ライフサイエンスコーパス: the mean of

1 497 species had a 95% confidence interval of the mean of +/- 0.9 min or less without the use of chrom

2 ram second squared, with a standard error of the mean of +/-0.027 x 10(-11) and a systematic error of

3 al equivalent autorefraction, as measured by the mean of 10 autorefraction readings.

4 rwent B-mode carotid ultrasound to determine the mean of 12 measurements of maximal carotid IMT.

5 (18.8 kg/h (95% confidence interval (CI) on the mean of 12.0-26.8 kg/h)) was 23 times greater than t

6 is significance was detected only when using the mean of 13 pathologists' scores.

7 Comparing the mean of 18 304 matriculants in 2019 to 2023 with 19

8 triculated to achieve parity, in contrast to the mean of 2 applicants and 1 matriculant per 2 program

9 sugar, and total energy intakes estimated as the mean of 2 applications of the Oxford WebQ were 0.37,

10 from the previous years, or 23 % relative to the mean of 2016 to February 2020.

11 The mean of (210)Po activity resulted 0.40+/-0.46Bqkg(-1

12 The mean of (238)U activity resulted 0.020+/-0.010Bqkg(-

13 ches 82 24% of the simulated enhancement, in the mean of 2480 separate measurements, scanning the irr

14 IOP differed from the increase in IOP using the mean of 3 measurements by more than 1.5 mm Hg was 35

15 The mean of 3 seated SBP measurements made up the visit-

16 The mean of 3 serum C-reactive protein measurements was

17 ned agreement between each frailty score and the mean of 35 FS, using a modified Bland-Altman model a

18 3 Omega cm(2) (average +/- standard error of the mean of 4 chips), comparable to other TEER values re

19 eated first with anti-VEGF (n = 55) received the mean of 4.35 +/- 0.53 injections and showed a statis

20 eated first with anti-VEGF (n = 55) received the mean of 4.35 0.53 injections and showed a statistica

21 500 pinworms per gut, a number far exceeding the mean of 40 per gut for other mice inside and outside

22 report and confirmed by medical records over the mean of 5.2 years of follow-up.

23 ood-frequency questionnaires (FFQs) by using the mean of 6 measurements of a 24-h dietary recall (24-

24 nfidence interval: 667, 712), decreased from the mean of 746 mGy .

25 with fatty meal was significantly lower than the mean of 75.8% +/- 16.3% (P < 0.01) with the first do

26 We ask by how much the mean of a complex trait can be increased by selectio

27 ric view of populations, whereby a change in the mean of a health variable at the population level is

28 re (i.e., number of standard deviations from the mean of a normal age- and body surface area-adjusted

29 The rate of change of the mean of a quantitative character is evaluated exactl

30 adaptation can be explained as adaptation to the mean of a rectified signal.

31 eing less than two standard deviations below the mean of a young reference group.

32 sis method that computes a gene set score as the mean of absolute values of weighted moderated gene t

33 ss an NF-kappaB inhibitor such as A20 offers the mean of achieving an anti-inflammatory effect withou

34 The mean of AFM1 levels was obtained 55.97 ng/kg (95% CI

35 pairment was defined as scores >1.5 SD below the mean of age-matched published normative data on at l

36 Airway tree caliber was quantified as the mean of airway lumen diameters measured from baselin

37 The mean of all anterior surface roughness measurements

38 Using the mean of all HbA1c measures over a mean follow-up of

39 For each patient, the mean of all matched lesions at baseline and study en

40 rst 4 weeks was increased by 30% or more, or the mean of all measurements collected during the 12 wee

41 group for every death, followed by computing the mean of all midpoint ages across all deaths attribut

42 The mean adequacy ratio was the mean of all nutrient adequacy ratios.

43 on (CV<5%) whether they were quantified from the mean of all or only the 2 most-abundant peptides.

44 d widely differing degrees of agreement with the mean of all scores and between each pair of scores.

45 The rate of progression was the mean of all subjects' damage in the worse eye divide

46 Mean differences were calculated as the mean of all the individual percentage differences be

47 0.023 Gy/GBq and 0.043 +/- 0.022 Gy/GBq for the mean of all vertebrae and hip bones, respectively.

