ライフサイエンスコーパス: tooth extraction

1 on with professional oral care (pretreatment tooth extraction).

2 can preserve alveolar ridge dimension after tooth extraction.

3 cause increased bleeding following a single tooth extraction.

4 absolute bony dimensional changes following tooth extraction.

5 n a human buccal wall defect model following tooth extraction.

6 ival biopsies were obtained prior to routine tooth extraction.

7 n increased risk for complications following tooth extraction.

8 ew bone growth in alveolar sockets following tooth extraction.

9 ted with 20 participants requiring ARP after tooth extraction.

10 alveolar bone resorption as a consequence of tooth extraction.

11 we induced ONJ using periapical disease and tooth extraction.

12 ence alveolar osteitis (AO) following wisdom tooth extraction.

13 sional changes in the ridge occur soon after tooth extraction.

14 most effective in preventing MRONJ following tooth extraction.

15 step in restoring healthy function following tooth extraction.

16 eserving alveolar ridge dimensions following tooth extraction.

17 lines for the management of acute pain after tooth extraction.

18 nerally restricted to preventive measures or tooth extraction.

19 the rate of alveolar bone healing following tooth extraction.

20 for use in alveolar ridge preservation after tooth extraction.

21 ne loss and/or accelerate bone healing after tooth extraction.

22 ne loss and the rate of bone formation after tooth extraction.

23 ficant and rapid bone loss that occurs after tooth extraction.

24 les in explaining dental pain recalled after tooth extraction.

25 have been used for ridge preservation after tooth extraction.

26 loss of ridge volume that typically follows tooth extraction.

27 in the unligated teeth and reduced BH after tooth extraction.

28 ation and tissue injury, including that from tooth extraction.

29 ma following acute injury or surgery such as tooth extraction.

30 rapy to prevent severe bone resorption after tooth extraction.

31 limited use in assessing implant risk before tooth extraction.

32 d a normal course of wound healing following tooth extraction.

33 xillary premolar, canine, or central incisor tooth extraction.

34 impact of amoxicillin prophylaxis on single-tooth extraction.

35 ontinue aspirin for persons requiring single-tooth extraction.

36 ons of the residual alveolar ridge following tooth extraction.

37 sthesia, 10 beagle dogs underwent atraumatic tooth extractions.

38 s, with 16 sites per group: 1) ESC-1, single tooth extraction; 2) ESC-2, two contiguous teeth extract

39 s in routine checkup visits but increases in tooth extraction, a procedure that is highly used by pub

40 Following tooth extraction, a total of 30 sockets in 19 patients w

41 We addressed the hypothesis that tooth extraction activates the expression of a unique se

42 ic space closure initiation, after permanent tooth extraction, affects the incidence of GC.

43 After tooth extraction, all sites were grafted with a combinat

44 alveolar ridge volume loss as compared with tooth extraction alone in nonmolar teeth.

45 physiologic ridge reduction as compared with tooth extraction alone.

46 After minimally traumatic tooth extraction, alveolar ridge dimensions were measure

47 continuation of OPG-Fc, but not ZA, prior to tooth extraction ameliorated subsequent ONJ development.

48 am computed tomography scans obtained before tooth extraction and after a variable healing period wer

49 f ridge dimensions were taken at the time of tooth extraction and again at implant placement.

50 arbitrary time between 3 and 6 months after tooth extraction and alveolar ridge preservation (ARP).

51 ffect of facial alveolar bone thickness upon tooth extraction and baseline therapy (USH or ARP) on th

52 After tooth extraction and delayed placement of a dental impla

53 Tooth extraction and dental disease have been strongly a

54 es are inherent to the healing process after tooth extraction and filling of the extraction site with

55 Fifty seven patients planned for tooth extraction and implant placement were enrolled.

56 ked at the effect of NICE guidance on wisdom tooth extraction and primary total hip replacement in th

57 useful in immediate implant placement after tooth extraction and resulted in greater stability and a

58 Forty-four patients needing a single rooted tooth extraction and ridge preservation in preparation f

59 st that waiting approximately 6 months after tooth extraction and ridge preservation using mineralize

60 in histologic and clinical healing following tooth extraction and ridge preservation using two differ

61 Molar tooth extraction and ridge preservation were performed i

62 Forty-four patients had tooth extraction and ridge preservation with DFDBA that

63 reater new vital bone formation occurs after tooth extraction and ridge preservation with DFDBA when

64 re histologic and clinical healing following tooth extraction and ridge preservation with either cort

65 tomographic (CT) scans are often taken after tooth extraction and socket healing to assess the healed

66 treatments and reduction of the time between tooth extraction and the placement of the definitive pro

67 l species in blood cultures following single-tooth extraction and tooth brushing.

