戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  ability statistically comparable to that of temporoparietal (18)F-FDG glucose metabolism.
2 volume in orbitofrontal, cingulate, insular, temporoparietal and cerebellar cortex, and with a more l
3 lls throughout the brain, especially in left temporoparietal and cerebellar white matter, but did not
4                  Brain glucose metabolism in temporoparietal and frontal brain regions was measured u
5 HO-connected network, encompassing bilateral temporoparietal and frontal brain regions, and metabolic
6                          At the local level, temporoparietal and frontal regions were affected by AD.
7 aque deposition and neurodegeneration within temporoparietal and hippocampal regions may indicate inc
8 to common brain regions, including bilateral temporoparietal and insular cortices, precentral gyrus,
9 (GMV) in developmental dyslexia in bilateral temporoparietal and left occipitotemporal cortical regio
10                           Elevated posterior temporoparietal and occipital AV-1451 uptake in probable
11 rebellum, posterior brainstem, and posterior temporoparietal and occipital brain regions.
12  had greater AV-1451 uptake in the posterior temporoparietal and occipital cortex compared to clinica
13 oss stimulus types, whereas higher-cognitive temporoparietal and prefrontal areas were more synchroni
14  HIV-1-infected subjects, involving the left temporoparietal and right parietal cortices and bilatera
15 ell as multimodal association regions of the temporoparietal and temporo-occipito-parietal junction,
16 abelled S1 (left temporal), S2 (insula), S3 (temporoparietal) and S4 (frontoparietal), exhibiting rob
17  [11C](R)-PK11195 binding in the entorhinal, temporoparietal, and cingulate cortex.
18 e, and robustness of frontoparietal control, temporoparietal, and dorsal attention networks (p < 0.05
19                    rTMS applied at the right temporoparietal area was not superior to sham treatment.
20                     rTMS applied at the left temporoparietal area with a frequency of 1 Hz yielded a
21    rTMS, especially when applied at the left temporoparietal area with a frequency of 1 Hz, is effect
22 efrontal cortex or regions in and around the temporoparietal area; this condition, which transcends t
23  rhythm amusia and in posterior temporal and temporoparietal areas in pitch amusia.
24 e brain surface were detected in frontal and temporoparietal areas in the BN compared with control pa
25  These analyses showed that neuronal loss in temporoparietal areas, traditionally included within Wer
26 t of the frontal lobes, in addition to large temporoparietal areas.
27 nd white matter volume in the left and right temporoparietal as well as the left inferior frontal bra
28 ignificant grey matter loss, whereas lateral temporoparietal association cortex displayed both signif
29  widespread pattern of GM loss involving the temporoparietal association cortices and the medial temp
30 lvement of the medial temporal lobes and the temporoparietal association cortices and, for the first
31  cutoff 0.25 pg/mL or greater, had increased temporoparietal atrophy at baseline compared to individu
32 trophy was associated with tau mutations and temporoparietal atrophy was associated with progranulin
33 ms, and more focal pattern of left posterior temporoparietal atrophy.
34       Furthermore, left occipitotemporal and temporoparietal brain activity correlates positively wit
35                                      Smaller temporoparietal brain regions were associated with incid
36 ratio (SUVR), and neurodegeneration (smaller temporoparietal brain regions) to incident dementia were
37 (-)), in bilateral occipitotemporal and left temporoparietal brain regions.
38                                            A temporoparietal-brainstem network was coherent with the
39                                              Temporoparietal CBV was reduced even in mildly affected
40                                              Temporoparietal cerebral blood volume, expressed as a pe
41                 Grey matter volumes in right temporoparietal clusters were greater in stroke survivor
42 sal pathways in semantic variant, and in the temporoparietal component of the dorsal bundles in logop
43 th fractional anisotropy altered only in the temporoparietal component of the dorsal pathway.
44 ted across electrodes, revealing frontal and temporoparietal components for latency and amplitude, re
45 cortical atrophy sites variably encompassing temporoparietal components of Wernicke's area, Broca's a
46 amarginal, frontoangular, frontotemporal and temporoparietal components, (referred to as the dorsal p
47 tions in fetal frontoparietal, striatal, and temporoparietal connectivity (B = 0.82, p < 0.001).
