ライフサイエンスコーパス: telephone interview

1 DMPA use were collected by computer-assisted telephone interview.

2 istory was obtained from chart review or via telephone interview.

3 factors were obtained using a questionnaire/telephone interview.

4 ty and completed a semistructured diagnostic telephone interview.

5 night eating syndrome with a semistructured telephone interview.

6 ts treated for KC with MMS were selected for telephone interview.

7 medication use were collected via structured telephone interview.

8 ember 31, 1995, participated in a structured telephone interview.

9 logical risk factors were assessed through a telephone interview.

10 ite the person to participate in a 30-minute telephone interview.

11 retrospectively from mothers in a structured telephone interview.

12 le of 58 bioptic drivers was administered by telephone interview.

13 inical and demographic data were obtained by telephone interview.

14 Risk factors were assessed in a telephone interview.

15 performed, and follow-up was established by telephone interview.

16 inical and demographic data were obtained by telephone interview.

17 story and other risk factors was obtained by telephone interview.

18 -up was obtained by mailed questionnaire and telephone interview.

19 d AD were assessed by structured psychiatric telephone interview.

20 take part then underwent a computer-assisted telephone interview.

21 1 were surveyed by written questionnaire and telephone interview.

22 design, and data were collected by means of telephone interview.

23 ects were asked to participate in a detailed telephone interview.

24 eight, and other factors were ascertained by telephone interview.

25 ischarge by chart review and at follow-up by telephone interview.

26 ood frequency questionnaire and a structured telephone interview.

27 f 50.1 years elected to respond to SRPMs via telephone interview.

28 assessed at baseline by a computer-assisted telephone interview.

29 o vaccination were determined by a follow-up telephone interview.

30 medical history was obtained from structured telephone interviews.

31 uestionnaires, review of medical records and telephone interviews.

32 iodontal disease for use via face-to-face or telephone interviews.

33 were obtained from patients by in-person and telephone interviews.

34 Oral health information was obtained from telephone interviews.

35 elf-reported medication use assessed through telephone interviews.

36 ion was collected by use of diary sheets and telephone interviews.

37 and healthcare coverage data via structured telephone interviews.

38 about 50% of eligible participants completed telephone interviews.

39 d transferring), was assessed during monthly telephone interviews.

40 and other risk factors was collected through telephone interviews.

41 osis and as of the study year, in structured telephone interviews.

42 ent in English or Spanish, and available for telephone interviews.

43 el exposures were confirmed through followup telephone interviews.

44 tudy for up to five years by means of annual telephone interviews.

45 llowed longitudinally with office visits and telephone interviews.

46 ast cancer risk factors was obtained through telephone interviews.

47 d MG was performed using medical records and telephone interviews.

48 Data were collected prospectively through telephone interviews.

49 tients' expectations, as determined from the telephone interviews.

50 tory was collected through record review and telephone interviews.

51 estionnaires, review of medical records, and telephone interviews.

52 revious 48 hours in quarterly semistructured telephone interviews.

53 r interrogation, patient questionnaires, and telephone interviews.

54 mined through medical records and by mail or telephone interviews.

55 reakfast cereals reported through structured telephone interviews.

56 ion was obtained from patients' standardized telephone interviews.

57 studies conducted in parallel with cellular telephone interviewing.

58 ride the economic and logistic advantages of telephone interviewing.

59 by trained personnel using computer-assisted telephone interviewing.

60 in 2013 (n = 7,193) using computer-assisted telephone interviewing.

61 visit questionnaire and were available for a telephone interview 1 to 7 days after the visit were inc

62 Mothers completed a computer-assisted telephone interview 1.5-24 months after their estimated

63 xtraction (54%), mailed questionnaires (6%), telephone interviews (1%), or a death registry (1%).

64 Data were from annual telephone interviews (1998-2003) with an observational c

65 ealth care professionals participated in the telephone interviews; 206 completed the survey.

66 Results For the telephone interviews, 239 of 264 (90.6%) FS attendees, 2

67 nonattendees (n = 299) were contacted for a telephone interview 3-6 months after invitation for scre

68 a 4-item assessment of cognitive function at telephone interviews 3 and 12 months after injury.

69 Among LPSP patients available for current telephone interview, 68% subjectively rated their qualit

70 study, we attempted an additional follow-up telephone interview 8 to 14 years after sterilization.