48 in a single serum specimen > or =3 SD above the mean of an age-matched control group.

49 c model that calculate stationary states for the mean of an ensemble of stochastic trajectories revea

50 , based on a slope greater than 1.5 SD below the mean of an independent subsample of individuals with

51 ble level) and above (more vulnerable level) the mean of attentional vulnerability (N = 15 in all ana

52 ated with deciles of baseline hemoglobin and the mean of baseline + year 3 hemoglobin.

53 ed with deciles of baseline WBC count and of the mean of baseline + year 3 WBC count.

54 Every 100 pg/mL above the mean of baseline serum LPS corresponded to an additi

55 IV-infected subjects, each 1 microg/mL above the mean of baseline serum sCD14 corresponded to an addi

56 s (CIs) for each variable were calculated as the mean of Bernoulli random variables and for the risk

57 irst test set, composed of 200 examinations, the mean of bone age estimates from the clinical report

58 The mean of C-reactive protein at ages 9 and 15 mediated

59 The mean of C-reactive protein at ages 9 and 15 years wa

60 Point estimates were determined as the mean of combinations and confidence limits by the IQ

61 1) and two standard deviations (l=3.3) below the mean of comparison subjects.

62 Moreover, using the mean of controls in set 1, we achieved 95% sensitivi

63 Scores higher than the mean of controls plus two SD (>2.466) were designate

64 lier estimate of unfolded state ASA given by the mean of Creamer's upper and lower bounds, a gratifyi

65 P levels in childhood, in adulthood, and for the mean of CRP levels at both time points, respectively

66 (LGE+/-, wall thinning+/-), or the change of the mean of CV per unit change (LGE heterogeneity, wall

67 mbient PM(2.5) concentration was assessed as the mean of daily exposure concentration in the year bef

68 The primary outcome was the mean of daily pain scores collected during week 1 of

69 The mean of daily smoking was positively correlated with

70 The mean of differences was -0.2 L/min with 95% limits o

71 an species exhibit a perceptual bias towards the mean of durations previously observed as well as ser

72 ent was determined for each lesion, and then the mean of each group was calculated.

73 The mean of each item, scored on a scale of 1 (best) to

74 eported by food frequency questionnaires and the mean of eight 24-hour recalls, using urinary methylh

75 ever, no statistic significant was showed in the mean of EQ-5D-utility and EQ-VAS between the severit

76 The mean of EQ-5D-utility and EQ-VAS were 0.76 (+/- 0.18

77 The mean of EQ-5D-utility in these patients who were cla

78 The 25th, 50th and 75th percentiles, and the mean of estimated thresholds of Oncomelania snail de

79 lity is persistently and significantly below the mean of EU15+ and requires additional concerted acti

80 ness of gambling products (n = 25), in which the mean of expert's ratings was considered as the true

81 ch to estimate the posterior distribution of the mean of expression in each cell type, by taking into

82 entially averaged work value is estimated as the mean of finite samples.

83 The variance and the mean of gamete size (volume) of each mating type mea

84 The mean of GCSE core subjects (English, mathematics, sc

85 Most of these studies focused on the mean of gene expression level, but not the variance

86 ean of prediction error variance or maximize the mean of generalized coefficient of determination.

87 ntions may affect the variability as well as the mean of health outcomes.

88 g technology [FDT]) appears to be lower than the mean of healthy age-matched controls, regardless of

89 d MCV were lower than 4 standard errors from the mean of healthy participants correlated with areas t

90 onment, and improving the quality of care to the mean of high-income countries) implemented in isolat

91 ine and the neonatal QTc (R=0.02, P=0.86) or the mean of hydroxychloroquine values obtained throughou

92 generalized atherosclerosis, was defined as the mean of IMT measured by B-mode ultrasonography at si

93 generalized atherosclerosis, was defined as the mean of IMT measurements at six sites of the carotid

94 t than employing the genetic variation among the mean of inbred families, and that higher degree of i

95 hest radiographs, where overall accuracy was the mean of individual accuracies of all 13 labels.

96 change on the normalized total z score (ie, the mean of individual NC test z scores) at week 48.

