コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 d mind wandering and decreased monitoring of task performance.
2 ship between striatal D2/3R availability and task performance.
3 luding sensitivity to reward and anticipated task performance.
4 ate-in order to model distinct components of task performance.
5 afety period that corresponded to subsequent task performance.
6 rk activity with behavioral aspects of motor task performance.
7 increase was associated with improvements in task performance.
8 rest pre- and post-T1 microsaccades affected task performance.
9 ger spatial segments, which are relevant for task performance.
10 concentration) was not clearly correlated to task performance.
11 alpha-band networks, which in turn impaired task performance.
12 reflect a causal contribution of neurons to task performance.
13 measure participants' brain activity during task performance.
14 dual differences in factors such as baseline task performance.
15 but not variations in power predict correct task performance.
16 s in dACC, measured with fMRI, and cognitive task performance.
17 in higher cortical fields, especially during task performance.
18 lations (rnoise) in rhesus macaque A1 during task performance.
19 ng MD excitability was sufficient to enhance task performance.
20 functional recruitment of these areas during task performance.
21 both areas show similar tuning curves during task performance.
22 eal flexibility over timescales relevant for task performance.
23 parietal control area 7a during attentional task performance.
24 wn mistakes can serve as a signal to improve task performance.
25 of the primary task and compared with single-task performance.
26 incorrect decisions serves to improve future task performance.
27 task performance, it impaired force-tracking task performance.
28 e was positively correlated with cooperation task performance.
29 campal-prefrontal synchrony seen during dual-task performance.
30 terns of grey matter atrophy associated with task performance.
31 ttending to global landmarks did not benefit task performance.
32 and subjective effort induced by continuous task performance.
33 ed the pattern of cortical activation during task performance.
34 Chemogenetic silencing of GC impaired task performance.
35 fects of a competing task were influenced by task performance.
36 g on distraction probability, thereby aiding task performance.
37 coactivation during many different kinds of task performance.
38 ss the entire MD cortex is correlated during task performance.
39 efrontal cortex predicts working memory (WM) task performance.
40 y the level of influence of each node during task performance.
41 striatal adaptation was related to improved task performance.
42 n of the reward zone by deep cells predicted task performance.
43 m suppresses neurons that may interfere with task performance.
44 re encoding task-relevant information during task performance.
45 his finding was not driven by differences in task performance.
46 ay reduce elements of interference affecting task performance.
47 ic tasks, but deactivated during nonsemantic task performance.
48 -level task performance and inferior complex-task performance.
49 alpha lateralization significantly affected task performance.
50 ropped markedly for subjects with the lowest task performance.
51 d flow PET scans acquired at rest and during task performance.
52 tive correlation between this activation and task performance.
53 t task-irrelevant information for successful task performance.
54 recording simultaneous single neurons during task performance.
55 by task difficulty, despite their successful task performance.
56 ificantly improved brief visuospatial memory task performance.
57 ween distributed neural circuits that enable task performance.
58 s is suggested to be required for successful task performance.
59 , the subordinate RSNs were activated during task performance.
60 resting activity patterns are important for task performance.
61 licit processes that simultaneously subserve task performance.
62 at was associated with lesser improvement in task performance.
63 broadband gamma frequency activity predicted task performance.
64 and did not differ from control subjects on task performance.
65 a compensatory mechanism that helps maintain task performance.
66 ent effect of D1-like receptor activation on task performance.
67 and shell to evaluate neural activity during task performance.
68 ed with higher executive capacity and better task performance.
69 s to the transition of tone sequences during task performance.
70 as and left precuneus associated with better task performance.
71 patients, using EEG during cognitive control task performance.
72 inhibition of visual cortex activity impairs task performance.
73 e inferior frontal sulcus at rest and during task performance.
74 vidual differences in effort-based motivated task performance.
75 od as movement away from systems involved in task performance.
76 f network dynamics with behavioral state and task performance.
77 -choice versus 5-choice serial reaction time task performance.
78 o more stable temporal dynamics and improved task performance.
79 age range 40-45 years affecting near visual task performance.
80 e fact that both groups exhibited equivalent task performance.
81 ation in hippocampal neurons correlated with task performance.
82 not solely driven by simplification of overt task performance.
83 of metabolism, in human visual cortex during task performance.
84 reasing task difficulty and rTMS benefits on task performance.
85 es in the interplay between pain and ongoing task performance.
86 away from neural motifs seen during complex task performance.
87 tial DA-BOLD association may be modulated by task performance.
88 ity, which was itself associated with poorer task performance.
89 tively regulate motor variability to improve task performance.
90 ing, which were themselves related to better task performance.
91 H infusion into the dorsomedial PFC improved task performance.
92 visual processing of the target and increase task performance.
93 effective recruitment of this region during task performance.