71 139 subjects (67%) who completed a baseline telephone interview, 84 (60%) received test results and

72 We obtained, by telephone interview, a lifetime history of MD, defined b

73 screening intentions), which we assessed by telephone interview about 3 weeks after random allocatio

74 ve status was administered with a structured telephone interview after up to 7 years.

75 5.00 dollars incentive on participation in a telephone interview among cases and controls in an ongoi

76 served were approached for an audio-recorded telephone interview and 15 participated (4 male, 11 fema

77 HSCT survivors completed a telephone interview and a set of questionnaires a mean o

78 The patients were followed up by means of telephone interview and clinical records, with emphasis

79 ed according to dry eye diagnostic codes and telephone interview and completed the Dry Eye Questionna

80 ritis, ascertained through computer-assisted telephone interview and computerized databases.

81 A telephone interview and descriptive analysis detailing d

82 996 comparing supplement data collected in a telephone interview and from a self-administered questio

83 1999, we ascertained respiratory symptoms by telephone interview and have identified 571 incident cas

84 The HC group completed a parallel telephone interview and set of questionnaires.

85 ling controls were administered a structured telephone interview and the Profile of Moods State (POMS

86 or acute coronary syndrome) were assessed by telephone interview and/or medical record review.

87 A telephone interview and/or patients' hospital files conf

88 Participants were given telephone interviews and asked about known and suspected

89 Data were collected by telephone interviews and chart reviews.

90 g major cardiac events were obtained through telephone interviews and chart reviews.

91 Information was collected through telephone interviews and clinical examinations at 3 and

92 Data were collected through telephone interviews and clinical examinations until 13

93 y assessed cross-sectional data derived from telephone interviews and mailed questionnaires completed

94 cancer risk factors were ascertained through telephone interviews and medical record abstractions.

95 ected information on immune diseases through telephone interviews and performed serological analyses

96 ubjective recovery information obtained with telephone interviews and validated questionnaires admini

97 nsvaginal ultrasonography, computer-assisted telephone interview, and follow-up assessment of outcome

98 east cancer risk factors were ascertained by telephone interview, and logistic regression was used to

99 auci-SS, based on a screening questionnaire, telephone interview, and review of medical records.

100 ents' deaths and invited to participate in a telephone interview, and surrogates for 262 cancer patie

101 y of diabetes was obtained by questionnaire, telephone interview, and/or medical record review.

102 ertained through 2013 using cognitive exams, telephone interviews, and hospital and death certificate

103 2008, men were recruited, completed baseline telephone interviews, and were than randomized to receiv

104 ) capability of completing questionnaire and telephone interview; and (5) completion of written infor

105 Subjects (N = 1,800) completed a 43-item telephone interview approximately 3 weeks after screenin

106 risk factors was obtained through structured telephone interviews approximately 1 year after diagnosi

107 viduals with RA, for which annual structured telephone interviews are conducted (n=508 in year 1, n=4

108 red with 332 men and 526 women with landline telephones interviewed as controls for 2 case-control st

109 Questionnaire and telephone interview assessed current bowel function and

110 0 adults participated in a Computer-Assisted Telephone Interview assessing knowledge, stereotypes, pr

111 A mutation carriers completed semistructured telephone interviews assessing self-reported disclosure

112 tion before injury, were followed-up through telephone interview at 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months post

113 ne 2012, through deaths registry linkage and telephone interview at 6-, 12-, 24-, and 36-months posti

114 collected using a detailed computer-assisted telephone interview at approximately 16 weeks of gestati

115 ry Questionnaire, which was administered via telephone interview at baseline and 2 and 6 mo later.

116 Outcomes were assessed by telephone interview at days 3, 7, 10, and 28.

117 We also propose that telephone interview at the end of reporting day is a pot

118 246 patients completed the telephone interview at week 1.

119 Patient outcomes were assessed by means of telephone interviews at 12 and 24 months conducted by ob

120 surgical records and from computer-assisted telephone interviews at 5, 21, and 33 months after prima

121 d at baseline, and at 24 and 48 months, with telephone interviews at 6-month intervals in between.