68 endocarditis-related bacteremia from single-tooth extraction and toothbrushing and to determine the

69 outcome between natural healing after molar tooth extraction and two different techniques of RP usin

70 week, starting four weeks before surgery for tooth extraction and until 7 and 21 days post-surgery.

71 The implants were placed at the time of tooth extraction and were not augmented with barrier mem

72 al conditions (e.g., bone loss around teeth, tooth extractions) and compared with analogous estimates

73 iresorptives were discontinued 1 wk prior to tooth extraction, and animals were evaluated 4 wk later

74 the rat face-M1 and face-S1 occurs following tooth extraction, and if subsequent dental implant place

75 Tooth extractions are followed by significant dimensiona

76 Patients with osteoporosis who receive tooth extractions are typically on either oral bisphosph

77 h a nonabsorbable membrane (dPTFE) following tooth extraction (ARP n = 26).

78 t LMR cutoff values < 4.95 and pre-treatment tooth extraction as significantly associated with the de

79 xamination, and data on number and timing of tooth extractions as well as pre-extraction diagnoses an

80 As a consequence, the decision of tooth extraction attributable to periodontal reasons in

81 e posterior mandible, a CT scan taken before tooth extraction can be of value in assessing the availa

82 gle local injection of fluvastatin following tooth extraction can potentially reduce the chance of de

83 > 0.05), but in comparison with naive rats, tooth extraction caused a significant (P < 0.05) and sus

84 o evaluate the efficacy of ARP therapy after tooth extraction compared with unassisted socket healing

85 baric oxygen (HBO) applied immediately after tooth extraction could ameliorate medication-related ost

86 onstrating the HBO applied immediately after tooth extraction effectively decreases the development o

87 17 adults were evaluated retrospectively for tooth extraction events.

88 ither the control group, which involved only tooth extraction (EXT n = 27), or the experimental group

89 mice, but not control non-drug-treated mice, tooth extraction followed by oral infection with Fusobac

90 dontal regeneration, using PDL-MSCs requires tooth extraction for cell isolation.

91 impact on bacteremia resulting from a single-tooth extraction, given the greater frequency for oral h

92 ted oral health, bleeding gums, loose teeth, tooth extraction, gum disease, and bone loss around teet

93 of self-reported oral health-overall rating, tooth extractions, gum bleeding, loose teeth, bone loss

94 Inadequate indication for tooth extraction has resulted in the sacrifice of many s

95 Alveolar bone changes following tooth extraction have been well documented and have give

96 dies assessed bone remodeling after a single tooth extraction; however, the effect of multiple contig

97 When implants are placed immediately after tooth extraction, I-BP may represent a useful diagnostic

98 Both groups received a periodontal flap, tooth extraction, implant placement, allograft bone, and

99 phasize the importance of dental disease and tooth extraction in ONJ pathogenesis and help delineate

100 mize the loss of alveolar bone subsequent to tooth extraction in preparation for implant therapy.

101 at dental caries was the principal cause for tooth extraction in the IAL and the control groups.

102 Based on these findings, we believe that tooth extraction is a low-risk procedure in HIV-positive

103 Tooth extraction is commonly performed for patients infe

104 Preservation of the alveolar crest after tooth extraction is essential to enhance the surgical si

105 This may represent a challenge and sometimes tooth extraction is inevitable.

106 role in oral osseous wound healing following tooth extraction is less clear.

107 Tooth extraction is the most commonly prescribed ablatio

108 oss of alveolar ridge width and height after tooth extraction is well documented, but models to evalu

109 For the ligature-induced periodontitis and tooth extraction (LIP-TE) model (n = 10), maxillary seco

110 sults seem to indicate that the decision for tooth extraction made by dental health professionals at

111 .95vs LMR >=4.95, P = 0.01) and pretreatment tooth extraction (no vs. yes, P = 0.03) was significantl

112 ry of state anxiety and pain reported during tooth extraction, not depression or state anxiety at the

113 en for 90 minutes, applied immediately after tooth extraction, on the development of osteonecrosis wa

114 ed two methods for socket preservation after tooth extraction: one with a bone graft plug alone, and

115 e, timing of DI placement (immediately after tooth extraction or after socket healing), and treatment