97 PRs because the method of calculating PPR as the mean of individual PPRs is biased in favor of high v

98 nse was considered to be a success if either the mean of IOP measurements collected during the first

99 d their corresponding surrogate exposures as the mean of local samples and assessed the amount of bia

100 ption that, if they were possible to obtain, the mean of many food records or recalls would be an acc

101 However, the mean of mismatches VerEp in locus C (VerEpC) was sig

102 with performance improving incrementally for the mean of more measures.

103 Taking the mean of most of these new estimates indicates that g

104 fter washout does not adequately approximate the mean of multiple IOP measurements.

105 The mean of necessary injected activity to reach a 90% T

106 The mean of none of the parameters of foveal avascular z

107 f ovarian cancer cell lines (three SDs above the mean of normal ovarian surface epithelial cells) and

108 this approach, residues are ranked based on the mean of normalized residue scores derived from four

109 were more than two standard deviations below the mean of normative CMR data.

110 extracted, fully inbred genotype will exceed the mean of outbred individuals.

111 ial modification by PA volume, calculated as the mean of PA at baseline and follow-up.

112 ion-macro and recall-macro metrics, that is, the mean of per-class precision and recall values, respe

113 tion of exotropia was 6.9 +/- 2.2 years, and the mean of postoperative follow-up was 14.3 +/- 4.2 mon

114 ing and earlier methods that either minimize the mean of prediction error variance or maximize the me

115 N1, with an effect size fourfold larger than the mean of previously reported common variants for lumb

116 only for children at the mean and 1 SD below the mean of PSD.

117 ey U test, and the results are summarized by the mean of ranks and a corresponding P value.

118 The mean of ranks is uninformative, and a clinically mea

119 The mean of regressions for the 55 phenophases studied w

120 were defined as signal intensity >2 SD than the mean of remote regions, wall thinning+ as those with

121 ing+ as those with wall thickness <2 SD than the mean of remote regions.

122 methods 2 and 3, the highest rCBV value and the mean of repeated rCBV measurements, respectively, we

123 The mean of SED and WL53 had a significantly higher IRbe

124 functional features such as the maximum and the mean of standard uptake value (SUV) and total lesion

125 Cognitive domain scores were calculated as the mean of standardized cognitive test scores within ea

126 ensity lipoprotein cholesterol, and glucose, the mean of systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and w

127 Among randomized trials the mean of tacrolimus trough concentration during the f

128 ment learning (RL), an algorithm that learns the mean of temporally discounted expected future reward

129 e difference of test minus retest divided by the mean of test/retest and expressed as a percent.

130 Time-updated SBP was the mean of that and all previous visits.

131 ted from random fields throughout the tumor, the mean of the 10 longest and widest nucleoli (MLN) was

132 ch to calculate the total score, rather than the mean of the 13 individual component scores, which as

133 ist joints, the mean absolute deviation from the mean of the 2 measurements was 0.036 mm (SD 0.034),

134 Episodic memory scores computed as the mean of the 2 standardized measures of Logical Memor

135 ich the increase in IOP after washout, using the mean of the 3 measurements, differed by more than 0.

136 he mean increase in IOP after washout, using the mean of the 3 measurements, was 5.3 (4.2) mm Hg.

137 Overall assessment scores were calculated as the mean of the 6 competency scores.

138 The mean of the A(405) readings of the plasma samples co

139 The mean of the absolute difference in length (measured

140 MC for each level was defined as the mean of the absolute differences between each repeti

141 The mean of the absolute PD values was calculated for fi

142 The four properties include the mean of the absolute values as well as the norm of t

143 nce (MAD) in months, which was calculated as the mean of the absolute values of the difference betwee

144 Furthermore, ultrasensitivity depends on the mean of the activation parameters and not on their v

145 ghest ankle pressure ("ABI-HI"), and 3) with the mean of the ankle pressures ("ABI-MN").

146 ratio of the maximum FDG activity divided by the mean of the aortic arch background).

147 The mean of the area under the receiver operating charac

148 conductivity and susceptivity obtained from the mean of the atlas, and using the Schur complement me

149 nd HPV prevalence were approximated based on the mean of the available data within each cluster.