122 of life was assessed by centrally conducted telephone interviews at baseline and days 50, 106, and 1

123 erican (39%), 745 White (61%)) who completed telephone interviews at baseline and follow-up (on avera

124 elating to self-harm from questionnaires and telephone interviews at eight waves of follow-up, commen

125 Telephone interviews at follow-up were used to collect d

126 taining to self-harm from questionnaires and telephone interviews at seven waves of follow-up, commen

127 mailed buccal-cell collection kits following telephone interviews at the Atlanta, Georgia, study site

128 Follow-up data on families were collected by telephone interview between 1991 and 1996.

129 We conducted telephone interviews beyond thematic saturation (N = 30)

130 pairment over time (score </=8 on a modified Telephone Interview Cognitive Screen).

131 A telephone interview collected information about caffeina

132 A telephone interview collected information about psycholo

133 odalities with a low response burden such as telephone interview, computer-assisted interview, and pr

134 ures were obtained from an annual structured telephone interview conducted by a trained survey worker

135 wup data were obtained via structured 1-hour telephone interviews conducted between 2002 and 2006.

136 diaries completed annually and retrospective telephone interviews conducted every 3 months to age 5 y

137 iled, self-administered questionnaires, with telephone interviews conducted for nonresponders.

138 assic twin genetic analysis using results of telephone interviews conducted from March 2002 through N

139 The first phase included 1-hour qualitative telephone interviews conducted from November to December

140 Telephone interviews conducted in January 2001 with pres

141 Similar results were obtained with the telephone interview data.

142 ental treatment was obtained from structured telephone interviews, dental records, and medical record

143 Telephone interviews done after the index office visit a

144 up was conducted by medical record review or telephone interview during January 2000.

145 Vaccination histories were obtained by telephone interviews during 1995-1996 and were confirmed

146 sessed prospectively via 3 computer-assisted telephone interviews during pregnancy and 6 months after

147 s, respiratory health was assessed weekly by telephone interviews during the first year of life (19,1

148 Risk factor information collected during a telephone interview focused on exposures before and afte

149 on over a 6-month period were eligible for a telephone interview focusing on NSAID use, which include

150 follow-up was available in 86 patients, and telephone interview follow-up was conducted in 85 patien

151 Evaluations included a 25-minute telephone interview followed by a comprehensive mail-in

152 Long-term follow-up was possible by telephone interview for 23 patients (median 36 months, r

153 ns, were associated with lower scores on the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (-0.56 points (

154 gnitive function annually using the modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS-m) and es

155 ate the relationship between AL and Modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS-m) at dis

156 irment, and dementia were assessed using the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status and proxy asses

157 dels using cognitive scores imputed from the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status for participant

158 performance was captured using the modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status test.

159 performance was measured using the Modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status, and functional

160 The Geriatric Depression Scale, Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status, and Medical Ou

161 The Geriatric Depression Scale, Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status, and Medical Ou

162 sured using the modified Rankin scale (mRS), Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status, and Sickness I

163 ive function was assessed using the modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status, supplemented b

164 ive functioning at 12 and 24 mo by using the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status-Modified (TICS-

165 Cognitive impairment was defined using the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status-modified as sco

166 Additional cases were identified through the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status-Modified or inf

167 d patients and by means of clinical visit or telephone interview for surviving patients.

168 Disability was assessed during monthly telephone interviews for a median of 60 months, and part

169 utilization were ascertained during monthly telephone interviews for up to 2 years.

170 ait speed) and were followed up with monthly telephone interviews for up to 5 years to ascertain expo

171 all the women for 5 years by means of annual telephone interviews; for women enrolled early in the st

172 t cough with phlegm among 52,325 subjects by telephone interview from 1999 through 2004.

173 We surveyed daughters 39-47 years of age by telephone interview from 2005 to 2008 to obtain informat

174 roduct use were retrospectively collected in telephone interviews from 2003-2011.

175 They underwent structured psychiatric telephone interviews from February 1996 through Septembe

176 orrelations ranged from 0.10 to 0.49 for the telephone interview group and from 0.02 to 0.67 for the

177 recalled diet ranged from 60% to 69% in the telephone interview group and from 69% to 79% in the sel

178 ollected from medical records and a parental telephone interview (if the child was older than 3 years

179 Information was subsequently verified by telephone interview in 165 cases and 408 controls.

180 -year-old white adults who participated in a telephone interview in 1990-1991.

181 ospital, office, and clinic) in 41 patients, telephone interview in 20, physical, examination in 15,

182 olled in 1993-1997 who completed a follow-up telephone interview in 2005-2010.

