ライフサイエンスコーパス: surgical outcome

1 generalization and less-favorable long-term surgical outcome).

2 not resected in one patient (Class III post-surgical outcome).

3 did not significantly influence clinical and surgical outcome.

4 or quality assurance, reflecting the "ideal" surgical outcome.

5 the seizure onset pattern, as well as in the surgical outcome.

6 n of antibiotic therapy, hospital costs, and surgical outcome.

7 tructures were performed and correlated with surgical outcome.

8 index <0.08 had a lower chance of successful surgical outcome.

9 1 and 2 were considered good, and 3-6 poor, surgical outcome.

10 n between age, sex, and suture material with surgical outcome.

11 lly change the evaluation and likely improve surgical outcome.

12 but also aid in margin assessment to improve surgical outcome.

13 he severity of myelopathy and for subsequent surgical outcome.

14 ere compared with histopathology results and surgical outcome.

15 Ostium size was not predictive of overall surgical outcome.

16 scalp EEGs were associated with an excellent surgical outcome.

17 y preventable condition with great impact on surgical outcome.

18 uvant therapies have been applied to improve surgical outcome.

19 82.4% probability of achieving a favourable surgical outcome.

20 le patients more likely to have a favourable surgical outcome.

21 ect of a patient's community of residence on surgical outcomes.

22 formed, and there are little data describing surgical outcomes.

23 sion, no standard criteria exist to classify surgical outcomes.

24 ogram is feasible and effective in improving surgical outcomes.

25 m-level initiatives aimed at improving their surgical outcomes.

26 sociated with an overall increase in adverse surgical outcomes.

27 perative experience has been shown to effect surgical outcomes.

28 derlying pathophysiology related to distinct surgical outcomes.

29 ealth system's teamwork level and its 60-day surgical outcomes.

30 t groups during CABG episodes realize better surgical outcomes.

31 has demonstrated an inverse association with surgical outcomes.

32 ed the impact of functional health status on surgical outcomes.

33 ur hundred four patients were assessable for surgical outcomes.

34 mpromising efforts to understand and improve surgical outcomes.

35 comes alone may not be sufficient to improve surgical outcomes.

36 e size of the GDI may not be associated with surgical outcomes.

37 care and improved quality of cancer care and surgical outcomes.

38 ssociated with more severe disease and worse surgical outcomes.

39 sts that ward-based care plays a key role in surgical outcomes.

40 acteristics, process measure compliance, and surgical outcomes.

41 spitals contributes to racial disparities in surgical outcomes.

42 ic conditions may be associated with adverse surgical outcomes.

43 be related to progression of CV disease and surgical outcomes.

44 us better document patient's complaints and surgical outcomes.

45 and intraoperative MRI has further improved surgical outcomes.

46 transfusion practices may result in improved surgical outcomes.

47 vestigate the correlation of ostium size and surgical outcomes.

48 n on preoperative imaging will have inferior surgical outcomes.

49 or minimizing risk to the IAN and optimizing surgical outcomes.

50 t any adverse effects and improve visual and surgical outcomes.

51 cluded demographics, BMI, comorbidities, and surgical outcomes.

52 echnique should be considered when reporting surgical outcomes.

53 nce, and postoperative management to improve surgical outcomes.

54 ution of technique translating into improved surgical outcomes.

55 main factors that contributed to successful surgical outcomes.

56 on preoperative cross-sectional images, and surgical outcomes.

57 ppendicitis resulted in significantly better surgical outcomes.

58 Neoadjuvant AI treatment markedly improved surgical outcomes.

59 f improved operative efficiency and improved surgical outcomes.

60 nd potential benefit of smoking cessation on surgical outcomes.

61 the risk of current versus prior smoking on surgical outcomes.

62 res has been the primary focus for improving surgical outcomes.

63 network integration could be associated with surgical outcomes.

64 and lateral temporal regions was related to surgical outcomes.

65 feration (MHEP) and its effects on long-term surgical outcomes.

66 ssociation between network participation and surgical outcomes.

67 as part of a national strategy for improving surgical outcomes.

68 ue has severe implications for breast cancer surgical outcomes.

69 ance to routine daily activity and favorable surgical outcomes.

70 ive is to describe this system and to review surgical outcomes.

71 immune driver genes in optimal vs suboptimal surgical outcomes.

72 ion of the clinically reported difference in surgical outcomes.

73 derstand how preoperative opioid use impacts surgical outcomes.

74 Addressing these will improve TT surgical outcomes.

75 al data are increasingly used to investigate surgical outcomes.

