ライフサイエンスコーパス: tonometry

1 rrelated with endothelial function (arterial tonometry).

2 ve reflections, measured via radial arterial tonometry).

3 -clinic IOP measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry.

4 eal biomicroscopy, fluorescein test, digital tonometry.

5 using reactive hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry.

6 (FMD), and arterial stiffness by applanation tonometry.

7 r pressure (IOP) was measured by noninvasive tonometry.

8 lanation tonometry was compared with rebound tonometry.

9 IOP was measured by rebound tonometry.

10 measured OPA on both eyes by dynamic contour tonometry.

11 ghlights an important limitation of Goldmann tonometry.

12 using both rebound tonometry and cannulation tonometry.

13 r pressure (IOP) was measured by applanation tonometry.

14 corneal properties than Goldmann applanation tonometry.

15 techniques, especially Goldmann applanation tonometry.

16 IOP was measured in mmHg by applanation tonometry.

17 hymeter, and IOP was measured by applanation tonometry.

18 ence interval, 7.15-8.6 mins) for the saline tonometry.

19 ously by using capnometric recirculating gas tonometry.

20 ated gas system than with traditional saline tonometry.

21 uscle and the stomach as assessed by gastric tonometry.

22 on value for the CO2 measurement with saline tonometry.

23 to a change in CO2 than conventional saline tonometry.

24 l artery pressure waveforms were recorded by tonometry.

25 l pH of the sigmoid colon was measured using tonometry.

26 IOP was measured by noncontact tonometry.

27 those obtained by conventional intermittent tonometry.

28 ired from pulse wave analysis by applanation tonometry.

29 performed during the 5 visits preceding home tonometry.

30 iation were compared between clinic and home tonometry.

31 sure was measured using Goldmann applanation tonometry.

32 patients who could successfully perform self-tonometry.

33 on (n = 6397), included Goldmann applanation tonometry.

34 nsthoracic echocardiography, and applanation tonometry.

35 ate [AI@75]) were obtained using applanation tonometry.

36 al [CI], 0.82-0.91) for Goldmann applanation tonometry, 0.91 (95% CI, 0.88-0.94) for Icare rebound to

37 s 2.66 mm Hg lower than Goldmann applanation tonometry (95% limits of agreement, -3.48 to 8.80 mm Hg)

38 This study gives strong support to ball tonometry, a new method of measuring cell turgor pressur

39 arey), which standardized the routine use of tonometry after the plaintiff lost vision because of a d

40 IOP was measured by Goldmann tonometry, AHF and corneal endothelium transfer coeffici

41 In the "comparison" study, carotid tonometry allowed the calculation of the reference effec

42 Radial artery applanation tonometry allows completely noninvasive continuous cardi

43 Capnometric recirculating gas tonometry allows continuous and automated assessment of

44 Dynamic contour tonometry also appears to give pressure readings that ar

45 aire was used to examine perceptions of self-tonometry among patients.

46 /- 1.3 kPa) by capnometric recirculating gas tonometry and 45.8 +/- 3.4 torr (6.1 +/- 0.5 kPa) by con

47 g MAR visual acuity, refraction, applanation tonometry and a dilated fundus examination.

48 and central pressures (estimated via radial tonometry and a generalized transfer function) were asse

49 IOP was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and a rebound tonometer.

50 iac CT, heart and brain MRI, serial vascular tonometry and accelerometry) have been performed repeate

51 2 pm, 6 pm, 9 pm using Goldmann applanation tonometry and at 12 midnight using Perkins tonometry in

52 Pulse-wave velocity was assessed from tonometry and body surface measurements.

53 O2 values were obtained by recirculating gas tonometry and by the conventional method.

54 etry appears to correlate well with Goldmann tonometry and can be used without topical anesthesia.

55 9SvJ) and hevin-null mice using both rebound tonometry and cannulation tonometry.

56 tricular geometry were measured with carotid tonometry and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, respec

57 ssure waveforms were recorded by applanation tonometry and central aortic pressure waveforms generate

58 ure (IOP) measured with Goldmann Applanation Tonometry and DCT in the study and control groups was no

59 icroscopy, conjunctival impression cytology, tonometry and fundus exam.