48 ferences, (B) modulated to a large extent by temporoparietal connectivity, and (C) accompanied by bra
49 id histology: 15.1%+/-1.5%), followed by the temporoparietal cortex (11C-PIB BPND: 0.75+/-0.08; amylo
50 ses in the P(i)/beta-ATP ratio were found in temporoparietal cortex (P = 0.002 right and P = 0.014 le
51 of the midbrain, substantia innominata (SI), temporoparietal cortex and hippocampus between the group
52 rtex, whereas disgust contexts triggered the temporoparietal cortex and hippocampus/amygdala.
53 reas in CBS due to AD, atrophy extended into temporoparietal cortex and precuneus (p < 0.001 uncorrec
54 ion and motor intention task, with the right temporoparietal cortex being involved during spatial att
55 sets and offsets of the stimuli, whereas the temporoparietal cortex exhibited sustained activity thro
56                                          The temporoparietal cortex has been directly implicated in d
57 trophy encompassed posterior frontal but not temporoparietal cortex in corticobasal degeneration/prog
58 ween the dorsal frontal cortex and the right temporoparietal cortex is modulated during saccadic inte
59 th a relative sparing of the hippocampus and temporoparietal cortex is, therefore, suggestive of DLB
60 s, grey matter volumes in parts of the right temporoparietal cortex positively related to spontaneous
61 ominantly posterior set of regions including temporoparietal cortex showed reduced source activity 25
62 of 4-day administration of 1-Hz rTMS to left temporoparietal cortex were superior to those of sham st
63 es), visuospatial function (occipital, right temporoparietal cortex) and language (left > right tempo
64 oparietal cortex) and language (left > right temporoparietal cortex).
65  received a 10-day TMS treatment to the left temporoparietal cortex, and 15 received the standard tre
66 etabolism, mostly in the left prefrontal and temporoparietal cortex, and areas of decreased metabolis
67 uditory cortex, surrounding auditory-related temporoparietal cortex, and frontal areas.
68                                              Temporoparietal cortex, and functional brain networks an
69                       Two structures in left temporoparietal cortex, angular gyrus (AG) and posterior
70 s suggest that posterior cortex, perhaps the temporoparietal cortex, calculates and represents the pe
71 ng such displays evokes strong activation in temporoparietal cortex, including areas in and near the
72 oth patient groups, mainly involving lateral temporoparietal cortex, precuneus, posterior cingulate c
73                                 In the right temporoparietal cortex, there was also a significant inc
74 hitectonically defined areas of parietal and temporoparietal cortex, with emphasis on areas in the in
75  which we also varied, localized in the left temporoparietal cortex, with high associations increasin
76 irment or AD dementia) showed high-intensity temporoparietal cortex-predominant [(18)F]PI-2620 bindin
77 entorhinal cortices, before spreading to the temporoparietal cortex.
78 l language comprehension regions in the left temporoparietal cortex.
79 c changes in right parahippocampal gyrus and temporoparietal cortex.
80 anism of AHs involves activation of the left temporoparietal cortex.
81  involving mesolimbic regions, striatum, and temporoparietal cortex.
82 mporally precise responses in prefrontal and temporoparietal cortex; these higher-order representatio
83  potential evolutionary advances of enhanced temporoparietal cortical connections with the laryngeal
84                                  In summary, temporoparietal cortical hypometabolism was seen in non-
85 bes, but also showed posterior cingulate and temporoparietal cortical losses at presymptomatic stage.
86 ls, with posterior cingulate and neocortical temporoparietal cortical losses, and medial temporal-lob
87 hological studies implicate both frontal and temporoparietal cortices when humans reason about the me
88 n BN in tracts extending through frontal and temporoparietal cortices, especially in those with the m
89  (PiB-PET), usually affecting prefrontal and temporoparietal cortices, with less occipital involvemen
90 le cerebral artery distribution or extensive temporoparietal damage.
