コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 art failure hospitalization in patients with systolic heart failure.
2 e, and reduced cost of care in patients with systolic heart failure.
3 trial was conducted of 6800 outpatients with systolic heart failure.
4 prognostic implications among patients with systolic heart failure.
5 nd is at least as common in the community as systolic heart failure.
6 urvival benefit in patients with nonischemic systolic heart failure.
7 stination therapy in patients with end-stage systolic heart failure.
8 ted cardiomyopathy (DCM), a leading cause of systolic heart failure.
9 d to reduce hospitalization and mortality in systolic heart failure.
10 that is in clinical trials for treatment of systolic heart failure.
11 ailability and muscle power in patients with systolic heart failure.
12 iorespiratory fitness (CRF) in patients with systolic heart failure.
13 ure in patients with decompensated end-stage systolic heart failure.
14 ure in patients with decompensated end-stage systolic heart failure.
15 reasingly prevalent in patients with chronic systolic heart failure.
16 vabradine reduces afterload of patients with systolic heart failure.
17 ct of isolated HR reduction in patients with systolic heart failure.
18 ardiac contractility is a central feature of systolic heart failure.
19 ivator, omecamtiv mecarbil, in patients with systolic heart failure.
20 n may provide a new therapeutic approach for systolic heart failure.
21 rral cohort representing a broad spectrum of systolic heart failure.
22 stic and prognostic utility in patients with systolic heart failure.
23 ing is the principal cause of progression of systolic heart failure.
24 in children and adolescents with symptomatic systolic heart failure.
25 having symptoms that could be attributed to systolic heart failure.
26 emerged as an important therapy for advanced systolic heart failure.
27 igh morbidity and mortality in patients with systolic heart failure(2,3) or have shown a very modest
28 We prospectively recruited 30 adults with systolic heart failure +/-21 days from LVAD implantation
29 rom 39 patients with decompensated end-stage systolic heart failure (92% male), aged 56 +/- 13 years.
31 daily with placebo in patients with ischemic systolic heart failure according to baseline high sensit
32 pathogenic variant status and associate with systolic heart failure across various clinical settings.
39 valuated and is used in select patients with systolic heart failure and chronic stable angina without
41 ital heart disease patients with symptomatic systolic heart failure and electrical dyssynchrony, CRT
43 is widely used for the treatment of chronic systolic heart failure and hypertension, and has been de
45 of ventricular systole are characteristic of systolic heart failure and might be improved by a new th
48 -blind trial, we assigned 2278 patients with systolic heart failure and mild-to-moderate anemia (hemo
51 uired to be monitored for the development of systolic heart failure and reduction of left ventricular
52 iews data from randomized clinical trials in systolic heart failure and the interactions between base
53 eatment for patients with moderate to severe systolic heart failure and ventricular dyssynchrony.
