コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 es were 8.9 months (placebo) and 8.5 months (thalidomide).
2 mide, rituximab alone or in combination, and thalidomide).
3 be associated with the clinical efficacy of thalidomide.
4 rite outgrowth, known detrimental effects of Thalidomide.
5 thasone, and 1 patient subsequently required thalidomide.
6 bogenic conditions, such as those induced by thalidomide.
7 apy, including bortezomib, lenalidomide, and thalidomide.
8 h combined chemoradiotherapy with or without thalidomide.
9 grade 3 toxicities in patients treated with thalidomide.
10 zziness, and malaise were more frequent with thalidomide.
11 re higher than with repeat administration of thalidomide.
12 reated with lenalidomide, bortezomib, and/or thalidomide.
14 randomly assigned to bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2), thalidomide 100 mg, and dexamethasone 40 mg, with (n = 4
15 ezomib and dexamethasone as before plus oral thalidomide 100 mg, days 1 to 21), or bortezomib-melphal
16 ubcutaneous bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2), and oral thalidomide 100 mg, dexamethasone 20 mg, and panobinosta
17 ell lines such as MM1.S, OPM2, and U266 with thalidomide (100 muM) and its structural analog lenalido
18 nonresponders to placebo who began receiving thalidomide, 11 of 21 (52.4%) subsequently reached remis
19 by significantly more children treated with thalidomide (13/28 [46.4%] vs 3/26 [11.5%]; risk ratio [
21 ys 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16 of a 28-day cycle; thalidomide 200 mg on days 1 to 28; and dexamethasone 20
22 o bortezomib for 1 year, in combination with thalidomide (200 mg per day orally) and dexamethasone (4
24 of multiple myeloma followed by repeat IMiD (thalidomide [34; 24%] or lenalidomide [106; 76%]) as one
25 ive phase 2 trials: 44 received single-agent thalidomide, 41 single-agent lenalidomide, and 40 a comb
26 autologous stem cell transplantation (78%), thalidomide (44%), and lenalidomide (34%); 22% of patien
36 ases, and the immunomodulators imiquimod and thalidomide allowed 5 patients to reach sustained comple
38 unomodulatory drugs (IMiDs; lenalidomide and thalidomide) among beneficiaries with myeloma, who can r
43 verse effects of a reference anti-angiogenic thalidomide analog, 5HPP-33, on in vitro angiogenesis wi
44 rtunity to characterize the class effects of thalidomide analogs and improve on the therapeutic promi
46 ation antimalarials that include quinacrine, thalidomide analogs, and Mycophenalate Mofetil may also
47 nd testing of individual enantiomers for two thalidomide analogs, including CC-122, a compound curren
50 This unique specific interaction between (S)-thalidomide and (R)-NDI derivative counterparts, evident
51 s were reported in 74% of patients receiving thalidomide and 22% receiving placebo; constipation, diz
53 domly assigning 323 patients with myeloma to thalidomide and 345 to a control arm, no difference was
54 ties, kinetics, and cell-type specificity of thalidomide and 4 analogs, all but 1 of which are in cli
55 trate that minor side chain modifications in thalidomide and a novel analogue, CC-122, can modulate t
58 To date, such effectors are derived from thalidomide and confer a broad substrate spectrum that i
59 GEP) of purified plasma cells 48 hours after thalidomide and dexamethasone test doses showed these ag
60 ith any evidence of clinical improvement, so thalidomide and dexamethasone were administered as repla
62 intravenous immunoglobulin, anti TNF agents, thalidomide and haematopoietic stem cell transplantation
63 lated skin IgG4-RD successfully treated with thalidomide and investigated their phenotypic characteri
