ライフサイエンスコーパス: suspicious

1 ort initially diagnosed as reactive (3/6) or suspicious (3/6) for lymphoma.

2 correctly identified 78 of the 85 nodules as suspicious (92% sensitivity; 95% confidence interval [CI

3 ent who were suspected of having PCa, with a suspicious abnormality (target) at prebiopsy MR.

4 We describe these suspicious accessions and their possible origins, and ad

5 ant (c.502-2A>G) in the FHL1 gene was highly suspicious among other candidate genes and variants.

6 sion (AMRV), which were further divided into suspicious AMRV (n = 37) and AMRV (n = 33).

7 The grafts with TCMRV, suspicious AMRV (sAMRV), and AMRV showed similar respons

8 Suspicious and definite CAABMR showed a similar prognosi

9 motional facial expressions (neutral, happy, suspicious and fearsome) of an oncoming walking confeder

10 uorodeoxyglucose PET uptake patterns in foci suspicious and nonsuspicious for cancer in patients with

11 ble method with which to biopsy DBT-detected suspicious architectural distortions not visualized at m

12 and autofluorescence provide a way to target suspicious areas.

13 t was applied to a set of recently collected suspicious artesunate tablets purchased in shops and pha

14 ference between suspicious melanoma and each suspicious atypia group: melanoma versus severe atypia a

15 C who underwent clip insertion into the most suspicious axillary lymph node (LN) were eligible.

16 MRI depicted more nonindex suspicious benign lesions than did contrast-enhanced mam

17 sy or not, especially in the cases which are suspicious between BIRADS III and IVa.

18 deaux wines from prestigious chateaux and 14 suspicious Bordeaux origin were determined to evaluate t

19 series of samples clearly demonstrated that suspicious Bordeaux wines displayed Pb isotopic signatur

20 MRI for improving differential diagnosis of suspicious breast abnormalities and reducing unnecessary

21 versus mean ADC values alone for analysis of suspicious breast lesions at MRI.

22 f routine DCE-MRI data from 22 patients with suspicious breast lesions initially ruled positive by in

23 mber 2011 to December 2013, 40 patients with suspicious breast lesions were included in this institut

24 utility of FNA biopsies in the evaluation of suspicious breast lesions.

25 ncy data were acquired from 78 patients with suspicious breast lesions.

26 ould detect the cancerous probability of any suspicious breast mass without any sample excision.

27 e in conjunction with the B-mode to classify suspicious breast masses.

28 false-positive control--that of a woman with suspicious but nonmalignant findings at MR imaging--was

29 mammograms that the technologists considered suspicious but that did not prompt recall at radiologist

30 or the indications were identified; however, suspicious but uncertain results were reported in five n

31 Deja vu experiences that were suspicious, but not diagnostic, of MTLE occurred in 6 ad

32 ns was 29.6, whereas the ODxRS for all other suspicious calcification morphologies was 19.4 (P < .03)

33 of the liver in nonanatomical resection and suspicious calcified lesions in hepatoduodenal ligament

34 s could be improved if directly conducted in suspicious cancer spots, preventing the need for biopsy.

35 eptor scintigraphy (SRS), in each clinically suspicious case.

36 ctive agent administration may be helpful in suspicious cases for differential diagnosis and to elimi

37 specimens, and trichrome staining method in suspicious cases.

38 lesions were sampled for biopsy because of a suspicious change at follow-up (two N0 lesions, one each

39 0.3%, 1.7%) and only 0.1% of the cancers had suspicious changes at 6-month follow-up and only one (17

40 One important challenge is to identify suspicious chemicals present in fingerprint residues, wh

41 nues to be reasonable for most patients with suspicious choroidal nevi.

42 ning tool for identifying many, but not all, suspicious colonies grown on selective media within 24 h

43 rial pathogens seen in middle Tennessee from suspicious colonies grown on selective stool culture med

44 hology on chromogenic media were compared to suspicious colonies on nonselective TSA II.

45 The suspicious colonies were analyzed by the Biotyper system

46 A total of 304 suspicious colonies were selected and further identified

47 resection and presented to our service with suspicious conjunctival lesions at a median of 22 years

48 ides a fast ex vivo preliminary diagnosis of suspicious conjunctival lesions with good histologic det

49 ly 2012 through July 2014 of 419 adults with suspicious conjunctival lesions.

