredictable complication of surgical interventions.

76 nging and we discuss genetic counselling and surgical interventions.

77 ting patients recovering from highly complex surgical interventions.

78 tization of care in general, specifically of surgical interventions.

79 with CTD, potentially increasing the risk of surgical interventions.

80 randomised trials assessing the efficacy of surgical interventions.

81 = 4 and 60% with AIS = 5 patients underwent surgical interventions.

82 indications for neurosurgical and orthopedic surgical interventions.

83 Among children who underwent surgical interventions, 1-year survival was high.

84 Seven ERMs progressed to requiring surgical intervention: 2 in the cryoretinopexy group and

85 =mild residual PVL had lower rates of repeat surgical interventions (6% versus 17%; P=0.004) and lowe

86 Disease amenable to surgical intervention accounts for 11-15% of world disab

87 nti-inflammatory rescue treatment or primary surgical intervention (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.54,

88 osis were less likely to receive recommended surgical intervention (adjusted odds ratio = 0.27; 95% c

89 As a result, the quality of surgical interventions affecting patient outcomes has be

90 ignificantly different than those undergoing surgical intervention after 3 months, 0.18+/-0.27 (20/30

91 The mortality of delayed elective surgical intervention after the first episode of emergen

92 ent include behavioral, pharmacological, and surgical interventions, all of which can result in a red

93 rol, surgeons may be able to perform certain surgical interventions alone; this would reduce the need

94 erence in the adjusted change in the rate of surgical interventions among minority patients as compar

95 ad premature menopause (11.9%), 93 underwent surgical intervention and 45 (48%) required intervention

96 nced by a very high admission rate, need for surgical intervention and a high in-hospital mortality r

97 ed at an advanced stage and is refractory to surgical intervention and chemotherapy.

98 osed at an advanced stage, and refractory to surgical intervention and chemotherapy.

99 rgeons had differential ability to arbitrate surgical intervention and construct the severity of pati

100 nce the goals for determining the success of surgical intervention and how patients with such misalig

101 Between 2006 and 2012, the rate of surgical intervention and in-hospital mortality for 5 in

102 re syndrome can lead to an immediate, proper surgical intervention and is necessary to prevent compli

103 The rates of surgical intervention and population mortality were comp

104 mation were collected, as well as details of surgical intervention and postoperative posturing advice

105 Many patients required surgical intervention and the final visual acuity was of

106 more suitable model organism with regard to surgical interventions and behavioral testing, we genera

107 eath occurred in 21/24 patients treated with surgical interventions and in 13/25 who remained on medi

108 high, with many children requiring multiple surgical interventions and long-term intensive care hosp

109 ividuals at risk may translate into elective surgical interventions and lowered mortality.

110 astric bypass was associated with additional surgical interventions and nutritional deficiencies.

111 ent disorders and to create patient-specific surgical interventions and rehabilitation.

112 ges are still not seamlessly integrated into surgical interventions and, thus, remain separated from

113 ut procedures, 60% underwent endovascular or surgical intervention, and 5% underwent amputation.

114 , predictive factors for hospitalization and surgical intervention, and health care expenditure.

115 ferral for surgery as a potential barrier to surgical intervention, and little is known about the eff

116 treated conservatively without the need for surgical intervention, and only one patient received a t

117 pain management, the role of endoscopic and surgical intervention, and the use of pancreatic enzyme-

118 e at work and leading to more than a million surgical interventions annually worldwide.

119 includes several months of antibiotics, and surgical intervention appears to be critical for success

120 Prompt surgical intervention appears to be vital for successful

121 were device-related complications requiring surgical intervention, appropriate and inappropriate ICD

122 Early cross-sectional imaging and surgical intervention are advised in order to reduce mor

123 resuscitation, neonatal intensive care, and surgical intervention are becoming more frequent.

124 eatment with corticosteroids, biologics, and surgical intervention are the usual therapeutic options.

125 Two commonly performed surgical interventions are available for severe (grade I

126 Both haemostatic agents and surgical interventions are investigational for intracere

127 To date, surgical interventions are the only means by which crani

128 The likelihood of receiving no surgery vs surgical intervention as a function of demographic and d

129 Surgical intervention as an adjunct to medical drug trea

130 Surgical intervention, as an adjunct to radiation and ch

131 ilicone oil without additional vitreoretinal surgical intervention at 6 months.

