ライフサイエンスコーパス: thermodilution

1 tion of cardiac output (measured by means of thermodilution).

2 volume index was obtained by transpulmonary thermodilution.

3 ioimpedance and, subsequently, invasively by thermodilution.

4 heral vascular resistance) was determined by thermodilution.

5 t obtained using standard intermittent bolus thermodilution.

6 min by bioimpedance and 5.0 +/- 1.1 L/min by thermodilution.

7 + 0.89x (r2 = .94) for lithium dilution vs. thermodilution.

8 Cardiac output was measured by thermodilution.

9 with their counterparts obtained from bolus thermodilution.

10 nt and a pulmonary artery catheter for bolus thermodilution.

11 - and temperature-sensitive sensor and bolus thermodilution.

12 n emission tomography, and invasive coronary thermodilution.

13 dex, which can be measured by transpulmonary thermodilution.

14 delivery were assessed using transpulmonary thermodilution.

15 he mixed gas equation and when determined by thermodilution.

16 c output was also measured using "continuous thermodilution."

17 tes with invasive measurements obtained with thermodilution?

18 0.16 cm(2), bias 0.14 +/- 0.17 cm(2)), or by thermodilution (0.85 +/- 0.19 cm(2), bias -0.03 +/- 0.19

19 measured for 7 days by PiCCO transpulmonary thermodilution; 225 measurements of EVLW indexed to actu

20 , we calculated CFR and MRR using continuous thermodilution (64 measurements of each) to assess their

21 sine (ADE) testing (CFR/IMR), and continuous thermodilution (absolute Q and R) with saline-induced hy

22 amic measurements obtained by transpulmonary thermodilution after injection of a cold saline bolus vi

23 the increment in leg blood flow (measured by thermodilution) after exposure to methacholine chloride.

24 with a > 10% increase in CI (transpulmonary thermodilution) after VE.

25 Use of the a transpulmonary thermodilution algorithm resulted in more days on mechan

26 Continuous intracoronary thermodilution allows the definition and characterizatio

27 asively assessed by continuous intracoronary thermodilution and defined as coronary flow reserve <2.5

28 Cardiac output by thermodilution and probe agreed equally well under all c

29 Cardiac output by thermodilution and systemic and pulmonary artery pressur

30 ance, with the cardiac output measurement by thermodilution and the volumetric data estimated from le

31 tion method is at least as accurate as bolus thermodilution and, since pulmonary artery catheterizati

32 t one reference standard test was performed (thermodilution and/or Sv o2 ) were included.

33 oral blood flow (FBF, ultrasound Doppler and thermodilution) and blood pressure were evaluated during

34 venous PO2 (blood samples), leg blood flow (thermodilution), and myoglobin (Mb) desaturation ((1) H

35 gy indices derived from continuous and bolus thermodilution, and suggested greater variability with b

36 c measurements, leg blood flow determined by thermodilution, and systemic and leg metabolic parameter

37 MRR derived from either bolus or continuous thermodilution, and was equally repeatable compared with

38 ermeability index measured by transpulmonary thermodilution are independent risk factors of day-28 mo

39 central venous pressures, cardiac output by thermodilution, arterial and venous blood gases; electro

40 e and three studies (166 patients) that used thermodilution as reference.

41 Intracoronary continuous thermodilution assessment of absolute coronary flow (Q)

42 flow to the index extremity was measured by thermodilution at baseline and 30 days after administrat

43 blood flow measured with continuous coronary thermodilution at high (40-50 mL/min) infusion speeds an

44 During thermodilution-based assessment of volumetric coronary b

45 and are primarily based on comparisons with thermodilution-based cardiac output measurements.