65 Through inhibition of CRBN ubiquitination, thalidomide and its analogs allow CRBN to accumulate, le
66 ur results reveal a novel mechanism by which thalidomide and its analogs modulate the CRBN function i
74 sus criteria, we re-assessed the efficacy of thalidomide and lenalidomide in 125 patients with myelof
75 rimary malignancies in patients treated with thalidomide and lenalidomide in the Arkansas total thera
77 se agents include the immunomodulatory drugs thalidomide and lenalidomide, the proteasome inhibitor b
80 omalidomide is a potent structural analog of thalidomide and member of a new class of immunomodulator
85 echanism of action and targets through which thalidomide and related immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) e
87 so correctly classify species-specific drug (Thalidomide) and false negative drug (D-penicillamine) i
89 lines of therapy; bortezomib, lenalidomide, thalidomide, and carfilzomib/marizomib in 88%, 88%, 62%,
90 with patients treated with cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (CTD) (22.5% [n = 121 of
91 examethasone (CVAD) versus cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (CTD; intensive) or melph
92 d an attenuated regimen of cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (CTDa; n = 426) with melp
93 ion (HSCT) with daratumumab plus bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (D-VTd) significantly imp
94 investigated the combination of carfilzomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (KTd) as induction/consol
95 progression-free survival versus bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (VTd) in patients with ne
97 e maintenance for 3 years versus bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone in year 1 and thalidomide
98 nostat 20 mg in combination with bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone is an efficacious and wel
99 n therapy as per protocol (cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone or cyclophosphamide, lena
102 ation or regimens incorporating bortezomide, thalidomide, and lenalidomide--substantially increase th
108 h at 72 months, survival was superior on the thalidomide arm in the one third exhibiting cytogenetic
110 mized trials establish a definitive role for thalidomide as induction therapy in conjunction with dex
111 al (ISRCTNG8454111) examined traditional and thalidomide-based induction and maintenance regimens and
113 oxicity (MPT-T) and the same MP regimen with thalidomide being replaced by lenalidomide (MPR-R).
115 degron peptides to CRBN depends on an intact thalidomide-binding pocket but is not competitive with I
118 des K48-linked polyubiquitin chains and that thalidomide blocks the formation of CRBN-ubiquitin conju
120 though the incorporation of the novel agents thalidomide, bortezomib, and lenalidomide in the front-l
121 ter treatment with novel agents (NA) such as thalidomide, bortezomib, and lenalidomide may be associa
122 a has been the introduction of novel agents, thalidomide, bortezomib, and lenalidomide, as part of fr
123 vincristine, and doxorubicin), novel agents (thalidomide, bortezomib, or lenalidomide), or hematopoie
124 N-Arylphthalimides (1-10P) derived from thalidomide by insertion of hydrophobic groups were eval
127 osyncrasies in FAERS, for example reports of thalidomide causing a deadly ADR when used against myelo
129 d adolescents with refractory Crohn disease, thalidomide compared with placebo resulted in improved c
132 ally selected from bortezomib, lenalidomide, thalidomide, cyclophosphamide, and corticosteriods) whic
133 munoglobulins, cyclosporine, plasmapheresis, thalidomide, cyclophosphamide, hemoperfusion, tumor necr