94 ensory comparison is no longer requested for task performance, a major proportion of directional corr
97 ted with the magnitude of SZ hallucinations, task performance and an independent measure of verbal wo
98 lly observed inverted-U relationship between task performance and arousal and that optimal detection
99 nderstood to diminish cognitive control over task performance and can thus undermine functioning acro
100 pendent effects in PFC were not explained by task performance and did not conform to established loca
101 er neural suppression is reflected in visual task performance and fMRI measures in ASD, and may be at
104 imate frequency coupling that sheds light on task performance and helps neuroscientists accurately ca
105 icient semantic processing leading to better task performance and imply that GABAergic neurochemical
106 sorder (ASD) is marked by superior low-level task performance and inferior complex-task performance.
108 k performance by systematically manipulating task performance and measuring corresponding network act
109 allowed us to assess in what way first-order task performance and metacognition are related to each o
110 ized for correlating frequency coupling with task performance and other relevant task phenomena.
111 n, impaired in psychosis and associated with task performance and schizotypy (schizotypy correlation
112 ssion resulted in a marked reduction in both task performance and sensory processing on the following
113 roup, the ASD group had significantly poorer task performance and significantly lower activation in i
115 in OFC, and decoding accuracy is related to task performance and the occurrence of individual behavi
117 sounds, but only when the animals engaged in task performance and were attentive to the stimuli.
118 ongoing spontaneous activity are modified by task performance and whether/how these intrinsic pattern
120 re any areas additionally activated for dual-task performance, and compared the neural activity and f
122 e goal tracking was associated with improved task performance, and inhibiting eye movements in humans
123 ociations between WM-related brain function, task performance, and neuropsychological functioning.
124 e genetic approaches suggest heritability of task performance, and population genetic studies indicat
125 the relationships among participant effort, task performance, and social connectedness as a function
126 that neural sensitivity was improved during task performance, and this improvement was closely assoc
127 , the more they replayed trajectories during task performance, and this replay was coupled with re-pl
128 standards, use problems with the gown during task performance, and usability and cognitive task load
130 lt-mode network (DMN)] fMRI responses during task performance are dynamically responsive to increasin
132 a new derived quantity that illustrates how task performance arises from the interaction of active e
133 refers to a long-term enhancement of visual task performance as a result of visual experience [1-6].
136 essing and striatal regions activated during task performance as well as the relationship of these re
137 n the T1D group was correlated with improved task performance (as indexed by shorter response times t
139 nts and their unaffected relatives preserves task performance at low task loads but is insufficient t
140 These effects were not due to differences in task performance, because accuracy was matched across th
141 Results indicated that, despite equivalent task performance between the 2 groups, children with T1D
142 behavior or brain response, or for cognitive task performance beyond those specifically trained.
143 ape of brain reconfigurations that accompany task performance both within and between four cognitive
144 on-coding transcripts weakly correlates with task performance (brood care vs. foraging), but not affe
145 imposes a negative impact on attention-based task performance, but also has been associated with enha
146 f transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) on task performance, but it is unclear whether these effect
147 terior cingulate cortex inactivation impacts task performance, but only orbitofrontal inactivation re
148 oups did not differ in online working memory task performance, but the transcranial direct current st
150 to minimize mental effort expenditure during task performance by avoiding decisions that require grea
151 en metacognitive performance and first-order task performance by recording EEG signals while particip
153 ationship between network activity and human task performance by systematically manipulating task per
154 this covariation reflects simplification of task performance by the nervous system so that muscles w
161 h congenital limb deficiency showed superior task performance compared to age-matched children, but h
162 G) changes in absence seizures with impaired task performance compared with seizures in which perform
164 nd physiological stress predicted individual task performance, consistent with an adaptive role for s
166 in breathing pattern that are time locked to task performance could also lead to confounding effects
167 agnetic resonance (fMRI) imaging during RiSE task performance could help to specify dysfunctional neu
172 or to multiple cortical areas just prior to task performance decreases variability during task-relev
174 ts is frequently ascribed to improvements in task performance due to division of labour amongst worke
175 ion of the default network can contribute to task performance during an externally directed executive
178 e (i.e., "distractors"), frequently modulate task performance, even when consistently paired with a p
181 sic network configuration for domain-general task performance experience more efficient network updat
182 We then determined how adaptation affects task performance for mice of both sexes and tested which
183 s to develop an objective tool based on dual-task performance for screening early-stage Alzheimer's d
186 elation between the network activity and the task performance from trial to trial, offering a means o
187 tightly coupled to both musical training and task performance, further supporting a role for cortical
190 he gamma band activity associated with motor task performance has its origins in the pallido-subthala
192 le for sensorimotor activation in conceptual task performance have suffered the caveat of lesions bei
193 anxiety (ICC = 0.66) and threat-potentiated task performance (ICC = 0.58) showed clinically useful t
195 feedback to shift arousal state and increase task performance in accordance with the Yerkes-Dodson la
196 ctional connectivity strength was related to task performance in ASD, whereas that between dorsolater