46 raphy (ICA) with fractional flow reserve and thermodilution-based coronary flow reserve was performed

47 Transpulmonary thermodilution-based EVLWi, plasma concentrations of epi

48 ) was significantly correlated with pressure/thermodilution-based index of microcirculatory resistanc

49 microvascular dysfunction (as defined by the thermodilution-based index of microvascular resistance >

50 ary microcirculation was also assessed using thermodilution-based methods, with microvascular resista

51 Transpulmonary thermodilution before and after bronchoalveolar lavage.

52 Arterial and femoral venous blood sampling, thermodilution blood flow measurements, and needle biops

53 (reference standard) using a transpulmonary thermodilution-calibrated Pulse Contour hemodynamic moni

54 PetCO2 predicted thermodilution cardiac index with bias of -11+/-27 (+/-2

55 easured oxygen consumption (Cath-mVo(2)) and thermodilution cardiac output (Cath-TD).

56 g continuous cardiac output (CCO) with bolus thermodilution cardiac output (COTD) measures in human a

57 atrial pressures, ascending aortic pressure, thermodilution cardiac output and Doppler mitral flow ve

58 decreases in systemic arterial pressure and thermodilution cardiac output associated with brain deat

59 Calculated VO2 was determined by multiplying thermodilution cardiac output by the arterialvenous oxyg

60 mprovement in both precision and accuracy of thermodilution cardiac output measurement.

61 This did not affect the accuracy of thermodilution cardiac output measurements that were mad

62 devices (SCDs) have a significant effect on thermodilution cardiac output measurements using a pulmo

63 Thermodilution cardiac output measurements via a pulmona

64 The average of the three thermodilution cardiac output measurements was compared

65 This prospective study of 960 thermodilution cardiac output measurements was conducted

66 Thermodilution cardiac output measurements with and with

67 This study compared 2-mL bolus thermodilution cardiac output measurements with standard

68 Baseline values of thermodilution cardiac output were highly correlated wit

69 e cardiac output monitoring and intermittent thermodilution cardiac output were simultaneously measur

70 Phase 2 (n = 12) found that the mean thermodilution cardiac output with 10 mL of cold (0-5 de

71 n on pericardial pressure (Pperi), Pcw, Pla, thermodilution cardiac output, and pulmonary artery flow

72 Mean arterial pressure, thermodilution cardiac output, mesenteric arteriolar dia

73 put monitoring has acceptable agreement with thermodilution cardiac output.

74 en noninvasive cardiac output monitoring and thermodilution cardiac output.

75 Measurements included: leg blood flow (LBF, thermodilution), cardiac output (Q), and oesophageal pre

76 catheterization laboratory with a Swan-Ganz thermodilution catheter before, during and after infusio

77 anesthesia, pigs underwent placement of a) a thermodilution catheter in the right internal jugular ve

78 ed by Millar catheter, echocardiography, and thermodilution catheter, a few days after their last exp

79 dynamic were evaluated by a pulmonary artery thermodilution catheter.

80 In four patients with pulmonary artery thermodilution catheters, the mean increase in cardiac i

81 ar relationship between pressure-derived and thermodilution CFR in native (r(2) = 0.52; p < 0.001) an

82 ary capillary wedge pressure was superior to thermodilution CI and Fick CI.

83 Thermodilution CI better predicts mortality and should b

84 o quartiles of RSW, Fick cardiac index (CI), thermodilution CI, and pulmonary capillary wedge pressur

85 Femoral artery thermodilution CO ranged from 0.32 to 9.19 L/min, (media

86 Thermodilution coronary flow reserve (CFRthermo) is a ne

87 FFR by continuous thermodilution correlated with standard FFR measurements

88 nary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) and SV (thermodilution derived cardiac output/heart rate).

89 document aims to summarize the principles of thermodilution-derived absolute coronary flow measuremen

90 ically significant coronary disease, FFR and thermodilution-derived CFR (CFRthermo) were measured sim

91 ure-temperature sensor-tipped coronary wire, thermodilution-derived CFR and IMR were measured, along

92 The index of microcirculatory resistance-a thermodilution-derived measure of the minimum achievable

93 ong correlation was found between continuous thermodilution-derived MRR and Doppler MRR (r = 0.88; 95

94 lity and correlation of continuous and bolus thermodilution-derived physiology indices in cardiac tra

95 Thermodilution devices are marginally more accurate than

96 CFR and MRR measurements using continuous thermodilution did not correlate with measurements using

97 Transpulmonary thermodilution enabled to detect small short-term change

98 the double indicator method, transpulmonary thermodilution estimation remained clinically acceptable

99 ue (EVLWref) and estimated by transpulmonary thermodilution (EVLWest).