60 hat is known about CCT and its relation with tonometry and glaucoma risk.

61 ority data elements within the categories of tonometry and gonioscopy.

62 f glaucoma, thereby complicating the role of tonometry and measurement of intraocular pressure as scr

63 ction was assessed using peripheral arterial tonometry and near-infrared spectroscopy, and the endoth

64 Radial artery applanation tonometry and pulse wave analysis were used to derive ce

65 Radial artery applanation tonometry and pulse wave analysis were used to derive ce

66 Radial artery applanation tonometry and pulse-wave analysis were used to derive ce

67 By use of calibrated tonometry and pulsed Doppler, arterial stiffness and pul

68 With the use of calibrated tonometry and pulsed Doppler, pulsatile hemodynamics wer

69 ve correlated well with Goldmann applanation tonometry and seem to be independent of corneal thicknes

70 ve measurements between Goldmann applanation tonometry and the EYEMATE-IO implant were performed.

71 Most patients could perform self-tonometry and the method was acceptable to patients.

72 analyzer, dynamic contour tonometry, rebound tonometry and the Proview phosphene tonometer.

73 central blood pressure (via radial arterial tonometry) and cardiovascular function with echocardiogr

74 , carotid artery pulse waves (by applanation tonometry) and the arrival time of reflected waves.

75 ascular function (by using peripheral artery tonometry), and numbers of circulating EPCs and EMPs (by

76 , 0.91 (95% CI, 0.88-0.94) for Icare rebound tonometry, and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.88-0.94) for pneumatonome

77 at was then converted to logMAR, applanation tonometry, and biomicroscopic examination with indirect

78 ssed by RVA, intraocular pressure by contact tonometry, and blood pressure by sphygmomanometry.

79 2 stages of the Bruce protocol), applanation tonometry, and brachial artery flow-mediated dilation te

80 Intraocular pressure was measured by tonometry, and central corneal thickness was measured by

81 ne clinic were screened using visual acuity, tonometry, and fundus photography.

82 oppler echocardiography, peripheral arterial tonometry, and gas exchange.

83 s using dual-wavelength oximetry, noncontact tonometry, and manual sphygmomanometry.

84 phy, magnetic resonance angiography, gastric tonometry, and mesenteric arteriography.

85 Glaucoma is diagnosed using ophthalmoscopy, tonometry, and perimetry.

86 eichert Technologies, Depew, NY), noncontact tonometry, and pneumotonometry.

87 cycloplegic autorefraction, ocular biometry, tonometry, and spectral-domain optical coherence tomogra

88 eated IOP measurements with pneumotonometry, tonometry, and the WIT resulted in SDs of 2.70 mm Hg, 3.

89 examination including, Goldmann applanation tonometry, anterior chamber swept source optical coheren

90 easy to learn to use." CONCLUSION: Icare ONE tonometry appears accurate and well-tolerated compared t

91 Rebound tonometry appears to correlate well with Goldmann tonome

92 ial function testing using peripheral artery tonometry are being performed at enrolment, defervescenc

93 sure (IOP) measurements based on non-contact tonometry are derived from statistics-driven equations a

94 are rebound tonometry, Tonopen, and Goldmann tonometry are in excellent agreement following vitreoret

95 try; however, pressure readings from rebound tonometry are not independent of corneal properties.

96 Vascular ultrasonography and tonometry are promising test modalities for assessment o

97 ontrolled Bioresonator Applanation Resonance Tonometry (ART) and to evaluate possible influential fac

98 e measured gastric-arterial PCO2 gradient by tonometry as an index of gastric mucosal perfusion.

99 itative imaging, optic disc photography, and tonometry at 11 visits.

100 measured in both eyes by masked applanation tonometry at 8 am, 11 am, and 4 pm for 7 consecutive wee

101 re unlikely to replace, Goldmann applanation tonometry at the present time.