150 tically significant paired-pulse depression, the mean of the averaged second EPSPs being 80 +/- 11% o

151 asound measurement at follow-up, measured as the mean of the axially transmitted speed of sound in me

152 phages and prophages was developed based on the mean of the BLAST score ratio (BSR) of the phage/pro

153 scored one or more standard deviations below the mean of the comparison subjects on the MMSE (N=8, 44

154 etween one and two standard deviations below the mean of the comparison subjects.

155 for all inflamed eyes was 39%+/-7% less than the mean of the control eye scores (mean +/- SEM, P < 0.

156 elow 250 mg/L (> 2 standard deviations below the mean of the control group) were associated with prol

157 m-born participants, with scores centered on the mean of the control group.

158 erum albumin concentration < or = 3 SD below the mean of the control subjects.

159 ses had 5-HT levels greater than 2 SDs above the mean of the controls, thus defining a subset of SIDS

160 e than 2 standard deviations below and above the mean of the corresponding voxels in the reference po

161 ior progeny value is a linear combination of the mean of the cross's progeny and their standard devia

162 onal synchrony was defined and quantified as the mean of the cross-correlation coefficients of sponta

163 expected difference between 2 cycles is 1/4 the mean of the cycles of 2 rhythms.

164 The mean of the daily peak blood ethanol concentration w

165 The shrunk estimator for mu differs from the mean of the data vectors and ultimately leads to a s

166 ted, with constant variance not depending on the mean of the data.

167 The mean of the DeltaT during the osteotomies in type II

168 ed on estimating the temperature response of the mean of the demand distribution.

169 Across patients, for scan ranges 1-6, the mean of the difference between maximal and minimal D

170 The mean of the difference between the biopsy (median 2.

171 lithium dilution with bolus thermodilution, the mean of the differences (lithium dilution-thermodilu

172 l within +/- 0.2 standard deviations (SD) of the mean of the differences.

173 The mean of the distribution biased the perceived latera

174 individuals in each group who differed from the mean of the distribution by the greatest magnitude a

175 The mean of the distribution of forward ET rates is high

176 We found that both increasing the mean of the distribution of individual plant values

177 The mean of the distribution of LOI in the cells is cons

178 a dot generating distribution and judged if the mean of the distribution was left or right of centre

179 nd unbiased genes, which relate primarily to the mean of the distributions of mutational effects and

180 rall core competency rating measure equaling the mean of the end of residency milestone subcompetency

181 about 40% and 71% higher, respectively, than the mean of the ensemble of simulations from TRENDY, pri

182 s the mean of the second response divided by the mean of the first avoids the error.

183 the ME equated to a ratio between the ME and the mean of the following expression: 0.0006(*)(P(2)+2K(

184 The mean of the four heme methyl shifts is shown to serv

185 The mean of the fractional SD of the elastance index in

186 The distance from the mean of the generator potential to spike threshold i

187 The mean of the global OHIP-14 score was 13.43 +/- 6.23

188 timed auditory stimuli were correlated with the mean of the heart rate ([Formula: see text]) and hea

189 ctor, and the rhombic axes are controlled by the mean of the imidazole orientations for the two His.

190 The mean of the interobserver coefficients of variation

191 glycosidic bond angles were held constant at the mean of the known solution values, irrespective of t

192 -hat filter, then estimate spot intensity as the mean of the largest 20% of pixel values in the targe

193 showed that hybridization effectively moved the mean of the life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emission

194 >/==" BORDER="0">2 standard deviations from the mean of the log ratios, and a P value of </=0.01.

195 tion is performed for each interval by using the mean of the logarithm of expression ratios in the in

196 e temporal demographic correlations decrease the mean of the long-run population growth rate, the com

197 It was demonstrated that using the mean of the LRI values predicted by RapidMiner and A

198 the bones of 3 different hands differed from the mean of the measurement by 2.29-4.04%.