91 ions begin in the visual cortex, followed by temporoparietal DMN regions, then finally in medial pref
92                                              Temporoparietal eDED or ePiB brain perfusion measurement
93 e-coupling between midfrontal electrodes and temporoparietal electrodes was stronger after negative f
94 AP subtypes displayed better preservation of temporoparietal FDG metabolism (mean [SD] FDG: Abeta-N+,
95 gions with relative decreases in metabolism (temporoparietal, frontal, posterior cingulate, and precu
96 disease-associated neurodegeneration status (temporoparietal glucose metabolism determined by fluorod
97    Spectra were acquired from midfrontal and temporoparietal gray matter with a double spin-echo sequ
98      The results indicate highly significant temporoparietal gyral asymmetries in both diagnostic gro
99 mispheres, respectively) and correlated with temporoparietal gyrification differences, classified via
100 showed highly similar patterns of AD-typical temporoparietal hypometabolism and did not differ in CIS
101 e focal and varied by PPA subtype, with left temporoparietal hypometabolism in LPA, left frontal hypo
102  biomarkers, namely hippocampal volume loss, temporoparietal hypometabolism, and neocortical beta-amy
103 ntal (ICCU = 0.18; P =.04; lambda = 3.4) and temporoparietal (ICCU = 0.24; P =.01; lambda = 1.7) P300
104 -term memory, attributed to left-lateralized temporoparietal, inferior parietal and posterior tempora
105 grey matter volume loss, with more extensive temporoparietal involvement in the early-onset group, an
106  was found after virtual lesions to the left temporoparietal junction (control site).
107 idence that neural computations in the right temporoparietal junction (rTPJ) and interconnected struc
108                            The brain's right temporoparietal junction (rTPJ) has been functionally as
109 cal evidence suggesting a role for the right temporoparietal junction (RTPJ) in belief attribution.
110  we show the causal involvement of the right temporoparietal junction (rTPJ) in updating probabilisti
111     Here, we provide evidence that the right temporoparietal junction (rTPJ) is causally involved in
112     A prominent theory claims that the right temporoparietal junction (rTPJ) is especially associated
113              Moreover, activity in the right temporoparietal junction (RTPJ) reflects only ES and cor
114  Here, we test the hypothesis that the right temporoparietal junction (RTPJ), an area involved in men
115 igher-order computational nodes in the right temporoparietal junction (rTPJ), right dorsolateral and
116 ponse to accordance with others in the right temporoparietal junction (rTPJ).
117  level processing because the left posterior temporoparietal junction (TP) emphasizes processing of l
118 h this task was found bilaterally within the temporoparietal junction (TPJ) among other areas.
119 target determined BOLD responses in the left temporoparietal junction (TPJ) and inferior frontal gyru
120 rk regions, such as superior temporal sulcus/temporoparietal junction (TPJ) and precuneus across male
121 esian controllability inference recruits the temporoparietal junction (TPJ) and striatum.
122 entral frontoparietal network comprising the temporoparietal junction (TPJ) and ventral frontal corte
123  others, are associated with activity in the temporoparietal junction (TPJ) area.
124 gest cluster of activity was obtained in the temporoparietal junction (TPJ) bilaterally.
125 ial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the temporoparietal junction (TPJ) has previously been shown
126                           As activity in the temporoparietal junction (TPJ) increases, people are mor
127                                          The temporoparietal junction (TPJ) is a key node within the
128                                    The human temporoparietal junction (TPJ) is a topic of intense res
129     However, although rarely emphasized, the temporoparietal junction (TPJ) is frequently recruited d
130 eye fields (FEFs), intraparietal sulcus, and temporoparietal junction (TPJ) of both hemispheres showe
131 get-evoked activation increases in the right temporoparietal junction (TPJ) of the ventral attentiona
132 h) in a cluster of electrodes over the right temporoparietal junction (TPJ) was associated with incre
133 tegration network (insula, dorsal cingulate, temporoparietal junction (TPJ)) is implicated in converg
134 s (dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) and temporoparietal junction (TPJ)) that tracked normative c
135 ked high-frequency gamma oscillations in the temporoparietal junction (TPJ), a brain region associate
136                                    The right temporoparietal junction (TPJ), a core region of the ven
137 poral correlation between vPMC and the right temporoparietal junction (TPJ), a region strongly implic
138 e anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), thalamus, temporoparietal junction (TPJ), and areas near or along
139 istent group of brain regions: the bilateral temporoparietal junction (TPJ), medial prefrontal cortex
140 ited stronger responses across groups in the temporoparietal junction (TPJ), medial prefrontal cortex
141                                        Right temporoparietal junction (TPJ), the posterior core of a
142 ngaged ventral parietal cortex-specifically, temporoparietal junction (TPJ)-and was also more active
143   We found that generous choices engaged the temporoparietal junction (TPJ).
144 evoked right-hemisphere dominant activity in temporoparietal junction (TPJ).
145 ramework and associated with activity in the temporoparietal junction (TPJ).
