ライフサイエンスコーパス: tissue graft

1 outcome was obtained utilizing a connective tissue graft.

2 f the time with the subepithelial connective tissue graft.

3 ived coronally advanced flap plus connective tissue graft.

4 ersed by the implantation of a small adipose tissue graft.

5 th coronally positioned flap plus connective tissue graft.

6 control but is as effective as a connective tissue graft.

7 bleaching, and partial-thickness connective tissue grafts.

8 uminal patency, and the immune reactivity to tissue grafts.

9 garettes for optimal results with connective tissue grafts.

10 ts wound healing of subepithelial connective tissue grafts.

11 of the transmission of viral infections from tissue grafts.

12 rgeted by the cytotoxic T cells specific for tissue grafts.

13 itreous cryopreservation compared with fresh tissue grafts.

14 reatment of choice when performing free soft tissue grafts.

15 nsiveness to concurrent allogeneic organ and tissue grafts.

16 harvesting donor tissue for autogenous soft tissue grafts.

17 when used as alternatives to autogenous soft tissue grafts.

18 s has been demonstrated only with xenogeneic tissue grafts.

19 sembly of functional tissues and implantable tissue grafts.

20 he subgroup that was treated with connective tissue grafts.

21 was analyzed, focusing on non-root coverage tissue grafts.

22 eneic hematopoietic stem cells but not solid tissue grafts.

23 ansplantation of CTS but not skeletal muscle tissue grafts.

24 s in preserving fertility through testicular tissue grafts.

25 ut the synaptic remodeling that occurs after tissue grafting.

26 l devices and eventually lead to therapeutic tissue grafting.

27 finding that could influence the success of tissue grafting after periodontal surgery.

28 derations, protein electrophoretic data, and tissue grafting analysis is of monophyletic (single hybr

29 eries evaluated the subepithelial connective tissue graft and the coronally advanced flap with enamel

30 nd weighted mean root coverage in connective tissue grafting and guided tissue regeneration (r = 0.90

31 Microsurgical, tissue grafting and in situ hybridization techniques hav

32 Tissue grafting and recombination experiments suggest th

33 Tissue grafting and recombination experiments suggest th

34 f the epicardium, cell proliferation assays, tissue grafts and bead grafts.

35 ted surgically with subepithelial connective tissue grafts and followed for 6 months.

36 to new strategies for improving perfusion of tissue grafts and may have implications for other physio

37 positioned flap, a subepithelial connective tissue graft, and a coronally positioned flap.

38 included coronally advanced flap, connective tissue graft, and guided tissue regeneration with and wi

39 therapy of papilla preservation, connective tissue grafting, and coronally advanced flaps may result

40 d by FITC skin painting, transgenic GFP skin tissue grafting, and footpad DC injection.

41 nd that data from genetics, tissue explants, tissue grafting, and molecular marker expression support

42 lture combined with vital cell labelling and tissue grafting, and show that the dental mesenchyme is

43 blood transfusion, blood products, organ or tissue grafts, and contaminated medical instruments.

44 ween buccal plate and fixture; 5) connective tissue grafts; and 6) immediate provisionalization.

45 Root coverage with connective tissue grafts appears to be negatively associated with c

46 was deepithelialized, and a large connective tissue graft approximately 1 mm thick was harvested.

47 ng a coronally advanced flap plus connective tissue graft are similar between smokers and nonsmokers.

48 The clinical benefits of autogenous soft tissue grafts are countered by donor site morbidity.

49 attern of SY labeling observed suggests that tissue grafts are extensively innervated, probably both

50 ort, treatment with an autogenous connective tissue graft at the time of excision can produce a highl

51 Soft tissue grafting at dental implant sites has been propose

52 Soft tissue grafting at single implant placement after alveol

53 cal guide, performing bone grafting and soft tissue grafting at the time of implant placement, and ha

54 rage similar to the subepithelial connective tissue graft but without the morbidity and potential cli

55 been observed in PD patients receiving fetal tissue grafts but has not been possible to demonstrate a

56 Rejection of male tissue grafts by genotypically identical female mice has

57 a coronally advanced flap plus a connective tissue graft (CAF + CTG).

