ライフサイエンスコーパス: toothbrush

1 l toothbrush) and 0.190 (experimental manual toothbrush).

2 ing three single brushing episodes with each toothbrush.

3 oothbrush and 2.99 prior to using the manual toothbrush.

4 3 minutes of brushing compared to the manual toothbrush.

5 y of a manual toothbrush to this new powered toothbrush.

6 e randomly assigned either a sonic or manual toothbrush.

7 pared with the use of a manual soft-bristled toothbrush.

8 g-rotating toothbrush compared with a manual toothbrush.

9 ed to augment plaque removal achieved with a toothbrush.

10 ubjects brushed three times with each of the toothbrushes.

11 .4% and 28.2% compared to the control manual toothbrushes.

12 ed toothbrush relative to the control manual toothbrushes.

13 h as injection drug use or shared razors and toothbrushes.

14 view of RCTs comparing powered versus manual toothbrushes.

15 tion would enhance the evaluation of powered toothbrushes.

16 rechargeable power toothbrush and two manual toothbrushes.

17 er self-esteem predicted higher frequency of toothbrushing.

18 divorced from the indeterminate variable of toothbrushing.

19 use of antibiotics were not associated with toothbrushing.

20 All patients received CBT of the basics of toothbrushing.

21 and is associated with the uptake of nursery toothbrushing.

22 and WF scores was associated with infrequent toothbrushing.

23 d one of which compared electric with manual toothbrushing.

24 ) in patients receiving toothbrushing vs. no toothbrushing.

25 the V-shaped lesion was excessive horizontal toothbrushing.

26 d study, 290 subjects were randomized to (1) toothbrushing, (2) single-tooth extraction with amoxicil

27 e intervention (22,600-ppm fluoride varnish, toothbrush, 50-mL tube of 1,450 ppm fluoride toothpaste,

28 o intervention (22,600 ppm fluoride varnish, toothbrush, a 50-mL tube of 1,450 ppm fluoride toothpast

29 ciated with gingival recession stemming from toothbrush abrasion.

30 Plaque removal scores for each toothbrush after 3 minutes of brushing were about 50% hi

31 a clinical evaluation of the safety of these toothbrushes after surgical root coverage procedures has

32 American Dental Association reference manual toothbrush alone and in combination with four floss prod

33 eater (P <0.05) mean plaque removal than the toothbrush alone.

34 removed plaque significantly better than the toothbrush alone.

35 ontact areas were as follows: 0.181 with the toothbrush alone; 0.228, 0.217, and 0.210 for the toothb

36 brush-on 0.4% SnF2 gel would be better than toothbrushing alone in maintaining periodontal health in

37 and placed into a control group, which used toothbrushing alone, and two treatment groups, which use

38 scores were 2.98 prior to using the powered toothbrush and 2.99 prior to using the manual toothbrush

39 -week study compared the efficacy of a sonic toothbrush and a manual brush in 40 patients with adult

40 removal scores than the experimental manual toothbrush and ADA reference manual toothbrush groups, r

41 ned plaque removal with a rechargeable power toothbrush and two manual toothbrushes.

42 d trials (RCTs) comparing manual and powered toothbrushes and provide advice on how future trials mig

43 Toothbrushing and dental service use were associated wit

44 lth-related beliefs, which in turn predicted toothbrushing and dental service use.

45 udies have explored the relationship between toothbrushing and development of gingival recession (GR)

46 e group allocation, patients were advised on toothbrushing and instructed in two customized methods o

47 of smoking (pack-years), daily frequency of toothbrushing and most recent visit to a dentist or dent

48 OHT messages focused on child toothbrushing and preventive dental visits.

49 bacteremia from single-tooth extraction and toothbrushing and to determine the impact of amoxicillin

50 ean differences of 0.211 (control ADA manual toothbrush) and 0.190 (experimental manual toothbrush).

51 kind of oral care or control with or without toothbrushing, and examined ventilator-associated pneumo

52 vs general nursing staff, electric vs manual toothbrushing, and studies at low vs high risk of bias.

53 s encouraging more widespread and consistent toothbrushing are warranted.

54 evices or interdental brushes as adjuncts to toothbrushing associated with dental flossing to improvi

55 powered toothbrush compared with the manual toothbrush at 6 months (control, 66.67%; test, 96.67%; P

56 ed split-mouth designs that may have changed toothbrushing behavior.

57 lity with the use of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush compared with a manual toothbrush.

