コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 oration (vitamin D receptor, beta-estradiol, tadalafil).
2 n (0.4 mg) after the last dose of placebo or tadalafil.
3 tor downregulator and U.S. FDA approved drug Tadalafil.
4 e and were attenuated in WTs co-administered tadalafil.
5 ere similar for sildenafil and vardenafil or tadalafil.
6 As, 5 ng/mL for sildenafil, and 10 ng/mL for tadalafil.
7 PDE5 inhibitors sildenafil and vardenafil or tadalafil.
8 tan and sildenafil and 1.52 for bosentan and tadalafil.
9 out mice were treated with either vehicle or tadalafil.
10 ere injected i.p. with vehicle (10% DMSO) or tadalafil (1 mg/kg) with or without KT5823 (KT, PKG bloc
11 - 0.80, 3.7 +/- 0.29, and 11.7 +/- 0.70 nM), tadalafil (1.8 +/- 0.40, 2.4 +/- 0.60, 1.9 +/- 0.37, and
15 ble patients from PHIRST received once-daily tadalafil 20 mg (T20 mg) or 40 mg (T40 mg) (n = 357) in
17 0.71; 95% CL: 0.61-0.82; P < 0.0001) and vs tadalafil (28%; geometric mean ratio 0.72; 95% CL: 0.64-
18 95% CI, 0.79-2.61) for the addition of daily tadalafil, 3.50 (95% CI, 0.22-6.78) for the addition of
20 pertension and Response to Tadalafil) study, tadalafil 40 mg improved exercise capacity and delayed c
21 safety of M/T FDC vs macitentan 10 mg and vs tadalafil 40 mg monotherapies in PAH patients, including
24 the time course of nitrate interaction with tadalafil, a phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitor with a
26 ypertension who was receiving treatment with tadalafil, a phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor, developed bi
28 is study was designed to evaluate effects of tadalafil, a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor used for the
29 ary arterial pressure more dramatically than tadalafil, a standard-of-care therapy for human pulmonar
33 ved combination therapy with ambrisentan and tadalafil, ambrisentan and placebo, or tadalafil and pla
35 adrenal cortex and is partially inhibited by tadalafil and other PDE inhibitors; its germline inactiv
36 erence in 6 min walking distance between the tadalafil and placebo groups was 0.5 m (95% CI -11.6 to
37 ean difference in the change in QTcI between tadalafil and placebo was 2.8 ms; tadalafil was equivale
42 se-5 inhibitors (PDE-5i, such as Sildenafil, Tadalafil and Vardenafil, mainly prescribed to treat ere
43 widely-used drugs for erectile dysfunction, tadalafil and vardenafil, trigger bone gain in mice thro
45 and endothelin pathways (eg, ambrisentan and tadalafil), and has shown demonstrable improvement in mo
46 sentan, epoprostenol, selexipag, sildenafil, tadalafil, and beraprost) form a similar class with a si
48 elexipag) versus initial double (macitentan, tadalafil, and placebo) oral therapy in newly diagnosed,
49 study, evaluated initial triple (macitentan, tadalafil, and selexipag) versus initial double (maciten
51 for 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine, sildenafil, tadalafil, and UK-122764, but mutants containing a compl
53 odiesterase-5 (PDE5) inhibitors (sildenafil, tadalafil, and vardenafil) are agents currently in clini
54 (finasteride), phosphodiesterase inhibitors (tadalafil), anticholinergics (trospium), and beta3 agoni
59 , D803P, L804M, N806D, I813L, S815K) reduces tadalafil binding affinity to levels characteristic of P
60 rogated the preservation of LV function with tadalafil by decline in FS to 17+/-1% and 23+/-3%, respe
61 inding site for the PDE5-selective inhibitor tadalafil (Cialis(R)) with the corresponding class-speci
63 resent study, we investigated the effects of tadalafil (Cialis), a long acting PDE5 inhibitor, on bra
64 ITION [a Study of First-Line Ambrisentan and Tadalafil Combination Therapy in Subjects with Pulmonary
65 rapy with 10 mg of ambrisentan plus 40 mg of tadalafil (combination-therapy group), 10 mg of ambrisen
66 c BP fell below 85 mm Hg in more subjects on tadalafil compared with placebo (p < 0.05), with no diff
67 diotherapy for prostate cancer, daily use of tadalafil compared with placebo did not result in improv
68 wenty-one participants were assigned 5 mg of tadalafil daily and 121 were assigned placebo for 24 wee
69 s were randomized to M/T FDC, macitentan, or tadalafil depending on their PAH treatment (treatment-na
72 r (CB1158) or phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor (tadalafil) during radiation therapy (RT) successfully ab
73 duced AMPK phosphorylation and abrogated the tadalafil effect on high glucose stimulation of laminin
74 m) with fixed moderate-dose hydroxyurea plus tadalafil (experimental arm) in 64 males (aged 18-40 yea
78 signal of higher all-cause mortality in the tadalafil group (hazard ratio, 5.10 [95% CI, 1.10-23.69]
82 to placebo and 17 patients (27%) assigned to tadalafil (hazard ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.52-2.01]; P=0.9
83 and phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors (such as tadalafil) improve lower urinary tract symptoms (mean im
84 trate that treatment of ischemic stroke with tadalafil improved functional recovery, which was associ
86 Study subjects from the clinical trial of tadalafil in PAH, a 16-week, parallel-group, randomized
87 n-to-treat population of the Ambrisentan and Tadalafil in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertensi
90 E inhibitor, and siRNA against CSE inhibited tadalafil-induced AMPK phosphorylation and abrogated the
92 le guanylyl cyclase, respectively, abolished tadalafil induction of H2S and AMPK phosphorylation.