58 flap (CAF) alone versus CAF with connective tissue graft (CAF+CTG) in the treatment of single Miller

59 ancer or endothelial cells, as well as tumor/tissue grafts, can be encapsulated in the hydrogels duri

60 , by placement of a subepithelial connective tissue graft concurrently with the biopsy procedure.

61 ilaminar techniques in combination with soft tissue grafts (connective tissue graft [CTG], collagen m

62 dvanced flap with a subepithelial connective tissue graft (control) or a coronally advanced flap with

63 efects were treated with either a connective tissue graft (CTG) (control) or recombinant human platel

64 f coronally advanced flap (CAF) + connective tissue graft (CTG) + PRF in Miller Class I and II recess

65 rvical lesions (NCCLs) treated by connective tissue graft (CTG) alone or in combination with a resin-

66 Connective tissue graft (CTG) and enamel matrix derivative (EMD) ap

67 t study shows 2-year results of a connective tissue graft (CTG) associated with LLLT in the treatment

68 n matrix (VCMX) was compared with connective tissue graft (CTG) for soft tissue augmentation around e

69 using collagen matrix (CM) versus connective tissue graft (CTG) for treatment of multiple recessions

70 ced flap (CAF) to a subepithelial connective tissue graft (CTG) in combination with a CAF in subjects

71 al was to assess the outcome of a connective tissue graft (CTG) in the esthetic zone of single immedi

72 (GTR) procedure in comparison to connective tissue graft (CTG) in the treatment of gingival recessio

73 The subepithelial connective tissue graft (CTG) is a popular means to treat gingival

74 Autologous connective tissue graft (CTG) is generally considered the gold stan

75 Connective tissue graft (CTG) plus coronally advanced flap (CAF) is

76 oronally advanced flap (CAF), and connective tissue graft (CTG) surgical technique is considered the

77 ty of the free gingival graft and connective tissue graft (CTG) techniques are highlighted, together

78 This study aimed to compare a connective tissue graft (CTG) to a (porcine) xenogeneic acellular d

79 val recession (bREC), effect of a connective tissue graft (CTG) when combined with a buccal single fl

80 d tunnel flap (TUN) combined with connective tissue graft (CTG) when compared to the trapezoidal coro

81 entered outcomes of subepithelial connective tissue graft (CTG) with and without enamel matrix deriva

82 The autogenous connective tissue graft (CTG) with coronally advanced flap (CTG+CAF

83 determine whether PC accelerated connective tissue graft (CTG) wound healing and maintained donor si

84 on treatment is the subepithelial connective tissue graft (CTG), but good outcomes have also been obt

85 flap (MCAF) with selective use of connective tissue graft (CTG).

86 s following CAF with or without a connective tissue graft (CTG).

87 The autogenous soft tissue graft (CTG/FGG) proved to be superior in all comp

88 long-term results 20 years after connective tissue grafting (CTG) or guided tissue regeneration (GTR

89 latal donor area of subepithelial connective tissue grafts (CTG) between cyanoacrylates tissue adhesi

90 was to compare thick versus thin connective tissue grafts (CTG) for the treatment of gingival recess

91 trix [ADM], collagen matrix [CM], connective tissue graft [CTG]) are able to significantly increase t

92 bination with soft tissue grafts (connective tissue graft [CTG], collagen matrix [CM], and acellular

93 Connective tissue grafts (CTGs) and coronally advanced flaps (CAFs)

94 Subepithelial connective tissue grafts (CTGs) and free gingival grafts (FGGs) are

95 hether the composition of palatal connective tissue grafts (CTGs) varies depending on donor site or h

96 omfort, whereas the subepithelial connective tissue graft demonstrated greater amount of keratinized

97 Tissue grafting experiments have implicated cell signall

98 ur studies comparing ADM versus a connective tissue graft for root coverage procedures, two studies c

99 In most cases, connective tissue grafting for root coverage should be preferred to

100 ce and the current status of autogenous soft tissue grafting for soft tissue augmentation and recessi

101 Soft tissue grafting for the purposes of increasing the width

102 ent research of actively growing, functional tissue grafts for joint repair.