76 Between optimal vs suboptimal surgical outcomes 99 probes displayed significantly diff

77 Surgical outcome abstraction remains laborious and a bar

78 To describe the variation in surgical outcomes across bariatric centers of excellence

79 to examine the effect of dialysis on 30-day surgical outcomes adjusted for age, race, sex, work rela

80 used to examine the impact of ESRD on 30-day surgical outcomes adjusted for age, race, sex, work rela

81 hepatic portal vein thrombosis (EHPVT), with surgical outcome after Meso-Rex bypass (MRB).

82 Optimization of surgical outcomes after colectomy continues to be active

83 cteristics of an EFVW may be able to predict surgical outcomes after Trabectome surgery.

84 received incentives to document independent surgical outcomes after training.

85 This investigation is the largest study of surgical outcomes among AIs to date and the first to foc

86 eported experiences (PREs) and risk-adjusted surgical outcomes among group practices.

87 intervention did not affect rates of adverse surgical outcomes among patients undergoing general surg

88 Surgical outcomes among recent graduates are an importan

89 accuracy of 78.84% to predict the patient's surgical outcome, among all other frequency bands.

90 HFOs show promise for improving surgical outcome and accelerating intracranial EEG inves

91 has emerged as the leading publicly reported surgical outcome and is tied to payment determinations.

92 pertinence of MAP(+) areas was confirmed by surgical outcome and pathology.

93 rtinence of MAP+ areas was confirmed by MSI, surgical outcome and pathology.

94 r major surgery, thus directly affecting the surgical outcome and patient recovery.

95 ve cardiopulmonary exercise testing predicts surgical outcome and should therefore be included in the

96 created an unadjusted model between age and surgical outcome and then developed two adjusted models

97 her age truly is an independent predictor of surgical outcome and to provide evidence to guide practi

98 scleral application) resulted in comparable surgical outcomes and bleb morphologies.

99 concentrations can have a negative effect on surgical outcomes and can also lead to surgeries being c

100 of these regions in the model, we predicted surgical outcomes and compared these to actual patient o

101 The purpose of this study was to examine surgical outcomes and complication rates of dacryocystor

102 Review of CMVR characteristics, surgical outcomes and complications in 19 eyes with CMVR

103 To compare surgical outcomes and complications of three inferior ob

104 Surgical outcomes and complications were prospectively r

105 evel characteristics associated with optimal surgical outcomes and decreased expenditures.

106 ve reported the procedure to be feasible but surgical outcomes and impact on short and long-term morb

107 ies of safety-net hospitals lead to inferior surgical outcomes and increased cost across 9 elective s

108 measured at gross pathology, correlates with surgical outcomes and is an independent predictor of poo

109 ng appropriate measures may result in better surgical outcomes and less recurrence.

110 approach with the overall goal of optimizing surgical outcomes and minimizing complications.

111 RT-PCR or both, due to the risk for worsened surgical outcomes and nosocomial spread.

112 ly collected can make future improvements to surgical outcomes and quality analyses.

113 The main outcome measures were postoperative surgical outcomes and recurrence rates.

114 In the authors' experience, the surgical outcomes and safety of LCS improved significant

115 hlight the impact of socioeconomic status on surgical outcomes and should be integrated into ACS NSQI

116 ticipation is associated with improvement in surgical outcomes and spending compared to control hospi

117 he WHO checklist has been linked to improved surgical outcomes and teamwork, yet we know little about

118 nificant impact of postoperative delirium on surgical outcomes and the long-term prognosis of older p

119 sed on wound modulation to enhance long-term surgical outcomes and the search for a small incision su

120 proach will help surgeons to achieve optimal surgical outcomes and to meet (and exceed) the high expe

121 , complications that do not impede favorable surgical outcomes and/or routine daily activity are the

122 ee patients undergoing surgery (Class I post-surgical outcome) and was not resected in one patient (C

123 th clinical features, tumor characteristics, surgical outcome, and long-term survival.

124 y eye, ocular demodicosis, follow-up period, surgical outcome, and tear levels of IL-17 measured by e

125 tion of lung cancer surgery among hospitals, surgical outcomes, and health services use.

126 Indications for retinal surgery, surgical outcomes, and intraoperative and postoperative

127 The concept of frailty, its effect on surgical outcomes, and its assessment and management wer

128 surveys, we conclude that factors outside of surgical outcomes appear to influence patients' percepti

129 with seizure-onset zone, resected tissue and surgical outcome are required to determine the true pred

130 The best early postoperative surgical outcomes are achieved in centers where there ar

131 Surgical outcomes are associated with patient and surgeo

132 ment is regarded as the first-line response, surgical outcomes are considerably favourable.

