ライフサイエンスコーパス: total binding

1 binding represents approximately 20% of the total binding.

2 Total binding and non-specific binding were measured usi

3 tes at both 0 and 37 degrees C; however, the total binding at 0 degrees C is less than that at 37 deg

4 croM, compound 28 displaced less than 10% of total binding at a concentration of 100 microM.

5 c binding of [3H]SCH58261 as a percentage of total binding at a radioligand concentration equal to th

6 wer glycans bound and a higher percentage of total binding attributable to the top three highest boun

7 Total binding energies were calculated from electrostati

8 halpy change contribute more than 50% of the total binding energy (76%).

9 the thiol, alkyl, and sulfonate moieties to total binding energy in the E x CoM binary complex.

10 AtSAT provides the major contribution to the total binding energy in the plant cysteine synthase comp

11 By decomposing the total binding energy into many-body components, we find

12 ental in nature, and the contribution to the total binding energy is roughly proportional to the numb

13 We also employ the assumption that the total binding energy is the sum of the energies of the i

14 The estimated total binding energy is ~70 kJ/mol, of which 50-60 kJ/mo

15 Switch II contributes a large portion of the total binding energy to these complexes, whereas switch

16 or proportion ( approximately 55-73%) of the total binding energy, and only 1-2 ion pairs, in compari

17 d with a strong entropic contribution to the total binding energy.

18 l) and together represent nearly half of the total binding energy.

19 was the major (favorable) contributor to the total binding energy.

20 lled 'hot spot', contributes the most to the total binding energy.

21 S. exigua feeding also increased total binding fourfold.

22 and Phe-122) together contribute 43% of the total binding free energy and 77% of the energy of non-i

23 ots account for a significant portion of the total binding free energy and correlate with structurall

24 es such as the correct DNA binding sequence, total binding free energy and free energy changes caused

25 For all analogs, the total binding free energy can be shown to include compen

26 ansfer process contributes almost 40% of the total binding free energy change and the total charge of

27 sin environments; however, the change in the total binding free energy is <2 kcal.mol(-1) because of

28 extent and account for only about 40% of the total binding free energy.

29 nd to account for no more than 50-60% of the total binding free energy.

30 pted acidic-lipid-dependent component of the total binding free energy.

31 s calculated by subtracting nonspecific from total binding measurements (in decays per minute/mm(2),

32 SR-BI was determined by subtracting from the total binding, nonspecific values measured using either

33 indicated that elastase treatment decreased total binding of (125)I-bFGF to the cell surface and aff

34 ed cells with methyl jasmonate increased the total binding of (125)I-Tyr-2, Ala-15-systemin more than

35 Up to 70% of total binding of (18)F- AMC20: in the D2/3R-rich striatu

36 s with methyl jasmonate (MeJA) increased the total binding of [(3)H]-l-volicitin to the enriched plas

37 drug use is largely unrelated to changes in total binding of D2 or NMDA receptors.

38 Total binding of high and low affinity sites is 57 +/- 1

39 Neither the total binding of Lucifer Yellow to CF1 nor the reaction

40 The total binding of Lucifer Yellow to CF1 was not affected

41 on and unstable angina demonstrate increased total binding of platelets to monocytes.

42 and protein receptor brings about the strong total binding of the toxin to the neuronal membrane.

43 thout affecting RTO, but it did not increase total binding or binding to nontetrameric PF4(K50E).

44 ed with radiolabelled ovine prolactin alone (total binding) or radiolabelled ovine prolactin in the p

45 g partner comprised approximately 90% of the total binding partners.

46 he surface density of fibrinogen changed the total binding probability linearly >3.5-fold but did not

47 tion of each position in the operator to the total binding, provides a reasonably accurate descriptio

48 Part of the total binding site constitutes the proper ssDNA-binding

49 r, unlike the proper-ssDNA-binding site, the total binding site shows a significant preference for py

50 GR hormone-binding affinity while decreasing total binding sites for hormone.

51 characteristics include the concentration of total binding sites on the cell surface, N, and equilibr

52 2) site constitutes approximately 46% of the total binding sites on the sensor chip, and its relative

53 , in cells expressing HLR-67, only 5% of the total binding sites were at the plasma membrane.

54 ults in an approximately 10-fold increase in total binding sites, but the newly created binding sites

55 dance of the K(D)(2) site is only 12% of the total binding sites.

56 apoER2 was obtained by subtracting from the total binding to the receptor-expressing cells the nonsp

57 rations could be measured and reached 75% of total binding under optimal conditions.

58 ompared with the wild-type species, although total binding was compromised.

59 yburide binding sites comprised up to 45% of total binding with highest concentrations in the hypotha

60 ted high levels of specific binding (>95% of total binding), with no appreciable binding in white mat