132 dren aged 6 to 11 years undergoing a planned surgical intervention at a third-level Italian pediatric

133 whether patients are likely to benefit from surgical intervention based on synchronizability of intr

134 ts and harms of a broad range of medical and surgical interventions, but the heterogeneity and lack o

135 his may help to evaluate the efficacy of the surgical intervention by comparing preoperative with pos

136 ung transplant recipients with CAD requiring surgical intervention (CAD-coronary artery bypass grafti

137 August 15, 2014, to March 9, 2015, of 59,928 surgical interventions carried out from January 1, 2012,

138 analysis included all patients who underwent surgical intervention (categorised into groups as treate

139 Surgical interventions confer survival advantages compar

140 remain unclear, with many patients requiring surgical intervention despite optimal medical management

141 e of the RVOT traditionally require multiple surgical interventions during their lifetimes.

142 of patients without other ocular pathology, surgical intervention effectively provided rapid visual

143 sts were calculated for hospital admissions, surgical interventions, endoscopies, PN, and immunosuppr

144 Aggressive endoscopic and surgical intervention, especially in the presence of lar

145 decreased with increasing complexity of the surgical intervention, even during the pandemic.

146 id annulus at the time of a left-sided valve surgical intervention, even if regurgitation is mild.

147 ying POAG patients at risk of progression to surgical intervention, even in the absence of eye-specif

148 are less likely than insured men to receive surgical intervention for an RRD.

149 or cerebrovascular event or need for cardiac surgical intervention for device-related complications d

150 A total of 8 untreated eyes (2.3%) required surgical intervention for elevated IOP compared with 93

151 Optimum surgical intervention for low-grade haemorrhoids is unkn

152 Surgical intervention for mild TBI is rarely necessary i

153 nwide cohort study of every infant requiring surgical intervention for NEC in the UK was conducted be

154 eferral for surgery may be major barriers to surgical intervention for patients with HCC.

155 ing issues with false positives and unneeded surgical intervention for patients.

156 Only 2 patients required additional surgical intervention for scar tissue removal.

157 ited evidence to assess benefits or harms of surgical intervention for screen-detected pancreatic ade

158 Wide local excision (WLE) is a common surgical intervention for solid tumors such as those in

159 ed a full-thickness macular hole or required surgical intervention for symptoms.

160 S AND We reviewed all patients who underwent surgical intervention for tetralogy of Fallot and major

161 e susceptible to further hospitalization and surgical intervention for the treatment of microbial ker

162 na vitrectomy and 4 (24%) were aphakic after surgical intervention for trauma.

163 Recognizing when they require surgical intervention for UGH or to improve visual funct

164 OS includes clinical effectiveness trials of surgical interventions for colorectal cancer.

165 ditions, thyrotropin levels, and medical and surgical interventions for management of hyperthyroidism

166 were eligible for inclusion if they compared surgical interventions for primary treatment of HD in re

167 thesize scientific evidence on the effect of surgical interventions for removal of mandibular third m

168 ve surgery and, more recently, non-resective surgical interventions for the treatment of drug-resista

169 urrent and potential pharmacotherapeutic and surgical interventions for the treatment of obesity and

170 ons to consider gender-affirming hormone and surgical interventions for transgender individuals exper

171 s of health service provision, and available surgical interventions for transgender people.

172 tions) vs revascularization (endovascular or surgical) intervention for IC in the community, focusing

173 ic requires to conscientiously weigh "timely surgical intervention" for colorectal cancer against eff

174 rgencies.Proportion of patients receiving no surgical intervention, for all 7 conditions was greater

175 , innovative drug delivery systems and novel surgical interventions give hope to patients with PD abo

176 In the surgical intervention groups, patients were not told whi

177 eted botulinum toxin injection and selective surgical intervention has reduced the burden of long-ter

178 other similar emergency case and successful surgical intervention have been reported before.

179 Recently, these surgical interventions have also been termed metabolic s

180 Although medical and surgical interventions have been reported, there are no

181 Although surgical interventions have greatly reduced mortality ra

182 gnificantly related to recurrence: number of surgical interventions (hazard ratio 0.9, 95% confidence

183 cal outcome associated with stroke and acute surgical intervention highlights the importance of the n

184 or positive inotropic drug or mechanical or surgical intervention (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.47-0.87; P=0.