100 (cerebral blood flow) and constant infusion thermodilution (femoral blood flow) with net exchange ca

101 Cardiac output (thermodilution), forearm vascular conductance (FVC, veno

102 sed cardiac index measured by transpulmonary thermodilution greater than or equal to 15% were defined

103 lume index (<850 mL/m) in the transpulmonary thermodilution group and pulmonary artery occlusion pres

104 Prior studies using single indicator thermodilution have reported that 21% to 35% of patients

105 measured by single-indicator transpulmonary thermodilution in a large cohort of patients without car

106 ive fluid balance with use of transpulmonary thermodilution in nonseptic shock.

107 venous blood samples and leg blood flow (by thermodilution) in eight patients with severe COPD (forc

108 dynamic and hepatic function (transpulmonary thermodilution, indocyanine green plasma disappearance r

109 re through a dedicated catheter for coronary thermodilution induces steady-state maximal hyperemia at

110 Intracoronary bolus thermodilution injections were performed at rest, immedi

111 rately derive cardiac output from 2-mL bolus thermodilution injections, allowing cardiac output to be

112 n CFR and MRR derived from either continuous thermodilution (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.95

113 P=0.004 and P=0.002, respectively) or bolus thermodilution (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.95

114 Intracoronary continuous thermodilution is a novel technique to quantify absolute

115 hemodynamic measurements with transpulmonary thermodilution is currently unknown.

116 Because intermittent bolus thermodilution is not a true "gold standard" for cardiac

117 Thermodilution is relatively accurate for cardiac output

118 LBF was determined by thermodilution: LGU = arteriovenous glucose difference (

119 mination, new techniques compared with bolus thermodilution may fail to achieve accuracy expectations

120 en uptake while leg blood flow (femoral vein thermodilution), mean arterial blood pressure (radial ar

121 Three independent sets of three consecutive thermodilution measurements (i.e., PAC-CO) each were per

122 compared with intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution measurements in a clinical study setting

123 tigated the agreement between transpulmonary thermodilution measurements obtained with bolus injectio

124 us noninvasive cardiac output monitoring and thermodilution measurements of cardiac output were compa

125 The variability of the thermodilution measurements was greater than that of the

126 For each measurement, the values of three thermodilution measurements were averaged at the followi

127 ght heart catheterization and transpulmonary thermodilution measurements were recorded 1 hour, 1 day,

128 e made concurrently with five femoral artery thermodilution measurements, and the concurrent measurem

129 segments and contemporaneous reference CO by thermodilution measurements, collected in an intensive c

130 and suggested greater variability with bolus thermodilution measurements.

131 col when performing continuous intracoronary thermodilution measurements.

132 testing to identify CMD requires Doppler or thermodilution measures of flow to determine the coronar

133 Cardiac output was measured by the thermodilution method and the ejection fraction and left

134 nostics, and focuses on the novel continuous thermodilution method.

135 of that estimated by the repetitive, single thermodilution method.

136 stimations closely approximated those of the thermodilution method; r2 = .74, p < .001; the precision

137 ry artery catheter and aortic transpulmonary thermodilution on 92 occasions; agreement was good, with

138 y arteries and a cardiac output measurement (thermodilution or Fick method) during coronary angiograp

139 acceptable agreement with intermittent bolus thermodilution over a wide range of cardiac output in an

140 show good correlation with pulmonary artery thermodilution (PATD) CO.

141 int was extravascular lung water measured by thermodilution (PiCCO) at Day 7.

142 lloid resuscitation guided by transpulmonary thermodilution (PiCCO) in an intensive care setting.