50 ion suspicious for follicular neoplasm," or "suspicious cytologic findings" were 95%, 94%, and 85%, r

51 In patients with follicular neoplasms or suspicious cytology, preoperative TSHR mRNA >1 ng/mug ha

52 s revealed that polysomy FISH, trisomy FISH, suspicious cytology, primary sclerosing cholangitis stat

53 the Erasmus MC and meeting the criteria for suspicious/diagnostic c-aAMR using the Banff Classificat

54 al or repeated prostate needle biopsy due to suspicious digital rectal examination (DRE) findings and

55 ing conditions, three exhibited at least two suspicious "DTAC warning criteria" for CNS infection.

56 present without classic clinical stigmata or suspicious family history has led to increased reliance

57 pancreas less than 3 cm in diameter without suspicious features in preoperative imaging should under

58 <3 cm) in asymptomatic patients without any suspicious features may be observed with serial imaging

59 Each radiologist identified suspicious findings and rated suspicion of breast cancer

60 CT examination and/or PET-CT scan revealed suspicious findings in the left upper abdomen.

61 Patients had benign or no suspicious findings on clinical examination.

62 Computer-aided detection identifies suspicious findings on mammograms to assist radiologists

63 s (range, 1.2-7.6 seconds) in the absence of suspicious findings on the DWIBS MIPs.

64 phy programs allow depiction of nonpalpable, suspicious findings requiring histologic evaluation, but

65 Nodules or other suspicious findings were classified as positive results.

66 to US, mammography depicted seven incidental suspicious findings, which lowered the specificity from

67 this work, we investigated the effect of one suspicious food contaminant, bisphenol A (BPA), in vivo.

68 Of these 69 CTAs, 10 were falsely suspicious for 11 BCVIs (vertebral, 7; carotid, 4) (fals

69 sis and a segment 7/8 lesion measuring 4 cm, suspicious for a hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), without

70 Readers marked locations suspicious for a nodule and provided a confidence score

71 ute AMR [23.5%], chronic active AMR [14.7%], suspicious for acute AMR [41.1%], suspicious for chronic

72 ountered when dealing with clinical isolates suspicious for B. pseudomallei or clinical specimens fro

73 e proficient at rapidly recognizing isolates suspicious for B. pseudomallei, be able to safely perfor

74 pathologic examination for 155 neoformations suspicious for being malignant through clinical and/or I

75 population of 22 patients initially screened suspicious for breast cancer.

76 and frequently demonstrates activity that is suspicious for but not diagnostic of ictal activity.

77 proportion of patients with isolated TG, TG suspicious for CAABMR (C4+/DSA- or C4d-/DSA+) and TG wit

78 Until recently, such cases were termed suspicious for CAABMR, and their prognosis remains uncle

79 In each region suspicious for cancer (median number per patient, two; r

80 were asked to characterize different regions suspicious for cancer as benign or malignant on multipar

81 s correlation -based biopsies in all regions suspicious for cancer in each patient, with adequate bio

82 ns.Materials and MethodsTZ lesions that were suspicious for cancer in men who underwent MRI with T2-w

83 wo independent radiologists delineated areas suspicious for cancer on images (T2-weighted, diffusion-

84 permetabolic (18)F-FDG PET/CT foci that were suspicious for cancer versus nonsuspicious by using the

85 The median size of the region suspicious for cancer was 8 mm (range, 4-13 mm).

86 Regions suspicious for cancer were identified on 3-T multiparame

87 bgroups of patients with at least one lesion suspicious for cancer were included: men with no prior P

88 g a subsequent MR-guided biopsy, the regions suspicious for cancer were reidentified and targeted by

89 205 patients with 216 mammographic findings suspicious for cancer were scheduled to undergo mammogra

90 Of the 44 breasts examined, 29 were suspicious for cancer, of which 15 were found to be posi

91 t "the calcifications are larger and are now suspicious for cancer," 30% would state "the calcificati

92 t core samples were obtained from 25 regions suspicious for cancer.

93 erapy the same day: 10 cases were clinically suspicious for cancer; however, only 5 of those cases we

94 the remaining 48 were classified as "highly suspicious for CCa" (n = 35) or as "probable IAC" (n = 1

95 Among 16 "highly suspicious for CCa" patients who underwent surgery, path

96 R [14.7%], suspicious for acute AMR [41.1%], suspicious for chronic active AMR [2.9%], and only micro

97 re to evaluate stable patients with symptoms suspicious for coronary disease.