146 sponses in the anterior insula (AI) (but not temporoparietal junction [TPJ]) encoded trial-wise empat
147 increased right supplementary motor area and temporoparietal junction activity.
148 orrelated with emotional appraisals, whereas temporoparietal junction and dorsomedial prefrontal cort
149  correlation between activation in the right temporoparietal junction and expected payoff that was ab
150 ipants mediated the negative associations of temporoparietal junction and inferior frontal gyrus acti
151 gical characteristics between groups, in the temporoparietal junction and its connection with the ven
152 nodal and sham in the right prefrontal, left temporoparietal junction and left cerebellar cortices.
153 ized to right lateral parietal cortex in the temporoparietal junction and long-term memory (LTM) retr
154 ing social information, namely the bilateral temporoparietal junction and middle and dorsal medial pr
155 al similarity between self and parent in the temporoparietal junction and nucleus accumbens was assoc
156 g left superior temporal and parietal lobes, temporoparietal junction and paracentral lobule, right s
157          A separate network, including right temporoparietal junction and parahippocampal gyrus, was
158 es in early visual cortex (EVC), then in the temporoparietal junction and posterior superior temporal
159 n high-level social reasoning (the bilateral temporoparietal junction and posterior superior temporal
160 wo-dimensional space were represented in the temporoparietal junction and superior temporal sulcus, t
161 also relied on specific interactions between temporoparietal junction area and frontal pole.SIGNIFICA
162  highlighted the role of connectivity of the temporoparietal junction as a multimodal area crucial fo
163  that includes both of these regions and the temporoparietal junction bilaterally is involved in proc
164 ial prefrontal cortex, the precuneus and the temporoparietal junction bilaterally, and the left occip
165                 This suggests that the right temporoparietal junction contributes to controlling sele
166 We found that activation levels in the right temporoparietal junction correlate with the sensory repr
167                   Second, only patients with temporoparietal junction damage showed a congruent under
168 exhibited higher connectivity with the right temporoparietal junction during prosocial, compared with
169 coded critical inputs for these signals: the temporoparietal junction encoded a linear humanlikeness
170  9.35; df = 2; P = .009) and TMS on the left temporoparietal junction for resistant hallucinations (c
171 e left superior frontal cortex and bilateral temporoparietal junction in both groups, with additional
172 sk, we did not find functional evidence of a temporoparietal junction in macaques.
173                 This suggests that the right temporoparietal junction is involved in controlling atte
174  and provided causal evidence that the right temporoparietal junction is involved specifically in the
175 o involvement of the frontal lobes, the left temporoparietal junction is necessary for reasoning abou
176 ity, we found that variability in insula and temporoparietal junction is reflected in reaction time v
177 icits in timing and spatial orientation with temporoparietal junction lesions could be functionally l
178 ld be functionally linked, implying that the temporoparietal junction may act as a cortical temporal
179                    Caudal regions within the temporoparietal junction may be involved in articulation
180  dorsomedial prefrontal cortex and posterior temporoparietal junction more closely tracked confidence
181  to indicate synchronized flow between right temporoparietal junction networks (previously shown to h
182         Third, despite clear evidence of the temporoparietal junction node of the ventral attention n
183 ity; in that directional influences from the temporoparietal junction on the frontal eye fields and t
184 ation) and position perception, seen only in temporoparietal junction patients, may reflect a common
185 sterior inferior temporal and left and right temporoparietal junction regions (controls more than pat
186  location distinct from activations in right temporoparietal junction reported in previous social cog
187 d, only the four patients with damage to the temporoparietal junction showed impaired spatial orienta
188 may reflect a common neural substrate in the temporoparietal junction that mediates the encoding of m
189                        In contrast, the left temporoparietal junction tracks associative relationship
190 eover, the anterior cingulate cortex and the temporoparietal junction updated beliefs about the decis
191 visual-target presentation, but in the right temporoparietal junction when the target was detected, p
192 ow-frequency 2-4 Hz phase reset in the right temporoparietal junction with concurrent increases in lo
193 fective empathy (whereas bilateral damage to temporoparietal junction would be required to disrupt em
194 gions putatively involved in theory of mind (temporoparietal junction), pain processing (anterior ins
195 n (dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, precuneus, temporoparietal junction), respectively.
196 nd body schema (supplementary motor area and temporoparietal junction).
197 plicated previously in social cognition (the temporoparietal junction).
