コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 avoid harm when treating patients with oral terbinafine.
2 y overall for the azoles, echinocandins, and terbinafine.
3 ytotoxic effect of Transfersome(R)-delivered terbinafine.
4 ergosterol pathway-targeting antifungal drug terbinafine.
5 ars to potentiate the antifungal activity of terbinafine.
6 nazole and less active than itraconazole and terbinafine.
7 fluconazole, griseofulvin, itraconazole, and terbinafine.
8 anidulafungin, caspofungin, micafungin, and terbinafine.
9 ants to the sterol synthesis inhibiting drug terbinafine.
10 L; ketoconazole, bimodal, no ECV determined; terbinafine, 0.25 ug/mL; flucytosine, rejected; and amph
11 e.g., untreated control, treated groups with terbinafine 1%, niosome, PL gel 1%, and PL niosomal gel
13 ween both methods were as follows: 100% with terbinafine, 97.8% with ciclopirox, and 89.1% with voric
15 ntified a total of 185 patients who received terbinafine after their CRC diagnosis and found that the
17 ure to further understand the specificity of terbinafine, an approved agent targeting fungal SQLE, an
18 re whether reversing the fungal dysbiosis by terbinafine, an approved antifungal drug, might inhibit
19 ts had comparable effects on the activity of terbinafine, an inhibitor of squalene epoxidase within t
20 ubrum strains known to have elevated MICs to terbinafine and five Trichophyton mentagrophytes strains
21 for earlier isolates that were resistant to terbinafine and identified 3 additional T. indotineae is
23 gainst the Ochroconis isolates revealed that terbinafine and micafungin were the most active drugs.
26 ith those of the Transfersome vehicle, naked terbinafine, and commercially available terbinafine (1%)
27 the mean MICs of fluconazole, itraconazole, terbinafine, and griseofulvin were 2.07 +/- 0.29, 0.13 +
30 ally relevant liver toxic effects related to terbinafine at a prevalence of 75% was between $18.2 mil
33 ifungal susceptibilities of dermatophytes to terbinafine, ciclopirox, and voriconazole in comparison
34 o 0.25 mug/ml, and 0.008 to 0.025 mug/ml for terbinafine, ciclopirox, and voriconazole, respectively.
35 tiple mouse models of CRC, administration of terbinafine decreased the fungal load, the fungus-induce
40 e results show that empirical treatment with terbinafine for patients with suspected onychomycosis is
41 ity of which demonstrated low MIC values for terbinafine (geometric mean [GM] and modal MIC, 0.031 mu
44 d cure outcome, butenafine hydrochloride and terbinafine hydrochloride were significantly more effica
45 ed dosage form (liquid spray) of 15 mg/ml of terbinafine in Transfersome that has been developed to d
46 t TDT 067 (a topical formulation of 15 mg/ml terbinafine in Transfersome(R) vesicles) has a much more
47 synthesis genes and increased sensitivity to terbinafine, indicating a sterol-responsive role for SRE
48 or the treatment of tinea capitis, including terbinafine, itraconazole, and fluconazole in this era o
49 of dermatophytes were compared with those of terbinafine, itraconazole, ketoconazole, griseofulvin, a
50 .6% of the isolates tested were resistant to terbinafine (MIC >= 0.5 mug/mL), including 21 T. rubrum
54 dotineae isolates have exhibited significant terbinafine resistance due to mutations in the Squalene
56 and to provide the structural insights into terbinafine-resistant mutants encountered in the clinic.
57 ved isolates, we identified the emergence of terbinafine-resistant T. concentricum microbiologically
58 vi) Treatment of S. cerevisiae with azole or terbinafine resulted in transcriptional upregulation of
61 ase gene mutations associated with decreased terbinafine susceptibility have been identified in Unite
62 wo nanoparticles, sorafenib-glycyrrhizin and terbinafine-taurocholic acid both ex vivo and in vivo.
63 ection using the sterol synthesis inhibitors terbinafine (TBF, targeting squalene epoxidase) and itra
65 f 75%, per-patient cost savings of empirical terbinafine therapy without confirmatory testing was $47
66 ansfersomes deliver the lipophilic fungicide Terbinafine to the fungal cell wall, (b) the membrane so
69 n vitro activity of amphotericin B (AMB) and terbinafine (TRB) and of the echinocandins against Penic
70 as used to study the in vitro interaction of terbinafine (TRB) with fluconazole (FLU), itraconazole (
71 microbiota transplantation from mice without terbinafine treatment reversed MDSC infiltration and par
72 -line therapy, but successful treatment with terbinafine, voriconazole, and posaconazole has been rep
73 mic reticulum, which was more efficient when terbinafine was delivered in Transfersome(R) vesicles (T
77 t activity were caspofungin, micafungin, and terbinafine, while amphotericin B showed the least activ
78 the salvage therapeutics amphotericin B and terbinafine without significantly affecting pathogenicit