183 on); and (iii) a prospective semi-structured telephone interview in a further 142 patients identified

184 Subjects completed telephone interviews in 1988-2001 and answered questions

185 re conducted at baseline and 48 months, with telephone interviews in between.

186 ine, 24, 48, and 72 months, with semi-annual telephone interviews in between.

187 n Bangladesh, Indonesia, Peru, and Tanzania; telephone interviews in the USA) between Oct 28, 2009, a

188 atients or proxies, who were followed-up via telephone interview, including the Glasgow Outcome Scale

189 Via telephone interviews, information was obtained on 4000 c

190 Of these, 695 subjects received a telephone interview involving an abbreviated version of

191 A telephone interview is effective for obtaining consent f

192 Cause of death was determined via telephone interviews, medical records, and autopsy repor

193 Cause was determined via telephone interviews, medical records, autopsy reports,

194 ctive dietary assessment performed by either telephone interview (n = 154) or self-administered FFQ (

195 (mean change: -1; 95% CI: -2.3, 1.4) and the Telephone Interview of Cognitive Status (-0.7; 95% CI: -

196 Cognitive function was assessed using the Telephone Interview of Cognitive Status (range: 0-41) at

197 Using the Telephone Interview of Cognitive Status cut point of </=

198 er Digit Coding Test and on the basis of the Telephone Interview of Cognitive Status) after 1 y.

199 Data were collected using a standardized telephone interview of men from the Vietnam Era Twin Reg

200 Data were from telephone interviews of 511 persons with RA.

201 We used data from medical records and telephone interviews of a random sample of people living

202 Data for the psychometrics came from telephone interviews of a sample of 107 Caucasian/Englis

203 PSOM score was estimated via telephone interview or clinician interview whenever home

204 of the surviving cohort completed at least 1 telephone interview or examination from August 2009 thro

205 re obtained from reporting paediatricians by telephone interview or site visit, and an expert group o

206 y (called delayed PPB) were collected during telephone interviews or hospital visits 7 and 30 days af

207 r the telephone and subjects who refused the telephone interview (P < 0.0001).

208 After a telephone interview, participants collected daily urine

209 During monthly telephone interviews, participants were assessed for dis

210 Through telephone interview, patients completed our self-develop

211 or instructions in their use; during monthly telephone interviews, PEFR rates were not elicited.

212 p from consenting patients' medical records, telephone interviews, physician questionnaires, and the

213 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after PV by using telephone interview questionnaires.

214 Participants completed a telephone interview regarding PCa-specific symptomatolog

215 TO-I Angiographic Study were contacted for a telephone interview regarding their current HRQOL (physi

216 e hundred fifty-nine hospitals completed the telephone interview, resulting in an overall response ra

217 Telephone interviews revealed that 47% donated solely be

218 Participants completed a semistructured telephone interview shortly after their first KT evaluat

219 Participants completed a semi-structured telephone interview shortly after their first KT evaluat

220 Participants completed two telephone interviews (shortly after initiation of transp

221 The goal of our cross-sectional telephone interview study was to generate a diverse samp

222 09, the twins participated in semistructured telephone interviews that primarily focused on psychiatr

223 women (48.3%) who completed the survey and a telephone interview, the weighted prevalence (95% CI) of

224 re extracted from the computerized notes and telephone interviews.The primary outcome was treatment f

225 nsive questionnaire that was administered by telephone interview to 53 patients with WG and 2 control

226 Participants completed a telephone interview to determine whether, after controll

227 Participants completed a telephone interview to measure the prevalence of arthrit

228 tation, the VA LV VFQ-48 was administered by telephone interview to subjects from five sites in the V

229 The VA LV VFQ-48 was administered by telephone interview to subjects with visual acuity rangi

230 d Their Children's Health Study administered telephone interviews to a population-based sample of 2,8

231 eptember 2011.We conducted chart reviews and telephone interviews to characterize North Carolina and

232 ovide qualified justification for the use of telephone interviews to collect axis I and II data.

233 he feasibility of using random digit dialing telephone interviews to locate adults in the continental

234 Each clinician was asked, by telephone interview, to define the probability of revers

235 The automated telephone interview took a mean of 33.5 minutes and was

236 Answers provided during telephone interviews using the Sleep-EVAL system were th

237 made a decision about trial participation, a telephone interview was conducted to assess knowledge of

238 A telephone interview was conducted, recording demographic

239 n day 3, 4, or 5, and on day 14 a structured telephone interview was done blind to the intervention.