102 re recruited to undergo intraoperative brain tonometry at the time of open craniotomy for epilepsy su

103 utput measurements obtained with applanation tonometry (AT-CO) using the T-Line system (Tensys Medica

104 ng medication underwent Goldmann applanation tonometry before and after a protocol-defined washout pe

105 adings were obtained by Goldmann applanation tonometry before pupil dilation for fundoscopy and OCT i

106 sel function measured by peripheral arterial tonometry between 2003 and 2008 in the Framingham Heart

107 w-mediated dilation, digital pulse amplitude tonometry, blood pressure, and carotid-radial pulse wave

108 re HOME device is safe and reliable for self-tonometry, but nearly 1 in 6 individuals may fail to cer

109 sure was measured using Goldmann applanation tonometry by the same observer before and 1 hour after p

110 d pressure pulsatility derived from arterial tonometry (carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity [CFPWV],

111 Tonometry catheters were placed in a test chamber design

112 Two balloon-tip tonometry catheters, one conventional and one modified f

113 mittent PCO2 values obtained by conventional tonometry catheters.

114 ressure was 2 to 3 mmHg higher using rebound tonometry compared with Goldmann applanation tonometry i

115 ren 3 years of age and younger using rebound tonometry compared with noncontact tonometry in 1 level

116 Digital tonometry confirmed acceptable levels of ocular tonus in

117 In children, Icare PRO tonometry correlates well with GAT in the sitting positi

118 ormance of the capnometric recirculating gas tonometry (CRGT) system was tested in vitro using an equ

119 In 204 families with tonometry data, a genome-wide scan was performed with mi

120 ssure (IOP) measurement with dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT)

121 ateral OPA was measured with dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) and was compared between the study and c

122 conventional GAT and Pascal dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) measurements, as well as the correlation

123 OPA was measured by dynamic contour tonometry (DCT), PPAA, RNFL, GCL and macular thickness w

124 ty (Doppler) and augmentation index (carotid tonometry) declined with verapamil (-5.9 +/- 2.1% and -3

125 cosal pH, as determined by recirculating gas tonometry, decreased significantly at 5 mins after start

126 rotid-femoral pulse wave velocity and radial tonometry-derived central augmentation index and subendo

127 rough digital tonometry (peripheral arterial tonometry) detected by reactive hyperemia index (RHI) an

128 cortical arousals, and a peripheral arterial tonometry device was used for the detection of periphera

129 , and LV geometry were measured with carotid tonometry, Doppler, and speckle-tracking echocardiograph

130 te whether the clinical application of brain tonometry during resective procedures could guide the ar

131 ility, was evaluated using peripheral artery tonometry (EndoPAT), and plasma levels of l-arginine, ar

132 flow-mediated dilation, peripheral arterial tonometry/EndoPAT (Itamar Medical Ltd, Caesarea, Israel)

133 examinations, including Goldmann applanation tonometry for IOP measurement, were conducted between 7:

134 ach visit by using radial artery applanation tonometry for pulse wave analysis and modeled in a mixed

135 5) and specificity 0.82 (95% CI, 0.66-0.92); tonometry (for measurement of intraocular pressure; 13 s

136 ally injected and intraocular pressure (IOP) tonometry, fundus photography, and electroretinography w

137 ncluding slit-lamp biomicroscopy, noncontact tonometry, fundus photography, central corneal thickness

138 IOP was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) at hour 0 (8 am +/- 1 hour) at baseline,

139 Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) error relative to intracameral intraocul

140 Goldmann-applanation tonometry (GAT) in the untreated state was recorded and

141 orrection equations for Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) is lacking.

142 Though Goldman applanation tonometry (GAT) is the "gold standard" for IOP measureme

143 Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) measurements were compared with the sens

144 Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) was performed at each study visit for co

145 Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) was then performed by a clinician masked

146 Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) was used for all IOP measurements which

147 between EYEMATE-IO and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) with an intraclass correlation coefficie

148 as measured using PDCT, Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), and the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA;

149 nts were obtained using Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) (Rei

150 e EYEMATE-SC system and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT).

151 rement within 5 mmHg of Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT).

152 our tonometry (DCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT).

153 nterval [CrI] 0-62) and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT; 45, 95% CrI 17-68), whereas threshold st

154 ess (CCT; P = 0.63) and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT; P = 0.32).

155 d examination including Goldmann applanation tonometry, gonioscopy and fundus photography.