103 hnologies as alternatives to autogenous soft tissue grafts for periodontal and peri-implant plastic s

104 ng a simple approach to harvest a connective tissue graft from the palate.

105 tages and disadvantages of harvesting a soft tissue graft from the tuberosity and to compare it with

106 Soft tissue grafts from the maxillary tuberosity are rich in

107 y of complication occurrence after free soft tissue grafting (FSTG) or subepithelial connective tissu

108 Different soft tissue graft harvesting approaches have been proposed.

109 The subepithelial connective tissue graft has markedly broadened clinicians' abilitie

110 e suggests that the subepithelial connective tissue graft has the highest percentage of mean root cov

111 Connective tissue grafting has a beneficial effect on the peri-impl

112 tient experience of previous autogenous soft tissue grafting has an influence on their decision to un

113 Many methods, most using autogenous soft tissue grafts, have been utilized, but with associated m

114 of the immediate implant combined with soft tissue graft (IMITG).

115 ment consisted of a subepithelial connective tissue graft in conjunction with a coronally positioned

116 cularization of the subepithelial connective tissue graft in dogs.

117 The subepithelial connective tissue graft in this study was found to have adhered to

118 Thus, implant placement combined with soft tissue grafting in preserved alveolar ridges does not re

119 and used as alternatives to autogenous soft tissue grafts in keratinized tissue augmentation and in

120 useful substitute for autogenous connective tissue grafts in root coverage procedures.

121 ferent strategies to generate transplantable tissue grafts in vitro and harness host regenerative pro

122 e the clinical effectiveness of a connective tissue graft including periosteum used as a barrier for

123 y a central role in acute rejection of solid tissue grafts, including orthotopic corneal allografts.

124 SN and surrounding tissue by a single solid tissue graft is sufficient to improve motor asymmetry in

125 age studies demonstrates that the connective tissue graft is the most effective and predictable metho

126 Longer-term pain after soft tissue grafting is associated with greater analgesic usa

127 Likewise, the survival of fetal neural tissue grafts is highly dependent on the establishment o

128 ure but varying the amount of the connective tissue graft left uncovered.

129 nce and plaque index, regardless of the soft tissue grafting material employed, whereas bilaminar tec

130 ained in noncastrated recipients, testicular tissue grafting may be applied in the clinic.

131 andomized controlled trial with a connective tissue graft (n = 20, CTG group), an XCM (n = 20, XCM gr

132 CID mice with functional human hematopoietic tissue grafts (NOD/SCID-hu mice) and observed that a sub

133 al, and molecular evidence shows that a soft tissue graft obtained from the maxillary tuberosity has

134 , crown lengthening, implant placement, soft tissue graft, open flap debridement or surgical removal

135 to receive either a subepithelial connective tissue graft or a coronally advanced flap plus EMD.

136 A connective tissue graft or free gingival graft, classically used fo

137 to 38.66, P <0.000), and use of a connective tissue graft (OR 4.56, 95% CI: 1.72 to 12.08, P <0.002)

138 as spontaneous immunity to certain tumours, tissue grafts, or autoimmune disorders.

139 The vascularization of the connective tissue graft originates from the periodontal plexus, the

140 Subjects that received an autogenous soft tissue graft over 10 years ago were screened and invited

141 improve the postoperative protocols of soft tissue grafting, particularly for FGG.

142 orced membrane, and a pediculated connective tissue graft (PCTG) to simultaneously augment the hard a

143 n in the outcome of subepithelial connective tissue grafts performed to cover localized gingival rece

144 Soft tissue graft placement combined with immediate implantat

145 ding the use of bone grafts, membranes, soft tissue grafts, post-surgical chlorhexidine rinses, syste

146 O-status to improve the quality of composite tissue grafts prior to transplantation.

147 cluded that: 1) the subepithelial connective tissue graft procedure provides a satisfactory solution

148 group) groups and treated with a connective tissue graft procedure.

149 the resorptive response following connective tissue graft procedures to treat tooth root recession.

150 his study was to evaluate the impact of soft tissue grafting procedures conducted over a decade ago o

151 the most common complications following soft tissue grafting procedures; however, detailed documentat

152 es and conventional subepithelial connective tissue grafts, respectively.