98 gic) symptoms, had lung parenchymal findings suspicious for COVID-19 at non-chest CT but not concurre

99 test positivity among Israelis with symptoms suspicious for COVID-19 who did and did not receive BCG

100 s drive-through testing center with symptoms suspicious for COVID-19.

101 oderate to severe upper respiratory symptoms suspicious for COVID-19.

102 test negative by NAAT but remain clinically suspicious for COVID-19.

103 spected device thrombosis, and 10 tests were suspicious for device thrombosis; these patients were th

104 PET scan was suspicious for distant metastases in 13 patients; three

105 astroenterologist to detect and biopsy areas suspicious for dysplasia.

106 r HHV6 DNA on the basis of clinical findings suspicious for encephalitis.

107 Gram stain positive for organisms, in cases suspicious for endophthalmitis, and in high-risk setting

108 epilepsy, specifying if MTLE; manifestations suspicious for epilepsy; or unaffected.

109 ignificance," "follicular neoplasm or lesion suspicious for follicular neoplasm," or "suspicious cyto

110 patients with suspected AA who had features suspicious for GATA2 mutations, later confirmed by DNA s

111 011; a total of 263 lesions were reported as suspicious for HCC on pretransplantation magnetic resona

112 d foci at (89)Zr-pertuzumab PET/CT that were suspicious for HER2-positive disease.

113 (89)Zr-pertuzumab-avid foci that were suspicious for HER2-positive metastases were tissue samp

114 weighted imaging; these findings were highly suspicious for high-grade prostate cancer (Fig 1).

115 y interstitial lung abnormality and findings suspicious for interstitial lung disease, respectively.

116 interstitial lung abnormalities and findings suspicious for interstitial lung disease.

117 Seventy-six patients suspicious for lung cancer on thorax CT imaging were pro

118 e noninvasive diagnosis of pulmonary nodules suspicious for lung cancer.

119 One lesion was morphologically suspicious for malignancy at CT and MR imaging but showe

120 Fourteen cases from TMC were suspicious for malignancy based on cytologic evaluation.

121 It contained outlined lesions found to be suspicious for malignancy by two independent radiologist

122 wing the detection of hypermetabolic lesions suspicious for malignancy in patients with oncologic dia

123 s of posterior segment inflammation that are suspicious for malignancy or infection and require tissu

124 spicion or impression (defined by well-known suspicious for malignancy ultrasonographic features, suc

125 with pulmonary nodules with imaging features suspicious for malignancy underwent preoperative PET.

126 s containing a bladder lesion interpreted as suspicious for malignancy were classified as positive.

127 mined significance, follicular neoplasm, and suspicious for malignancy) are histologically benign.

128 s with an imaging report that was flagged as suspicious for malignancy, 131 were identified by the tr

129 were categorized as negative for malignancy, suspicious for malignancy, and positive for malignancy.

130 by rating the number and location of lesions suspicious for malignancy, as well as image quality and

131 flagged by reviewing radiologists as being "suspicious for malignancy." The trigger algorithm was de

132 Partial biopsies of pigmented lesions suspicious for melanoma may lead to delayed melanoma dia

133 SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Tumors clinically suspicious for melanoma with diameter exceeding 5 mm wer

134 US findings were considered suspicious for metastasis if cortical thickening and/or

135 USG for findings that were indeterminate or suspicious for metastasis were 96% (95% CI, 80%-99%), 88

136 Of 36 patients with findings suspicious for metastasis, 23 (64%) had metastasis confi

137 or hemangioma, (2) indeterminate lesion, (3) suspicious for metastasis, or (4) consistent with metast

138 secutive patients with pleural abnormalities suspicious for MPD underwent whole-body positron emissio

139 infant developed an upper air way infection suspicious for nasopharyngitis, which might be a possibl

140 Two drusen suspicious for nGA at baseline were identified, but neit

141 routine B-scan imaging for identifying areas suspicious for nGA in this population from the COMPLETE

142 h clinical and laboratory features that were suspicious for NMOSD.

143 ratin 19 (K19) may show the earliest changes suspicious for PBC, namely, loss of the canals of Hering

144 s found to have a mass in his colon that was suspicious for possible malignancy.

145 mL or less, a digital rectal examination not suspicious for prostate cancer, and age 50 years or olde

146 r less, and a digital rectal examination not suspicious for prostate cancer.