133 variety of surgical procedures, but current surgical outcomes are inadequately characterized.

134 We now understand that surgical outcomes are poor for patients with rapidly gro

135 omplications (PPCs), a leading cause of poor surgical outcomes, are heterogeneous in their pathophysi

136 raduates of IVSR programs achieve equivalent surgical outcomes as fellowship-trained vascular surgeon

137 al characteristics, risk factors, visual and surgical outcomes as well as the microbiological profile

138 nes including visual speech recognition, for surgical outcome assessment in patients with cleft lip a

139 We report on long-term improvement in surgical outcomes associated with participation in ACS N

140 This analysis demonstrates improving cardiac surgical outcomes at children's hospitals participating

141 structures, the Premier HQID did not improve surgical outcomes at participating hospitals.

142 w these outcomes are achieved to improve all surgical outcomes at underresourced hospitals.

143 States were examined using the Breast Cancer Surgical Outcomes (BRCASO) database.

144 Adding oxaliplatin did not improve surgical outcomes but added significant toxicity.

145 ith time, hospitals had progressively better surgical outcomes but enrollment in a national quality r

146 The Checklist improves surgical outcomes but the economic case for widespread u

147 tically significant difference in suboptimal surgical outcome by 3 years between children with IXT tr

148 The cumulative probability of a suboptimal surgical outcome by 3 years was 28% (19 of 72) for child

149 Cumulative probability of suboptimal surgical outcome by 3 years was 46% (43/101) in the BLRc

150 The primary outcome was suboptimal surgical outcome by 3 years, defined as constant or inte

151 ve highlighting has the potential to improve surgical outcomes by facilitating intraoperative nerve i

152 actors for dry eye, patient satisfaction and surgical outcomes can be maximized.

153 and March 15, 2020, and were recorded in the Surgical Outcomes Collaborative registry as having eithe

154 ral surgeons has raised concerns about their surgical outcomes compared with specialist pediatric sur

155 bal surgical treatment protocols, and assess surgical outcomes, complications, and functional results

156 ity, the effects of excessive body weight on surgical outcomes constitute a relevant quality of care

157 e of post-operative trichiasis or other poor surgical outcomes could jeopardize these efforts. In thi

158 roup underwent reoperation or met suboptimal surgical outcome criteria at 3 years (treatment group di

159 0%) in the BLRc group (8 of 9 met suboptimal surgical outcome criteria) and in 4 participants (5%) in

160 (5%) in the R&R group (3 of 4 met suboptimal surgical outcome criteria; treatment group difference of

161 Functional and surgical outcome data were collected at the latest avail

162 ncephalography, neuroimaging, pathology, and surgical outcome data were reviewed.

163 The database provides high-quality surgical outcomes data from more than 80 participating U

164 laucoma from the Veterans Affairs Ophthalmic Surgical Outcomes Data Project were compared.

165 Clinical and surgical outcomes depend on multiple factors, including

166 d criteria for analyses of correlations with surgical outcome: detection of interictal ripples (Rs),

167 ion and offer a local example of world-class surgical outcomes, diminishing surgeons' most frequently

168 Variability in surgical outcomes does not relate to surgical skill alon

169 ters was not associated with improvements in surgical outcomes during the study period.

170 is thought to be an important determinant of surgical outcomes, few studies have examined this empiri

171 red with standard preoperative assessment on surgical outcomes, focusing on studies that used a contr

172 implementation was associated with improved surgical outcomes following general surgery procedures,

173 entary refers to 'Virtual resection predicts surgical outcome for drug-resistant epilepsy' by Kini et

174 Main surgical outcome for each procedure type was single-surg

175 To evaluate the surgical outcome for management of giant retinal tear (G

176 pose of the current study is to evaluate the surgical outcome for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (

177 Cataract surgical outcomes for all operations performed by surgeo

178 elation between hospital teaching status and surgical outcomes for both emergency and elective genera

179 Although surgical outcomes for congenital heart disease have impr

180 ans is of critical importance for optimizing surgical outcomes for elderly patients undergoing ambula

181 Compare surgical outcomes for hepatitis B virus (HBV)-hepatocell

182 The study objectives were to characterize surgical outcomes for malignant small bowel obstruction

183 sk estimation is essential when benchmarking surgical outcomes for reimbursement and engaging in shar

184 Contemporary surgical outcomes for the entire population of newborns

185 g-term risk and predisposing factors and the surgical outcomes for, retinal detachment (RD) after ped

186 eline for automated extraction of ophthalmic surgical outcomes from EHR to answer key clinical questi

187 opulmonary connection (SCPC) correlated with surgical outcomes from the Fontan procedure.