136 PROTAC by Cu(I)-catalyzed cycloaddition of a thalidomide-derived azide to an alkynylated inhibitor.
137 g modes of hydrolyzed metabolites of several thalidomide-derived effectors, which we elucidated via c
138 ansplantation; TT3A applied VTD (bortezomib, thalidomide, dexamethasone) in the first year of mainten
140 We studied 140 patients who received either thalidomide-dexamethasone (81; 58%) or lenalidomide-dexa
141 zomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone (VTD) versus thalidomide-dexamethasone (TD) as induction therapy befo
144 e survival were demonstrated with bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone (VTD) versus thalidomide-dexam
145 ted a randomized trial to compare bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone (VTD) with bortezomib-cyclopho
146 1, 2, 4, and 5 [cycles 5 to 8]), bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone (VTD; n = 167; bortezomib and
147 amethasone [VTD]) versus a dual combination (thalidomide-dexamethasone [TD]) in patients with multipl
148 d safety of a triple combination (bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone [VTD]) versus a dual combinati
149 from the GIMEMA MM-BO2005 study (bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone v thalidomide-dexamethasone) s
150 v VAD), and PETHEMA GEM05MENOS65 (bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone v thalidomide-dexamethasone) s
151 OS65 (bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone v thalidomide-dexamethasone) studies were pooled in an int
152 tudy (bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone v thalidomide-dexamethasone) supplemented the integrated p
153 zomib/thalidomide/dexamethasone (VTD) versus thalidomide/dexamethasone (TD) versus vincristine, BCNU,
154 roup conducted a trial to compare bortezomib/thalidomide/dexamethasone (VTD) versus thalidomide/dexam
155 b or thalidomide/dexamethasone or bortezomib/thalidomide/dexamethasone followed by HDT/ASCT; n = 276)
156 thalidomide, and dexamethasone in year 1 and thalidomide/dexamethasone in years 2 and 3 in the 2003-3
157 ized induction with VBMCP/VBAD/bortezomib or thalidomide/dexamethasone or bortezomib/thalidomide/dexa
158 lthough 80% of patients randomly assigned to thalidomide discontinued study drug after 2 years becaus
162 /L vs >2.5 mg/L), previous use or non-use of thalidomide during induction therapy, and previous use o
163 ed trial designed to evaluate the effects of thalidomide during induction treatment and as maintenanc
164 o thalidomide) or to the experimental group (thalidomide during induction, between transplantations,
165 prominent in individuals who were exposed to thalidomide early in the sensitive period (days 20 to 26
166 tion between the chiral NDI receptor and the thalidomide enantiomer of the opposite configuration.
167 a 21-day cycle (bortezomib on days 1 and 8; thalidomide every day; dexamethasone on days 1, 2, 8, an
171 intenance with interferon for the VAD arm or thalidomide for the TAD arm.(1) This study together with
172 r improvement was observed at 8 weeks in the thalidomide group (75% response, 13/28 [46.4%] vs 3/26 [
174 Mean duration of clinical remission in the thalidomide group was 181.1 weeks (95% CI, 144.53-217.76
181 In this large trial of patients with NSCLC, thalidomide in combination with chemotherapy did not imp
182 induction and maintenance), the TT3b trial (thalidomide in induction and lenalidomide in maintenance
183 lenalidomide in maintenance), the TT6 trial (thalidomide in induction and lenalidomide in maintenance
184 ssion-free survival in patients who received thalidomide in induction and maintenance therapy in the
185 f IMiD combination regimens: the TT3a trial (thalidomide in induction and maintenance), the TT3b tria
188 nvestigated whether the clinical efficacy of thalidomide in multiple myeloma is associated with CRBN
190 of accuracy towards the determination of (S)-thalidomide in the blood samples, so it can be successfu
198 ation therapy of docetaxel, bevacizumab, and thalidomide inhibited tumor growth most effectively.
202 known as immunomodulatory drugs derived from thalidomide is developed and sold as racemates because o
209 ere insensitive to the inhibitory effects of thalidomide, lenalidomide, and pomalidomide on LPM diffe
210 activities of immunomodulatory drugs such as thalidomide, lenalidomide, and pomalidomide, recognizes
211 ue therapies (high-dose statins, octreotide, thalidomide, lenalidomide, and tamoxifen) were described
212 agents with angiogenic inhibitory capacity (thalidomide, lenalidomide, bevacizumab, sunitinib, soraf
216 mb malformations are well established in the thalidomide literature, correlation with associated eye
218 mide (VMPT) induction followed by bortezomib-thalidomide maintenance (VMPT-VT) with VMP in patients w
221 a lower incidence of hematologic SPMs in the thalidomide maintenance arm (hazard ratio = 0.38; P = .0
222 n associated with improved survival, whereas thalidomide maintenance has sometimes been associated wi
227 etween nine 4-week cycles of MPT followed by thalidomide maintenance until disease progression or una
228 ed MM patients were randomized to open-label thalidomide maintenance until progression, or no mainten
229 ith clinically significant neuropathy during thalidomide maintenance vs myelosuppression with MPR.