199 The mean of the measurements of maximal carotid IMT at 1

200 The LI is defined as the mean of the melting points of specific fatty acids i

201 ', fathers', and midparental BMI percentile (the mean of the mothers' and fathers' BMI cohort- and se

202 The mean of the multi-trial findings suggests the machin

203 The GP function models changes in the mean of the negative binomial likelihood through a l

204 Analysis of data showed that at 3SD above the mean of the negative control, significant elevations

205 ients in the honeymoon stage was higher than the mean of the new onset patients, but significantly lo

206 - subjects had a native T1 value >2 SD above the mean of the normal range.

207 Previous works only give the mean of the number of unique sequences in the librar

208 models, basin-wide average AGB is similar to the mean of the observations.

209 The 95% LOA concerning the mean of the observers' measurements of the longest d

210 The mean of the OD scores for all inflamed eyes was 39%+

211 with an error within 1 standard deviation of the mean of the original waveforms recorded on fifty-fou

212 % CI -9.72 to -7.69]; p<0.0001), superior to the mean of the other two active treatments (doxazosin a

213 e of environmental variance of one trait and the mean of the other.

214 red measurement expressed as a percentage of the mean of the pair plotted against the mean of the pai

215 tage of the mean of the pair plotted against the mean of the pair.

216 ized LD change of less than half an SD below the mean of the participants without COPD with no smokin

217 Also, the mean of the patient's average tumor dose for the CR

218 With the hybrid method, the mean of the patient's average tumor dose over 8 pati

219 Many past studies have used the mean of the patient's probing depths or attachment l

220 The mean of the patients' ages was 24.40 +/- 15.16 years

221 was systematically evaluated and reported as the mean of the percentage of cancer cells remaining wit

222 The significance of the mean of the PLS2 regression coefficients is found to

223 e group was not significantly different from the mean of the population (ie, mean +/- SD, 100 +/- 1),

224 ial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) correlated with the mean of the posterior distribution, a statistic that

225 The mean of the predictions of random forest classifiers

226 that the optimal strategy was to aim between the mean of the prior (the screen center) and the mean s

227 ainty appears to generalize differently from the mean of the prior, and an interesting asymmetry aris

228 ontrast sensitivity (WMCS), being defined as the mean of the products of each spatial frequency multi

229 Furthermore, if an estimate of the mean of the PRS in the underlying population is avai

230 The mean of the radiation dose values for 131 abdominal

231 s [(CROI/CREF) - 1], where CROI and CREF are the mean of the radioactivity concentrations from 90 to

232 The mean of the RAL1/RAL2 site-specific variances (A) wa

233 The mean of the relative difference ((MIR values - NIR v

234 05-0.95) refers to the ratio of the range to the mean of the relative-intensity (or determined concen

235 (2) Scalar property: the mean of the response times varies widely for differe

236 .2 +/- 2.6 frames) was 1.7 times longer than the mean of the right coronary artery (20.4 +/- 3.0) and

237 in the CHSH game can be bounded knowing only the mean of the RNG bias.

238 .45 mm2 (range 0.00 mm2 to 35.28 mm2) whilst the mean of the SAL1/SAL2 variances (B) was 0.09 mm2 (ra

239 DEGage calculates the mean of the sample-wise differences of gene expressi

240 The Verbal Index Score is calculated as the mean of the scores from the Word Definitions and Ver

241 Calculating PPR as the mean of the second response divided by the mean of t

242 gnals, with the dissimilarity being taken to the mean of the signals over all the pixels.

243 The mean of the six antibody concentrations was signific

244 and corrected for background, by subtracting the mean of the smallest 70% of pixel values.

245 ace energy from liquid metal measurements as the mean of the solid-state surface energies over these

246 The mean of the Spearman correlation coefficients was 0.

247 The results show close correlations between the mean of the spectrophotometric and magnetophoretic m

248 l RR intervals (SDNN) and the square root of the mean of the squared differences between adjacent nor

249 l regression setting, in terms of minimizing the mean of the squared prediction error.

250 P=0.04) and 7% lower 5-minute square root of the mean of the squares of successive N-N differences (9

251 a systematically warped manner-biased toward the mean of the stimulus distribution.