185 rbid consequences, including requirement for surgical intervention if not identified and treated prom

186 s based on topical drugs, laser therapy, and surgical intervention if other therapeutic modalities fa

187 arly manifest glaucoma cases (P = 0.004) and surgical intervention in advanced disease (P = 3.6 x 10(

188 Our findings might argue for an early surgical intervention in eyes with DME irrespective of t

189 ory therapy, combined MII-pH monitoring, and surgical intervention in few selected cases.

190 cending aortic dilatation that would justify surgical intervention in patients with bicuspid aortic v

191 surgeons appears to lower the threshold for surgical intervention in specific upper gastrointestinal

192 earing are the most frequent indications for surgical intervention in sports injuries and an understa

193 Rates of surgical intervention in the ACO cohort were significant

194 erative outcomes for African Americans after surgical intervention in the universally insured militar

195 When examining surgical interventions in a population of pediatric pati

196 for nearly 170 years has allowed life saving surgical interventions in animals and people.

197 of favourable cost-effectiveness analyses of surgical interventions in low-income and middle-income c

198 ard current blockers (such as quinidine), or surgical interventions, including left cardiac sympathet

199 pression, as well as an emerging spectrum of surgical interventions, including liposuction for late-s

200 lization of subtle structural details during surgical interventions, including retinal detachment rep

201 sought to identify patient characteristics, surgical interventions, institutional characteristics, r

202 Surgical intervention involves open, laparoscopic, or ro

203 rvice was associated with a delay in time to surgical intervention (IRR = 1.84, 95% CI = 1.69, 2.01),

204 Surgical intervention is associated with improved surviv

205 Surgical intervention is needed in some cases of spontan

206 Although the role for surgical intervention is well established, a clear trend

207 Early surgical intervention may be considered for patients wit

208 f the cases were managed conservatively, but surgical intervention may be occasionally required.

209 experience suggests that early image-guided surgical intervention may facilitate a less complicated

210 ter failed goniotomy surgery or as a primary surgical intervention may offer a phakic infant with gla

211 One-hundred fifty-nine patients underwent surgical intervention (mean cyst size, 8.5 cm +/- 5.3),

212 Clinical and treatment variables (VF, surgical interventions, medications) were not independen

213 Surgical intervention might be considered in highly sele

214 Surgical intervention might be delayed until symptoms ar

215 us, obesity, and hypercholesterolemia making surgical intervention more difficult.

216 those requiring a glaucoma-related secondary surgical intervention (n = 9).

217 and extensive polyposis requiring immediate surgical intervention (n = 9).

218 he impact of overlap on outcomes amongst all surgical interventions (n = 61,524) over 1 year (2014) a

219 e know that major glenoid bone loss requires surgical intervention, none of the studies performed so

220 Surgical interventions occur at lower rates in resource-

221 While surgical interventions occur at lower rates in resource-

222 groups, necrotizing enterocolitis requiring surgical intervention occurred in 20/492 (4.1%) vs 28/51

223 h precise spatiotemporal control but without surgical intervention of the skull or artery.

224 For refractory epilepsy, this surgical intervention offers many advantages over tradit

225 ring patients from the risks associated with surgical intervention on the brain.

226 e approach to the management of DCIS without surgical intervention or radiation therapy may be advisa

227 tify the effects of injury and disease, plan surgical interventions, or control realistic high-dimens

228 al center was not associated with receipt of surgical intervention (P = 0.27).

229 with regard to ERM progression resulting in surgical intervention (P = 0.707).

230 significantly reduced the number of planned surgical interventions (P < .001), modified the surgical

231 zation and need for retreatment sessions and surgical intervention, pain perception, and procedure ti

232 atastrophic and chronic GF were referred for surgical intervention particularly transplantation and c

233 e treatments such as red cell transfusion or surgical interventions performed in response to the blee

234 arger with self-selected music, and lower in surgical interventions performed under general anesthesi

235 ciated with RRD, systemic comorbidities, and surgical intervention (pneumatic retinopexy [PR], pars p

236 of AAK, individualized medical and advanced surgical interventions preserves and improves visual acu

237 orm pharmacological drug-delivery schedules, surgical intervention procedures and the management of r

238 hyperparathyroidism, and their candidacy for surgical intervention provided informed consent.