147 ine or neck with unsuspected findings highly suspicious for pulmonary COVID-19.

148 Solid-component masses reported as suspicious for RCC or AML were correlated with histologi

149 experienced interpreters for abnormal uptake suspicious for recurrent disease in the prostate bed and

150 samples from 129 patients with active SSTIs suspicious for S. aureus were collected and characterize

151 ask of detection and segmentation of lesions suspicious for sPC.

152 ite edema (n = 15), in >=81% of FECD corneas suspicious for subclinical edema (n = 16), in <=42% of F

153 efinite edema (obvious visible edema), being suspicious for subclinical edema (possible corneal thick

154 Corneas suspicious for subclinical edema that subsequently under

155 g abnormally with no other clinical findings suspicious for TBI.

156 %) were unremarkable and 4 reported a lesion suspicious for TRB.

157 c location, and classified these findings as suspicious for tumor or metastasis or nonsuspicious.

158 atures of 53 conjunctival lesions clinically suspicious for tumors of 46 patients referred to the Uni

159 fection cohort) or those with brain findings suspicious for Zika virus infection, with intracranial c

160 for the analytes is high enough to pick out suspicious formulations containing no API or a substitut

161 iggers can be used to identify patients with suspicious imaging findings in whom follow-up diagnostic

162 g the biopsy to men with equivocal to highly suspicious IMPROD bpMRI findings would have resulted in

163 ult, we believe that these parameters may be suspicious in terms of the presence of LSTV rather than

164 7 melanomas, 48 benign nevi, and 98 atypical/suspicious, including 48 atypical nevi and 50 melanomas

165 pendent on the doctor's ability to recognise suspicious injuries, such as bruising, bite marks, burns

166 ging of his prostate and pelvis revealed two suspicious intraprostatic lesions with restricted diffus

167 ed with two stimulus confederates performing suspicious/irregular activity, supports the predictions

168 of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), suspicious isolates are now routinely identified to the

169 like appearance on mammograms exhibited more suspicious kinetic characteristics (mean T(peak) approxi

170 yes of unilateral retinoblastoma without any suspicious lesion and those performed more than 6 months

171 ugust 2008, LN was determined to be the most suspicious lesion in 352 samples (2.1%) (pleomorphic and

172 First-line evaluation of each suspicious lesion was performed by using the apparent di

173 In screenees without a suspicious lesion, anxiety levels significantly dropped

174 ex malignancies, lesion size, and additional suspicious lesions (malignant or benign) were compared d

175 difference was found between the numbers of suspicious lesions (n = 80) or lesion-positive patients

176 diagnosis drew regions of interest on cancer-suspicious lesions and contralateral visually normal TZs

177 DTI method allows for rapid interrogation of suspicious lesions and longitudinal changes in tissue he

178 ics included fine needle aspiration (FNA) of suspicious lesions and mini-laparoscopy to establish the

179 icular potential as home-based remedy for BU suspicious lesions at community level where laboratory c

180 ultrasonography because they had additional suspicious lesions at MR imaging.

181 graphy (US)-MR imaging fusion-guided biopsy, suspicious lesions detected at multiparametric MR imagin

182 type of CSE, who initiated it, the number of suspicious lesions detected, how lesions were managed (e

183 Monitoring clinically suspicious lesions for change decreased from 16% (12 of

184 nt and a lower annual mean excision rate for suspicious lesions in specialized surveillance (0.81; 95

185 Biopsy was recommended for 32 suspicious lesions on 27 (11%) of 247 MR imaging studies

186 r women at average risk who are recalled for suspicious lesions or who have high breast density.

187 All suspicious lesions underwent biopsy and had benign patho

188 The positive predictive value for all suspicious lesions was 56.6% (47 of 83).

189 Additionally, SUVmean/max and size of suspicious lesions were determined.

190 All suspicious lesions were recorded.

191 sk women (age range, 28-83 years) who had 92 suspicious lesions with negative findings at mammography

192 nitiated it, whether the physician noted any suspicious lesions, and, if so, how lesions were managed

193 l-thickness punch biopsies are indicated for suspicious lesions, whereas shaves and small punch biops

194 as to instruct on proper biopsy technique of suspicious lesions.

195 preoperative colonoscopy were noted to have suspicious lesions.

196 or directed fine-needle aspiration biopsy of suspicious lesions.