252 ved adverse changes in rMSSD [square root of the mean of the sum of the squared differences between a

253 tion of all normal R-R intervals (SDNN), and the mean of the sum of the squared differences between a

254 Of the 955 participants, the mean of the summed ranks for placebo was 2360 (95% C

255 The mean of the time constants (tauPCr) was 35 s (range,

256 nchyma was segmented automatically, in which the mean of the top 10% late enhancement was calculated.

257 Child-based analyses (i.e., the mean of the two eyes) were used.

258 ndent and interaction analyses were based on the mean of the two eyes.

259 a plot of arteriovenous differences against the mean of the two measurements.

260 ss production in the mixed culture surpassed the mean of the two monocultures.

261 The mean of the two ROIs was used to calculate mean FD b

262 ayesian in the sense that it learns not only the mean of the weights but also the uncertainty around

263 s machine learning models tend to regress to the mean of their training data, this bias tends to nega

264 nd treadmill running time, using 2 SDs below the mean of their young counterparts as cutoff points.

265 global domain of functioning was computed as the mean of these six domains.

266 t equilibrates selection-pressure asymmetry; the mean of this distribution is generally not the fitne

267 ses, or stroke is 1.34 mg/l to 6.45 mg/l and the mean of this range is 3 mg/l.

268 ites with an affinity approximately equal to the mean of those for HABs and LABs.

269 t, for the large majority of the biomarkers, the mean of three 24-h urine samples could provide a cor

270 essure by the measured flow and expressed as the mean of three measurements at each flow rate.

271 s with uncontrolled hypertension (defined as the mean of three systolic blood pressure measurements o

272 he schizophrenic patients was assessed using the mean of time 1 and time 2 Brief Psychiatric Rating S

273 s no effect on cell motility, as measured by the mean of time to reach the source.

274 The mean of total DAI was significantly higher in contro

275 tive traits have only a detectable effect on the mean of trait.

276 computed from folate supplement intake plus the mean of two 24-h recalls completed during the course

277 Urinary sodium excretion was calculated as the mean of two 24-h urine excretions.

278 The mean of two 24-hour dietary recalls was used to calc

279 astolic blood pressure (BP) were recorded as the mean of two measurements taken with a sphygmomanomet

280 Frailty assessed using the mean of two or more measurements recorded at separat

281 ality were higher for frailty assessed using the mean of two versus single measurements for FI (ORs f

282 fasting triglyceride level from baseline to the mean of values at 10 months and 12 months, changes i

283 plates, signals ranged from <30 to >120% of the mean of vehicle-treated cells for molecules known to

284 reduction [53.6-69.0]; both p<0.0001) and at the mean of weeks 10 and 12 (60.2% reduction [95% CI 54.

285 ity lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level at the mean of weeks 10 and 12 and at week 12.

286 (95% CI, 67% to 83%) (monthly) vs placebo at the mean of weeks 10 and 12 in the moderate- and high-in

287 aseline in LDL cholesterol at week 12 and at the mean of weeks 10 and 12, analysed by intention-to-tr

288 ere percent change from baseline in LDL-C at the mean of weeks 10 and 12, and at week 12.

289 a percentage difference of -65.0 (2.87)% at the mean of Weeks 22 and 24 (P < .0001 for all).

290 rcent change in LDL-C level from baseline to the mean of weeks 22 and 24 levels and from baseline to

291 For the mean of weeks 22 and 24, between-group difference in

292 For the mean of weeks 22 and 24, LDL-C level with ezetimibe

293 change from baseline in LDL-C at Week 24 and the mean of Weeks 22 and 24.

294 thritis Index pain subscale from baseline to the mean of weeks 4 and 6, comparing AZD3582 with placeb

295 .9%) by per-protocol analysis at week 52 and the mean of weeks 50 and 52, respectively (P < .001 for

296 change from baseline in LDL-C at week 52 and the mean of weeks 50 and 52.

297 56.2% (2.2%) at week 52 and 62.7% (1.9%) for the mean of weeks 50 and 52; 49.7% (2.4%) and 55.3% (2.2

298 The mean of within-knee standard deviations of JSW in th

299 ociated protein tyrosine phosphatase-1B than the mean of WL5 and WL29.

300 n data the best fitting relationship between the mean of X0 and all the other covariates fitted in th