54 ents that clinically have both diastolic and systolic heart failure and will soon become the most com
57 ined ventricular tachycardia with syncope or systolic heart failure as a result of ischemic or nonisc
58 ntagonists improve outcomes in patients with systolic heart failure but may induce worsening of renal
61 an exercise training trial for patients with systolic heart failure, cardiopulmonary exercise tests w
62 brillator (ICD) in patients with symptomatic systolic heart failure caused by coronary artery disease
63 urvival benefit in patients with nonischemic systolic heart failure during a median follow-up of 5.6
64 urvival benefit in patients with nonischemic systolic heart failure during a median follow-up of 5.6
66 m coenzyme Q in 1,191 patients with ischemic systolic heart failure enrolled in CORONA (Controlled Ro
67 y profile) in patients with mild symptoms of systolic heart failure, even in those already receiving
68 s with New York Heart Association class I/II systolic heart failure exhibit left ventricular (LV) rev
70 h greater proportional representation in the systolic heart failure group; all 12 SNPs were confirmed
71 proved systolic function in a sheep model of systolic heart failure (heart failure with reduced eject
73 ished adjunctive treatment for patients with systolic heart failure (HF) and ventricular dyssynchrony
74 ng at night ("sleep apnea") in patients with systolic heart failure (HF) have failed to improve progn
78 ommend digoxin for patients with symptomatic systolic heart failure (HF) receiving optimal medical th
79 remodeling associated with the transition to systolic heart failure (HF) were examined in the spontan
87 tractile failure during cardiac ischemia and systolic heart failure, in part due to decreased excitat
90 defibrillators in drug abusers with chronic systolic heart failure is both sensitive and controversi
94 trolled trial, 556 patients with symptomatic systolic heart failure (left ventricular ejection fracti
95 fication of mRNA decapping as a mechanism of systolic heart failure may open the way to the developme
96 RVEF) can identify patients with nonischemic systolic heart failure more likely to benefit from ICD i
97 CD implantation in patients with symptomatic systolic heart failure not caused by coronary artery dis
100 echocardiographic analysis in patients with systolic heart failure obtained from a variety of invest
101 efibrillators] in Patients With Non-Ischemic Systolic Heart Failure on Mortality) did not demonstrate
102 illators [ICDs] in Patients With Nonischemic Systolic Heart Failure on Mortality) found that primary-
103 illators [ICDs] in Patients With Nonischemic Systolic Heart Failure on Mortality) found that primary-
105 ficacy of ICDs in Patients With Non-Ischemic Systolic Heart Failure on Mortality), adding 4 years of
106 fficacy of ICDs in Patients with Nonischemic Systolic Heart Failure on Mortality), patients with noni
108 ardiomyopathy, defined as a new diagnosis of systolic heart failure or a left ventricular ejection fr
110 ducted a randomized, controlled trial of 223 systolic heart failure patients and compared the effects
112 In a multicenter cohort of 1513 chronic systolic heart failure patients, we measured a contempor
113 ment of patients with moderately symptomatic systolic heart failure, patients experienced thromboembo
114 ure on Mortality), patients with nonischemic systolic heart failure randomized to ICD or control unde
116 ansplantation in ESRD patients with advanced systolic heart failure results in an increase in LVEF, i
117 ontrols and 1,117 Caucasian individuals with systolic heart failure revealed 12 SNPs in the cardiovas
118 gnificantly lower BNP levels than those with systolic heart failure (S-CHF) (413 pg/ml vs. 821 pg/ml,
119 e retrospective cohort had 664 patients with systolic heart failure (SHF) and 399 patients with diast
120 ol group of 35 subjects and 60 patients with systolic heart failure (SHF) were included for compariso
124 enefit of prophylactic ICDs in patients with systolic heart failure that is not due to coronary arter
125 ve pulmonary disease, hypertension, elderly, systolic heart failure, thyroid disease), and CHA(2)DS(2
126 In decompensated patients with advanced systolic heart failure, tissue Doppler-derived mitral E/
128 vabradine and outcomes in chronic HF (SHIFT [Systolic Heart Failure Treatment With the IF Inhibitor I
129 o either placebo or ivabradine in the SHIFT (Systolic Heart Failure Treatment With the If Inhibitor I
131 s in a cohort of patients with non-ischaemic systolic heart failure, using data collected prior to IC
132 a compound that has been developed to treat systolic heart failure via targeting the cardiac myosin
133 prevention ICD in patients with nonischemic systolic heart failure warrants further investigation.
134 ure in patients with decompensated end-stage systolic heart failure was recently challenged, but the
136 In DANISH, 556 patients with nonischemic systolic heart failure were randomized to receive an ICD
137 DANISH trial, 1116 patients with nonischemic systolic heart failure were randomized to receive an ICD
139 au patterns may be observed in patients with systolic heart failure who cannot further increase .Q at
140 tors (PROSe-ICD) enrolled 1189 patients with systolic heart failure who underwent ICD implantation fo
142 ntolerance, they progressively switch toward systolic heart failure with 100% KO mice dying after 13
145 easingly utilized for patients with advanced systolic heart failure, women continue to represent a sm