197 delivering precise quantitative analysis of suspicious lesions.

198 ed for initial prostate biopsies and had one suspicious (Likert scale score, >/=3) focus at prebiopsy

199 an inform noninvasively on the malignancy of suspicious liver lesions by differentiating between beni

200 oth FNAB and CNB were obtained from the same suspicious LN.

201 conserving therapy who do not have palpable, suspicious lymph nodes, who have tumors 3.0 cm or smalle

202 ntrally reviewed and classified as normal or suspicious lymph nodes.

203 x confirmed Hodgkin's lymphoma patients, two suspicious lymphoma cases, and two patients with reactiv

204 Suspicious macular configurations are easy to recognize

205 lementary device, for real-time diagnosis of suspicious margins of dissected tumors to declare more p

206 Annual screening mammogram demonstrated a suspicious mass in the left breast.

207 n be used as a reference when a child with a suspicious mass is encountered.

208 hs later he saw an urologist, who palpated a suspicious mass on the left testicle; an ultrasound conf

209 Diagnostic imaging reveals a suspicious mass, and core biopsy confirms invasive ducta

210 d reconstructed into a volume encompassing a suspicious mass, identified by a radiologist-defined ell

211 Renal transplant recipients with suspicious masses or cancer or both can safely undergo n

212 SILV showed a significant difference between suspicious melanoma and each suspicious atypia group: me

213 Conclusion The recall rate for suspicious microcalcifications at mammographic screening

214 Background Trends in the detection of suspicious microcalcifications at mammography screening

215 the positive predictive value for recall for suspicious microcalcifications from 51% to 33% (P < .001

216 The recalls of suspicious microcalcifications from all radiology report

217 tion help predict the risk of malignancy for suspicious microcalcifications.

218 d at mammography screening, 3556 of whom had suspicious microcalcifications.

219 geted biopsy; nearly 100% of men with highly suspicious MRI lesions are diagnosed with CaP; ability t

220 ssified mutations suggests that there are 10 suspicious mutations likely to cause diseases, and there

221 A total of 258 (28.5%) had a suspicious nerve, 62 (6.8%) had ocular hypertension, 102

222 omas were labeled UDN and as morphologically suspicious nevi by the 9 dermatologists.

223 In cases of laser removal of tattoos, hidden suspicious nevi may be revealed gradually.

224 mber of nevi labeled UDN and morphologically suspicious nevi, specificity of lesion-focused analysis

225 focused analysis to identify morphologically suspicious nevi.

226 US-guided FNA in the most suspicious node at US, or the largest node if all appear

227 Patients with AUS-suspicious nodes had a greater number of positive nodes

228 tal examination was performed and revealed a suspicious nodule in the right lobe of the prostate with

229 from 24 thyroid patients having at least one suspicious nodule.

230 ph node involvement, and determining whether suspicious nodules are malignant.

231 so found in benign nodules, testing only GEC suspicious nodules may be helpful in avoiding false posi

232 The overall referral rate for suspicious nodules was 2.1%.

233 w-up examinations required for the workup of suspicious nodules.

234 hieve a more conservative management for non-suspicious nodules.

235 ucing the large number of benign biopsies of suspicious nodules.

236 e hundred forty-one patients with clinically suspicious of CBDS but negative ERC, who had received ES

237 (by the presence of symptoms, signs, or test suspicious of colonic pathology or by family history of

238 The same scholars who are suspicious of generalization are reluctant to embrace ev

239 e (IOP) >21 mmHg or an optic disc appearance suspicious of glaucoma.

240 vely) in our Department as either typical or suspicious of hemangioma 1.5-4 years earlier were enroll

241 T was found in detecting cases of small foci suspicious of lytic lesions on skull radiographs, seen a

242 ho encourage young people to be vigilant and suspicious of others?