232 CQLQ scores significantly improved with thalidomide (mean difference vs. placebo, -11.4 [95% CI,
233 34 months) than single-agent lenalidomide or thalidomide (median, 7 and 13 months, respectively; P =
234 ing autism to exposures in early pregnancy - thalidomide, misoprostol, and valproic acid; maternal ru
235 y and bortezomib plus dexamethasone, and (2) thalidomide monotherapy and thalidomide plus dexamethaso
237 he combination of melphalan, prednisone, and thalidomide (MPT) is considered standard therapy for new
239 ] E1A06) compared melphalan, prednisone, and thalidomide (MPT-T) with melphalan, prednisone, and lena
240 ore and 48 h after a test dose exposure with thalidomide (n=42), lenalidomide (n=18), or pomalidomide
242 SNP associations were related to exposure to thalidomide only or general drug-related peripheral neur
243 ence of a response to induction therapy with thalidomide or lenalidomide predicts a poorer outcome af
249 igned randomly to either a control group (no thalidomide) or to the experimental group (thalidomide d
251 disruption of LPM differentiation by atRA or thalidomide perturbed subsequent chondrogenic differenti
254 We conclude that maintenance therapy with thalidomide-prednisone after autologous stem cell transp
255 irst disease recurrence was 27.7 months with thalidomide-prednisone and 34.1 months in the observatio
256 p of 4.1 years, no differences in OS between thalidomide-prednisone and observation were detected (re
257 ted a randomized, controlled trial comparing thalidomide-prednisone as maintenance therapy with obser
259 Nine second malignancies were observed with thalidomide-prednisone versus 6 in the observation group
260 respectively; hazard ratio = 0.77; P = .18); thalidomide-prednisone was associated with superior myel
262 n ENL lesions and showed that treatment with thalidomide reduced its expression and the prominent neu
264 erms of patient baseline characteristics and thalidomide regimens, there was no evidence that treatme
267 mmunomodulatory therapeutic strategies using thalidomide showed consistent efficacy, and should be co
270 activation of both astrocytes and microglia, thalidomide significantly reduces Abeta load and plaque
271 ug discontinuation (PMDD) of bortezomib (V), thalidomide (T), and dexamethasone (D) on overall surviv
273 enantiosensor dedicated for determination of thalidomide (TD) enantiomers (especially towards the tox
274 RL4) complex, is a direct protein target for thalidomide teratogenicity and antitumor activity of imm
277 nt of future neuroprotective strategies with thalidomide therapy and the better use of this important
280 CONCLUSION The addition of bevacizumab and thalidomide to docetaxel is a highly active combination
281 highly significant benefit to OS from adding thalidomide to MP (hazard ratio = 0.83; 95% confidence i
283 of developing a peripheral neuropathy after thalidomide treatment can be mediated by polymorphisms i
285 eding in one of our patients was achieved by thalidomide treatment, exemplifying a successful bed-to-
287 thalidomide) and TT3 (TT3a with bortezomib, thalidomide; TT3b with additional lenalidomide) offered
288 vestigate efficacy by incorporating low-dose thalidomide, using sub-cutaneous weekly bortezomib, and
289 This randomized trial compared VMP plus thalidomide (VMPT) induction followed by bortezomib-thal
290 mparison of maintenance with bortezomib plus thalidomide (VT) or prednisone (VP) in 178 elderly untre
296 the tragic toxicological effects of the drug thalidomide, which had been prescribed as a mild sedativ
297 s prospectively antagonized by etanercept or thalidomide, which resolved cytokine, chemokine, and rec
298 al metronomic regimen of daily celecoxib and thalidomide with alternating periods of etoposide and cy
299 from two large clinical trials that compared thalidomide with conventional-based treatment in myeloma
300 ment (including lenalidomide, bortezomib, or thalidomide), with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group