156 amination that included Goldmann applanation tonometry, gonioscopy, and CECC measurements.

157 almologic examination, including applanation tonometry, gonioscopy, biometry, stereoscopic fundus exa

158 lit-lamp biomicroscopy, Goldmann applanation tonometry, gonioscopy, dilated fundus examination, centr

159 ution visual acuity, refraction, applanation tonometry, gonioscopy, Lens Opacities Classification Sys

160 ophthalmic examination included applanation tonometry, gonioscopy, pachymetry, optic disc evaluation

161 anterior and posterior segment examinations, tonometry, gonioscopy, pachymetry, perimetry, specular m

162 adings were obtained by Goldmann applanation tonometry (Haag-Streit, Konig, Switzerland) before pupil

163 hage, intramucosal PCO2 by recirculating gas tonometry had increased significantly (49.3 +/- 9.7 torr

164 Effects of tonometry, handling, water drinking, and instillation of

165 Rebound tonometry has been used in animal models of glaucoma, bu

166 Self-tonometry has the potential to improve patient engagemen

167 Other interventions, for example, gastric tonometry, have been abandoned.

168 and appears to correlate well with Goldmann tonometry; however, pressure readings from rebound tonom

169 Home tonometry identified significantly higher maximum IOP, l

170 IOP was measured by applanation tonometry immediately prior to measuring LP opening pres

171 g rebound tonometry compared with noncontact tonometry in 1 level III study.

172 IOP was measured by applanation tonometry in 14 untreated marmosets ranging in age from

173 -radial pulse wave velocity were assessed by tonometry in 1962 participants (mean age, 61 years; 56%

174 nction by carotid ultrasound and applanation tonometry in 271 unmedicated hypertensive patients class

175 ntraocular pressure (IOP) was evaluated with tonometry in a colony of glaucomatous dogs at 8, 15, 18,

176 Subjects underwent tonometry in both eyes while upright (sitting), after in

177 ation, and holds promise for clinic and home tonometry in children.

178 cently been compared to Goldmann applanation tonometry in humans.

179 Tonometry in mice required a biprism angle of 36 degrees

180 IOP was measured by rebound tonometry in mice, and pressure versus flow data were me

181 e (IOP) was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry in monkeys under ketamine anesthesia.

182 n tonometry and at 12 midnight using Perkins tonometry in supine position on two consecutive days.

183 tonometry compared with Goldmann applanation tonometry in the 2 level II studies performed in a clini

184 ss may influence the accuracy of applanation tonometry in the diagnosis, screening, and management of

185 , and a similar number happy to perform self-tonometry in the future.

186 loci linked to IOP (measured by applanation tonometry) in 244 affected sibling pairs with T2D using

187 ressure in the radial artery was obtained by tonometry, in the supine and sitting positions before an

188 ressure in the radial artery was obtained by tonometry, in the supine and sitting positions before an

189 tomileusis surgery make Goldmann applanation tonometry inaccurate, the advent of new diagnostic modal

190 IOP for rebound versus Goldmann applanation tonometry increased as the IOP increased.

191 Using arterial tonometry, iohexol clearance, and magnetic resonance ima

192 Gastric tonometry is an important clinical tool that can provide

193 Rebound tonometry is convenient, can be used without topical ane

194 Goldmann applanation tonometry is the most widely used method of measuring in

195 r calculated by Doppler echocardiography and tonometry: left ventricular volumes and end-systolic ela

196 rneal thickness (CCT), IOP (using noncontact tonometry), manifest refraction, average keratometry, ag

197 Gastric tonometry may aid in the rapid assessment of pharmacolog

198 Newer technology such as rebound tonometry may decrease the frequency of examination unde

199 Goldmann applanation tonometry measurements were modified with 5 correction e

200 (in models that included blood pressure and tonometry measures collected during examination cycle 7)

201 Tonometry measures were obtained on average 3 years afte

202 anges, and agreement were evaluated in the 3 tonometry methods.

203 l artery blood pressure waveform obtained by tonometry (n = 6,336); carotid distensibility and Young'

204 Perhaps the combination of gastric tonometry, near-infrared spectroscopy, urinary PO2 and c

205 requiring computed tomography scan, such as tonometry of carotid femoral pulse wave velocity, bioele

206 d pressure waveforms obtained by applanation tonometry of the contralateral carotid artery.