198 tivation than both other groups in the right temporoparietal junction, a cluster that also demonstrat
199 ude of sustained BOLD responses in the right temporoparietal junction, a core region of the ventral a
200 tenance and greater suppression in the right temporoparietal junction, a region involved in attention
201 the medial prefrontal and parietal cortices, temporoparietal junction, and anterior temporal lobes du
202  errors activation was seen in the striatum, temporoparietal junction, and inferior frontal gyrus.
203 l cortex, posterior superior temporal sulcus/temporoparietal junction, and intraparietal sulcus-and w
204 rk consisting of posterior cingulate cortex, temporoparietal junction, and medial prefrontal cortex p
205 regions, including the medial temporal lobe, temporoparietal junction, and posterior cingulate/precun
206 prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate gyrus, temporoparietal junction, and precuneus-represented or u
207 profiles of the ventromedial frontal cortex, temporoparietal junction, and precuneus.
208  right superior temporal and parietal lobes, temporoparietal junction, and precuneus.
209 l prefrontal cortex, right hippocampus, left temporoparietal junction, and right fusiform gyrus, with
210 nted in the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, temporoparietal junction, and rostral cingulate cortex.
211 me, and neural response in ventral striatum, temporoparietal junction, and ventromedial prefrontal co
212 rontal cortex, inferior parietal lobule, and temporoparietal junction, as well as the insula, cingula
213  was most prominent in the temporal lobe and temporoparietal junction, but extended more broadly into
214           Specifically, HD-tDCS to the right temporoparietal junction, but not another hub of the soc
215 face area and thickness of the precuneus and temporoparietal junction, classically involved in ToM in
216                    Furthermore, in the right temporoparietal junction, confidence effects were enhanc
217 ht central and parietal areas, including the temporoparietal junction, during LD.
218 er activation of the fusiform gyrus, insula, temporoparietal junction, inferior parietal lobe, and su
219  and in the default-mode network (precuneus, temporoparietal junction, medial prefrontal cortex, post
220 s as theory of mind and brain activations in temporoparietal junction, posterior cingulate cortex, an
221 cingulate cortex, anterior insula, bilateral temporoparietal junction, right frontal operculum, bilat
222 e left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, right temporoparietal junction, right premotor and right entor
223 s engage a neural network which includes the temporoparietal junction, superior temporal sulcus, and
224 mentalizing network, including the MPFC, the temporoparietal junction, the superior temporal sulcus,
225  attentional reorienting system in the right temporoparietal junction, two additional brain networks
226 sions to any one of these structures, except temporoparietal junction, would cause impaired affective
227 ingulate cortex, temporal pole, amygdala and temporoparietal junction.
228 olism bias in the inferior parietal lobe and temporoparietal junction.
229 be and thematic errors localized to the left temporoparietal junction.
230 scrimination selectively activated the right temporoparietal junction.
231  right inferior frontal gyrus, and bilateral temporoparietal junction.
232 n inferior temporal regions, and at the left temporoparietal junction.
233 s and the bilateral superior temporal sulcus/temporoparietal junction.
234 parietal cortices, right prefrontal and left temporoparietal junction.
235 utations in the medial prefrontal cortex and temporoparietal junction.
236  was associated with activation in the right temporoparietal junction.
237 he prefrontal cortex, the precuneus, and the temporoparietal junction.
238 esponse enhancement to visual targets in the temporoparietal junction.
239  right ventral putamen and claustrum and the temporoparietal junction.
240 ion flow between the sender's and receiver's temporoparietal junction.
241                                        Right temporoparietal junction/posterior superior temporal sul
242 tic stimuli to examine the role of the right temporoparietal junction/posterior superior temporal sul
243 x, 3.73; P < .001; deactivation of the right temporoparietal junction: Z max 4.08; P = .02).
244 ls were (1) the existence of left hemisphere temporoparietal language areas outside the traditional "
245 nt function analysis based on left and right temporoparietal measures correctly classified 88.5% of t
246    W-scores were computed within entorhinal, temporoparietal, medial and lateral prefrontal, insular
247 was intentional; when harm was unintended, a temporoparietal-medial-prefrontal circuit suppressed amy
248 g/mL increase) was associated with increased temporoparietal metabolism (0.005; 95% CI, 0.000-0.010)
249 m (-0.048; 95% CI, -0.067 to -0.029) but not temporoparietal metabolism (0.010; 95% CI, -0.010 to 0.0
250 e association of greater WMHs with increased temporoparietal metabolism (0.051; 95% CI, 0.027-0.076).
