ライフサイエンスコーパス: tonometer

1 e were performed with a Goldmann applanation tonometer.

2 metry was performed with a modified Goldmann tonometer.

3 d DBA/2NNia mice was measured with a rebound tonometer.

4 almologist specialists to use the ICare HOME tonometer.

5 Goldmann applanation tonometry and a rebound tonometer.

6 influence IOP as measured with a non-contact tonometer.

7 ter (GAT) and supine position with a Perkins tonometer.

8 traocular pressure (IOP) was measured with a tonometer.

9 sing the Ocular Response Analyzer noncontact tonometer.

10 were killed, IOP was measured with a rebound tonometer.

11 ressure was measured using a TonoLab rebound tonometer.

12 ere examined for changes in IOP by a TonoLab tonometer.

13 ice were measured using a commercial rebound tonometer.

14 ads and measured twice weekly with a rebound tonometer.

15 was calculated with the help of an arterial tonometer.

16 d IOP was measured with Goldmann applanation tonometer.

17 IOP was monitored with an applanation tonometer.

18 rown Norway rats was measured with a rebound tonometer.

19 traocular pressure (IOP) was measured with a tonometer.

20 IOP was measured with a rebound tonometer.

21 intraocular pressure (IOP) using the rebound tonometer.

22 rebound tonometry and the Proview phosphene tonometer.

23 oelasticity, were measured with a noncontact tonometer.

24 fference in measurement of IOP between the 2 tonometers.

25 H were determined with saline-filled balloon tonometers.

26 dynamic and can be influenced by the use of tonometers.

27 d poorest agreement between PN and the other tonometers.

28 a small MD in the measured IOP between the 2 tonometers.

29 s of ocular biometrics, AHD, and IOP using 4 tonometers.

30 0.98) showed excellent agreement between the tonometers.

31 ontact lenses beyond current wearable ocular tonometers.

32 esult in significant differences among the 3 tonometers.

33 raobserver variability were observed for all tonometers.

34 agreement (95% limits) seemed to vary across tonometers: 0.2 mmHg (-3.8 to 4.3 mmHg) for the NCT to 2

35 IOP was recorded with a handheld tonometer 1 hour, 4 hours, and 23 hours following daily

36 The Perkins tonometer, although slightly less accurate than the Tono

37 (IOP) was measured with the Dynamic Contour tonometer and central corneal thickness (CCT) was also e

38 a can perform self-tonometry using a rebound tonometer and examine patient acceptability.

39 calculated from the deep learning-predicted tonometer and mire diameters using the Imbert-Fick formu

40 odel was trained to localize and segment the tonometer and mires.

41 l PCO2 was measured with an air-equilibrated tonometer and pHi and PCO2 gap were calculated.

42 te the relationship between mean IOP by each tonometer and rates of visual field loss over time, whil

43 led to identify the outline of the reference tonometer and the applanation mires.

44 New tonometers such as the dynamic contour tonometer and the Proview tonometer do not appear to be

45 IOP and CCT were measured with a hand-held tonometer and ultrasound pachymetry on the first, third,

46 an analysis was used to compare each pair of tonometers and whether the difference between tonometers

47 P) was measured using a Goldmann applanation tonometer, and central corneal thickness (CCT) was measu

48 IOP was measured with a rebound tonometer, and optic nerve (ON) damage was determined by

49 IOP was monitored daily by handheld tonometer, and retinas were collected 8 days and 5 weeks

50 IOP was measured with a hand-held tonometer, and semiautomated optic nerve axon counts wer

51 ter (HAT), rebound tonometer, transpalpebral tonometer, and Tono-Pen.

52 corneal conforming shape used on a Goldmann tonometer appears to be a more sensitive and reliable in

53 Use of the Proview phosphene tonometer appears to decrease patient anxiety regarding

54 baseline, both with an applanation resonance tonometer (ART) and an ocular response analyzer (ORA), a

55 The IOP measurements were conducted with a tonometer at 2 to 4 hours after onset of the nocturnal a

56 (in mm Hg) measured by hand-held applanation tonometer, at different time points.

57 th the Tono-Pen (TP), a handheld applanation tonometer based on the Mackay-Marg principle.

58 ts were obtained over a 4-week study using a tonometer before and after pump implantation.

59 applanating tips and reduced weights in the tonometer body from those used in humans and species wit

60 (CCT) and IOP values obtained with all three tonometers but only the IOP values detected with the ICa

61 The I/I tonometer can be used for noninvasive, in vivo IOP measu

62 Two 1-sided tests revealed tonometers can be considered equivalent to one another a

63 A gastric tonometer catheter was placed in the stomach lumen.

64 rwell, MA), the Perkins handheld applanation tonometer (Clement Clarke, Harlow, UK), and the Ocular B

65 ncluding IOP measurement using a non-contact tonometer, corneal structure evaluation with Pentacam Sc

66 The IOP readings generated by the rebound tonometer correlated very well with the actual pressure

67 and IOP was estimated by the new-generation tonometer Corvis ST.