97 stereochemistry of all four stereoisomers of tadalafil is determined using vibrational circular dichr
98 , we contemplated that cardioprotection with tadalafil is mediated by hydrogen sulfide (H(2)S) signal
102 combination of the ERA macitentan and PDE5i tadalafil (M/T FDC) in a once-daily, single tablet would
103 inhibitors, such as sildenafil, vardenafil, tadalafil, mirodenafil, and udenafil, and hormonal treat
104 re the Efficacy and Safety of Macitentan and Tadalafil Monotherapies With the Corresponding Fixed-dos
107 group), or 40 mg of tadalafil plus placebo (tadalafil-monotherapy group), all administered once dail
110 0 patients were randomly assigned to receive tadalafil (n=60) or placebo (n=60), of whom 56 (93%) ver
111 al in healthy men were compared (placebo and tadalafil [n = 90], with a subset [n = 61] receiving all
114 ial combination therapy with ambrisentan and tadalafil on long-term outcomes in patients with pulmona
115 eriments the influence of the PDE5 inhibitor tadalafil on the development of doxorubicin-induced card
116 addition increased binding affinity of [(3)H]tadalafil or [(3)H]vardenafil, an effect presumably medi
117 affinities for cGMP, vardenafil, sildenafil, tadalafil, or 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX) were re
118 y of V782A for cGMP, vardenafil, sildenafil, tadalafil, or IBMX was reduced 5.5-, 23-, 10-, 3-, and 1
119 onophosphate biological pathway (sildenafil, tadalafil, or riociguat), prostacyclin pathway agonists
120 (ambrisentan-monotherapy group), or 40 mg of tadalafil plus placebo (tadalafil-monotherapy group), al
122 l test of equivalence, placebo and high-dose tadalafil produced equivalent effects on the QT interval
125 ial combination therapy with ambrisentan and tadalafil reduces the risk of clinical failure events co
127 ial combination therapy with ambrisentan and tadalafil resulted in a significantly lower risk of clin
128 igher vardenafil potency over sildenafil and tadalafil results from stronger contacts with Tyr-612, G
129 0 (79%; 95% CI, 70%-88%) assigned to receive tadalafil retained erectile function between weeks 28 an
131 Treatment with PDE5 inhibitors and daily tadalafil, shockwaves, or a vacuum device was associated
133 ont combination therapy with ambrisentan and tadalafil significantly improved hemodynamics, RV struct
134 r iNOS and 1400W, an iNOS blocker, inhibited tadalafil stimulation of CSE expression and AMPK phospho
136 monary Arterial Hypertension and Response to Tadalafil) study, tadalafil 40 mg improved exercise capa
137 daily administration of the PDE-5 inhibitor, tadalafil (TAD) will attenuate inflammation, improve fas
138 esponding to maximum plasma concentration of tadalafil, the mean difference in the change in QTcI bet
139 mans, in whom vardenafil is more potent than tadalafil, the relative potencies were reversed with res
140 modeling revealed a higher binding energy of tadalafil to mouse PDE5A compared with vardenafil, due t
141 These findings do not support daily use of tadalafil to prevent erectile dysfunction in these patie
144 g a sheep model of advanced HF, we show that tadalafil treatment improves contractile function, rever
146 ubules in HF and their restoration following tadalafil treatment involves the BAR domain protein Amph
148 dication supply disruption, does not support tadalafil use in patients with heart failure with preser
149 overy of antimalarial compounds derived from tadalafil, using a drug-to-genome-to-drug approach.
152 nding systolic BP at 8 and 24 h after taking tadalafil versus placebo (p < 0.02), with no significant
153 cI between tadalafil and placebo was 2.8 ms; tadalafil was equivalent to placebo (a priori, upper lim
156 was less, but affinity of H613A or F786A for tadalafil was weakened 37- and 17-fold, respectively.
159 s the target for sildenafil, vardenafil, and tadalafil, which are drugs for treatment of erectile dys
161 ion of the three-dimensional distribution of tadalafil within a Cialis tablet to a depth of >140 mum.
162 on, we hypothesized that PKG activation with tadalafil would limit myocardial ischemia/reperfusion (I