251 he positive association of greater WMHs with temporoparietal metabolism suggests that these pathologi
252 t white matter disconnections within a broad temporoparietal network important for phonological and s
253  default mode network and subcortical fronto-temporoparietal network in UWS compared to MCS patients.
254 ypically associated with focal injury to the temporoparietal or ventral frontal cortex.
255 ents with relatively circumscribed temporal, temporoparietal, or parietal lesions.
256  were significant correlations between right temporoparietal P(i)/beta-ATP ratios and estimated reduc
257                                         Left temporoparietal P(i)/beta-ATP ratios correlated with ful
258                          For the frontal and temporoparietal P300 amplitude and latency components, t
259 iblings showed significant reductions in the temporoparietal P300 amplitude component.
260                                              Temporoparietal P300 amplitude reduction and frontal P30
261 ility of event-related potential frontal and temporoparietal P300 changes as intermediate phenotypes
262                                 In contrast, temporoparietal (posterior segment) connections are righ
263 s disease presentations are distinguished by temporoparietal-predominant atrophy.
264 involved in articulation and associated with temporoparietal projections of the third branch of the s
265 by additional blood flow increases in a left temporoparietal region previously implicated in the rete
266 ues and neuroimaging in humans show that the temporoparietal region sits at the confluence of auditor
267 al temporal region and two cut points in the temporoparietal region were identified to collectively p
268 d large grey matter reductions over the left temporoparietal region, but not in the basal ganglia, re
269 related with gray matter volumes in the left temporoparietal region, whereas DB scores correlated wit
270 tal region, but MI was elevated (+8%) in the temporoparietal region.
271 ienced outcomes, whereas lateral frontal and temporoparietal regions adapted to observed social outco
272 ienced outcomes, whereas lateral frontal and temporoparietal regions adapted to observed social outco
273 ontrols revealed marked atrophy in bilateral temporoparietal regions and only limited atrophy in the
274 hey also shared cortical atrophy of the left temporoparietal regions and precuneus (P < .05, family-w
275 jor depression group showed abnormalities in temporoparietal regions associated with orienting to une
276 man brain regions composed of prefrontal and temporoparietal regions have been associated with stimul
277  atrophy, and asymmetric involvement of left temporoparietal regions in logopenic variant primary pro
278 ical tau aggregation 6 years later, covering temporoparietal regions typical for neurofibrillary tang
279 ter volume reduction in the left frontal and temporoparietal regions was consistent with left frontot
280 ral hyperconnectivity between left and right temporoparietal regions was positively related with lang
281 ns with memory decline in the entorhinal and temporoparietal regions, Abeta-independent tau associati
282 ied primarily in posterior cortex, including temporoparietal regions, extending into occipital and ce
283 or frontoinsular, anterior temporal and left temporoparietal regions, respectively.
284                                           In temporoparietal regions, significant gyral asymmetries w
285 the classic pattern of hypometabolism in the temporoparietal regions.
286  from the left anterior temporal to the left temporoparietal regions.
287 orrelated with atrophy and hypometabolism in temporoparietal regions.
288 ng-range connections between the frontal and temporoparietal regions.
289 451 retention in medial temporal and lateral temporoparietal regions.
290 eech sound categorization: they suggest that temporoparietal responses in passive paradigms such as t
291 ty (N = 15) or 10 Hz rTMS targeting a distal temporoparietal site (N = 15).
292 with greater N2 amplitude at left than right temporoparietal sites.
293 d (2) the right anterior insula and the left temporoparietal/temporooccipital junction, predicted cha
294 visual memory test, followed by time-varying temporoparietal thickness (standardized beta = 0.21, P =
295 sburgh compound B uptake was associated with temporoparietal thinning, which correlated with memory d
296 t self-awareness and agency, mediated by the temporoparietal (TPJ) area and the prefrontal cortex, ar
297 te deactivation, whereas OCD patients showed temporoparietal underactivation.
298 ort the importance of left-hemisphere dorsal temporoparietal white matter tracts in reading.
299 so been linked to normal variability of left temporoparietal white matter volume connecting the middl
300 ecreased diffusion anisotropy bilaterally in temporoparietal white matter.

 
Page Top