68 rmined using 86Rb+ as a tracer for K+; glass tonometers coupled to a gas mixing pump were used to equ

69 ore, single-use tonometer tips or disposable tonometer covers should be considered when treating pati

70 g a newly developed modified Goldmann convex tonometer (CT) 1 year after myopic laser refractive surg

71 The iCare HOME tonometer demonstrated good agreement with GAT, with mea

72 onometers and whether the difference between tonometers depended on mean IOP.

73 parisons was the difference in IOP between 2 tonometers dependent on mean IOP.

74 he dynamic contour tonometer and the Proview tonometer do not appear to be influenced by central corn

75 ements obtained with the iCare IC200 rebound tonometer during natural sleep and under general anesthe

76 d comparisons, were included, representing 8 tonometers: dynamic contour tonometer, noncontact tonome

77 The Goldmann-type tonometer error measured on live human eyes was 5.2 +/-1

78 e pressures were monitored with a TonoPen XL tonometer for 17 days before the rats were killed.

79 The availability of an easy-to-use, reliable tonometer for IOP measurements in mice will allow more e

80 The narrow LoA between the tonometers for an IOP <21 mmHg makes it a useful alterna

81 mpared the accuracy and variability of three tonometers for measuring IOP in rabbits.

82 upright position with a Goldmann Applanation Tonometer (GAT) and supine position with a Perkins tonom

83 as measured once with a Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) and twice by ART (ART1, ART2), in random

84 d prisms affixed to the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) armature.

85 IOP using the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) was also obtained after compensation for

86 In this study, the gold standard Goldmann tonometer (GAT) was compared to ICP and Tono-Pen AVIA (T

87 lar pressure (IOP) with Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) was measured at baseline and at 4 and 8

88 IOP values obtained by Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), and Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA).

89 eumatonometer (PN), and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT).

90 al tonometers (TTs) and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT).

91 traocular pressure with Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT-IOP), and endothelial cell density (ECD),

92 smaller variance; the hand-held applanation tonometer had lower accuracy and higher variability.

93 nse analyzer, Ocuton S, handheld applanation tonometer (HAT), rebound tonometer, transpalpebral tonom

94 acceptability and feasibility of iCare HOME tonometer (HT) and Virtual Field (VF) devices in the hom

95 vailable (45%), and otherwise with the iCare tonometer (iCare USA, Raleigh, NC), the Tono-Pen (Reiche

96 ressure measurements using the ICare rebound tonometer (ICare, Helsinki, Finland) were obtained.

97 action until the introduction of the Schiotz tonometer in 1905.

98 IOP was measured by two scales of Schiotz tonometer in both eyes, and the mean was calculated.

99 udy evaluated the applicability of a rebound tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure (IOP) in rat

100 Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured by a tonometer in rats under ketamine-xylazine anesthesia.

101 g mechanical ventilation, with a nasogastric tonometer in situ, in whom enteral feeding was initiated

102 IOP was measured using a Perkins tonometer in the supine position on 58 eyes and upright

103 erformed using a modified electronic Schiotz tonometer in two positions: seated position, 70 degrees

104 ase in GAT IOP, the difference between the 2 tonometers increased by 0.04 mmHg (P < 0.001).

105 eyes were monitored by slit lamp, a handheld tonometer, indirect ophthalmoscopy, electroretinography

106 Hourly awakening during noncontact tonometer IOP measurements did not seem to alter the mea

107 The iCare HOME tonometer is a reliable and feasible tool for at-home IO

108 uation, when measuring IOP with the Goldmann tonometer, it is likely that IOP is underestimated in ey

109 tonometers, one should consider that not all tonometer measurements are interchangeable and the propa

110 erwent Icare HOME (Icare Oy, Vanda, Finland) tonometer measurements to record IOP 4 times daily for 5

111 (SICS) using rebound tonometry with an iCare tonometer model IC100.

112 ith calibrated tonometer (rats) and Goldmann tonometer (monkeys).

113 eters: dynamic contour tonometer, noncontact tonometer (NCT), ocular response analyzer, Ocuton S, han

114 [SD] 11.3+/-3.0 years) using three different tonometers: non-contact (NCT), the ICare and Goldmann ap

115 , representing 8 tonometers: dynamic contour tonometer, noncontact tonometer (NCT), ocular response a

116 The Tono-pen XL is the tonometer of choice for measuring IOP in rabbits within

117 ke a comparative analysis of three different tonometers on a group of healthy children to see whether

118 asurement of IOP was performed with a Shiotz tonometer once weekly for 4 weeks.

119 fore, when comparing IOP data from different tonometers, one should consider that not all tonometer m

120 thickness was assessed using an applanation tonometer or high-resolution MRI (23.4 microm2 in-plane)

121 he supine (TonoPen XL) and sitting (Goldmann tonometer) positions.