58 higher in participants who used the powered toothbrush compared with the manual toothbrush at 6 mont

59 The uptake of toothbrushing correlated with the decline in d(3)mft (co

60 The powered toothbrush delivered a covariance-adjusted mean plaque s

61 The power toothbrush delivered an adjusted (via analysis of covari

62 The powered toothbrush delivered statistically significantly superio

63 g plaque scores of 0.270, whereas the manual toothbrushes delivered adjusted mean differences of 0.21

64 The power toothbrush demonstrated a statistically significantly gr

65 s-sectional and longitudinal self-reports of toothbrushing, dental floss use, annual prophylaxis, and

66 Toothbrushing did not impact on length of ICU stay, or I

67 anically ventilated critically ill patients, toothbrushing did not significantly reduce the risk of v

68 Toothbrushing exposes epithelia and other tissues of the

69 6 blood draws was 23%, 33%, and 60% for the toothbrushing, extraction-amoxicillin, and extraction-pl

70 Participants reported that the toothbrush felt more pleasant and less rough when either

71 ions, and preventive dental behaviors--i.e., toothbrushing, flossing, using interdental devices, seek

72 r study examined plaque removal with the two toothbrushes following a single use in 40 subjects.

73 21 days, followed by treatment with a sonic toothbrush for 21 days.

74 and distribution of fluoride toothpaste and toothbrushes for home use, measured as the percentage of

75 here were no data on the benefits of powered toothbrushes for periodontal attachment.

76 Thirteen subjects abstained from toothbrushing for 48 hrs and rinsed for 1 min with a 12

77 Toothbrushing for patients in the ICU was associated wit

78 m indirectly predicted gingival bleeding via toothbrushing frequency and oral hygiene effectiveness.

79 There was no association between toothbrushing frequency and the self-consciousness subsc

80 ardiovascular risk, adjusting for education, toothbrushing frequency, body mass index, and diabetes.

81 al visits, self-esteem, oral health beliefs, toothbrushing frequency, oral hygiene effectiveness, and

82 Socioeconomic status was also linked to toothbrushing frequency.

83 cket, bleeding, or calculus; number of DMFT; toothbrushing frequency; blood pressure; sex; and income

84 The powered toothbrush group had, on average, 42.4% and 28.2% greate

85 l manual toothbrush and ADA reference manual toothbrush groups, respectively.

86 Diabetes control was associated with toothbrushing (>/=1 time daily [odds ratio (OR) = 3.10;

87 group were significantly more likely to meet toothbrushing guidelines (odds ratio [OR], 1.77 [95% CI,

88 onfidence interval (CI) 1.08-4.69) and early toothbrushing habits (OR = 2.56, 95% CI 1.34-4.88).

89 use (OR = 7.97, 95% CI 2.98-21.33) and early toothbrushing habits (OR = 4.23, 95% CI 1.72-10.41).

90 n of gutka placement in the mouth, and daily toothbrushing habits were collected using a questionnair

91 ion, regularity of dental visit, and child's toothbrushing habits.

92 uch as age, sex, educational attainment, and toothbrushing habits.

93 The powered toothbrush had, on average, 42.1% and 49.6% greater plaq

94 Both toothbrushes had statistically significantly greater pla

95 The new toothbrush has a powered oscillating round head and a se

96 mentally different design than other powered toothbrushes has recently been introduced.

97 Toothbrushing has no effect on mortality or length of st

98 Oscillating-rotating power toothbrushes have been proven to be clinically efficacio

99 dings of numerous other studies that powered toothbrushes have great potential to remove plaque and i

100 toothbrushes in the U.S. showed that common toothbrush head components can accumulate substantial am

101 brush alone; 0.228, 0.217, and 0.210 for the toothbrush in combination with the three traditional flo

102 Our studies on 22 popular manual toothbrushes in the U.S. showed that common toothbrush h

103 The intervention was supervised toothbrushing in nurseries and distribution of fluoride

104 rimental groups, provided written and verbal toothbrushing instructions, and had their teeth polished

105 e is some evidence to suggest that the sonic toothbrush is more beneficial in resolving inflammation

106 preparing to clean our teeth, we know that a toothbrush is useful, but not a screwdriver.

107 Although toothbrushing is generally performed, interdental cleani

108 iven the greater frequency for oral hygiene, toothbrushing may be a greater threat for individuals at

109 review and meta-analysis suggest that daily toothbrushing may be associated with significantly lower

110 es of bacteremia from dental procedures, but toothbrushing may pose a greater threat.

111 Reports suggest powered toothbrushing may provide some clinical benefit over man

112 igated whether the perception of an electric toothbrush might also be affected by the sound that it m

113 ciency of a recently developed smart digital toothbrush monitoring and training system (DTS) in terms

114 American Dental Association reference manual toothbrush (MT) on mid-buccal preexisting GR (PreGR) dur

115 ling and root planing and the use of a sonic toothbrush on the rate of preterm delivery (<37 weeks ge

116 antisepsis seems to attenuate the effect of toothbrushing on ventilator-associated pneumonia (p for

117 the effect of oral care strategies involving toothbrushing on ventilator-associated pneumonia.

118 In response to toothbrushing, only 10% in the test groups still had RS

119 nt regimen consisting of tongue brushing and toothbrushing or tongue brushing and toothbrushing plus

120 000 ppm F-) for 30 or 120 sec (equivalent to toothbrushing) or for 30 min.

121 m, WalletHub.com (r(s) = 0.30, p = 0.03) and Toothbrush.org (r(s) = 0.35, p = 0.01) rankings.