197 been linked directly to successful cognitive task performance in external-task-positive regions but n
198 ship between free-living sleep and cognitive task performance in healthy adolescents is less clear th
199 or lobe were additionally activated for dual-task performance in healthy controls and for motor task
201 e if the effect of bilateral STN DBS on dual-task performance in isolated patients with dystonia, who
202 ine receptor (nAChR) agonist, normalized MSO task performance in ketamine-treated rats and this effec
203 unds, SZ lacked the correlation of iHGP with task performance in posterior superior temporal gyrus (S
206 ascular risk factors, and neuropsychological task performance in the domains of learning and memory,
207 brain activity is reported to maintain motor task performance in the face of motor fatigue and cognit
208 between breastfeeding and specific cognitive task performance in the first 2 y of life, particularly
210 nce imaging abnormalities are evident during task performance, including impaired deactivation of the
214 on model--is now regularly used to decompose task performance into underlying processes such as the q
215 ation are effectively the same: if objective task performance is above chance, there is likely consci
217 le manage this relationship between pain and task performance is essential to understanding the disru
218 tes that variability in brain signals during task performance is related to brain maturation in old a
219 ain's functional network architecture during task performance is shaped primarily by an intrinsic net
220 -positive computation, we find that animals' task performance is susceptible to subtle perturbations
222 ile punishment improved serial reaction time task performance, it impaired force-tracking task perfor
227 inhibition using a combination of behavioral task performance measures, electromyography, electroence
228 strategy offered a significant advantage in task performance measures, indicating that either may be
229 PN) predicted interindividual differences in task performance more accurately than other fMRI and PET
230 onstrated slower walking speeds, slower near task performance, more frequent driving cessation, and l
231 amental relationships between learning rate, task performance, network size, and intrinsic noise in n
232 symptom onset and is evident despite normal task performance, neural responses during failed inhibit
233 kingly similar to the impairments in complex task performance observed in patients with diabetes, whi
237 f in freewill is endorsed, is independent of task performance or motivation, and is reversed when fre
238 ena in which one sensory modality influences task performance or perception in another sensory modali
240 even transiently during the delay, impaired task performance, primarily by increasing inappropriate
244 ial relationship between pain perception and task performance revealed that pain's disruptive effects
245 lifies the decrement in cognitive-motor dual-task performance seen when moving from a single-task to
246 local field potentials were recorded during task performance simultaneously from VTA and mPFC, two r
247 ions of sensory feedback, motor control, and task performance strategy, and will likely be effective
248 es in modularity were correlated with memory task performance, such that lower modularity levels were
249 get presentation are associated with reduced task performance, suggesting that oculomotor freezing mi
250 arger trade-offs between pain perception and task performance, suggesting that these psychological fa
251 at rest and reduced neural activation during task performance suggests enhanced neural efficiency in
252 between beta power during working memory and task performance suggests that working memory representa
253 n inverse-U relationship between arousal and task performance, suggests that there is a state of arou
254 ecision of vision or proprioception improved task performance (target matching with the seen or felt
257 he monkeys showed behavioral improvements in task performance that were accompanied by rapid and long
259 been linked to spatial memory, attention and task performance, the cellular and network origin of the
260 also significantly predicted improvement in task performance, the distinct post-intervention coordin
262 nsion and so have identical contributions to task performance; the biarticular rectus femoris (RF) pr
263 f the neural response becomes smaller during task performance, thereby improving neural detection thr
264 osed by response variability diminish during task performance, thereby improving the sensitivity of n
265 rge rate can be modulated transiently during task performance, thereby increasing the signal-to-noise
266 heta phase synchrony and improved arithmetic task performance, thereby underlining the functional rel
267 l information in the context of hierarchical task performance, they exhibit dissociable profiles in t
268 ory, only information in S1 is important for task performance through pathways that do not necessaril
271 ined functional imaging data recorded during task performance to see how the opportunity to experienc
272 ween increased psychosis RPS and reduced MID task performance (uncorrected P = .03 for RPS model 4, 0
273 ontent predicts individual differences in WM task performance using a novel behavioral approach.
275 Behavioral assessment showed that fine motor task performance was altered in children of ll mothers a
282 Crucially, the effect of 10 Hz flicker on task performance was predicted by the distance between 1
286 By examining functional connectivity during task performance, we extend previous findings suggesting
287 -group differences in neural activity during task performance were assessed using a whole-brain, mixe
288 rrant computational parameters of the Stroop task performance were associated with aberrant inhibitor
290 While Motifs occurring during cognitive task performance were more likely to have more matches i
291 outcomes and indicated that the deficits in task performance were plausibly explained by elevated se
292 ng an increase in adaptive drive in upcoming task performance when motor errors are largest in magnit
294 ral and model classifiers achieve their best task performance when they accumulate evidence over a ti
295 ectivity, which was related to its effect on task performance, whereas this connection was enhanced b
296 berately re-aimed their movements to improve task performance, which may be associated with the inhib
297 aneously restored awake dynamics and the top task performance while the anesthetic was still being in
298 's computational capability by comparing its task performance with a standard machine learning techni
300 MOD-treated patients who exhibited improved task performance with treatment also showed greater trea