122 anipulated by changing reservoir height, and tonometer pressure readings were recorded by an independ

123 measured by a standard Goldmann applanation tonometer prism (IOPg) and a modified correcting applana

124 Nine of the 10 studies used tonometer prisms and 1 used steel discs.

125 Damage to tonometer prisms can be caused by sodium hypochlorite, 7

126 of various disinfection methods for reusable tonometer prisms in eye care and to highlight how disinf

127 Tonometer prisms should be examined regularly for signs

128 ) was measured on each eye using a new iCare tonometer probe, an iCare probe previously used and disi

129 The ICare tonometer provided statistically higher IOP values (16.9

130 pressure (IOP) was measured with calibrated tonometer (rats) and Goldmann tonometer (monkeys).

131 ensated IOP (IOP(cc)), and the ICare Rebound Tonometer (RBT) (Tiolat, Oy, Helsinki, Finland).

132 Participants' tonometer readings were similar to those of the ophthalm

133 Upon tonometer return, subjects underwent SLT or new medicati

134 s had their IOPs measured with iCare rebound tonometer (RT), ocular response analyzer corneal-compens

135 measured hourly using a portable noncontact tonometer (session with nocturnal hourly awakening).

136 only the IOP values detected with the ICare tonometer showed a statistically significant correlation

137 Tonometer skills were assessed by comparing participants

138 New tonometers such as the dynamic contour tonometer and the

139 (IOPg) and a modified correcting applanation tonometer surface Goldmann prism (IOPc) before and after

140 hysician, immediately followed by ICare HOME tonometer (TA022, ICare Oy) measurement by the patient.

141 Icare PRO (ICP) is a new Rebound tonometer that is able to measure intraocular pressure (

142 The Goldmann tonometer, the standard for measuring the IOP in the hum

143 these instruments: the hand-held applanation tonometer, the Tono-pen XL, and the pneumatonometer.

144 Tonometers, thus modified, were then used in conscious,

145 The tonometer tip cracks can irritate the cornea, harbor mic

146 ifference in IOP with and without a weighted tonometer tip.

147 w disinfectants to enter the interior of the tonometer tip.

148 nd to highlight how disinfectants can damage tonometer tips and cause subsequent patient harm.

149 Therefore, single-use tonometer tips or disposable tonometer covers should be

150 Disinfectants can cause tonometer tips to swell and crack by dissolving the glue

151 the first experience of the use of a digital tonometer to understand the biomechanical properties of

152 Venous blood from healthy volunteers was tonometered to create different oxygen tensions simulati

153 d on many cohorts of children with different tonometers to determine how the values correlate between

154 IOP was measured with a handheld tonometer (Tono-Pen; Medtronic Solan, Jacksonville, FL)

155 andheld applanation tonometer (HAT), rebound tonometer, transpalpebral tonometer, and Tono-Pen.

156 ability and agreement between transpalpebral tonometers (TTs) and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT

157 All tonometers underestimate IOP, with increasing inaccuracy

158 he Tono-pen XL and the hand-held applanation tonometer underestimated the IOP, whereas the pneumatono

159 All three tonometers underestimated the true IOP, especially at hi

160 On average, IOP by the rebound tonometer was 2.66 mm Hg lower than Goldmann applanation

161 The I/I tonometer was also used to measure IOP in vivo in anesth

162 Repeatability of the measurements with each tonometer was assessed by calculating the mean and varia

163 This tonometer was calibrated in mice against manometrically

164 The accuracy of the TonoLab rebound tonometer was determined in cannulated mouse and rat eye

165 The rebound tonometer was easy to use and accurately measured IOP in

166 the superior mesenteric artery and an ileal tonometer was inserted.

167 The Goldmann applanation tonometer was modified to measure IOP in the conscious,

168 A 7-French recirculating gas tonometer was placed in the stomach via the orogastric r

169 The Perkins applanation tonometer was the most reliable for measuring IOP in the

170 agreement in IOP measurements from the four tonometers was analyzed with Data analysis using Bootstr

171 e agreement between Icare HOME and reference tonometers was used to assess precision.

172 The IOPs with the rebound tonometer were similar whether obtained by self-tonometr

173 egree of correlation of the peak IOP by both tonometers were assessed.

174 TonoLab and Tono-Pen tonometers were calibrated in cannulated rat eyes connec

175 adjusted for proparacaine's effect on IOP, 3 tonometers were equivalent between each other when deter

176 All tonometers were less accurate when the IOP was elevated

177 Measurements with the 3 tonometers were not statistically different from each ot

178 In anesthetized rats Goldmann tonometers were tested that had reduced biprism angles i

179 An induction-impact (I/I) tonometer, which operates on the rebound principle, was

180 The IOP was measured using an applanation tonometer with a fiber-optic pressure sensor.

181 cornea generated by Corvis ST, a noncontact tonometer with a high-speed Scheimpflug-camera.

182 Then a tonometer with the appropriate configuration of tip and

183 Tonometers with reduction of the biprism angles in the a

184 Tonometers with tips with biprism angles of 48 degrees a

185 three times using a Nidek NT-510 non-contact tonometer within a maximum of 5 min before and after VF