239 justified in randomised controlled trials of surgical interventions provided there is a strong scient

240 ssive antifungal and supportive care without surgical intervention, provided that all the necessary s

241 Surgical intervention provides resolution of extraesopha

242 of 150 meta-analyses of randomized trials of surgical interventions published between January 2010 an

243 The surgical intervention rate was 47%.

244 Surgical intervention-related complications classified a

245 is for these IE patients that the timing of surgical intervention remains a point of considerable di

246 When diagnosed at an early stage, surgical intervention remains the treatment of choice.

247 which were treated pharmacologically with no surgical intervention required and 1 that required revis

248 All surgical interventions resulted in a reduction of gastri

249 Early surgical intervention results in similar visual outcomes

250 ng cardiovascular diseases as without urgent surgical intervention, ruptured AAA has a mortality rate

251 A surgical intervention's impact on mortality cannot be as

252 Management of NS-TAA, including surgical intervention, should be similar to that of MFS.

253 usion, if weight loss is the primary goal of surgical intervention, significant volume reduction is r

254 In spite of all available medical and surgical interventions, some eyes may still suffer this

255 same or fewer medications without secondary surgical intervention (SSI).

256 ally investigate the systemic effects of the surgical interventions, such as regulation of body weigh

257 Younger individuals benefited more from surgical intervention than those who were older (p value

258 tarsudil, although 2 patients also underwent surgical interventions that might have contributed to im

259 es (5.6%), and all patients required further surgical intervention to achieve cure.

260 ning cases (57.7%) were deemed semielective (surgical intervention to be performed within 48 hours).

261 mifepristone plus misoprostol group required surgical intervention to complete the miscarriage versus

262 or hematoma, or the need for percutaneous or surgical intervention to control the bleeding event.

263 Surgical intervention to improve vision was performed in

264 ed gastric bypass to become the most popular surgical intervention to induce sustained weight loss.

265 Surgical intervention to lower IOP was required in 3 cas

266 hat cause severe regurgitation need emergent surgical intervention to prevent disease progression.

267 Early surgical intervention to prevent reflux reduces the prog

268 nd our results could influence the choice of surgical intervention to remove all predisposing cells.

269 red clinical study, 88 patients who required surgical intervention to treat a qualifying infrabony pe

270 neutralization of tumour necrosis factor and surgical intervention together with lifestyle modificati

271 h the preponderance of lesions is treated by surgical intervention, various strategies have been deve

272 he outcomes of hemolysis events treated with surgical interventions versus medical management alone.

273 Among a subset of super-utilizers, surgical intervention was associated with a reduction in

274 No surgical intervention was done in 2 eyes.

275 Surgical intervention was less successful at hole closur

276 Surgical intervention was required in 22 (20%) patients.

277 Surgical intervention was required in nearly 23% donors

278 ction was unsuccessful in 5 patients, but no surgical intervention was required.

279 compared with 162,142 admissions in the USA.Surgical intervention was significantly more common in t

280 The frequency of surgical intervention was similar.

281 wth between the pre-operative CT imaging and surgical intervention was simulated using MSC Marc.

282 The primary end point for the surgical intervention was the successful completion of a

283 oids in the setting of hydrops, and prenatal surgical intervention was uncommon (1.7%).

284 eeded additional therapy, the mean number of surgical interventions was lower, and treatment time in

285 Furthermore, after surgical intervention, we found a reduction of plasma Ca

286 gression to full-thickness macular hole, and surgical intervention were analyzed.

287 Exercise restriction, beta-blockers, and surgical intervention were discussed with the families.

288 The odds of receiving surgical intervention were lowest for minority patients

289 e patients (n = 46,791) undergoing inpatient surgical intervention were retrospectively enrolled (201

290 Surgical interventions were considered to be out of scop

291 Among all age groups, 59,928 surgical interventions were performed in dedicated traum

292 Surgical interventions were primarily for general surgic

293 analysis had improved SNOT-22 outcomes with surgical intervention when compared with continued medic

294 s resynostosis typically requires additional surgical intervention, which can be associated with a hi

295 and US hospitals differ in the threshold for surgical intervention, which may be associated with incr

296 six women (0.3%) in the placebo arm reported surgical intervention, which was significantly different

297 Most children were treated by surgical intervention with resection of necrotic bowel l

298 Current treatment options rely on surgical intervention with the use of an autograft, desp

299 We compared these two surgical interventions with early structured physiothera

300 t failure (those who needed further glaucoma surgical intervention) within 1 month after a single HiF