153 l evaluation of the subepithelial connective tissue graft revealed a connective tissue attachment bet

154 MCAT) technique and subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) (MCAT+SCTG+/-HA).

155 in (PRF) + CAF, and subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) + CAF.

156 on of an autogenous subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) and a coronally advanced flap (CAF)

157 llagen membrane and subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) have made collagen membrane an attra

158 The subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) is a predictable technique for root

159 The subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) is one of the most used and predicta

160 two versions of the subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) procedure, SCTG with or without the

161 Subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) procedures provide the best root cov

162 y of life following subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) surgery through a randomized control

163 sthetic outcomes of subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) technique with or without the use of

164 grafting (FSTG) or subepithelial connective tissue grafting (SCTG) procedures; 2) to evaluate the us

165 er GR reduction for subepithelial connective tissue grafts (SCTG) + coronally advanced flap (CAF) com

166 different types of subepithelial connective tissue grafts (SCTG) considering clinical parameters and

167 g of donor sites of subepithelial connective tissue grafts (SCTG), harvested by the single incision t

168 aling with those of subepithelial connective tissue grafts (SCTG).

169 Subepithelial connective tissue grafts (SCTGs), matrix grafts, and enamel matrix

170 ous grafts, such as subepithelial connective tissue grafts (SCTGs).

171 ians performing partial-thickness connective tissue grafts should be alert to the possible occurrence

172 trains of immunodeficient mice bearing human tissue grafts (skin and artery) inoculated with 1 x 10(6

173 ection of primarily vascularized xenografts, tissue grafts such as skin or islets are revascularized

174 nd of keratinized tissue, and lack of a soft tissue graft surgery at the time of implant placement.

175 llowing routine partial thickness connective tissue graft surgery.

176 jor vascular surgery, organ transplantation, tissue-graft surgery, and cases managed with low mean ar

177 gingival augmentation procedure (connective tissue graft; surgery group) and an equal number of cont

178 roup for recession coverage; b) a connective tissue graft tended to increase keratinized tissue compa

179 atio of 3.5), but compared with a connective tissue graft, the result was not significantly different

180 atal rugae are generally avoided during soft tissue grafting, there are few literature references det

181 en proposed to replace autogenous connective tissue grafts, therefore the aims of this study are to r

182 n, beginning with a subepithelial connective tissue graft to increase tissue thickness subjacent to t

183 ression in cultured human TECs, human thymic tissue grafted to immunodeficient mice, and murine fetal

184 sites of gingival recession using connective tissue grafting to alleviate root surface sensitivity an

185 n medicine from using synthetic implants and tissue grafts to a tissue engineering approach that uses

186 gingival recession have typically used soft tissue grafts to obtain defect coverage with great clini

187 Isthmic tissue grafts transform chick caudal forebrain into an e

188 gnize proteins expressed by many normal host tissues, graft-versus-leukemia effects are often accompa

189 the palatal donor sites following connective tissue grafting via the SIT.

190 APF with any evaluated soft tissue graft was associated with with reduction of probi

191 ogic examination; a subepithelial connective tissue graft was harvested and utilized to prevent an es

192 A soft tissue graft was harvested from each side for histology

193 membrane) and 84% (subepithelial connective tissue graft) was achieved.

194 , CB cell suspension grafts or control adult tissue grafts were intracerebally transplanted into the

195 Both the hard and soft tissue grafts were well accepted by the body and healing

196 Palatal biopsies, in the form of connective tissue grafts, were obtained from periodontally healthy

197 bio-integration profile and quality of soft tissue graft when using mineral fiber-reinforced screws

198 the safety and efficacy of stem cell-derived tissue grafts when returned to the same pigs at a later

199 was superior to the subepithelial connective tissue graft with regard to early healing and patient-re

200 rom mouse fibroblasts, resulting in prostate tissue grafts with appropriate histological and molecula

201 Although connective tissue grafts with coronally advanced flaps (CTG + CAF)

202 splantation is the most common form of solid tissue grafting, with an approximately 80% to 90% succes

203 eal transplantation, the most common form of tissue grafting worldwide.