116 scussing regenerative therapy at the time of tooth extraction or immediate implant placement with or

117 Because of bone resorption following tooth extraction, preservation of adequate bony dimensio

118 Patients presenting for tooth extraction, prior to extraction, rated their curre

119 Pretreatment tooth extraction reduced the incidence of ORN in low LMR

120 After a single tooth extraction, remodelling processes are initiated an

121 Tooth extraction results in alveolar bone resorption and

122 Analysis of wisdom tooth extraction showed that NICE guidance was not the p

123 BMP-2/ACS (0.43 mg/ml) can be safely used in tooth extraction sites and in local ridge augmentation p

124 Second, osteotomies were produced in healed tooth extraction sites and therefore represented the pla

125 ed to bisphosphonate, bacterial infection at tooth extraction sites caused diminished KGF expression

126 diate implants placed in multiple contiguous tooth extraction sites compared to immediate implants pl

127 ver, the effect of PTH therapy on healing of tooth extraction sites is unknown.

128 relief and anti-inflammatory therapeutics at tooth extraction sites to prevent and treat AO.

129 one grafting in maxillary, non-molar, single-tooth extraction sites were recruited.

130 pared to immediate implants placed in single tooth extraction sites.

131 e findings suggest that PTH therapy promotes tooth extraction socket healing and that intra-oral inje

132 re to determine the effect of PTH therapy on tooth extraction socket healing and to examine whether P

133 ctive as subcutaneous injection in promoting tooth extraction socket healing.

134 acterised by loss of the blood clot from the tooth extraction socket leading to infection and pain, r

135 study was to examine the effects of MaR1 on tooth extraction socket wound healing in a preclinical r

136 n tissue before trabecular bone formation in tooth extraction socket.

137 For the tooth extraction (TE) model (n = 10), maxillary first mo

138 Following tooth extraction, the contribution of Gli1(+) MSCs to th

139 mice that developed osteonecrosis following tooth extraction, there was increased bacterial infiltra

140 terials have been used immediately following tooth extraction to fill and/or cover the socket in an a

141 erial, is commonly applied immediately after tooth extraction to reduce jawbone shrinkage in preparat

142 search for procedures to decrease time from tooth extraction to restoration.

143 e was composed of patients who presented for tooth extraction to the outpatient oral/maxillofacial su

144 y placing a biocompatible product, following tooth extraction, to maintain bone volume.

145 d prior to oral surgical procedures, such as tooth extraction, to prevent ONJ development or in patie

146 Tooth extraction triggers alveolar ridge resorption, and

147 Tooth extraction typically leads to loss of ridge width

148 l healing changes of alveolar bone following tooth extraction using cone-beam volumetric tomography (

149 Pretreatment tooth extraction was a useful treatment to prevent ORN.

150 The most attributable reason for tooth extraction was coronal tooth fracture, followed by

151 th (bicuspids forward) immediately following tooth extraction were enrolled.

152 Thirty-six healthy persons requiring a tooth extraction were randomized to receive 325 mg/day a

153 Thirty patients requiring tooth extraction were randomly allocated to either contr

154 Molar tooth extractions were performed in mice.

155 ing gums and 1.37 (95% CI, 1.12 to 1.68) for tooth extraction when we compared severe versus none/low

156 randomized to (1) toothbrushing, (2) single-tooth extraction with amoxicillin prophylaxis, or (3) si

157 with amoxicillin prophylaxis, or (3) single-tooth extraction with identical placebo.

158 ric, and radiographic healing 4 months after tooth extraction with or without placement of a putty-fo

159 ult subjects that underwent non-molar single tooth extraction with or without simultaneous ARP therap

160 , tooth status, tumor size, and pretreatment tooth extraction with professional oral care (pretreatme

161 to compare the histologic changes following tooth extraction with ridge preservation in humans using

162 rptive events that occur as a consequence of tooth extraction with the purpose of facilitating tooth

163 fect of short-term ALN on bone formation and tooth extraction wound healing.

164 expressed by the fibroblasts associated with tooth extraction wound-healing.

165 the differences in the therapeutic effect on tooth-extraction wound healing between bisphosphonate an

166 valuated the impact of strontium ranelate on tooth-extraction wound healing in estrogen-deficient and

167 ted BH and the expression of bone markers in tooth-extraction wound in estrogen-deficient rats wherea

168 he following parameters were analyzed inside tooth-extraction wound: proportion of newly formed bone