122 WalletHub.com (r(s) = 0.53, p = 0.00008) and Toothbrush.org (r(s) = 0.60, p < 0.00001) rankings.

123 lth rankings formulated by WalletHub.com and Toothbrush.org.

124 chanical scaling, followed by rigorous daily toothbrushing over a 4-week washout period.

125 tion in plaque than the ADA reference manual toothbrush (P < 0.001), which in turn had a statisticall

126 ction in plaque than the experimental manual toothbrush (P < 0.001).

127 check-up within last year (p=0.18), owning a toothbrush (p=0.99), cleaning teeth twice a day (p=0.68)

128 he modified Bass technique (MBT) after their toothbrushing performance was monitored and they receive

129 e was modestly associated with less frequent toothbrushing, plaque deposit, and greater odds of edent

130 d-resistant, respectively; and 0.252 for the toothbrush plus powered flosser.

131 In a well-matched twin cohort, tongue and toothbrushing plus flossing significantly decreased ging

132 ing and toothbrushing or tongue brushing and toothbrushing plus flossing.

133 had a significant effect on caregivers' own toothbrushing (pooled mean difference, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.0

134 between the roll-out of the national nursery toothbrushing program and a reduction in dental decay in

135 oothbrushing twice daily vs more frequently, toothbrushing provided by dental professionals vs genera

136 evant GR data for the multidirectional power toothbrush (PT) are lacking.

137 .001) greater plaque removal for the powered toothbrush relative to the control manual toothbrushes.

138 floss products in combination with a manual toothbrush removed plaque significantly better than the

139 ontrolled warming heat built-in unit or on a toothbrush, respectively, in addition to regular twice-d

140 Use of a powered toothbrush resulted in a significantly greater reduction

141 The oscillating-rotating toothbrush safely provides clinical benefits in plaque a

142 Electric and manual toothbrushing seem to have similar effects.

143 elling TCS-TP, over one third of the adults' toothbrushes showed a cumulative TCS uptake of 21-37.5 m

144 Both toothbrushes showed statistically significantly greater

145 One trial comparing electric vs. manual toothbrushing showed no difference in ventilator-associa

146 y trial with low risk of bias suggested that toothbrushing significantly reduced ventilator-associate

147 ntifrices exhibited RS relief resulting from toothbrushing starting at Week 4 and 2, respectively.

148 a treatment of proximal hygiene (study 1) or toothbrushing (study 2), respectively.

149 viors known to predict pediatric caries (eg, toothbrushing, sugar-sweetened beverages, diet, fluoride

150 alone, and two treatment groups, which used toothbrushing supplemented with daily use of a SnF2 gel.

151 regimen consisting of 1) tongue brushing and toothbrushing (TB) and 2) TB + flossing (TB + Fl).

152 r 6-month continuous use of different manual toothbrushes (TBs) influences plaque removal and the deg

153 ontal maintenance consisted of thrice-weekly toothbrushing the treated sites.

154 study was to compare the effect of 2 powered toothbrushes, the Rowenta MH700 and the Braun Plak Contr

155 ared the plaque removal efficacy of a manual toothbrush to this new powered toothbrush.

156 This study measured the ability of three toothbrushes to remove plaque following three single bru

157 lling 1,408 patients, five of which compared toothbrushing to usual oral care and one of which compar

158 Authors of toothbrush trials should consider the Consolidated Stand

159 mechanical ventilation vs those who did not, toothbrushing twice daily vs more frequently, toothbrush

160 In groups 1 and 2, toothbrushing twice daily was reported by 78.3% and 74.2

161 written instructions but no demonstration on toothbrush use at baseline.

162 ception of the sensations experienced during toothbrush use were systematically altered by variations

163 n of short duration with subjects trained in toothbrush use.

164 8 vs. 25.89; p = 0.53) in patients receiving toothbrushing vs. no toothbrushing.

165 The powered toothbrush was found to deliver greater plaque removal b

166 of brushing, and the difference between the toothbrushes was greater following 3 minutes of brushing

167 Toothbrushing was associated with significantly lower ri

168 The slope of the uptake in toothbrushing was correlated with the slope in the reduc

169 The adjusted mean changes for the manual toothbrush were 0.43 and 0.62, respectively.

170 Soft-bristle manual and powered toothbrushes were given to participants randomly assigne

171 steem, oral health beliefs, and frequency of toothbrushing were collected through self-completed ques

172 brushing movements with a standard electric toothbrush while they rated either the pleasantness or t

173 where you can expect them to be found (e.g., toothbrush), while others vary widely (e.g., cat).

174 A new battery-powered toothbrush with a fundamentally different design than ot

175 Use of an oscillating-rotating powered toothbrush with a soft-bristle head resulted in higher G

176 Similar results were observed on children's toothbrushes with small pea-size heads.

177 ts, compared any kind of oral care involving toothbrushing with any other kind of oral care or contro

178 imen, consisting of manual scaling and daily toothbrushing with plain pumice.