240 o select the sample, and a computer-assisted telephone interview was used to collect data on traumati

241 Up to 4 repeated cognitive assessments by telephone interview were completed over 12 years.

242 alidated questionnaires adapted for use in a telephone interview were used to identify people with se

243 A total of 303 diagnostic telephone interviews were completed (178 [58.7%] female

244 Telephone interviews were completed for 302 cases and 55

245 Telephone interviews were completed monthly for more tha

246 S: In this qualitative study, semistructured telephone interviews were conducted between April 2018 a

247 Structured psychiatric telephone interviews were conducted from February 1996 t

248 DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Telephone interviews were conducted in 2007 in a stratif

249 Telephone interviews were conducted to determine the lif

250 Telephone interviews were conducted with 12,385 physicia

251 Telephone interviews were conducted with 13 neovascular

252 In 1993, structured telephone interviews were conducted with 2,445 of 2,977

253 Telephone interviews were conducted with 228 patients an

254 Telephone interviews were conducted with 246 individuals

255 Semistructured telephone interviews were conducted with a purposeful sa

256 Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with a purposive sam

257 Telephone interviews were conducted with a representativ

258 Telephone interviews were conducted with a total of 207

259 Detailed telephone interviews were conducted with affected indivi

260 Telephone interviews were conducted with both cases and

261 iews were conducted with family members, and telephone interviews were conducted with involved health

262 Telephone interviews were conducted with mothers of 662

263 1997 National Immunization Survey, in which telephone interviews were conducted with parents of 3274

264 Computer-assisted telephone interviews were conducted with population-base

265 Telephone interviews were done between November 2012 and

266 NG, AND PARTICIPANTS: One-on-one qualitative telephone interviews were held with English-speaking US

267 Telephone interviews were performed with memory aids mai

268 Medical record reviews and telephone interviews were performed.

269 After 4 months, it was determined via a telephone interview whether or not participants had deci

270 thered by a review of hospital records and a telephone interview with a family member or other inform

271 A standardized telephone interview with a series of trauma probes and a

272 ationally representative survey conducted by telephone interview with decedents' next of kin.

273 ere ascertained through hospital records and telephone interview with relatives.

274 sthma risk factors were collected in 2012 by telephone interviews with 1,643 participants (stage 2) u

275 ncer risk factor data were collected through telephone interviews with 257 nonsmoking lung cancer cas

276 ng 2001 and 2002 data, the authors conducted telephone interviews with 399 women whose child's birth

277 e predictors of such attitudes, we conducted telephone interviews with 561 family members who had rec

278 Data was collected from telephone interviews with 98 service users using a mixtu

279 Telephone interviews with a nationally representative sa

280 We conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with a purposive sample of staff re

281 cted by self-administered questionnaires and telephone interviews with a randomly selected subsample

282 d decisions was collected through structured telephone interviews with an existing cohort of married

283 Cases of chickenpox are identified by telephone interviews with each child's parent(s) every 6

284 We conducted telephone interviews with executives at 609 of the large

285 terviews with surgeons and scrub nurses, and telephone interviews with Infection Control Nurses.

286 of both programs were identified, including telephone interviews with infection preventionists who c

287 rental smoking information was obtained from telephone interviews with mothers of 731 (84.7% of eligi

288 022 and March 2024, in-depth, semistructured telephone interviews with older adults receiving home-de

289 Data sources included medical records and telephone interviews with patients at 3, 6, 15, and 27 m

290 d from consenting patients' medical records, telephone interviews with patients, and mailed questionn

291 rom consenting patients' medical records and telephone interviews with patients.

292 nd the interpretation of the results through telephone interviews with physicians and genetic counsel

293 eating donors is often requested by means of telephone interviews with relatives of the deceased.

294 We conducted telephone interviews with SLE patients who refused parti

295 DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Telephone interviews with successive cohorts of employed

296 We conducted telephone interviews with symptomatic patients who were

297 ected retrospectively from patient notes and telephone interviews with the patients and/or their loca

298 relative separately through a combination of telephone interviews with the relatives (or their proxie

299 risk and protective factors were assessed in telephone interviews with workplace managers.

300 aemic events were determined by a structured telephone interview within 24 h of travel.