243 findings, or (2) mobile mass detected on THV suspicious of thrombus, irrespective of dysfunction and

244 Two orbits from 2 children rated as "suspicious of tumor" received intravenous chemotherapy w

245 ment and judged them as "definitive tumor," "suspicious of tumor," "postsurgical condition/scar forma

246 The biopsy finding of TE classified as "suspicious of UOC" was compared with the following endpo

247 s (41 breasts) were diagnosed with cancer: 8 suspicious on both ultrasound and mammography, 12 on ult

248 were classified as benign, indeterminate, or suspicious on the basis of US characteristics at retrosp

249 4.3 mm (range, 4-25 mm), and LNs, which were suspicious only in CT or MRI, presented with a mean size

250 nts with visual acuity of worse than 6/12 or suspicious optic discs had detailed examination includin

251 atients with positive family history or with suspicious optic nerve head findings for complete ophtha

252 alified Health Centers detected high rate of suspicious optic nerves, ocular hypertension, and retina

253 spectroscopy of the breast was performed in suspicious or biopsy-proved malignant lesions that were

254 cues indicative of a potential threat (i.e., suspicious or fearful facial expression).

255 gery is favored in patients with concomitant suspicious or malignant thyroid nodules, coexisting hype

256 n to chronic AMR occurred also in cases with suspicious or nondiagnostic findings).

257 stic categories included negative, atypical, suspicious, or positive.

258 Suspicious, oxidase-positive isolates are serotyped in m

259 For women with no suspicious, palpable axillary nodes who undergo breast-c

260 y substance of interest) was used to locate "suspicious" particles among various residues present in

261 ive and feasible screening methods to triage suspicious patients to CT are needed.

262 One hundred thirty (71.8%) of 181 AUS-suspicious patients were node positive at surgery compar

263 as identification on the model of clinically suspicious pigmented lesions, lesions needing a biopsy,

264 esponse time, scan prescription data to flag suspicious purchasing patterns and alert physicians and

265 esions in menopausal patients exhibited less suspicious quantitative and qualitative characteristics

266 The control subjects had suspicious radiographs, had undergone CT within 24 hours

267 rmed in 130 consecutive patients with cancer-suspicious regions (CSRs) on multiparametric MR images o

268 equences) was followed by targeted biopsy of suspicious regions and systematic sextant sampling.

269 Traditionally, the treatment of suspicious renal masses was radical nephrectomy.

270 tion, purity, concentration, and toxicity of suspicious samples containing ricin in less than 30 minu

271 nient sensing methods for detecting ricin in suspicious samples must be developed.

272 n different atypia subgroups in the group of suspicious samples.

273 ears), who gave informed consent and who had suspicious screening mammograms and an indication for bi

274 Microcalcifications are considered suspicious signs of breast cancer and a breast biopsy is

275 Of the 22 clinically suspicious sites evaluated in 5 patients (4 men, 1 woman

276 By detecting and mapping suspicious sites, guided biopsy of invisible, precancero

277 tapes for collecting and fixing cells from a suspicious skin area and transferring the cells into a s

278 Latent yaws was defined as lack of suspicious skin lesions or presence of ulcers negative f

279 mple bedside evaluation of itch and pain for suspicious skin lesions.

280 implementable tool for physicians evaluating suspicious skin lesions.

281 d data addressing potential overtreatment of suspicious skin lesions.

282 Suspicious spirit samples from Russia and Kenya were ana

283 and thereby improves large area scanning of suspicious surfaces.

284 Suspicious symptoms should be appropriately investigated

285 n for health-care teams, prompt diagnosis of suspicious symptoms) should be strictly followed in pati

286 oing research, clinical problems such as the suspicious thyroid fine needle aspiration, better treatm

287 Several DNA viruses are highly suspicious to have oncogenic effects in humans.

288 nd negative predictive values for individual suspicious ultrasound features were also assessed.

289 Depending on the constellation or number of suspicious ultrasound features, a fine-needle biopsy is

290 2 was an asymptomatic 42-year-old woman with suspicious ultrasound findings in her left breast; contr

291 study, we selected cases of natural and non-suspicious unnatural death referred to Her Majesty's (HM

292 the sum of the volumes of ROIs classified as suspicious uptake.

293 nt cohort and classified as nonsuspicious or suspicious uptake.

294 iotherapy for uveal melanoma, 2 patients had suspicious uveoscleral nevi, and 1 patient had invasive

295 mutations per sample +/- 21), intermediately suspicious via multiparametric MR imaging (31 mutations

296 sis (34 mutations per sample +/- 19), mildly suspicious via multiparametric MR imaging (37 mutations

297 A significant excess of both parameters in suspicious wines were found in reference to authentic va

298 ending mycology results) among patients with suspicious wounds.

299 could help exclude malignancy in women with suspicious x-ray screening mammograms.

300 was correctly identified as nonsuspicious or suspicious, yielding 85% classification accuracy, 80% se