207 Brain tonometry offers the potential of real-time intraoperati

208 scopy, nonmydriatic digital photography, and tonometry on 429 participants.

209 All parents accomplished Icare ONE tonometry on at least 1 eye; 98% reported it was "easy t

210 s B-mode ultrasound and arterial applanation tonometry on the common carotid artery) was lower (P:<0.

211 Participants underwent ocular tonometry, optical coherence tomography imaging, and gen

212 cally significant adverse effects on gastric tonometry or global indexes of tissue oxygenation.

213 ometer were similar whether obtained by self-tonometry or investigator, with excellent reproducibilit

214 lar pressure >23 mm Hg, Goldmann applanation tonometry), or glaucoma medication use.

215 seconds to study transient changes in IOP to tonometry, or for 15 seconds every 2.5 minutes to study

216 1) and to 6.89 +/- 0.10 by recirculating gas tonometry (p < .001 vs. baseline).

217 nimum IOP, and greater IOP range than clinic tonometry (P < 0.001).

218 ncrease at 1 month with Goldmann applanation tonometry (P = .005).

219 orr (6.1 +/- 0.5 kPa) by conventional saline tonometry (p = NS).

220 ct of arrhythmias on the peripheral arterial tonometry (PAT) amplitude and pulse rate changes.

221 ress were measured using peripheral arterial tonometry (PAT) at baseline and following 3 acute mental

222 Using a fingertip peripheral arterial tonometry (PAT) device, we measured digital pulse amplit

223 noninvasive technique of peripheral arterial tonometry (PAT).

224 ontinuously measured using peripheral artery tonometry (PAT, Itamar Inc).

225 IOP was determined by Goldmann applanation tonometry, PD with vernier calipers in room light, Rfx b

226 OP measurements were compared with in-clinic tonometry performed during the 5 visits preceding home t

227 helial response to hyperemia through digital tonometry (peripheral arterial tonometry) detected by re

228 ncy doubling technique perimetry, noncontact tonometry, pneumatonometry, presenting visual acuity, an

229 Intraocular pressure measurements via home tonometry provide additional clinical information regard

230 Dynamic contour tonometry provides intraocular pressure readings that ar

231 3.1%, P = 0.01) and digital pulse amplitude tonometry ratio (0.10 +/- 0.12 to 0.23 +/- 0.16, P = 0.0

232 ine tonometry samples, and recirculating gas tonometry readings were obtained immediately before and

233 he ocular response analyzer, dynamic contour tonometry, rebound tonometry and the Proview phosphene t

234 nts 6 months apart with Goldmann applanation tonometry recorded in the sitting position at 9 am, 10 a

235 least one pre-exposure and one post-exposure tonometry records within 365 days of the index date were

236 ence interferometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry, respectively.

237 hest and breast x-rays, visual acuity tests, tonometry, retinal photography, audiometry, vital capaci

238 using reactive hyperemia-peripheral arterial tonometry (RH-PAT) and assessed associations with argini

239 ue of reactive hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry (RH-PAT) as a noninvasive tool to identify ind

240 Reactive hyperemia-peripheral arterial tonometry (RH-PAT), a noninvasive method to assess perip

241 erial and mixed venous blood samples, saline tonometry samples, and recirculating gas tonometry readi

242 ripheral (Finapres) and central (applanation tonometry) SBP values.

243 Rebound tonometry seems to be a reasonably accurate instrument t

244 g gonioscopy by a masked grader, applanation tonometry, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, optic nerve evaluati

245 dy best-corrected visual acuity, applanation tonometry, slit-lamp examination, indirect ophthalmoscop

246 e ratio, and arterial elasticity measured by tonometry substantially reduced the magnitudes of these

247 Natural-sleep rebound tonometry supports bias-aware, clinic-based trend monito

248 The automated gas tonometry system has a significantly faster response to

249 a slightly faster time constant for the gas tonometry system with a 5% change in the gas environment

250 om 7.10 +/- 0.10) by the conventional saline tonometry technique (p < .01) and to 6.89 +/- 0.10 by re

251 ickness (CCT) is a potent confounder of most tonometry techniques, especially Goldmann applanation to

252 easurement using the noninvasive applanation tonometry technology is basically feasible in ICU patien

253 The applanation tonometry technology provides cardiac output values with

254 ore detailed clinical phenotyping using home tonometry, the results of which may guide additional int

255 For tonometry, there was consensus that we need to define ne

256 ontinuously by capnometric recirculating gas tonometry throughout the experiment.