188 All patients with an excellent surgical outcome had at least 10 years of follow-up.

189 the impact of portal hypertension in general surgical outcomes has been limited.

190 influence of mental health on postoperative surgical outcomes has not been investigated.

191 Wide variations in vascular surgical outcomes have been demonstrated in England.

192 (PCI) have been steadily improving, whether surgical outcomes have improved over time is not fully e

193 %) with a low complication rate (1%-6%), but surgical outcomes have not been reported previously spec

194 rtebra (P = .035) enabled prediction of good surgical outcome; however, preoperative mJOA (P = .927),

195 ry (3 to <5 years) is associated with better surgical outcomes; however, further evidence from a rand

196 Socioeconomic status affects surgical outcomes; however, the American College of Surg

197 ical applicability of administrative data in surgical outcomes improvement.

198 combined pre- and postresection ECoG predict surgical outcome in different tailoring approaches.

199 rather than mortality, is the most important surgical outcome in economic terms.

200 SF-36 seems well suited for assessing surgical outcome in patients after incisional hernia rep

201 ase their diagnostic value which may improve surgical outcome in patients with localization-related i

202 m and clinically validate them with the post-surgical outcome in patients with medically refractory e

203 tron emission tomography (PET) predicts post-surgical outcome in patients with non-small cell lung ca

204 A retrospective longitudinal study examined surgical outcomes in 64,891 Michigan patients in 29 hosp

205 Retrospective comparison of surgical outcomes in an academic pediatric ophthalmology

206 ry residency (IVSR) programs achieve similar surgical outcomes in clinical practice as compared to gr

207 Data on management and surgical outcomes in older patients with EA are limited.

208 VR devices demonstrated at least parity with surgical outcomes in patients of similar risk.

209 We further compared the surgical outcomes in patients with and without mesial te

210 Chart review of AGV and BGI surgical outcomes in patients with NVG.

211 olecule agents, and nucleic acids to improve surgical outcomes in resectable disease, augment current

212 Given the potential for poorer surgical outcomes in the setting of indiscriminate proph

213 Reference values for optimal surgical outcomes in well-defined low-risk bariatric pat

214 The mFI is associated with poor surgical outcomes, including readmission, primarily due

215 ion, four trauma radiologists unaware of the surgical outcome independently reviewed all CT studies a

216 forming surgical valve centers with the best surgical outcomes is challenging.

217 lly, continued investigation into optimizing surgical outcomes is essential in this population of inf

218 n fraction and heart failure symptoms affect surgical outcomes is not fully described.

219 n nonsurgical populations, but its effect on surgical outcomes is unclear.

220 significant difference for several secondary surgical outcomes, it was associated with higher prostag

221 ecklists results in striking improvements in surgical outcomes led to the rapid adoption of such chec

222 me hospitals/surgeons often achieve superior surgical outcomes, many rectal cancer resections are per

223 al more than surgeon experience, and overall surgical outcomes may be improved by standardized techni

224 ble to open appendectomy in terms of several surgical outcome measures for both uncomplicated and com

225 Data on several surgical outcome measures such as observed mortality, ov

226 erall, except in highly specialized centers, surgical outcomes might be static, and there is abundant

227 Efforts to ensure equitable surgical outcomes need to focus on both patient-level, a

228 The electroclinical presentation and surgical outcome of lesional anterior cingulate epilepsy

229 g a logistic regression model to predict the surgical outcome of patients with CSM.

230 y was to ascertain the clinical features and surgical outcome of patients with FMNS with infantile un

231 e of retinopexy has little relevance for the surgical outcome of PPV for the primary RRD.

232 This study aims to compare surgical outcome of transanal ileal pouch-anal anastomos

233 omen, but whether this was due to the poorer surgical outcome of women or better TAVR outcome, compar

234 mortality and complications by comparing the surgical outcomes of a cohort of surgical patients treat

235 This study reports the surgical outcomes of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome

236 o analyze the demographics, indications, and surgical outcomes of anophthalmic surgery (enucleation a

237 : There have been few studies evaluating the surgical outcomes of cornea fellows during training.

238 The aim of this study is to compare surgical outcomes of international medical graduates (IM

239 ce, associated cardiovascular anomalies, and surgical outcomes of left pulmonary artery sling (LPAS)

240 To compare the surgical outcomes of ocular surface squamous neoplasia (

241 of our retrospective study was to assess the surgical outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy, 180 degrees

242 We retrospectively assessed the surgical outcomes of PCMs based on a tumor classificatio

243 that examined the effects of malnutrition on surgical outcomes, optimizing metabolic function and nut

244 seline reported more anxiety about patients' surgical outcomes or events following disclosure (odds r

245 But TtD was not associated with metastasis, surgical outcome, or survival.

246 e only significant clinical factor affecting surgical outcome (P = 0.0003).