143 blood flow was also measured using cortical thermodilution probes in 33 patients, and regional cereb

144 isk elective surgery patients using both the thermodilution pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) and multi

145 A quadrilumen thermodilution pulmonary artery catheter was placed in m

146 were instrumented with femoral arterial and thermodilution pulmonary artery catheters.

147 echniques appear to have similar accuracy as thermodilution pulmonary artery catheters.

148 not correlate with measurements using bolus thermodilution (R=0.33, P=0.170; R=0.34, P=0.155, respec

149 Cardiac output by PISA agreed closely with thermodilution (r=0.91, Delta=-0.05+/-0.55 L/min), but S

150 15 cm(2) (oxymetry) and 0.68 +/- 0.21 cm(2) (thermodilution), respectively, and mean systolic gradien

151 lene wash-in technique and constant infusion thermodilution, respectively.

152 hium dilution (single measurement) and bolus thermodilution (series of three to six measurements acco

153 Thermodilution (Td) and estimated oxygen uptake Fick (eF

154 stroke volume (SV) were measured by MRI and thermodilution (TD) in 15 mice (3 L1, 4 L2, 8 LC).

155 in the lower extremity was determined using thermodilution (TD) techniques.

156 Stroke volume from ACOM was compared with thermodilution (TD), aortic valve pulsed-wave Doppler (P

157 and cardiac output by the intermittent bolus thermodilution (TDCO) method and continuous cardiac outp

158 CO was also measured using thermodilution (TDCO) when a pulmonary artery catheter w

159 ronary artery (R(micro app)) or with a novel thermodilution technique (apparent index of microcircula

160 e were measured by the renal vein retrograde thermodilution technique and by renal extraction of Cr-E

161 2-mL bolus technique and the 10-mL standard thermodilution technique in a perspective series.

162 erived CFR values with those obtained by the thermodilution technique using the intracoronary pressur

163 the Doppler wire and, more recently, using a thermodilution technique with the coronary pressure wire

164 Cardiac output, measured with bolus thermodilution technique, and arterial and venous oxygen

165 ssure wire, with the use of a novel coronary thermodilution technique, is feasible and adds informati

166 pressure measurements against an established thermodilution technique.

167 olic volume was derived, was measured by the thermodilution technique.

168 Ultrasound Doppler and thermodilution techniques provided direct measurements o

169 cending coronary artery using bolus coronary thermodilution techniques to measure coronary flow reser

170 ary microvascular assessments using coronary thermodilution techniques.

171 easured intermittently by using conventional thermodilution techniques.

172 Comparing lithium dilution with bolus thermodilution, the mean of the differences (lithium dil

173 he response of cardiac index (transpulmonary thermodilution) to fluid administration (500 mL saline).

174 catheter after calibration by transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD).

175 ut measured by intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution using a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC-CO

176 inserted central catheter for transpulmonary thermodilution using EV1000 led to a significant overest

177 ctive cardiac output (difference between the thermodilution value and the AV-ECMO flow rate) and mean

178 odynamic management guided by transpulmonary thermodilution vs. pulmonary artery catheter in shock di

179 Transpulmonary thermodilution (vs. pulmonary artery catheter) monitorin

180 sure criteria at baseline and transpulmonary thermodilution (vs. pulmonary artery catheter) monitorin

181 on, the estimation of EVLW by transpulmonary thermodilution was influenced by the amount of EVLW, the

182 after bronchoalveolar lavage, transpulmonary thermodilution was performed to record the value of inde

183 he mean of the differences (lithium dilution-thermodilution) was -0.25 +/- 0.46 [SD] L/min.

184 rom pulse contour analysis or transpulmonary thermodilution) was used as the reference.

185 nce reserve (MRR) using continuous and bolus thermodilution were performed in consecutive cardiac tra

186 CFR, and MRR values obtained from continuous thermodilution were systematically lower compared with t

187 (PCWP), central venous pressure and SV (via thermodilution) were obtained while central blood volume

188 t and validation of continuous intracoronary thermodilution, which offers a simplified and validated