257 was easy, with 73 of 79 (92%) reporting self-tonometry to be comfortable, and a similar number happy

258 othelial function by using peripheral artery tonometry to determine the reactive hyperemia index (RHI

259 sease characteristics and radial applanation tonometry to measure arterial stiffness were evaluated i

260 herosclerosis, and radial artery applanation tonometry to measure arterial stiffness.

261 ography, carotid ultrasonography, and radial tonometry to measure arterial stiffness.

262 is (discrete plaque), and radial applanation tonometry to measure arterial stiffness.

263 The authors used tonometry to measure microbead-induced IOP elevations.

264 Applanation tonometry (TONO) and in-plane PCMR was performed in 24 v

265 IOP measurements using Icare rebound tonometry, Tonopen, and Goldmann tonometry are in excell

266 part in the study received standardized self-tonometry training and were then instructed to measure t

267 Baseline examinations included tonometry, ultrasound A-scan biometry, and anterior segm

268 IOP was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry under ketamine anesthesia after single or twic

269 ther patients with glaucoma can perform self-tonometry using a rebound tonometer and examine patient

270 ed in the supine position for 5 minutes, and tonometry using the Icare PRO and the Tono-Pen was obtai

271 ; p = NS vs. corresponding recirculating gas tonometry values).

272 ported that they frequently performed either tonometry, visual field testing, or fundus examination d

273 Preoperative IOP measured by Goldmann tonometry was 13.4 +/- 6.2 mm Hg.

274 ce, mean IOP +/- SD as determined by rebound tonometry was 9.8 +/- 3.9 mm Hg when the animals were an

275 Goldmann tonometry was analyzed in a retrospective, cross-section

276 el III study in which noncontact applanation tonometry was compared with rebound tonometry.

277 artially successful patients (71%) felt self-tonometry was easy, with 73 of 79 (92%) reporting self-t

278 ssure (IOP) measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry was not different between groups (P = 0.112) w

279 A subset of patients in whom home tonometry was ordered by their glaucoma clinician becaus

280 Gastric tonometry was performed after completion of the surgical

281 Radial applanation tonometry was performed in the third Strong Heart Study

282 Tonometry was performed only in the first study.

283 To evaluate intraocular pressure (IOP), tonometry was performed with a modified Goldmann tonomet

284 Gastric tonometry was used as an index of gastric mucosal oxygen

285 Radial tonometry was used to calculate central blood pressure.

286 Goldmann applanation tonometry was used to measure IOP.

287 he 6-hour IOP response (Goldmann applanation tonometry) was determined before the drug application an

288 Using peripheral arterial tonometry, we compared ED in YLPHIV and age-matched yout

289 Using arterial tonometry, we evaluated 3 measures of aortic stiffness:

290 Using arterial tonometry, we evaluated heritability and linkage of forw

291 2 clinical visits with Goldmann applanation tonometry were included.

292 romanometer and radial pressure by automated tonometry were measured in 20 patients at steady state a

293 Echocardiography and arterial tonometry were performed to quantify arterial and ventri

294 ne modified for continuous recirculating gas tonometry, were inserted into each animal's stomach by t

295 ures were obtained from Goldmann applanation tonometry when available (45%), and otherwise with the i

296 red at various intervals by pneumotonometry, tonometry, WIT, and manometry.

297 cision cataract surgery (SICS) using rebound tonometry with an iCare tonometer model IC100.

298 Home tonometry with iCare HOME reliably detects therapy-relat

299 Measurement of AS by applanation tonometry with pulse-wave velocity has been the gold-sta

300 ures can be accurately estimated from radial tonometry with the use of a generalized TF.