247 BOLD maps were independently related to good surgical outcome (p=0.007).

248 Other surgical outcome parameters were similar in patients wit

249 is an important instrument to ensure optimal surgical outcomes, particularly during the adoption of n

250 The Primary Aldosteronism Surgical Outcome (PASO) study was an international proje

251 According to surgical outcome, patients were classified as seizure-fr

252 ancer before surgery and (b) investigate the surgical outcome (positive margin rates and mastectomy r

253 pared with that of conventional imaging, and surgical outcomes (positive margin and mastectomy rates)

254 improve the presurgical assessment, and post-surgical outcome prediction, where it could widely be us

255 in accurate pre-surgical assessment and post-surgical outcome prediction.

256 diversity and composition are predictors of surgical outcome, promoting the concept of community eco

257 tinel lymph node mapping promises to improve surgical outcomes, reduce rates of repeat surgery, and i

258 patient-reported outcomes often omitted from surgical outcomes registries is essential to improving q

259 Post-surgical outcomes related to this region may be better u

260 interval: 0.23 to 0.30; p < 0.0001) but post-surgical outcome remained affected by AF (10-year post-s

261 uration before transfusion) on perioperative surgical outcomes remains poorly defined.

262 uctal adenocarcinoma (PDA) and the impact on surgical outcomes remains unclear.

263 atients' perspectives of care correlate with surgical outcomes remains unclear.

264 en gastrectomy (OG) have been planned, their surgical outcomes reported but their oncologic outcomes

265 These findings suggest that a surgical outcomes reporting system does not provide a cl

266 nalysis is widely applicable to the field of surgical outcomes research.

267 can lead to improved functional imaging and surgical outcomes, respectively.

268 y (P-POSSUM), Surgical Risk Scale (SRS), and Surgical Outcome Risk Tool (SORT).

269 Trichiasis surgical outcomes should be improved.

270 The European Surgical Outcomes Study was an international study desig

271 tudy of patients enrolled in the Obesity and Surgical Outcomes Study, using data of Medicare claims e

272 Surgical outcomes such as initial treatment failure, lat

273 However, poor surgical outcome suggests a complex relationship between

274 and supervision, cornea fellows can achieve surgical outcomes that are comparable to experienced sur

275 t are only 2 of many factors associated with surgical outcomes that should be incorporated into surgi

276 how these lipids affect key factors defining surgical outcomes-that is, I/R, LR, and liver malignancy

277 mferential trabeculotomy achieved comparable surgical outcomes to mitomycin C-augmented combined trab

278 ntial weight loss, few studies have compared surgical outcomes to nonsurgical treatment, particularly

279 reporting of programmatic congenital cardiac surgical outcomes using a new risk model that includes b

280 The post-surgical outcome was assessed after 22.14 +/- 10.05 mont

281 ied) had negative imaging studies, and their surgical outcome was compared with 117 patients with pos

282 Surgical outcome was monitored with serial optical coher

283 The proportion of patients with good surgical outcome was significantly higher (13/16; 81%) i

284 requirements for establishing benchmarks for surgical outcomes was performed.

285 ) among these physicians is a determinant of surgical outcomes, we examined national Medicare data fr

286 -fMRI results to identify patients with good surgical outcome were 81% and 79%, respectively, and pos

287 iables potentially associated with excellent surgical outcome were examined in patients with a minimu

288 Fifteen patients with good surgical outcome were included.

289 reening-detected AAAs, AAAs operated on, and surgical outcome were retrieved from all 21 Swedish coun

290 ostdiagnosis imaging, biopsy, and short-term surgical outcomes were also evaluated between those who

291 gs, associated cardiovascular anomalies, and surgical outcomes were analyzed.

292 Surgical outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier life

293 Surgical outcomes were generally favorable, but VA outco

294 th the exception of low mortality, favorable surgical outcomes were not consistently associated with

295 Similar surgical outcomes were observed after additional glaucom

296 enting clinical histories, measurements, and surgical outcomes were reviewed.

297 ificity profile in determining the patient's surgical outcome with area under the curve of 0.76, wher

298 itivity and 95.2% specificity, and simulates surgical outcomes with a mean accuracy of 1.1 +/- 0.3 mm

299 There remains variability in surgical outcomes with or without dose adjustment in str

300 eme severity patients showed vastly improved surgical outcomes with the laparoscopic approach.